Skip to content

Efficacy Study of Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid in the Knee Osteoarthritis

Efficacy Evaluation of Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid (Sinovial®) vs Synvisc® in the Treatment of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis. A Double-blind, Controlled, Randomised, Parallel-group Non-inferiority Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00556608
Enrollment
381
Registered
2007-11-12
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2010-05-31
Last updated
2012-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to prove the non-inferiority of the intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (Sinovial®) in the symptomatic treatment of knee OA in comparison to Synvisc®.

Interventions

DEVICESinovial® (syringe containing sodium hyaluronate solution)

2 mL 0.8% sodium hyaluronate (16 mg) solution. 3 intra-articular injections once-a-week.

DEVICESynvisc® ( syringe containing Hylan G-F 20 solution)

2 mL 0.8% Hylan G-F 20 (16 mg) solution. 3 intra-articular injections once-a-week.

Sponsors

IBSA Institut Biochimique SA
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 40 and 80 years * Primary knee OA of the medial or lateral femoro-tibial compartment * Symptoms for at least 3 months * Diagnosis according to ACR criteria * Kellgren & Lawrence radiological grade 2-3 * Patients who failed to respond sufficiently (not responders) to analgesics and/or NSAIDs taken regularly or responders intolerant to the regular use of analgesics and/or NSAIDs. * Mean WOMAC pain subscore at the target knee \>= 40 mm and \< 80 mm on a VAS at baseline after wash-out from analgesics/NSAIDs· If bilateral knee OA: definition of the most symptomatic joint at screening based on patient's evaluation and Investigator's clinical judgment and mean WOMAC pain subscore at baseline in the contra-lateral knee \< 30 mm * Written informed consent * Subject able to understand, co-operative and reliable

Exclusion criteria

* BMI \>= 32 kg/m2 * Secondary (post-traumatic) knee OA * Predominantly patello-femoral pain/syndrome * No remaining joint space width * Symptomatic hip OA or other interfering health condition * Severe varus/valgus deformity (\>15°) * History/present evidence of (target knee): inflammatory, infective or metabolic joint diseases; recurrent clinical chondrocalcinosis; crystal arthropaties; osteo-articular pathologies differing from arthrosis; articular fracture; ochronosis; acromegaly; haemochromatosis; Wilson's disease; primary osteochondromatosis; heritable disorders; collagen gene mutations. * Concomitant rheumatic disease * Significant injury to the target knee in the last 6 months * Previous joint replacement/arthroplasty (target knee) * Arthroscopy/osteotomy/surgery in the past 1 year (target knee) * Any surgery scheduled in the next 6 months * Venous or lymphatic stasis in the relevant limb * Skin infection/disease/trauma at the injection site * Systemic or i.a. (target knee) corticosteroids in the past 3 months * I.a. corticosteroids (non-target joint) in the past 4 weeks * Viscosupplementation (target knee) in the past year * Recently started (in the last 3 months) physical therapy (target knee) * Recently (in the last 3 months) started therapy or change in dosage of SYSADOAs * Ongoing anticoagulant therapy * Chronic or recurrent use of NSAIDs/analgesics/narcotics because of diseases different from OA of the target knee * History of allergy or hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid or paracetamol or avian proteins * Participation in a clinical study in the last 3 months * Pregnant or lactating women, and women of childbearing potential not willing to use adequate contraception * Patients unable to stay in the study for 6 months, non-cooperating, not able to understand

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Improvement in WOMAC pain subscore from baselineto week 26

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in WOMAC OA Index total score and pain, function and stiffness subscores;Change in Lequesne's algofunctional index; Change in global pain (visit assessment); Change in global status by the patient;Change in global status by the Investigator;SPID%26 weeks

Countries

Czechia, France, Germany, Italy, Slovakia, Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026