Skip to content

Coarctation Of the Aorta Stent Trial

Coarctation Of the Aorta Stent Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00552812
Acronym
COAST
Enrollment
105
Registered
2007-11-02
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2015-07-31
Last updated
2016-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coarctation of the Aorta

Keywords

Aortic Coarctation, Heart Defects, Congenital, Stents, Heart Catheterization

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Cheatham Platinum bare metal stents are safe and effective in the treatment of native and recurrent aortic coarctation in selected children, adolescents and adults.

Detailed description

The goals of this study are to provide information that will support labeling of both the CP bare metal and covered stents to treat native and recurrent aortic coarctation in selected children, adolescents and adults. The investigation will have two phases: Phase One will examine the safety and efficacy of the bare metal stent, and will collect information about the covered stent when used as rescue therapy for aortic injuries occurring during bare metal stent procedures. The aims of the Phase One study are to assess the use of the CP bare metal stent to: 1. provide a reduction equivalent to surgery in arm-leg systolic cuff blood pressure gradient 12 months after dilation and stent implantation, in comparison to the pre-dilation gradient; 2. accomplish gradient relief with a shorter number of days in hospital than surgery; 3. accomplish gradient relief with a rate of occurrence of serious procedure-related adverse events occurring within 30 days of dilation that is equivalent to surgery; and 4. accomplish gradient relief with a rate of occurrence of post-procedural paradoxical hypertension that is lower than surgery.

Interventions

DEVICEStent therapy of aortic coarctation

Transcatheter delivery of a metallic stent to enlarge region of aortic narrowing caused by the coarctation.

Sponsors

Richard E. Ringel
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Native or recurrent aortic coarctation * Weight greater than or equal to 35 kg * Noninvasive, arm-leg cuff systolic blood pressure difference or catheter measured systolic coarctation gradient greater than or equal to 20 mmHg

Exclusion criteria

* Age \> 60 years * Connective tissue disorders, including Marfan syndrome and other genetic syndromes such as Turner syndrome and Noonan syndrome * Inflammatory aortitis * Bloodstream infection, including endocarditis * Pregnancy * Aortic aneurysm * Prior stent placement * Adults lacking capacity to consent * Foster children and/or wards of the court

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Difference Between Arm and Leg Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 12 Months12 monthsNoninvasive systolic blood pressures are measured in the arms and legs at baseline and 12 month follow-up. The difference between these measurements are calculated. The difference between systolic arm and leg blood pressures decreased by 30 ± 22 mmHg (n=90)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a Systolic Blood Pressure Greater Than the 95th Percentile for Age and Gender 12 Months Post Stent PlacementBaseline and 12 monthsNoninvasive Blood pressure is assessed at baseline and 12 months. The number of patients with a Systolic Blood Pressure \> 95th Percentile for Age and Gender is recorded at Baseline (n=105) and compared to 12 month follow up (n=92).
Systolic Blood Pressure, Difference Between Upper and Lower ExtremitiesBaseline and 12 monthsMeasurement of difference between upper and lower extremities by noninvasive, automated measurement of four quadrant Systolic Blood Pressure. Comparison between baseline and 12 month follow up.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment opened February, 2008 and ended December, 2010

Pre-assignment details

Patients were consented as outpatients, but final selection criteria were assessed in the catheterization laboratory

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Coarctation Stenting
Stent enlargement of aortic coarctation : Transcatheter delivery of a metallic stent to enlarge region of aortic narrowing caused by the coarctation.
105
Total105

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCoarctation Stenting
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
67 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
38 Participants
Age, Continuous16 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
105 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
73 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 105
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 105

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Difference Between Arm and Leg Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 12 Months

Noninvasive systolic blood pressures are measured in the arms and legs at baseline and 12 month follow-up. The difference between these measurements are calculated. The difference between systolic arm and leg blood pressures decreased by 30 ± 22 mmHg (n=90)

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coarctation StentingChange in Difference Between Arm and Leg Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 12 Months30 mmHgStandard Deviation 22
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Systolic Blood Pressure Greater Than the 95th Percentile for Age and Gender 12 Months Post Stent Placement

Noninvasive Blood pressure is assessed at baseline and 12 months. The number of patients with a Systolic Blood Pressure \> 95th Percentile for Age and Gender is recorded at Baseline (n=105) and compared to 12 month follow up (n=92).

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

Population: Study patients compared at baseline and within the 12 month follow up window: Baseline (n=105) compared to 12 month follow up (n=92)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Coarctation StentingPercentage of Participants With a Systolic Blood Pressure Greater Than the 95th Percentile for Age and Gender 12 Months Post Stent PlacementBaseline61 percentage of participants
Coarctation StentingPercentage of Participants With a Systolic Blood Pressure Greater Than the 95th Percentile for Age and Gender 12 Months Post Stent Placement12 month follow up17 percentage of participants
Secondary

Systolic Blood Pressure, Difference Between Upper and Lower Extremities

Measurement of difference between upper and lower extremities by noninvasive, automated measurement of four quadrant Systolic Blood Pressure. Comparison between baseline and 12 month follow up.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

Population: Comparison between baseline(n=105) and 12 month follow up (n=92)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coarctation StentingSystolic Blood Pressure, Difference Between Upper and Lower ExtremitiesBaseline29 mmHgStandard Deviation 17
Coarctation StentingSystolic Blood Pressure, Difference Between Upper and Lower Extremities12 months-1 mmHgStandard Deviation 15

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026