Skip to content

Ultrasound Guided Octreotide LAR Injection in Acromegaly

Study to Determine Whether Ultrasound Guidance Improves Delivery and Efficacy of Intramuscular Injection of Long-Acting Octreotide in the Treatment of Acromegaly

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00552071
Enrollment
15
Registered
2007-11-01
Start date
2007-07-31
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2018-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acromegaly

Keywords

Acromegaly, Octreotide LAR, Ultrasound guidance

Brief summary

Approximately half of patients with acromegaly do not respond to treatment with somatostatin receptor ligands such as octreotide LAR. This may be due to inadequate drug delivery if the standard of care regular injection is inaccurately delivered in the intramuscular (IM) compartment. Ultrasound guidance of IM injections may improve accuracy of placement of IM injections and increase drug levels, thereby improving efficacy of octreotide LAR for the treatment of acromegaly. The purpose of this study is to determine whether octreotide LAR drug levels differ if given by ultrasound-guided IM injection or by regular IM injection in patients with acromegaly.

Interventions

DRUGOctreotide LAR 30 MG Injection

Stable dose of 30 mg octreotide LAR, or a dose determined by historical dosing, delivered every 28 days for 3 months.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of active acromegaly based on evidence of a pituitary tumor * Historical serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I levels or a lack of suppression of growth hormone (GH) \< 1 ng/mL during an oral glucose tolerance test * Previous treatment with a stable dose of octreotide LAR for at least 3 months * No previous treatment with a stable dose of octreotide LAR for at least 3 months after receiving 3 months of octreotide LAR during a run-in phase prior to any other study-related activity

Exclusion criteria

* Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus * Pregnant or breast feeding * Current gallstones * History of hepatic disease, except patients with \< 3 X ULN LFTs indicative of hepatic steatosis * Past or current history of cancer, except for basal cell carcinoma or in situ cancer of the cervix * History of glucocorticoid therapy within the past 6 months, current treatment with any chemotherapeutic agents or exogenous GH therapy * History of investigational drugs administered or received within 30 days of study entry * Known hypersensitivity to octreotide LAR * Any other concomitant illnesses or therapy that would interfere with evaluation of efficacy or safety or increase the risk for study interruption or discontinuation in the opinion of the investigator or sponsor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plasma Octreotide Level After Each Treatment Phase3 monthsVenous sampling was performed at each visit immediately prior to each IM injection. Levels were measured at each visit and mean for the group was calculated after each treatment phase.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum IGF-1 Level3 monthsVenous sampling was performed at each visit immediately prior to each IM injection. Levels were measured at each visit and mean for the group was calculated after each treatment phase.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study recruited subjects with active acromegaly. Equal numbers of men and women were to be recruited, but the recruitment plan was adjusted during the course of the trial to account for the high number of women withdrawn from the study. 12 women and 9 men were recruited; 8 men and 7 women completed the study and were included in the analysis.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects who had not received 3 monthly injections of a stable dose of octreotide LAR prior to enrollment were given 3 monthly injections of octreotide LAR at a stable dose of 30 mg every 28 days or at a dose determined by historical dosing. Nine of the 15 subjects participated in this run-in period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ultrasound-guided Injections Followed by Regular Injections
Subjects received octreotide LAR via ultrasound-guided IM gluteal injections every 28 days for 3 months followed by regular IM gluteal injections every 28 days for 3 months.
6
Regular Injections Followed by Ultrasound-guided Injections
Subjects received octreotide LAR via regular IM gluteal injections every 28 days for 3 months followed by ultrasound-guided IM gluteal injections every 28 days for 3 months.
9
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyPregnancy10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRegular Injections Followed by Ultrasound-guided InjectionsUltrasound-guided Injections Followed by Regular InjectionsTotal
Age, Continuous53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
9 participants6 participants15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 101 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 101 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Plasma Octreotide Level After Each Treatment Phase

Venous sampling was performed at each visit immediately prior to each IM injection. Levels were measured at each visit and mean for the group was calculated after each treatment phase.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Subjects were regrouped for analysis by treatment. Octreotide levels after 3 monthly octreotide LAR injections with ultrasound guidance were compared to octreotide levels obtained after 3 monthly octreotide LAR injection without ultrasound guidance.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ultrasound-guided Injections of Octreotide LARPlasma Octreotide Level After Each Treatment Phase885 pg/mLStandard Deviation 702
Regular Injections of Octreotide LARPlasma Octreotide Level After Each Treatment Phase1167 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1126
p-value: 0.4t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Serum IGF-1 Level

Venous sampling was performed at each visit immediately prior to each IM injection. Levels were measured at each visit and mean for the group was calculated after each treatment phase.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Subjects were regrouped for analysis by treatment. Serum IGF-I levels after 3 monthly octreotide LAR injections with ultrasound guidance were compared to Serum IGF-I levels obtained after 3 monthly octreotide LAR injection without ultrasound guidance.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ultrasound-guided Injections of Octreotide LARSerum IGF-1 Level132 percentage of upper limit of normalStandard Deviation 92
Regular Injections of Octreotide LARSerum IGF-1 Level124 percentage of upper limit of normalStandard Deviation 83
p-value: 0.43t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026