Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of CDB-2914 in Comparison to Levonorgestrel for Emergency Contraception

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00551616
Enrollment
2221
Registered
2007-10-31
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2009-04-30
Last updated
2022-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Contraception

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of CDB-2914 in comparison to levonorgestrel for preventing pregnancy up to 5 days after unprotected sexual intercourse.

Interventions

Single dose

DRUGLevonorgestrel

Single dose

Sponsors

HRA Pharma
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* women 16 or older in UK(except Northern Ireland) sites, 17 years or more in Northern Ireland (UK) and 18 years or more in Ireland and US * present within 120 hours of unprotected intercourse * regular menstrual cycles * No current use of hormonal contraception * Willing to not use hormonal methods of contraception until study completion * At least one complete menstrual cycle (2 menses) post miscarriage, delivery or abortion * For women who present more than 72 hours after intercourse, decline the insertion of an Intra Uterine Device for emergency contraception * Able to provide informed consent * Willing to abstain from further acts of unprotected intercourse until study completion

Exclusion criteria

* One or more acts of unprotected intercourse more than 120 hours * current or recent use of hormonal methods of contraception * currently pregnant or breastfeeding * tubal ligation or current use of IUD * Use of hormonal emergency contraception since last menstrual period * Current use of IUD * Tubal ligation * Partner with a vasectomy * Unsure about the date of the last menstrual period * Severe asthma insufficiently controlled by oral glucocorticoid * Hypersensitivity to the active substance levonorgestrel or any of the excipients of the drug products used in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With PregnancyWithin 72 hours of unprotected IntercourseThe rate of pregnancy in women who received emergency contraception within 72 h of unprotected sexual intercourse.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Menstrual Bleeding Patternswithin the menstrual cycle of the unprotected IntercourseOnset of next menses after emergency contraception compared to usual date.
Actual Pregnancy Rate Compared to Expected Pregnancy RateWithin 120 hours of unprotected IntercourseConditional probabilities of pregnancy from the time of unprotected sex intercourse to treatment were estimated for up to 120 hours using Spline Cubic Estimation (Stone & Koo, 1985) Pregnancy rate expected in the absence of emergency contraception is based on Trussell J, Rodriguez G, Ellertson C. New estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception. Contraception. 1998;57(6):363-9.

Countries

Ireland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CDB-2914
CDB-2914: Single dose (30 mg)
1,104
Levonorgestrel
Levonorgestrel: Single dose (1.5 mg)
1,117
Total2,221

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up4840

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalCDB-2914Levonorgestrel
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
93 Participants44 Participants49 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2128 Participants1060 Participants1068 Participants
Age, Continuous24.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
24.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
24.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
34 Participants13 Participants21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
417 Participants210 Participants207 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
157 Participants77 Participants80 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
1613 Participants804 Participants809 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2221 Participants1104 Participants1117 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Time from unprotected sexual intercourse to emergency contraception (hours)
0-24h
762 Participants367 Participants395 Participants
Time from unprotected sexual intercourse to emergency contraception (hours)
>120h
4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Time from unprotected sexual intercourse to emergency contraception (hours)
25-48h
766 Participants388 Participants378 Participants
Time from unprotected sexual intercourse to emergency contraception (hours)
49-72h
457 Participants238 Participants219 Participants
Time from unprotected sexual intercourse to emergency contraception (hours)
73-96h
158 Participants72 Participants86 Participants
Time from unprotected sexual intercourse to emergency contraception (hours)
97-120h
74 Participants38 Participants36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1,1040 / 1,117
other
Total, other adverse events
596 / 1,104572 / 1,117
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 1,1044 / 1,117

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Pregnancy

The rate of pregnancy in women who received emergency contraception within 72 h of unprotected sexual intercourse.

Time frame: Within 72 hours of unprotected Intercourse

Population: Intention to treat

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CDB-2914Number of Participants With Pregnancy20 Participants
LevonorgestrelNumber of Participants With Pregnancy30 Participants
Secondary

Actual Pregnancy Rate Compared to Expected Pregnancy Rate

Conditional probabilities of pregnancy from the time of unprotected sex intercourse to treatment were estimated for up to 120 hours using Spline Cubic Estimation (Stone & Koo, 1985) Pregnancy rate expected in the absence of emergency contraception is based on Trussell J, Rodriguez G, Ellertson C. New estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception. Contraception. 1998;57(6):363-9.

Time frame: Within 120 hours of unprotected Intercourse

Population: Efficacy evaluable population (women aged 35 years or younger who were enrolled for the first time in the study and whose pregnancy status after treatment was known)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CDB-2914Actual Pregnancy Rate Compared to Expected Pregnancy RateNumber of pregnancies observed15 Participants
CDB-2914Actual Pregnancy Rate Compared to Expected Pregnancy RateNumber of expected pregnancies47 Participants
LevonorgestrelActual Pregnancy Rate Compared to Expected Pregnancy RateNumber of pregnancies observed22 Participants
LevonorgestrelActual Pregnancy Rate Compared to Expected Pregnancy RateNumber of expected pregnancies46 Participants
Comparison: Comparison of % of observed pregnancies vs % of expected pregnancies based on Trussell 1998p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.04, 2.98]Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison of % of observed pregnancies vs % of expected pregnancies based on Trussell 1998p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.68, 3.94]Chi-squared
Secondary

Menstrual Bleeding Patterns

Onset of next menses after emergency contraception compared to usual date.

Time frame: within the menstrual cycle of the unprotected Intercourse

Population: Intent to Treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CDB-2914Menstrual Bleeding Patterns2.1 DAYSStandard Deviation 8.2
LevonorgestrelMenstrual Bleeding Patterns-1.2 DAYSStandard Deviation 7.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026