Skip to content

Erlotinib and Gemcitabine With or Without Panitumumab in Treating Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Randomized Phase II Trial of Panitumumab, Erlotinib and Gemcitabine vs. Erlotinib and Gemcitabine in Patients With Untreated, Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00550836
Enrollment
104
Registered
2007-10-30
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2017-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Cancer

Keywords

adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, duct cell adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, stage IV pancreatic cancer

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Erlotinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Monoclonal antibodies, such as panitumumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Panitumumab may also stop the growth of pancreatic cancer by blocking blood flow to the tumor. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying how well giving panitumumab together with gemcitabine and erlotinib works compared to giving gemcitabine and erlotinib alone in treating patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * To assess whether the addition of panitumumab (a dual-epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor) to standard chemotherapy comprising gemcitabine hydrochloride and erlotinib hydrochloride results in an improvement in overall survival of patients with previously untreated, metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Secondary * To compare objective response rates, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, quality of life, and adverse event rates in patients treated with these regimens. * To evaluate the downstream marker, KRAS, in stool specimens. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to ECOG performance status (0 vs 1) and prior adjuvant chemotherapy (yes vs no). The first 6 patients are assigned to arm II. Subsequent patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and oral erlotinib hydrochloride once daily on days 1-28. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 2 courses. Patients achieving a complete response (CR) after 2 courses receive 2 additional courses of treatment; patients achieving a partial response (PR) receive retreatment as above in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients achieving a CR after 4 courses of treatment receive maintenance therapy comprising erlotinib hydrochloride daily until the first disease progression. After the first progression, patients are retreated with gemcitabine hydrochloride and erlotinib hydrochloride until second progression (using the first progression tumor measurements as the new baseline reference). * Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride and erlotinib hydrochloride as in arm I and panitumumab IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 15. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 2 courses. Patients achieving a CR after 2 courses receive 2 additional courses of treatment; patients achieving a PR receive retreatment as above in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients achieving a CR after 4 courses of treatment receive maintenance therapy comprising erlotinib hydrochloride daily and panitumumab every 2 weeks until the first disease progression. After the first progression, patients are retreated with gemcitabine hydrochloride, erlotinib hydrochloride, and panitumumab until second progression (using the first progression tumor measurements as the new baseline reference). Stool samples are collected at baseline and analyzed for KRAS mutations via protein analyses. Quality of life will be assessed at baseline, every 2 courses during treatment, and at the end of treatment. After the second progression, patients are followed every 3-6 months for 2 years.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALpanitumumab

Given IV

DRUGerlotinib hydrochloride

Given orally

DRUGgemcitabine hydrochloride

Given IV

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (ductal or undifferentiated) * Metastatic disease * No islet cell, acinar cell, or cystadenocarcinomas * No locally advanced disease * No history or known presence of CNS metastases PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * ECOG performance status 0-1 * Life expectancy ≥ 3 months * ANC ≥ 1,500/mm\^3 * Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm\^3 * Total bilirubin ≤ 2 times upper limit of normal (ULN) (patients may be stented) * AST ≤ 2.5 times ULN * Creatinine ≤ 2.0 times ULN * Magnesium ≥ lower limit of normal * Not pregnant or nursing * Negative pregnancy test * Fertile patients must use effective contraception * Willing to provide a stool specimen * No malignancy diagnosed within the past 3 years except basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, prostate cancer (Gleason \< 7), or carcinoma in situ of the cervix * No uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements * No clinically significant cardiovascular disease (i.e., myocardial infarction, unstable angina, symptomatic congestive heart failure, or serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia) within the past year * No known positive test(s) for HIV infection, hepatitis C virus, or acute or chronic active hepatitis B infection * No liver dysfunction from cirrhosis or viral hepatitis * No enteral hyperalimentation * No grapefruit or grapefruit juice during the study PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * Recovered from prior therapy * More than 4 months since prior radiotherapy, immunotherapy, or biologic therapy * More than 4 weeks since prior and no elective or planned major surgery * More than 2 weeks since prior minor and no elective or planned surgery * No prior cytotoxic chemotherapy for metastatic disease * Adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected disease or chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced disease is allowed, provided it was administered \> 6 months prior to study entry * Adjuvant chemotherapy must not have contained an EGFR inhibitor * Gemcitabine hydrochloride used as either a radiosensitizer or as maintenance therapy is allowed, provided more than 6 months have elapsed since the last day of treatment * No prior anti-EGFR antibody therapy (e.g., cetuximab) or treatment with small molecule EGFR inhibitors (e.g., gefitinib hydrochloride, erlotinib hydrochloride, or lapatinib) * No concurrent immunotherapy or radiotherapy * No other concurrent chemotherapy * No concurrent colony-stimulating factors during the first course of study therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall SurvivalUp to 2 yearsOverall Survival is defined as the time from registration to death due to any cause. The estimate will be done using the Kaplan-Meier method. The primary goal of this trial is to compare the experimental arm (Arm B) to the standard arm (Arm A). The primary analysis will be a comparison of Arm A to Arm B using a one-sided log-rank test between the 2 Kaplan-Meier curves.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Confirmed Response RateUp to 2 yearsEvaluated using RECIST version 1.0. Confirmed tumor response rate was defined as achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) in two consecutive assessments at least 6 weeks apart. CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. The confirmed response rate is reported as the number of participants with confirmed responses divided by the number of evaluated participants.
Progression-free SurvivalUp to 2 yearsProgression-free survival is defined as the time from randomization to documentation of disease progression or death, whichever comes first. Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest dimension (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. The distribution of progression-free survival will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. The progression-free survival curves will be compared between the 2 arms using a log-rank test.
Time to Treatment FailureUp to 2 yearsTime to treatment failure is defined to be the time from the date of randomization to the date at which the patient is removed from treatment due to progression, adverse events, or refusal. If the patient is considered to be a major treatment violation or is taken off study as a nonprotocol failure, the patient will be censored on the date they are removed from treatment. The time to treatment failure will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Frequency and Severity of Observed Adverse EffectsUp to 2 yearsPatients are assessed for Adverse events each cycle using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 (CTCAE v3.0). The maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be recorded for each patient, and tables will be reviewed to determine adverse event patterns. The number of patients in each arm that reported a grade 3 or higher adverse event and a grade 4 or higher adverse event are reported. A complete listing of all adverse events is reported in the Adverse Events section.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A: GE
Patients receive 1000 mg/m\^2 gemcitabine hydrochloride IV on days 1, 8, and 15; and 100 mg oral erlotinib hydrochloride on days 1-28. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 2 courses. Patients achieving a complete response (CR) after 2 courses receive 2 additional courses of treatment; patients achieving a partial response (PR) receive retreatment as above. Patients achieving a CR after 4 courses of treatment receive erlotinib hydrochloride until the first disease progression. After the first progression, patients are retreated with gemcitabine hydrochloride and erlotinib hydrochloride until second progression.
46
Arm B: PGE
Patients receive 1000 mg/m\^2 gemcitabine hydrochloride IV on days 1, 8, and 15; 100 mg oral erlotinib hydrochloride on days 1 - 28; and 4.0 mg/kg panitumumab IV on days 1 and 15. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 2 courses. Patients achieving a CR after 2 courses receive 2 additional courses of treatment; patients achieving a PR receive retreatment as above. Patients achieving a CR after 4 courses of treatment receive erlotinib hydrochloride and panitumumab until the first disease progression. After the first progression, patients are retreated with gemcitabine hydrochloride, erlotinib hydrochloride, and panitumumab until second progression.
46
Total92

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject39

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm A: GEArm B: PGETotal
Age, Continuous60.5 years62 years61.5 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
46 participants46 participants92 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants15 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants31 Participants60 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
45 / 4646 / 46
serious
Total, serious adverse events
30 / 4627 / 46

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival

Overall Survival is defined as the time from registration to death due to any cause. The estimate will be done using the Kaplan-Meier method. The primary goal of this trial is to compare the experimental arm (Arm B) to the standard arm (Arm A). The primary analysis will be a comparison of Arm A to Arm B using a one-sided log-rank test between the 2 Kaplan-Meier curves.

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: All treated patients that were eligible were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A: GEOverall Survival4.2 months
Arm B: PGEOverall Survival8.3 months
Comparison: It was calculated that 39 participants randomized in a 1:1 fashion between the 2 arms would have 80% to detect a difference in median survival of 6 vs. 9.7 months for GE vs. PGE respectively with a minimum follow up of 6 months. Sample size was determined using a 1-sided log-rank test at alpha=0.20.p-value: 0.36Log Rank
Secondary

Confirmed Response Rate

Evaluated using RECIST version 1.0. Confirmed tumor response rate was defined as achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) in two consecutive assessments at least 6 weeks apart. CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. The confirmed response rate is reported as the number of participants with confirmed responses divided by the number of evaluated participants.

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: All patients that started protocol treatment and were evaluated were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: GEConfirmed Response Rate0.087 rate of confirmed response
Arm B: PGEConfirmed Response Rate0.065 rate of confirmed response
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Frequency and Severity of Observed Adverse Effects

Patients are assessed for Adverse events each cycle using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 (CTCAE v3.0). The maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be recorded for each patient, and tables will be reviewed to determine adverse event patterns. The number of patients in each arm that reported a grade 3 or higher adverse event and a grade 4 or higher adverse event are reported. A complete listing of all adverse events is reported in the Adverse Events section.

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: All evaluable patients were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: GEFrequency and Severity of Observed Adverse EffectsGrade 3+ Adverse Event41 participants
Arm A: GEFrequency and Severity of Observed Adverse EffectsGrade 4+ Adverse Event15 participants
Arm B: PGEFrequency and Severity of Observed Adverse EffectsGrade 3+ Adverse Event41 participants
Arm B: PGEFrequency and Severity of Observed Adverse EffectsGrade 4+ Adverse Event14 participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival is defined as the time from randomization to documentation of disease progression or death, whichever comes first. Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest dimension (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. The distribution of progression-free survival will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. The progression-free survival curves will be compared between the 2 arms using a log-rank test.

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: All treated patients were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A: GEProgression-free Survival2.0 months
Arm B: PGEProgression-free Survival3.6 months
p-value: 0.419Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Treatment Failure

Time to treatment failure is defined to be the time from the date of randomization to the date at which the patient is removed from treatment due to progression, adverse events, or refusal. If the patient is considered to be a major treatment violation or is taken off study as a nonprotocol failure, the patient will be censored on the date they are removed from treatment. The time to treatment failure will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: All eligible treated patients were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A: GETime to Treatment Failure2.0 months
Arm B: PGETime to Treatment Failure3.8 months
p-value: 0.36Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026