Skip to content

Proteomic Profiling in Predicting Response in Patients Receiving Erlotinib for Stage IIIB, Stage IV, or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Feasibility Study Investigating Translational Science in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients With Stage IIIb or IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With the EGFR-TKI, Erlotinib

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00550537
Enrollment
116
Registered
2007-10-30
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2017-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer

Keywords

stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, recurrent non-small cell lung cancer, squamous cell lung cancer, adenosquamous cell lung cancer, bronchoalveolar cell lung cancer, large cell lung cancer, adenocarcinoma of the lung

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Studying samples of tumor tissue, blood, and urine in the laboratory from patients receiving erlotinib may help doctors predict how patients will respond to treatment. PURPOSE: The phase II trial is studying proteomic profiling to see how well it predicts response in patients receiving erlotinib for stage IIIB, stage IV, or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * To define a pre-treatment tumor proteomic profile that predicts response, stable disease, or progressive disease in patients with stage IIIB, stage IV, or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib hydrochloride. Secondary * To test and refine a pre-treatment serum proteomic expression pattern that predicts response to erlotinib hydrochloride and/or carboplatin and paclitaxel after failing treatment with erlotinib hydrochloride. * To test and refine tumor proteomic profiles that predict response to carboplatin and paclitaxel after failing treatment with erlotinib hydrochloride. * To analyze individual and pattern(s) of erlotinib hydrochloride-induced genomic and proteomic biomarker changes in relation to response or non-response to treatment. * To correlate the efficacy and toxicity of erlotinib hydrochloride with expression of EGFR, EGFR pathway, ErbB family, and other related biomarkers. * To determine a set of biomarkers to be evaluated in tumor tissue or surrogate tissues prior to treatment with erlotinib hydrochloride to enable patient selection for therapy. * To estimate response rate and progression-free and overall survival of patients treated with erlotinib hydrochloride as initial therapy. * To characterize the safety profile of erlotinib hydrochloride in these patients. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients receive oral erlotinib hydrochloride once daily until disease progression. At the time of disease progression, patients receive standard chemotherapy comprising paclitaxel IV over 3 hours and carboplatin IV over 15-30 minutes on day 1. Patients with non-squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer also receive bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days for up to 6 courses. Tumor tissue, plasma, serum, and urine samples are collected at baseline for proteomics analysis. After the completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 8 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGbevacizumab

15 mg/m2 given through a vein for every 3 weeks

DRUGcarboplatin

AUC = 6 given through a vein on day 1 of each cycle.

DRUGerlotinib hydrochloride

150 mg taken by mouth daily

DRUGpaclitaxel

200 mg/m2 given through a vein on day 1 of each cycle.

GENETICgene expression analysis

Blood and tissue collection.

GENETICprotein expression analysis

Blood and tissue collection.

GENETICproteomic profiling

Blood and tissue collection.

OTHERlaboratory biomarker analysis

Blood and tissue collection.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 120 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), meeting 1 of the following criteria: * Stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) or stage IV disease * Recurrent disease after prior surgery * Measurable or evaluable disease is desirable but not required * No untreated symptomatic brain metastases * Patients who are neurologically unstable despite radiotherapy for the brain metastases are not eligible * No requirement for steroids to control neurological symptoms PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * ECOG performance status 0-2 * ANC ≥ 1,500/mm³ * Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL * Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³ * Creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL * Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL * Normal hemostasis by history * PT/PTT within 0.5 seconds of normal range * Not pregnant or nursing * Negative pregnancy test * Fertile patients must use effective contraception * Willing to undergo biopsy procedures * No known severe hypersensitivity to erlotinib hydrochloride or any of the excipients of this product * No other concurrent malignancies or malignancies diagnosed within the past 5 years, except basal cell carcinoma or cervical cancer in situ * No significant cardiac disease, including any of the following: * NYHA class III or IV heart disease * Uncontrolled dysrhythmia * Myocardial infarction within the past 6 months * No evidence of clinically active interstitial lung disease * Chronic stable radiographic changes that are asymptomatic allowed * No evidence of any other severe or uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g., unstable or uncompensated respiratory, cardiac, hepatic, or renal disease) * No evidence of any other significant clinical disorder or laboratory finding that makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the trial * No uncontrolled hypertension * Blood pressure must be ≤ 150/90 mmHg on a stable antihypertensive regimen PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * See Disease Characteristics * At least 6 months since prior adjuvant chemotherapy * No unresolved chronic toxicity \> CTC grade 2 from prior anticancer therapy (except alopecia) * More than 30 days since prior non-approved or investigational drugs * No prior chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC * No concurrent phenytoin, carbamazepine, rifampin, barbiturates, or St. John's wort * No concurrent administration of other drugs known to inhibit EGFR * No other concurrent anti-neoplastic or anti-tumor agents, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, or hormonal anticancer therapy * No other concurrent investigational agents * Concurrent cardioprotective doses of aspirin, as recommended by the physician, for cardiovascular disease allowed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pre-treatment Tumor Proteomic Profile as a Predictor of Response, Stable Disease, or Progressive DiseaseEnd of treatment date

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tumor Proteomic Profiles as Predictors of Response to Carboplatin and Paclitaxel After Failing Treatment With Erlotinib HydrochlorideEnd of treatment date
Analysis of Individual and Pattern(s) of Erlotinib Hydrochloride-induced Genomic and Proteomic Biomarker Changes in Relation to Response or Non-response to TreatmentEnd of treatment dateEnd of treatment date
Correlation of the Efficacy and Toxicity of Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Expression of EGFR, EGFR Pathway, ErbB Family, and Other Related BiomarkersEnd of treatment date
Determination of a Set of Biomarkers to be Evaluated in Tumor Tissue or Surrogate Tissues Prior to Treatment With Erlotinib Hydrochloride to Enable Patient Selection for TherapyEnd of treatment date
Pre-treatment Serum Proteomic Expression Pattern as a Predictor of Response to Erlotinib Hydrochloride and/or Carboplatin and Paclitaxel After Failing Treatment With Erlotinib HydrochlorideEnd of treatment date
Progression-free Survival (PFS) for Erlotinib Initial Therapy in Chemotherapy-naïve Patients With Advanced NSCLCThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearPFS is defined as the time from on erlotinib treatment date to progression or death (whichever comes first) before cross-over to PC or PC+B. For those did not progressed nor died, they were censored at the last follow up (either the off erlotinib treatment date or lost follow up date). The median survival time and 95% confidence interval were estimated using Kaplan-meier method.
Number of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per GradeThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearThe intensity of the AE will be graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) of the (US) National Cancer Institute (NCI) - Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) \[version 3.0 of December 2003\] (Appendix B). Grade 1 Mild AE Grade 2 Moderate AE Grade 3 Severe AE Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE Grade 5 Death related to AE
Overall Survival for Erlotinib Initial Therapy in Chemotherapy-naïve Patients With Advanced NSCLCThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearThe overall survival time is defined as the time from on treatment to death. Patients were censored of they were alive at the last follow up date. The median survival time and its confidence interval were estimated using Kaplan-meier method.
Response Rate for Erlotinib Initial Therapy in Chemotherapy-naïve Patients With Advanced NSCLCThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearNumber of patients in each response category, per RECIST v1.1, summarized as follows for target lesion criteria (see RECIST v1.1 for additional details): complete response (CR),disappearance of target lesions; partial response (PR), \>=30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; progressive disease (PD), \>=20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions or appearance of new lesions; stable disease (SD), insufficient change in target lesions or new lesions to qualify as either PD or SD. The response rate is calculated as the percentage of PR+CR among patients assessed for response.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The recruitment period for this trial was October 2007 to July 2011. Participants were recruited at Vanderbilt Medical Center, Emory University, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Florida - Gainesville.

Pre-assignment details

10 participants were consented to participate in this trial, but were determined to be ineligible; 3 participants withdrew from the study prior to beginning treatment; 1 participant progressed before beginning treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment
Erlotinib followed by paclitaxel + carboplatin (+ bevacizumab in non-squamous) at the time disease progression. bevacizumab: 15 mg/m2 given through a vein for every 3 weeks carboplatin: AUC = 6 given through a vein on day 1 of each cycle. erlotinib hydrochloride: 150 mg taken by mouth daily paclitaxel: 200 mg/m2 given through a vein on day 1 of each cycle. gene expression analysis: Blood and tissue collection. protein expression analysis: Blood and tissue collection. proteomic profiling: Blood and tissue collection. laboratory biomarker analysis: Blood and tissue collection.
116
Total116

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event20
Overall StudyChange in treatment plan4
Overall StudyDeath18
Overall StudyDeclining performance status2
Overall StudyDisease progression before46
Overall StudyOther complicating ilness3
Overall StudyTreated closer to home4
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment
Age, Continuous70.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
112 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
102 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
116 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
69 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
47 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
108 / 116
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 116

Outcome results

Primary

Pre-treatment Tumor Proteomic Profile as a Predictor of Response, Stable Disease, or Progressive Disease

Time frame: End of treatment date

Population: Lab data was lost by the collaborating institution, Colorado.

Secondary

Analysis of Individual and Pattern(s) of Erlotinib Hydrochloride-induced Genomic and Proteomic Biomarker Changes in Relation to Response or Non-response to Treatment

End of treatment date

Time frame: End of treatment date

Population: Lab data was lost by the collaborating institution, Colorado.

Secondary

Correlation of the Efficacy and Toxicity of Erlotinib Hydrochloride With Expression of EGFR, EGFR Pathway, ErbB Family, and Other Related Biomarkers

Time frame: End of treatment date

Population: Lab data was lost by the collaborating institution, Colorado.

Secondary

Determination of a Set of Biomarkers to be Evaluated in Tumor Tissue or Surrogate Tissues Prior to Treatment With Erlotinib Hydrochloride to Enable Patient Selection for Therapy

Time frame: End of treatment date

Population: Lab data was lost by the collaborating institution, Colorado.

Secondary

Number of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per Grade

The intensity of the AE will be graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) of the (US) National Cancer Institute (NCI) - Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) \[version 3.0 of December 2003\] (Appendix B). Grade 1 Mild AE Grade 2 Moderate AE Grade 3 Severe AE Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE Grade 5 Death related to AE

Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Population: 116 paticipants, one patient was excluded due to death before any treatment. All patients who received erlotinib treatment and experienced an Adverse events.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TreatmentNumber of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per Gradeworst-grade 118 participants
TreatmentNumber of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per Gradeworst-grade 251 participants
TreatmentNumber of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per Gradeworst-grade 315 participants
TreatmentNumber of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per Gradeworst-grade 41 participants
Secondary

Overall Survival for Erlotinib Initial Therapy in Chemotherapy-naïve Patients With Advanced NSCLC

The overall survival time is defined as the time from on treatment to death. Patients were censored of they were alive at the last follow up date. The median survival time and its confidence interval were estimated using Kaplan-meier method.

Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Population: Total 116 participants. One patient was excluded due to death before any treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TreatmentOverall Survival for Erlotinib Initial Therapy in Chemotherapy-naïve Patients With Advanced NSCLC12.53 months
Erlotinib Followed by PC+BOverall Survival for Erlotinib Initial Therapy in Chemotherapy-naïve Patients With Advanced NSCLC17.23 months
ErlotinibOverall Survival for Erlotinib Initial Therapy in Chemotherapy-naïve Patients With Advanced NSCLC6.08 months
Secondary

Pre-treatment Serum Proteomic Expression Pattern as a Predictor of Response to Erlotinib Hydrochloride and/or Carboplatin and Paclitaxel After Failing Treatment With Erlotinib Hydrochloride

Time frame: End of treatment date

Population: Lab data was lost by the collaborating institution, Colorado.

Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS) for Erlotinib Initial Therapy in Chemotherapy-naïve Patients With Advanced NSCLC

PFS is defined as the time from on erlotinib treatment date to progression or death (whichever comes first) before cross-over to PC or PC+B. For those did not progressed nor died, they were censored at the last follow up (either the off erlotinib treatment date or lost follow up date). The median survival time and 95% confidence interval were estimated using Kaplan-meier method.

Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Population: Total 116 participants. One patient was excluded due to death before erlotinib treatment. Total 115 patients were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TreatmentProgression-free Survival (PFS) for Erlotinib Initial Therapy in Chemotherapy-naïve Patients With Advanced NSCLC3.16 months
Secondary

Response Rate for Erlotinib Initial Therapy in Chemotherapy-naïve Patients With Advanced NSCLC

Number of patients in each response category, per RECIST v1.1, summarized as follows for target lesion criteria (see RECIST v1.1 for additional details): complete response (CR),disappearance of target lesions; partial response (PR), \>=30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; progressive disease (PD), \>=20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions or appearance of new lesions; stable disease (SD), insufficient change in target lesions or new lesions to qualify as either PD or SD. The response rate is calculated as the percentage of PR+CR among patients assessed for response.

Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Population: Total 116 participants, 11 not assessed and 4 not evaluable. 101 assessed for response.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
TreatmentResponse Rate for Erlotinib Initial Therapy in Chemotherapy-naïve Patients With Advanced NSCLC18.8 percentage of patients assessed
Secondary

Tumor Proteomic Profiles as Predictors of Response to Carboplatin and Paclitaxel After Failing Treatment With Erlotinib Hydrochloride

Time frame: End of treatment date

Population: Lab data was lost by the collaborating institution, Colorado.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026