Skip to content

Randomized Comparison Angioplasty Outcomes at Hospitals With and Without On-site Cardiac Surgery

Randomized Comparison Angioplasty Outcomes at Hospitals With and Without On-site Cardiac Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00549796
Enrollment
18876
Registered
2007-10-26
Start date
2006-04-30
Completion date
2012-02-29
Last updated
2014-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Angina Pectoris, Coronary Arteriosclerosis

Keywords

coronary artery disease, angioplasty, stent, percutaneous coronary intervention, on-site cardiac surgery, randomized trial

Brief summary

Angioplasty is a procedure which opens blocked heart arteries using balloons and/or stents. Most U.S. states and all national heart organizations require that angioplasty be done only at hospitals that can also perform open heart surgery. The reason for this is that there is a risk that angioplasty can cause injury to the heart artery that might require open heart surgery to fix. Open heart surgery is a backup in case it is needed. The risk that open heart surgery will be needed is very small. Nevertheless, without more research, many state Departments of Health and all national heart organizations do not want to change the requirement for having on-site open heart surgery wherever angioplasty is performed. Some States already allow this; and European heart organizations already allow it, as well. This study is designed to determine whether the safety and benefits of angioplasty are the same at hospitals that perform angioplasty either with or without open heart surgery backup. Patient who enter the study have a heart catheterization at a hospital without a heart surgery program. If they need angioplasty, then they are randomized to either stay at the hospital without heart surgery for their angioplasty or to be transferred for the procedure to a hospital with heart surgery. For every four patients, three stay at the hospital without heart surgery and one is transferred. The study is designed to show that there is no detectable difference between the safety and benefits of the procedure at the two types of hospital (with and without heart surgery). The cost of the procedure at the two hospital types is also compared.

Interventions

OTHERPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Patients undergo routine, clinically indicated PCI

Sponsors

Duke University
CollaboratorOTHER
Maryland Medical Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Pre-catheterization: * Must be undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization for suspected CAD * Be at least 18 years of age * Must not be pregnant (negative pregnancy test) or must not be of childbearing potential must be able to give informed consent. Post-catheterization: * Coronary artery disease judged to be clinically and angiographically significant * Ability to perform PCI with equipment available at the local site * Procedure risk judged to be not high (see below)

Exclusion criteria

Pre-catheterization: * Inability to give informed consent * ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction * Pregnancy Post-catheterization: * High likelihood of requiring a device not available at the hospitals without SOS * No need for PCI * Need for coronary artery bypass surgery * High procedural risk (see below) High procedural risk criteria are: * PCI of unprotected left main coronary artery * PCI of left circulation lesion in the presence of critical (\>70%) unprotected left main coronary artery lesion * Poor left ventricular function (EF\< 20%) and need to perform PCI in a vessel supplying significant myocardium

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mortality6 weeks
MACE = death + MI + TVR9 Months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
target vessel revascularization (TVR)hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
any subsequent revascularization (ASR)hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
heart failure and classhosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
angina and classhosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
strokehosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
composite adverse endpoint (MACE)hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
MACE = death + MI + TVRhosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
MACE = death + MI + ASRhosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
emergency CABGhosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
angiographic (procedural) success (<20% residual stenosis and TIMI 3 flow)hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
completeness of revascularizationhosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
percent of patients with complete or partial revascularizationhosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
bleeding (non-CABG transfusion, vascular repair)hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
length of stayhosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
total direct medical costhosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
major resource consumption patterns (hospital and ICU days, surgeries, hospitalizations)hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
angiographic (end-procedure) complications (embolization, dissection, no reflow, etc)hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
myocardial infarctionhosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026