Skip to content

Arthroscopy in the Treatment of Degenerative Medial Meniscus Tear

Efficacy of Arthroscopic Partial Resection for the Degenerative Tear of the Medial Meniscus of a Knee

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00549172
Enrollment
146
Registered
2007-10-25
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2023-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, Knee, Arthroscopic Surgery, Menisci, Medial, Placebo Effect, Treatment Efficacy

Brief summary

Degenerative meniscal tears are the most common etiology for knee pain, swelling and loss of function. Partial arthroscopic meniscectomy is the most common orthopaedic procedure to treat meniscal tears. Improvements have been reported both after arthroscopy and with conservative treatment, however no direct comparison exist. Accordingly, the aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for the treatment of degenerative tear of medial meniscus of the knee using a double-blind, placebo controlled, randomised trial.

Detailed description

Middle-aged men and women with degenerative meniscal tears constitute a large group of patients presenting with knee pain, sometimes accompanied with swelling and loss of function. Many meniscal tears occur without a trauma in physically active individuals as well as in older people and could be a part of early osteoarthritis. Partial arthroscopic meniscectomy is the most common orthopaedic procedure and is used to treat patients with meniscal tears. Many patients report improvement after arthroscopy referring especially to reduced knee pain, better knee function and improved quality of life. However, similar results have also been obtained with conservative treatment (physical therapy) of patients with degenerative meniscal tears. Accordingly, the aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for the treatment of degenerative tear of medial meniscus of the knee using a double-blind, placebo controlled, randomised trial. The outcome of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (vs. sham surgery) is assessed using the Lysholm knee score and pain at rest and activity (VAS) at 2, 6 and 12 months after the operation. In addition, the functional outcome is assessed using the WOMET knee score (a disease-specific quality of life -knee score development on the assessment of meniscal pathology), the general quality of life score (15-D), and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOperative (partial arthroscopy)

Partial arthroscopic resection of degenerative rupture of the medial meniscus

PROCEDUREConservative (diagnostic arthroscopy)

Diagnostic arthroscopy

Sponsors

Helsinki University Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Kuopio University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Turku University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Central Finland Hospital District
CollaboratorOTHER
Tampere University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age: 35 to 65 years of age. 2. A pain located on the medial joint line of the knee that has persistent at least for 3 months. 3. Pain that can be provoked by palpation or compression of the joint line or a positive McMurray sign. 4. Tear of the medial meniscus on MRI. 5. Degenerative rupture of the medial meniscus confirmed at arthroscopy.

Exclusion criteria

1. Acute, trauma-induced onset of symptoms. 2. Locking or painful snapping of the knee joint. 3. A surgical operation performed on the affected knee. 4. Osteoarthritis of the medial compartment of the knee (determined by clinical criteria of the ACR). 5. Osteoarthritis on knee radiographs (Kellgren-Lawrence \> 1). 6. Acute (within the previous year) fractures of the knee. 7. Decreased range of motion of the knee. 8. Instability of the knee. 9. MRI assessment showing a tumor or any other complaint requiring surgical or other means of treatment. 10. Arthroscopic assessment showing anything other than a degenerative tear of the medial meniscus requiring surgical intervention.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Lysholm Knee ScoreOne yearThe Lysholm knee score is based on an eight-item questionnaire designed to evaluate knee function and symptoms in activities of daily living. Scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate less severe symptoms.
Pain After Exercise (VAS)One yearKnee pain after exercise (during the preceding week) was assessed on a rating scale of 0 to 10, with 0 denoting no pain and 10 denoting extreme pain.
WOMET (Western Ontario Meniscal Tear -Disease Specific Quality of Life -Assessment Tool)One yearThe Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) contains 16 items addressing three domains: 9 items addressing physical symptoms; 4 items addressing disabilities with regard to sports, recreation, work, and lifestyle; and 3 items addressing emotions. The score indicates the percentage of a normal score; therefore, 100 is the best possible score, and 0 is the worst possible score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
15-D (General Quality of Life -Assessment Tool)One yearThe 15D instrument is a generic health-related quality-of-life instrument comprising 15 dimensions. The maximum 15D score is 1 (full health), and the minimum score is 0 (death).
Pain at Rest (VAS)One yearKnee pain at rest (during the preceding week) was assessed on a rating scale of 0 to 10, with 0 denoting no pain and 10 denoting extreme pain.
Cost Effectiveness1 and 2 yearsCost effectiveness data comparing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy and diagnostic arthroscopy. Costs are based on healthcare utilisation and sickness absence.

Countries

Finland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Operative (O)
Partial resection of degenerative tear of medial meniscus Operative (partial arthroscopy): Partial arthroscopic resection of degenerative rupture of the medial meniscus n=70
70
Conservative (K)
Arthroscopy (diagnostic) Conservative (diagnostic arthroscopy): Diagnostic arthroscopy n=76
76
Total146

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOperative (O)Conservative (K)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
70 Participants76 Participants146 Participants
Age, Continuous52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Region of Enrollment
Finland
70 participants76 participants146 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants29 Participants57 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
42 Participants47 Participants89 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 700 / 76
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 700 / 76

Outcome results

Primary

Pain After Exercise (VAS)

Knee pain after exercise (during the preceding week) was assessed on a rating scale of 0 to 10, with 0 denoting no pain and 10 denoting extreme pain.

Time frame: One year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Operative (O)Pain After Exercise (VAS)2.7 units on a scale
Conservative (K)Pain After Exercise (VAS)2.9 units on a scale
Primary

The Lysholm Knee Score

The Lysholm knee score is based on an eight-item questionnaire designed to evaluate knee function and symptoms in activities of daily living. Scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate less severe symptoms.

Time frame: One year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Operative (O)The Lysholm Knee Score82.2 units on a scale
Conservative (K)The Lysholm Knee Score83.4 units on a scale
Primary

WOMET (Western Ontario Meniscal Tear -Disease Specific Quality of Life -Assessment Tool)

The Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) contains 16 items addressing three domains: 9 items addressing physical symptoms; 4 items addressing disabilities with regard to sports, recreation, work, and lifestyle; and 3 items addressing emotions. The score indicates the percentage of a normal score; therefore, 100 is the best possible score, and 0 is the worst possible score.

Time frame: One year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Operative (O)WOMET (Western Ontario Meniscal Tear -Disease Specific Quality of Life -Assessment Tool)81.0 units on a scale
Conservative (K)WOMET (Western Ontario Meniscal Tear -Disease Specific Quality of Life -Assessment Tool)79.9 units on a scale
Secondary

15-D (General Quality of Life -Assessment Tool)

The 15D instrument is a generic health-related quality-of-life instrument comprising 15 dimensions. The maximum 15D score is 1 (full health), and the minimum score is 0 (death).

Time frame: One year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Operative (O)15-D (General Quality of Life -Assessment Tool)0.94 units on a scale
Conservative (K)15-D (General Quality of Life -Assessment Tool)0.92 units on a scale
Secondary

Cost Effectiveness

Cost effectiveness data comparing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy and diagnostic arthroscopy. Costs are based on healthcare utilisation and sickness absence.

Time frame: 1 and 2 years

Secondary

Pain at Rest (VAS)

Knee pain at rest (during the preceding week) was assessed on a rating scale of 0 to 10, with 0 denoting no pain and 10 denoting extreme pain.

Time frame: One year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Operative (O)Pain at Rest (VAS)1.6 units on a scale
Conservative (K)Pain at Rest (VAS)1.9 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 31, 2026