Skip to content

Reducing Sex-Related HIV Risk Behaviors in Patients Receiving Treatment for Opioid Dependence

Reducing Sex-Related HIV Risk Behaviors in Patients Receiving Treatment for Opioid Dependence

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00548275
Acronym
Project RED
Enrollment
22
Registered
2007-10-23
Start date
2006-07-31
Completion date
2011-06-30
Last updated
2020-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections, Opiate Dependence

Keywords

Buprenorphine, Drug counseling, HIV risk reduction counseling, HIV Seronegativity, HIV risk behaviors

Brief summary

The major goal is to determine in patients entering buprenorphine treatment, the prevalence of specific sex-related HIV risk behaviors, their physician's screening of these behaviors and to evaluate the impact of risk reduction counseling.

Detailed description

The profile of opioid dependence is changing in the United States. According to the 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), 3.7 million Americans had used heroin at least once in their lifetime and over half a million individuals had used heroin within the past year. Approximately 323,000 individuals met criteria for past-year heroin abuse or dependence. While these figures are concerning, the increasing prevalence of prescription opioid abuse and dependence is also worrisome. In 2006 12.6 million reported non-medical use of prescription opioids. Of these, 1.6 million met criteria for prescription opioid abuse or dependence. Sex-related HIV risk behaviors are prevalent amongst opioid dependent individuals with one study reporting unprotected intercourse within the prior 30 days in 75% of patients. Given that 79-85% of U.S. HIV/AIDS cases are secondary to sexual transmission, as non-injecting drug use increases, the relative contribution of sex-related HIV risk behaviors will increase as well. While drug treatment with methadone, and more recently buprenorphine (BUP), a new medication effective for the treatment of opioid dependence that can be prescribed by office-based physicians, has been shown to decrease drug-related HIV risk behaviors, my prior research demonstrates that BUP does not appear to impact as significantly on sex-related HIV risk behaviors. While the process of HIV risk behavior change begins with risk assessment, studies have shown that physicians, in general, frequently do not address risky behaviors with their patients. The current literature is lacking, however, with regards to the prevalence of specific high-risk sexual behaviors in patients enrolled in BUP treatment. Interventions specifically targeted at counseling for sex-related HIV risk behaviors delivered to patients receiving BUP treatment have not been refined. The proposed research will evaluate the prevalence of specific sex-related HIV risk behaviors in patients enrolled in office-based BUP treatment and the patients' perception of their providers' screening for these behaviors (Phase 1). These results will inform the conduct of a subsequent randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a sex-related HIV risk reduction counseling intervention (Phase 2). Phase 1. We hypothesize that sex-related HIV risk behaviors are prevalent in opioid dependent patients enrolled in BUP treatment and that patients will report that their providers fail to screen for these behaviors. The specific aims are to determine in patients entering BUP treatment: 1) the prevalence of specific sex-related HIV risk behaviors, and 2) by patient report, their provider's screening of these behaviors. Phase 2. We hypothesize that in opioid dependent patients receiving office-based BUP, Enhanced Sexual Risk Management (ESRM) will be more effective in increasing specific safe sex practices compared with standard physician counseling, Standard Sexual Risk Management (SSRM) and that it will demonstrate cost-effectiveness overall when compared to SSRM. The specific aims of this randomized clinical trial are 1) to determine the efficacy of ESRM compared to SSRM, in individuals enrolled in BUP treatment and 2) To compare the cost-effectiveness of ESRM versus SSRM in individuals enrolled in BUP treatment. These interventions will be adapted from existing effective interventions evaluated in two recently conducted multi-site randomized clinical trials, the CDC-funded Project RESPECT and the NIMH-funded Project Light.20, 21

Interventions

BEHAVIORALEnhanced Sexual Risk Management

management of sexual risk

BEHAVIORALStandard Sexual Risk Management

management of sexual risk

Sponsors

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects meeting DSM-IV criteria for current opioid dependence * HIV risk behaviors

Exclusion criteria

* current dependence on benzodiazepines or sedatives * current suicide or homicide risk * current psychotic disorder or untreated major depression * inability to read or understand English * unstable medical problems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
recent diagnosis of an STD3 months
proportion of condom use during acts of sexual intercourse3 months
number of unprotected vaginal/anal intercourse acts3 months
number of sexual partners3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
buprenorphine treatment retention3 months
abstinence from illicit drug use3 months
health status3 months
patient and physician satisfaction3 months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026