Femoral Fracture (Proximal)
Conditions
Keywords
Proximal femoral fracture, Trochanteric fracture, Intramedullary nailing
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to monitor trochanteric fracture healing and review the performance of the ATN system.
Detailed description
Proximal femoral fractures are among the most common femoral fractures. In the past plates and screws were often used to repair these fractures but this treatment had limitations including restricted weight bearing. Intermedullary nailing is an alternative to plate and screw treatment. Weight bearing is allowed and the procedure can be a less invasive. Among intramedullary nailing complications are iatrogenic fractures that can be further divided into trochanteric and femoral shaft fractures. Trochanteric fractures often heal without additional intervention however femoral shaft fractures usually require an additional surgical procedure to facilitate healing. This study will monitor fracture healing using clinical and radiographic evaluations of subjects with trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur treated with the ATN system.
Interventions
Trochanteric nailing for proximal femoral fractures.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Ability to understand and willing to sign the approved consent form. * 18 years of age * Skeletally mature * Have stable or unstable proximal femur fracture, including pertrochanteric, intertrochanteric, high subtrochanteric or any combination of the AO Proximal Femur Fracture Classification
Exclusion criteria
* Subjects with concomitant lower extremity injuries or multiple trauma that would interfere with normal hip fracture rehabilitation. * Subjects who have isolated or combined medial femoral neck fractures. * Subjects who are unwilling or unable to comply with a rehabilitation program or are unwilling or unable to be assessed for 1 year following surgery. * Subjects who are pregnant or breastfeeding. * Subjects who are a prisoner or a known alcohol or drug abuser. * Subjects who have a prior surgical history in the affected hip, or conditions that may interfere with outcome or impede healing. * Subjects who have an obliterated medullary canal or other conditions that may complicate the reaming process. * Subjects who have evidence of active untreated infections that may spread to other areas of the body. * Subjects who have a highly communicable disease or pathology that may limit follow-up. * Subjects, who in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator, have an existing condition that indicates the Subject is not a good candidate for the study. * Subjects who are participating in another clinical investigation. * Subjects known to have allergies to titanium, aluminum, vanadium. * Subjects who are currently eligible for workman's compensation.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Pain Category | 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months | Merle D'Aubigne measures three categories for Pain, Mobility and Ability to walk using a 0 to 6 scoring scale for each category. Scoring is 0 indicating worse outcomes and 6 indicating better outcomes. Each Category is scored and reported separately |
| Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Walk Category | 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months | Merle D'Aubigne measures three categories for Pain, Mobility and Ability to walk using a 0 to 6 scoring scale for each category. Scoring is 0 indicating worse outcomes and 6 indicating better outcomes. Each Category is scored and reported separately |
| Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Mobility Category | 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months | Merle D'Aubigne measures three categories for Pain, Mobility and Ability to walk using a 0 to 6 scoring scale for each category. Scoring is 0 indicating worse outcomes and 6 indicating better outcomes. Each Category is scored and reported separately |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Lower Extremity Measure (LEM) | 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months |
| SF-12 | 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months |
| Medical Imaging | 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months |
| Six Item Screener and Ambulatory Status | 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Between September 2006 & September 2009, 62 subjects were recruited and enrolled at 6 US clinics by orthopaedic surgeons. Each study site could enroll up to 20 subjects (cohorts were re-assigned as necessary to complete enrollment in a timely manner). Recruitment was based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria in the clinical investigation plan.
Pre-assignment details
This was a non-randomized study so all subjects that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria received the ATN Trochanteric Nail. Consented subjects could be excluded from the trial based on results of pre-operative clinical and/or radiographic evaluations, as per the exclusion criteria in the clinical investigation plan.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System The participants in this study will undergo treatment of trochanteric fractures using DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System implants and results will be reviewed by clinical and radiographic evaluations. | 62 |
| Total | 62 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 79.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1 |
| Region of Enrollment United States United States | 62 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 42 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 20 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 4 / 62 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 62 |
Outcome results
Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Mobility Category
Merle D'Aubigne measures three categories for Pain, Mobility and Ability to walk using a 0 to 6 scoring scale for each category. Scoring is 0 indicating worse outcomes and 6 indicating better outcomes. Each Category is scored and reported separately
Time frame: 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System | Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Mobility Category | 4 Week Merle D'Aubigne for Mobility Score (0 worst to 6 best) | 5.2 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System | Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Mobility Category | 3 Month Merle D'Aubigne Mobility Score (0 worst to 6 best) | 5.4 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System | Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Mobility Category | 6 Month Merle D'Aubigne Mobility Score (0 worst to 6 best) | 5.4 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System | Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Mobility Category | 12 Month Merle D'Aubigne Mobility Score (0 worst to 6 best) | 5.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Pain Category
Merle D'Aubigne measures three categories for Pain, Mobility and Ability to walk using a 0 to 6 scoring scale for each category. Scoring is 0 indicating worse outcomes and 6 indicating better outcomes. Each Category is scored and reported separately
Time frame: 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System | Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Pain Category | 4 Week Merle D'Aubigne for Pain Score (0 worst to 6 best) | 4.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System | Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Pain Category | 3 Month Merle D'Aubigne Pain Score (0 worst to 6 best) | 4.4 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System | Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Pain Category | 12 Month Merle D'Aubigne Pain Score (0 worst to 6 best) | 4.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System | Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Pain Category | 6 Month Merle D'Aubigne Pain Score (0 worst to 6 best) | 4.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Walk Category
Merle D'Aubigne measures three categories for Pain, Mobility and Ability to walk using a 0 to 6 scoring scale for each category. Scoring is 0 indicating worse outcomes and 6 indicating better outcomes. Each Category is scored and reported separately
Time frame: 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System | Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Walk Category | 4 Week Merle D'Aubigne for Walk Score (0 worst to 6 best) | 1.3 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System | Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Walk Category | 3 Month Merle D'Aubigne Walk Score (0 worst to 6 best) | 2.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System | Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Walk Category | 6 Month Merle D'Aubigne Walk Score (0 worst to 6 best) | 3.0 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System | Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Walk Category | 12 Month Merle D'Aubigne Walk Score (0 worst to 6 best) | 2.7 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
Lower Extremity Measure (LEM)
Time frame: 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months
Medical Imaging
Time frame: 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months
SF-12
Time frame: 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months
Six Item Screener and Ambulatory Status
Time frame: 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months