Skip to content

DePuy Trochanteric (ATN) Nailing Clinical Outcomes Trial

Clinical Trial to Monitor the Clinical Effectiveness of the DePuy ATN Trochanteric Nailing System in the Treatment of Trochanteric Fractures of the Proximal Femur

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00546429
Acronym
ATN
Enrollment
62
Registered
2007-10-19
Start date
2006-09-01
Completion date
2009-09-01
Last updated
2023-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femoral Fracture (Proximal)

Keywords

Proximal femoral fracture, Trochanteric fracture, Intramedullary nailing

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to monitor trochanteric fracture healing and review the performance of the ATN system.

Detailed description

Proximal femoral fractures are among the most common femoral fractures. In the past plates and screws were often used to repair these fractures but this treatment had limitations including restricted weight bearing. Intermedullary nailing is an alternative to plate and screw treatment. Weight bearing is allowed and the procedure can be a less invasive. Among intramedullary nailing complications are iatrogenic fractures that can be further divided into trochanteric and femoral shaft fractures. Trochanteric fractures often heal without additional intervention however femoral shaft fractures usually require an additional surgical procedure to facilitate healing. This study will monitor fracture healing using clinical and radiographic evaluations of subjects with trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur treated with the ATN system.

Interventions

Trochanteric nailing for proximal femoral fractures.

Sponsors

DePuy Orthopaedics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ability to understand and willing to sign the approved consent form. * 18 years of age * Skeletally mature * Have stable or unstable proximal femur fracture, including pertrochanteric, intertrochanteric, high subtrochanteric or any combination of the AO Proximal Femur Fracture Classification

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with concomitant lower extremity injuries or multiple trauma that would interfere with normal hip fracture rehabilitation. * Subjects who have isolated or combined medial femoral neck fractures. * Subjects who are unwilling or unable to comply with a rehabilitation program or are unwilling or unable to be assessed for 1 year following surgery. * Subjects who are pregnant or breastfeeding. * Subjects who are a prisoner or a known alcohol or drug abuser. * Subjects who have a prior surgical history in the affected hip, or conditions that may interfere with outcome or impede healing. * Subjects who have an obliterated medullary canal or other conditions that may complicate the reaming process. * Subjects who have evidence of active untreated infections that may spread to other areas of the body. * Subjects who have a highly communicable disease or pathology that may limit follow-up. * Subjects, who in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator, have an existing condition that indicates the Subject is not a good candidate for the study. * Subjects who are participating in another clinical investigation. * Subjects known to have allergies to titanium, aluminum, vanadium. * Subjects who are currently eligible for workman's compensation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Pain Category4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 monthsMerle D'Aubigne measures three categories for Pain, Mobility and Ability to walk using a 0 to 6 scoring scale for each category. Scoring is 0 indicating worse outcomes and 6 indicating better outcomes. Each Category is scored and reported separately
Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Walk Category4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 monthsMerle D'Aubigne measures three categories for Pain, Mobility and Ability to walk using a 0 to 6 scoring scale for each category. Scoring is 0 indicating worse outcomes and 6 indicating better outcomes. Each Category is scored and reported separately
Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Mobility Category4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 monthsMerle D'Aubigne measures three categories for Pain, Mobility and Ability to walk using a 0 to 6 scoring scale for each category. Scoring is 0 indicating worse outcomes and 6 indicating better outcomes. Each Category is scored and reported separately

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Lower Extremity Measure (LEM)4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months
SF-124 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months
Medical Imaging4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months
Six Item Screener and Ambulatory Status4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Between September 2006 & September 2009, 62 subjects were recruited and enrolled at 6 US clinics by orthopaedic surgeons. Each study site could enroll up to 20 subjects (cohorts were re-assigned as necessary to complete enrollment in a timely manner). Recruitment was based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria in the clinical investigation plan.

Pre-assignment details

This was a non-randomized study so all subjects that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria received the ATN Trochanteric Nail. Consented subjects could be excluded from the trial based on results of pre-operative clinical and/or radiographic evaluations, as per the exclusion criteria in the clinical investigation plan.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System
The participants in this study will undergo treatment of trochanteric fractures using DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System implants and results will be reviewed by clinical and radiographic evaluations.
62
Total62

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail System
Age, Continuous79.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
Region of Enrollment
United States
United States
62 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 62
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 62

Outcome results

Primary

Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Mobility Category

Merle D'Aubigne measures three categories for Pain, Mobility and Ability to walk using a 0 to 6 scoring scale for each category. Scoring is 0 indicating worse outcomes and 6 indicating better outcomes. Each Category is scored and reported separately

Time frame: 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail SystemSuccess in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Mobility Category4 Week Merle D'Aubigne for Mobility Score (0 worst to 6 best)5.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail SystemSuccess in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Mobility Category3 Month Merle D'Aubigne Mobility Score (0 worst to 6 best)5.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail SystemSuccess in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Mobility Category6 Month Merle D'Aubigne Mobility Score (0 worst to 6 best)5.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail SystemSuccess in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Mobility Category12 Month Merle D'Aubigne Mobility Score (0 worst to 6 best)5.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Primary

Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Pain Category

Merle D'Aubigne measures three categories for Pain, Mobility and Ability to walk using a 0 to 6 scoring scale for each category. Scoring is 0 indicating worse outcomes and 6 indicating better outcomes. Each Category is scored and reported separately

Time frame: 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail SystemSuccess in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Pain Category4 Week Merle D'Aubigne for Pain Score (0 worst to 6 best)4.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail SystemSuccess in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Pain Category3 Month Merle D'Aubigne Pain Score (0 worst to 6 best)4.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail SystemSuccess in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Pain Category12 Month Merle D'Aubigne Pain Score (0 worst to 6 best)4.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail SystemSuccess in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Pain Category6 Month Merle D'Aubigne Pain Score (0 worst to 6 best)4.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Primary

Success in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Walk Category

Merle D'Aubigne measures three categories for Pain, Mobility and Ability to walk using a 0 to 6 scoring scale for each category. Scoring is 0 indicating worse outcomes and 6 indicating better outcomes. Each Category is scored and reported separately

Time frame: 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail SystemSuccess in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Walk Category4 Week Merle D'Aubigne for Walk Score (0 worst to 6 best)1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail SystemSuccess in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Walk Category3 Month Merle D'Aubigne Walk Score (0 worst to 6 best)2.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail SystemSuccess in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Walk Category6 Month Merle D'Aubigne Walk Score (0 worst to 6 best)3.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
DePuy Orthopaedics ATN Trochanteric Nail SystemSuccess in Terms of the Merle D'Aubigne Postel Score for Walk Category12 Month Merle D'Aubigne Walk Score (0 worst to 6 best)2.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

Lower Extremity Measure (LEM)

Time frame: 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months

Secondary

Medical Imaging

Time frame: 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months

Secondary

SF-12

Time frame: 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months

Secondary

Six Item Screener and Ambulatory Status

Time frame: 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026