Skip to content

BONCURE Study: A Study of Monthly Bonviva (Ibandronate) in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis on Bisphosphonate Therapy.

'Open, Prospective, Multi-center, Two-part Study of Patient Preference With Monthly Ibandronate Therapy in Women With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Switched From Once-daily or Once Weekly Alendronate or Risendronate - BONCURE (BONviva for Current Bisphosphonate Users - Regional European Trial)'

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00545779
Enrollment
677
Registered
2007-10-17
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2008-10-31
Last updated
2016-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis

Brief summary

This single arm study will assess participant preference for monthly Bonviva, versus daily or weekly alendronate or risedronate, in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Participants currently on a daily or weekly regimen of bisphosphonate therapy (alendronate or risedronate) will answer a questionnaire to identify participants who may benefit from a monthly Bonviva regimen. Eligible participants will then discontinue their present bisphosphonate treatment, and switch to monthly Bonviva 150mg per oral (po). At the beginning and end of Bonviva treatment, all participants will complete an Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 500+ individuals.

Interventions

DRUGIbandronate

150 mg orally once monthly for 6 months

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* post-menopausal women; * \>=3 months daily or weekly alendronate or risedronate for treatment or prevention of post-menopausal osteoporosis.

Exclusion criteria

* inability to stand or sit in an upright position for at least 60 minutes; * hypersensitivity to bisphosphonates; * treatment with other drugs affecting bone metabolism; * abnormalities of the oesophagus, which delay oesophageal emptying.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Current Daily or Weekly Bisphosphonate Users in Part A Who Answer 'Yes' to Any of the Questions in the Candidate Identification Questionnaire (CIQ)Visit 0 (less than or equal to [<=] Day -30)The CIQ was completed in Part A by all the participants. The information from the CIQ was used to determine the percentage of current daily or weekly bisphosphonate users for whom monthly ibandronate represented a potentially more satisfactory therapeutic option. In the CIQ participants were asked to answer either 'yes' or 'no' to the following 3 questions: 1. I would prefer a monthly oral dosing schedule to my current (daily or weekly) dosing schedule. 2. More than once per month, I have experienced stomach upset within 48 hours of taking my osteoporosis medication. 3. Over the past 3 months, I have missed taking 3 or more doses of my current (daily or weekly) osteoporosis medication.
Percentage of Participants Who Reported Preference for Monthly IbandronateVisit 0 (<= Day -30)Percentage of participants who reported preference for monthly ibandronate were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Positive Change in Total Composite Satisfaction Score (CSS) at Month 6 in Part B by CIQ Fracture (Fr) GroupMonth 6Participants with a positive change from their baseline CSS at Month 6 are considered those participants who are satisfied with once-monthly dosing of ibandronate after 6 months of use were reported. The CSS is scaled from 0 to 100 and is an average of the 4 domain scores of the Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q): Convenience (questions 1 to 6), Quality of Life (questions 7 and 8), Overall Satisfaction (questions 9 and 10) and Side Effects (questions 11 to 16). Higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Choose a Monthly Reminder to Take Ibandronate in Part BVisit 0 (<= Day -30)
Percentage of Participants Who Reported an Improvement in the Frequency of Gastro-intestinal (GI) Symptoms Per Month in Part BBaseline to Month 6
Percentage of Participants Eligible Current Daily or Weekly Bisphosphonate Users at Screening Who Elect to Enter Part B by CIQVisit 0 (<= Day -30)
Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) Domain Scores in Part BBaseline, Month 6The OPSAT-Q is a validated questionnaire designed to capture satisfaction with bisphosphonate treatment. It comprises four domains: convenience (questions 1-6), quality of life (questions 7 and 8), overall satisfaction (questions 9 and 10), and side effects (questions 11-16). Each domain (scale) ranges 0-100 scale. All items were scored such that higher scores represented greater satisfaction or less bother. Treatment satisfaction was measured with the OPSAT-Q composite satisfaction score (OPSAT-Q CSS), which was the average of the scores from the four domains of the OPSAT-Q converted to a 0-100-point scale, in which higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
Percentage of Participants by Age and Activity Level Reporting High Satisfaction According to the Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) in Part BMonth 6
Percentage of Participants Who Reported an Improved Satisfaction Score After 6 Months in Part BMonth 6Percentage of participants who report an improved satisfaction score after 6 months of monthly ibandronate therapy as compared to daily or weekly alendronate or risendronate at baseline based on responses to each individual question in the CIQ were reported. In the CIQ participants were asked to answer either 'yes' or 'no' to the following 3 questions: 1. I would prefer a monthly oral dosing schedule to my current (daily or weekly) dosing schedule 2. More than once per month, I have experienced stomach upset within 48 hours of taking my osteoporosis medication 3. Over the past 3 months, I have missed taking 3 or more doses of my current (daily or weekly) osteoporosis medication
Percentage of Participants Who Have Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 80% Compliance With 6 Monthly Doses of Ibandronate in Part BUp to Month 6

Countries

Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, North Macedonia, Serbia, Turkey (Türkiye)

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ibandronate
Participants completed Candidate Identification Questionnaire (CIQ) in Part A and received Ibandronate 150 milligram (mg) tablet orally once-monthly up to 6 months in Part B of the study.
670
Total670

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event/intercurrent illness5
Overall StudyDid not cooperate7
Overall StudyFailure to return3
Overall StudyOther protocol violation1
Overall StudyViolation of selection criteria at entry8
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIbandronate
Age, Continuous62.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
Sex: Female, Male
Female
670 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 640
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 640

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Current Daily or Weekly Bisphosphonate Users in Part A Who Answer 'Yes' to Any of the Questions in the Candidate Identification Questionnaire (CIQ)

The CIQ was completed in Part A by all the participants. The information from the CIQ was used to determine the percentage of current daily or weekly bisphosphonate users for whom monthly ibandronate represented a potentially more satisfactory therapeutic option. In the CIQ participants were asked to answer either 'yes' or 'no' to the following 3 questions: 1. I would prefer a monthly oral dosing schedule to my current (daily or weekly) dosing schedule. 2. More than once per month, I have experienced stomach upset within 48 hours of taking my osteoporosis medication. 3. Over the past 3 months, I have missed taking 3 or more doses of my current (daily or weekly) osteoporosis medication.

Time frame: Visit 0 (less than or equal to [<=] Day -30)

Population: All enrolled participants who completed the part A of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IbandronatePercentage of Participants Current Daily or Weekly Bisphosphonate Users in Part A Who Answer 'Yes' to Any of the Questions in the Candidate Identification Questionnaire (CIQ)68.1 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Reported Preference for Monthly Ibandronate

Percentage of participants who reported preference for monthly ibandronate were reported.

Time frame: Visit 0 (<= Day -30)

Population: All enrolled participants who completed the part A of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IbandronatePercentage of Participants Who Reported Preference for Monthly Ibandronate67.5 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Positive Change in Total Composite Satisfaction Score (CSS) at Month 6 in Part B by CIQ Fracture (Fr) Group

Participants with a positive change from their baseline CSS at Month 6 are considered those participants who are satisfied with once-monthly dosing of ibandronate after 6 months of use were reported. The CSS is scaled from 0 to 100 and is an average of the 4 domain scores of the Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q): Convenience (questions 1 to 6), Quality of Life (questions 7 and 8), Overall Satisfaction (questions 9 and 10) and Side Effects (questions 11 to 16). Higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: The intent-to treat (ITT) population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication. Number of participant analyzed are with or without previous history of Fr.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IbandronatePercentage of Participants With Positive Change in Total Composite Satisfaction Score (CSS) at Month 6 in Part B by CIQ Fracture (Fr) GroupParticipants answer Yes with previous Fr (n=115)86.1 percentage of participants
IbandronatePercentage of Participants With Positive Change in Total Composite Satisfaction Score (CSS) at Month 6 in Part B by CIQ Fracture (Fr) GroupParticipants answer Yes without previous Fr(n=310)89.0 percentage of participants
IbandronatePercentage of Participants With Positive Change in Total Composite Satisfaction Score (CSS) at Month 6 in Part B by CIQ Fracture (Fr) GroupParticipants answer NO with previous Fr (n=47)87.2 percentage of participants
IbandronatePercentage of Participants With Positive Change in Total Composite Satisfaction Score (CSS) at Month 6 in Part B by CIQ Fracture (Fr) GroupParticipants answer NO without previous Fr (n=155)77.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) Domain Scores in Part B

The OPSAT-Q is a validated questionnaire designed to capture satisfaction with bisphosphonate treatment. It comprises four domains: convenience (questions 1-6), quality of life (questions 7 and 8), overall satisfaction (questions 9 and 10), and side effects (questions 11-16). Each domain (scale) ranges 0-100 scale. All items were scored such that higher scores represented greater satisfaction or less bother. Treatment satisfaction was measured with the OPSAT-Q composite satisfaction score (OPSAT-Q CSS), which was the average of the scores from the four domains of the OPSAT-Q converted to a 0-100-point scale, in which higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: The ITT population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IbandronateOsteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) Domain Scores in Part BBaseline: Convenience58.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.4
IbandronateOsteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) Domain Scores in Part BMonth 6: Convenience89.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2
IbandronateOsteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) Domain Scores in Part BBaseline: Confidence with daily functioning62.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.6
IbandronateOsteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) Domain Scores in Part BMonth 6: Confidence with daily functioning86.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.8
IbandronateOsteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) Domain Scores in Part BBaseline: Overall satisfaction61.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
IbandronateOsteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) Domain Scores in Part BMonth 6: Overall satisfaction89.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
IbandronateOsteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) Domain Scores in Part BBaseline: Side effects83.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 91.7
IbandronateOsteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) Domain Scores in Part BMonth 6: Side effects93.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.2
Secondary

Percentage of Participants by Age and Activity Level Reporting High Satisfaction According to the Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) in Part B

Time frame: Month 6

Population: Analysis was not performed because the data were difficult or impossible to derive from the database.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants Eligible Current Daily or Weekly Bisphosphonate Users at Screening Who Elect to Enter Part B by CIQ

Time frame: Visit 0 (<= Day -30)

Population: The ITT population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IbandronatePercentage of Participants Eligible Current Daily or Weekly Bisphosphonate Users at Screening Who Elect to Enter Part B by CIQAnswered Yes to at least 1 question in CIQ68.1 percentage of participants
IbandronatePercentage of Participants Eligible Current Daily or Weekly Bisphosphonate Users at Screening Who Elect to Enter Part B by CIQAnswered NO to every question in CIQ31.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Choose a Monthly Reminder to Take Ibandronate in Part B

Time frame: Visit 0 (<= Day -30)

Population: The ITT population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IbandronatePercentage of Participants Who Choose a Monthly Reminder to Take Ibandronate in Part B99.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Have Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 80% Compliance With 6 Monthly Doses of Ibandronate in Part B

Time frame: Up to Month 6

Population: The ITT population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IbandronatePercentage of Participants Who Have Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 80% Compliance With 6 Monthly Doses of Ibandronate in Part B98.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Reported an Improved Satisfaction Score After 6 Months in Part B

Percentage of participants who report an improved satisfaction score after 6 months of monthly ibandronate therapy as compared to daily or weekly alendronate or risendronate at baseline based on responses to each individual question in the CIQ were reported. In the CIQ participants were asked to answer either 'yes' or 'no' to the following 3 questions: 1. I would prefer a monthly oral dosing schedule to my current (daily or weekly) dosing schedule 2. More than once per month, I have experienced stomach upset within 48 hours of taking my osteoporosis medication 3. Over the past 3 months, I have missed taking 3 or more doses of my current (daily or weekly) osteoporosis medication

Time frame: Month 6

Population: The ITT population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IbandronatePercentage of Participants Who Reported an Improved Satisfaction Score After 6 Months in Part BCIQ Question 1 = No (n=205)80.0 percentage of participants
IbandronatePercentage of Participants Who Reported an Improved Satisfaction Score After 6 Months in Part BCIQ Question 3 = No (n=530)83.8 percentage of participants
IbandronatePercentage of Participants Who Reported an Improved Satisfaction Score After 6 Months in Part BCIQ Question 1 = Yes (n=422)88.2 percentage of participants
IbandronatePercentage of Participants Who Reported an Improved Satisfaction Score After 6 Months in Part BCIQ Question 2 = Yes (n=115)93.0 percentage of participants
IbandronatePercentage of Participants Who Reported an Improved Satisfaction Score After 6 Months in Part BCIQ Question 2 = No (n=512)83.8 percentage of participants
IbandronatePercentage of Participants Who Reported an Improved Satisfaction Score After 6 Months in Part BCIQ Question 3 = Yes (n=97)94.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Reported an Improvement in the Frequency of Gastro-intestinal (GI) Symptoms Per Month in Part B

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6

Population: Analysis was not performed because the data were difficult or impossible to derive from the database.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026