Skip to content

A Study to Assess the Efficacy of Rituximab (MabThera) in First Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Multicentre, Non-Randomised, Open-Label Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Induction Treatment With Rituximab, Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Followed by Rituximab Maintenance Therapy (R-Fc-Rm) in the First Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00545714
Enrollment
86
Registered
2007-10-17
Start date
2007-11-21
Completion date
2016-05-20
Last updated
2019-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell

Brief summary

This single arm study will assess the efficacy and safety of rituximab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, followed by rituximab maintenance therapy, as first line treatment of participants with CLL.

Interventions

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m\^2 as IV infusion will be administered on Days 1-3 of first six 28-day cycles.

DRUGFludarabine

Fludarabine 25 mg/m\^2 as IV infusion will be administered on Days 1-3 of first six 28-day cycles.

DRUGRituximab

Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 as IV infusion will be administered on Day 0 of Cycle 1; 500 mg/m\^2 as IV infusion will be administered on Day 1 of Cycle 2-6; and 375 mg/m\^2 as IV infusion every 2 months from 3 months after Day 1 Cycle 6 up to a total of 18 doses or up to 3 years after Cycle 6.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* CLL according to World Health Organization diagnostic criteria * Active disease * No previous treatment * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2

Exclusion criteria

* Transformation to aggressive B-cell malignancy (prolymphocytic leukemia, large-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma) * Other malignancies except for localized skin cancer * Continuous systemic corticosteroid treatment * Known infection with hepatitis B or C

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With CR Achieved After the Rituximab, Fludarabine, and Cyclophosphamide RegimenMonth 9CR was defined as no adenopathies (ADPs) and visceromegalies (VSMs) in physical examination (PE); no general symptoms (Sx); lymphocytes (Lymph) in peripheral blood less than (\<) 4000 per cubic millimeter (mm\^3); normalization of peripheral blood parameters: neutrophils (Neut) greater than (\>) 1500/mm\^3, platelets (Plt) \>100,000/mm\^3, hemoglobin (Hb) \>11 grams per deciliter (g/dL) without transfusion; normocellular bone marrow (BM) with \<30% Lymph; BM aspirate/biopsy with no evidence of infiltration of lymphoid nodules.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR Among Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryPost-Induction Phase: at 6 months; during Maintenance Phase: at Cycles 9, 12, 15, 18 (cycle length = 2 months); during Follow-Up: at Follow-Up Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 36CR: no ADPs and VSMs in PE; no general Sx; Lymph in peripheral blood \<4000/mm\^3; normalization of peripheral blood parameters: Neut \>1500/mm\^3, Plt \>100,000/mm\^3, Hb \>11 g/dL without transfusion; normocellular BM with \<30% Lymph; BM aspirate/biopsy with no evidence of infiltration of lymphoid nodules. PR: decrease \>50% in Lymph in peripheral blood; reduction in ADPs \>50% in total sum of up to 6 ADPs or in the baseline ADP of largest diameter (LD), no new ADP or enlargement of a prior ADP; \>50% decrease in VSM; Neut \>1500/mm\^3 or \>50% increase from Baseline; Plt \>100,000/mm\^3 or \>50% increase from Baseline; Hb \>11.0 g/dL or \>50% increase from Baseline value without transfusion. Participants who met all CR criteria but had persistent anemia or thrombocytopenia were considered as PR. Negative MRD: Lymph \<0.01% of all white blood cells (WBCs) in blood or BM after two consecutive measurements. Analysis performed only in blood during the Maintenance Phase and Follow-Up.
Percentage of Participants With CR With Incomplete Bone Marrow Recovery (CRi)Baseline up to progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 92 months)Participants with CRi were those who met all CR criteria (including BM examinations) but had persistent anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia apparently unrelated to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) but related to drug toxicity. CR: no ADPs and VSMs in PE; no general Sx; Lymph in peripheral blood \<4000/mm\^3; normalization of peripheral blood parameters: Neut \>1500/mm\^3, Plt \>100,000/mm\^3, Hb \>11 g/dL without transfusion; normocellular BM with \<30% Lymph; BM aspirate/biopsy with no evidence of infiltration of lymphoid nodules.
Percentage of Participants Who DiedBaseline up to death due to any cause (up to 92 months)
Overall Survival (OS)Baseline up to death due to any cause (up to 92 months)OS was defined as time from treatment start to death of the participant. For all other participants, the last follow-up available was taken as the last control. If the participant had not completed the study, the date of the last visit available was considered. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methodology.
Percentage of Participants With PD or DeathBaseline up to PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 92 months)PD was defined as new ADPs (1.5 centimeters \[cm\]), hepato-/splenomegaly (HSM), Richter syndrome (RS), or other infiltrated organs; greater than or equal to (\>/=) 50% increase in size of Baseline prior ADPs or HSM in participants with PR; Lymph increase \>/=50% in peripheral blood with B Lymph \>/=5000/mm\^3; cytopenia attributable to CLL. Progression of any cytopenia (not related to autoimmune cytopenia) reported as a 2-g/dL decrease in basal Hb, Hb \<10 g/dL, \>/=50% decrease in basal Plt count, or count \<100,000/mm\^3 at \>/=3 months post-treatment was defined as PD if BM biopsy confirmed infiltration of clonal CLL cells.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Baseline up to PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 92 months)PFS was defined as time from start of study treatment to PD or death, whichever occurred first. For other participants, last follow-up available was taken as last control. If participant did not complete study, date of last visit available was considered. PFS was estimated using KM methodology. PD was defined as new ADPs (1.5 cm), HSM, RS, or other infiltrated organs; \>/=50% increase in size of Baseline prior ADPs or HSM in participants with PR; Lymph increase \>/=50% in peripheral blood with B Lymph \>/=5000/mm\^3; cytopenia attributable to CLL. Progression of any cytopenia (not related to autoimmune cytopenia) reported as a 2-g/dL decrease in basal Hb, Hb \<10 g/dL, \>/=50% decrease in basal Plt count, or count \<100,000/mm\^3 at \>/=3 months post-treatment was defined as PD if BM biopsy confirmed infiltration of clonal CLL cells.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryPost-Induction Phase (IP): at 6 months; during Maintenance Phase (MP): at Cycles 9, 12, 15, 18 (cycle length = 2 months); during Follow-Up (FU): at Follow-Up Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36CR was defined as no ADPs and VSMs in PE; no general Sx; Lymph in peripheral blood \<4000/mm\^3; normalization of peripheral blood parameters: Neut \>1500/mm\^3, Plt \>100,000/mm\^3, Hb \>11 g/dL without transfusion; normocellular BM with \<30% Lymph; BM aspirate/biopsy with no evidence of infiltration of lymphoid nodules. PR was defined as decrease \>50% in Lymph in peripheral blood; reduction in ADPs \>50% in total sum of up to 6 ADPs or in the baseline ADP of largest diameter (LD), no new ADP or enlargement of a prior ADP; \>50% decrease in VSM; Neut \>1500/mm\^3 or \>50% increase from Baseline; Plt \>100,000/mm\^3 or \>50% increase from Baseline; Hb \>11.0 g/dL or \>50% increase from Baseline value without transfusion. Participants who met all CR criteria but had persistent anemia or thrombocytopenia were considered as PR.
Duration of Response (DOR)From first CR or PR up to detectable MRD or disease occurrence/PD, whichever occurred first (up to 92 months)DOR: time from CR/PR to MRD/PD. PD: new ADP (1.5 cm), HSM, RS, other infiltrated organs or \>/=50% increase size in those with PR; blood Lymph increase \>/=50% with B Lymph \>/=5000/mm\^3; cytopenia due to CLL. Progression of (nonautoimmune) cytopenia: 2-g/dL decrease basal Hb, Hb \<10 g/dL, \>/=50% decrease basal Plt or \<100,000/mm\^3 at \>/=3 months post-treatment was PD if clonal CLL cell infiltration on BM biopsy. CR: no ADP/VSM in PE; no general Sx; blood Lymph \<4000/mm\^3; Neut \>1500/mm\^3; Plt \>100,000/mm\^3; Hb \>11 g/dL (no transfusion); normocellular BM with \<30% Lymph; BM aspirate/biopsy with no lymphoid nodule infiltration. PR: \>50% decrease blood Lymph; \>50% decrease in total sum up to 6 ADPs or baseline ADP of LD, no new/enlargement of prior ADP; \>50% decrease VSM; Neut \>1500/mm\^3 or \>50% increase; Plt \>100,000/mm\^3 or \>50% increase; Hb \>11.0 g/dL or \>50% increase (no transfusion). All CR criteria but persistent anemia or thrombocytopenia was PR. MRD: Lymph \>0.01% of blood/BM WBCs.
Percentage of Participants With Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 38 Cells >/=30% in Peripheral BloodPost-Induction Phase: at 6 months; during Maintenance Phase: at Cycles 9, 12, 15, 18 (cycle length = 2 months); during Follow-Up: at Follow-Up Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36Percentages of participants with CD38 expression by \>/=30% of CLL cells during the Induction Phase, Maintenance Phase, and Follow-Up were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesPost-Induction Phase: at 6 months; during Maintenance Phase: at Cycles 9, 12, 15, 18 (cycle length = 2 months)Percentages of participants with genetic abnormalities (deletion 6q, deletion 11q22-q23, deletion p53, trisomy 12, and deletion 13q14) in the course of the disease during the Induction Phase and Maintenance Phase were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) ExpressionPost-Induction Phase: at 6 months; during Maintenance Phase: at Cycles 9, 12, 15, 18 (cycle length = 2 months); during Follow-Up: at Follow-Up Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36Percentages of participants with positive and negative ZAP-70 expression during the Induction Phase, Maintenance Phase, and Follow-Up were reported. Positive ZAP-70 was defined as ZAP-70 expression by \>/=20% of CLL cells. Negative ZAP-70 was defined as ZAP-70 expression by \<20% of CLL cells.
Percentage of Participants With Immunoglobulin Heavy Locus (IgH) RearrangementPost-Induction Phase: at 6 months; during Maintenance Phase: at Cycles 9, 12, 15, 18 (cycle length = 2 months); during Follow-Up: at Follow-Up Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36Percentages of participants with IgH rearrangement during the Induction Phase, Maintenance Phase, and Follow-Up were reported.
Treatment-Free Survival (TFS)Baseline up to PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 92 months)TFS was defined time from start of study treatment until participant received new chemotherapy/immunotherapy because of PD and to reduce the disease with palliative or curative intent. PD was defined as new ADPs (1.5 cm), HSM, RS, or other infiltrated organs; \>/=50% increase in size of Baseline prior ADPs or HSM in participants with PR; Lymph increase \>/=50% in peripheral blood with B Lymph \>/=5000/mm\^3; cytopenia attributable to CLL. Progression of any cytopenia (not related to autoimmune cytopenia) reported as a 2-g/dL decrease in basal Hb, Hb \<10 g/dL, \>/=50% decrease in basal Plt count, or count \<100,000/mm\^3 at \>/=3 months post-treatment was defined as PD if BM biopsy confirmed infiltration of clonal CLL cells.

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 86 participants were enrolled in 29 centers in Spain in this two-phase study (Induction Phase and Maintenance Phase).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rituximab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide
Participants received rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 as IV infusion on Day 0 of Cycle 1 and 500 mg/m\^2 as IV infusion on Day 1 of Cycles 2-6 (cycle length = 28 days); fludarabine 25 mg/m\^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle and cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m\^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle during the Induction Phase. Participants with a PR or CR and appropriate neutrophil conditions received maintenance treatment with rituximab (375 mg/m\^2 as IV infusion every 2 months) from 3 months after Day 1 Cycle 6 up to a total of 18 doses or up to 3 years after Cycle 6 of Induction Phase.
84
Total84

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Induction Phase (6 Months)Disease Progression1
Induction Phase (6 Months)Eligibility Criteria Violation2
Induction Phase (6 Months)Physician Decision3
Induction Phase (6 Months)Unacceptable Toxicity6
Maintenance Phase (36 Months)Death2
Maintenance Phase (36 Months)Disease Progression9
Maintenance Phase (36 Months)Physician Decision1
Maintenance Phase (36 Months)Protocol Violation1
Maintenance Phase (36 Months)Unacceptable Toxicity16
Maintenance Phase (36 Months)Withdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRituximab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide
Age, Continuous57.92 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.87
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
57 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
82 / 86
serious
Total, serious adverse events
35 / 86

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With CR Achieved After the Rituximab, Fludarabine, and Cyclophosphamide Regimen

CR was defined as no adenopathies (ADPs) and visceromegalies (VSMs) in physical examination (PE); no general symptoms (Sx); lymphocytes (Lymph) in peripheral blood less than (\<) 4000 per cubic millimeter (mm\^3); normalization of peripheral blood parameters: neutrophils (Neut) greater than (\>) 1500/mm\^3, platelets (Plt) \>100,000/mm\^3, hemoglobin (Hb) \>11 grams per deciliter (g/dL) without transfusion; normocellular bone marrow (BM) with \<30% Lymph; BM aspirate/biopsy with no evidence of infiltration of lymphoid nodules.

Time frame: Month 9

Population: ITT Population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and met inclusion/exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With CR Achieved After the Rituximab, Fludarabine, and Cyclophosphamide Regimen95.2 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR: time from CR/PR to MRD/PD. PD: new ADP (1.5 cm), HSM, RS, other infiltrated organs or \>/=50% increase size in those with PR; blood Lymph increase \>/=50% with B Lymph \>/=5000/mm\^3; cytopenia due to CLL. Progression of (nonautoimmune) cytopenia: 2-g/dL decrease basal Hb, Hb \<10 g/dL, \>/=50% decrease basal Plt or \<100,000/mm\^3 at \>/=3 months post-treatment was PD if clonal CLL cell infiltration on BM biopsy. CR: no ADP/VSM in PE; no general Sx; blood Lymph \<4000/mm\^3; Neut \>1500/mm\^3; Plt \>100,000/mm\^3; Hb \>11 g/dL (no transfusion); normocellular BM with \<30% Lymph; BM aspirate/biopsy with no lymphoid nodule infiltration. PR: \>50% decrease blood Lymph; \>50% decrease in total sum up to 6 ADPs or baseline ADP of LD, no new/enlargement of prior ADP; \>50% decrease VSM; Neut \>1500/mm\^3 or \>50% increase; Plt \>100,000/mm\^3 or \>50% increase; Hb \>11.0 g/dL or \>50% increase (no transfusion). All CR criteria but persistent anemia or thrombocytopenia was PR. MRD: Lymph \>0.01% of blood/BM WBCs.

Time frame: From first CR or PR up to detectable MRD or disease occurrence/PD, whichever occurred first (up to 92 months)

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who achieved a clinical response of CR or PR were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamideDuration of Response (DOR)NA Years
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as time from treatment start to death of the participant. For all other participants, the last follow-up available was taken as the last control. If the participant had not completed the study, the date of the last visit available was considered. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methodology.

Time frame: Baseline up to death due to any cause (up to 92 months)

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamideOverall Survival (OS)7.51 Years
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Died

Time frame: Baseline up to death due to any cause (up to 92 months)

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants Who Died23.2 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR Among Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry

CR: no ADPs and VSMs in PE; no general Sx; Lymph in peripheral blood \<4000/mm\^3; normalization of peripheral blood parameters: Neut \>1500/mm\^3, Plt \>100,000/mm\^3, Hb \>11 g/dL without transfusion; normocellular BM with \<30% Lymph; BM aspirate/biopsy with no evidence of infiltration of lymphoid nodules. PR: decrease \>50% in Lymph in peripheral blood; reduction in ADPs \>50% in total sum of up to 6 ADPs or in the baseline ADP of largest diameter (LD), no new ADP or enlargement of a prior ADP; \>50% decrease in VSM; Neut \>1500/mm\^3 or \>50% increase from Baseline; Plt \>100,000/mm\^3 or \>50% increase from Baseline; Hb \>11.0 g/dL or \>50% increase from Baseline value without transfusion. Participants who met all CR criteria but had persistent anemia or thrombocytopenia were considered as PR. Negative MRD: Lymph \<0.01% of all white blood cells (WBCs) in blood or BM after two consecutive measurements. Analysis performed only in blood during the Maintenance Phase and Follow-Up.

Time frame: Post-Induction Phase: at 6 months; during Maintenance Phase: at Cycles 9, 12, 15, 18 (cycle length = 2 months); during Follow-Up: at Follow-Up Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 36

Population: ITT Population. Only those with negative MRD were included in the analysis. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable for indicated category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR Among Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryPost-IP: Blood MRD Negative100.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR Among Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryPost-IP: BM MRD Negative100.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR Among Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryMP (9 Cycles): Blood MRD Negative100.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR Among Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryMP (12 Cycles): Blood MRD Negative100.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR Among Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryMP (15 Cycles): Blood MRD Negative100.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR Among Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryMP (18 Cycles): Blood MRD Negative100.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR Among Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry6 Months FU: Blood MRD Negative100.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR Among Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry12 Months FU: Blood MRD Negative100.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR Among Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry18 Months FU: Blood MRD Negative100.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR Among Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry24 Months FU: Blood MRD Negative100.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR Among Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry36 Months FU: Blood MRD Negative100.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry

CR was defined as no ADPs and VSMs in PE; no general Sx; Lymph in peripheral blood \<4000/mm\^3; normalization of peripheral blood parameters: Neut \>1500/mm\^3, Plt \>100,000/mm\^3, Hb \>11 g/dL without transfusion; normocellular BM with \<30% Lymph; BM aspirate/biopsy with no evidence of infiltration of lymphoid nodules. PR was defined as decrease \>50% in Lymph in peripheral blood; reduction in ADPs \>50% in total sum of up to 6 ADPs or in the baseline ADP of largest diameter (LD), no new ADP or enlargement of a prior ADP; \>50% decrease in VSM; Neut \>1500/mm\^3 or \>50% increase from Baseline; Plt \>100,000/mm\^3 or \>50% increase from Baseline; Hb \>11.0 g/dL or \>50% increase from Baseline value without transfusion. Participants who met all CR criteria but had persistent anemia or thrombocytopenia were considered as PR.

Time frame: Post-Induction Phase (IP): at 6 months; during Maintenance Phase (MP): at Cycles 9, 12, 15, 18 (cycle length = 2 months); during Follow-Up (FU): at Follow-Up Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36

Population: ITT Population. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable for indicated category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryPost-IP: CR75.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryPost-IP: PR13.1 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryMP (9 Cycles): CR89.4 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryMP (9 Cycles): PR6.4 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryMP (12 Cycles): CR87.9 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryMP (12 Cycles): PR6.1 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryMP (15 Cycles): CR90.9 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryMP (15 Cycles): PR4.5 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryMP (18 Cycles): CR88.1 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow CytometryMP (18 Cycles): PR8.5 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry6 Months FU: CR83.3 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry6 Months FU: PR0.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry12 Months FU: CR94.4 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry12 Months FU: PR0.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry18 Months FU: CR100.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry18 Months FU: PR0.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry24 Months FU: CR93.1 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry24 Months FU: PR0.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry30 Months FU: CR100.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry30 Months FU: PR0.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry36 Months FU: CR100.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of CR or PR as Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry36 Months FU: PR0.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 38 Cells >/=30% in Peripheral Blood

Percentages of participants with CD38 expression by \>/=30% of CLL cells during the Induction Phase, Maintenance Phase, and Follow-Up were reported.

Time frame: Post-Induction Phase: at 6 months; during Maintenance Phase: at Cycles 9, 12, 15, 18 (cycle length = 2 months); during Follow-Up: at Follow-Up Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36

Population: ITT Population. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable for indicated category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 38 Cells >/=30% in Peripheral BloodPost-IP47.6 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 38 Cells >/=30% in Peripheral BloodMP (9 Cycles)44.4 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 38 Cells >/=30% in Peripheral BloodMP (12 Cycles)45.5 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 38 Cells >/=30% in Peripheral BloodMP (15 Cycles)47.6 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 38 Cells >/=30% in Peripheral BloodMP (18 Cycles)47.4 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 38 Cells >/=30% in Peripheral Blood6 Months FU66.7 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 38 Cells >/=30% in Peripheral Blood12 Months FU45.7 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 38 Cells >/=30% in Peripheral Blood18 Months FU100.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 38 Cells >/=30% in Peripheral Blood24 Months FU41.4 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 38 Cells >/=30% in Peripheral Blood30 Months FU50.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 38 Cells >/=30% in Peripheral Blood36 Months FU35.5 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With CR With Incomplete Bone Marrow Recovery (CRi)

Participants with CRi were those who met all CR criteria (including BM examinations) but had persistent anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia apparently unrelated to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) but related to drug toxicity. CR: no ADPs and VSMs in PE; no general Sx; Lymph in peripheral blood \<4000/mm\^3; normalization of peripheral blood parameters: Neut \>1500/mm\^3, Plt \>100,000/mm\^3, Hb \>11 g/dL without transfusion; normocellular BM with \<30% Lymph; BM aspirate/biopsy with no evidence of infiltration of lymphoid nodules.

Time frame: Baseline up to progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 92 months)

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With CR With Incomplete Bone Marrow Recovery (CRi)7.1 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Genetic Abnormalities

Percentages of participants with genetic abnormalities (deletion 6q, deletion 11q22-q23, deletion p53, trisomy 12, and deletion 13q14) in the course of the disease during the Induction Phase and Maintenance Phase were reported.

Time frame: Post-Induction Phase: at 6 months; during Maintenance Phase: at Cycles 9, 12, 15, 18 (cycle length = 2 months)

Population: ITT Population. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable for indicated category. Designation of 'MP (xC)' refers to number of cycles in Maintenance Phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesPost-IP: Deletion 6q3.6 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesPost-IP: Deletion 11q22-q2326.2 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesPost-IP: Deletion p534.8 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesPost-IP: Trisomy 1215.5 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesPost-IP: Deletion 13q1450.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (9C): Deletion 6q4.3 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (9C): Deletion 11q22-q2325.5 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (9C): Deletion p530.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (9C): Trisomy 1217.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (9C): Deletion 13q1455.3 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (12C): Deletion 6q3.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (12C): Deletion 11q22-q2321.2 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (12C): Deletion p530.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (12C): Trisomy 12 (n= 33)21.2 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (12C): Deletion 13q1451.5 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (15C): Deletion 6q4.5 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (15C): Deletion 11q22-q2331.8 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (15C): Deletion p530.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (15C): Trisomy 1218.2 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (15C): Deletion 13q1459.1 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (18C): Deletion 6q3.4 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (18C): Deletion 11q22-q2323.7 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (18C): Deletion p530.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (18C): Trisomy 1218.6 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Genetic AbnormalitiesMP (18C): Deletion 13q1449.2 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Immunoglobulin Heavy Locus (IgH) Rearrangement

Percentages of participants with IgH rearrangement during the Induction Phase, Maintenance Phase, and Follow-Up were reported.

Time frame: Post-Induction Phase: at 6 months; during Maintenance Phase: at Cycles 9, 12, 15, 18 (cycle length = 2 months); during Follow-Up: at Follow-Up Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36

Population: ITT Population. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable for indicated category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Immunoglobulin Heavy Locus (IgH) RearrangementPost-IP36.2 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Immunoglobulin Heavy Locus (IgH) RearrangementMP (9 Cycles)37.1 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Immunoglobulin Heavy Locus (IgH) RearrangementMP (12 Cycles)20.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Immunoglobulin Heavy Locus (IgH) RearrangementMP (15 Cycles)29.4 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Immunoglobulin Heavy Locus (IgH) RearrangementMP (18 Cycles)33.3 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Immunoglobulin Heavy Locus (IgH) Rearrangement6 Months FU100.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Immunoglobulin Heavy Locus (IgH) Rearrangement12 Months FU37.9 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Immunoglobulin Heavy Locus (IgH) Rearrangement18 Months FU50.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Immunoglobulin Heavy Locus (IgH) Rearrangement24 Months FU33.3 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Immunoglobulin Heavy Locus (IgH) Rearrangement30 Months FU0.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Immunoglobulin Heavy Locus (IgH) Rearrangement36 Months FU45.8 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With PD or Death

PD was defined as new ADPs (1.5 centimeters \[cm\]), hepato-/splenomegaly (HSM), Richter syndrome (RS), or other infiltrated organs; greater than or equal to (\>/=) 50% increase in size of Baseline prior ADPs or HSM in participants with PR; Lymph increase \>/=50% in peripheral blood with B Lymph \>/=5000/mm\^3; cytopenia attributable to CLL. Progression of any cytopenia (not related to autoimmune cytopenia) reported as a 2-g/dL decrease in basal Hb, Hb \<10 g/dL, \>/=50% decrease in basal Plt count, or count \<100,000/mm\^3 at \>/=3 months post-treatment was defined as PD if BM biopsy confirmed infiltration of clonal CLL cells.

Time frame: Baseline up to PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 92 months)

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With PD or Death39.29 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) Expression

Percentages of participants with positive and negative ZAP-70 expression during the Induction Phase, Maintenance Phase, and Follow-Up were reported. Positive ZAP-70 was defined as ZAP-70 expression by \>/=20% of CLL cells. Negative ZAP-70 was defined as ZAP-70 expression by \<20% of CLL cells.

Time frame: Post-Induction Phase: at 6 months; during Maintenance Phase: at Cycles 9, 12, 15, 18 (cycle length = 2 months); during Follow-Up: at Follow-Up Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36

Population: ITT Population. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable for indicated category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) ExpressionPost-IP: Positive57.3 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) ExpressionPost-IP: Negative42.7 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) ExpressionMP (9 Cycles): Positive57.5 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) ExpressionMP (9 Cycles): Negative42.5 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) ExpressionMP (12 Cycles): Positive62.1 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) ExpressionMP (12 Cycles): Negative37.9 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) ExpressionMP (15 Cycles): Positive57.1 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) ExpressionMP (15 Cycles): Negative42.9 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) ExpressionMP (18 Cycles): Positive54.9 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) ExpressionMP (18 Cycles): Negative45.1 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) Expression6 Months FU: Positive63.6 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) Expression6 Months FU: Negative36.4 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) Expression12 Months FU: Positive60.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) Expression12 Months FU: Negative40.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) Expression18 Months FU: Positive100.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) Expression18 Months FU: Negative0.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) Expression24 Months FU: Positive59.3 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) Expression24 Months FU: Negative40.7 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) Expression30 Months FU: Positive100.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) Expression30 Months FU: Negative0.0 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) Expression36 Months FU: Positive57.1 Percentage of Participants
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Positive and Negative Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70 (ZAP-70) Expression36 Months FU: Negative42.9 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as time from start of study treatment to PD or death, whichever occurred first. For other participants, last follow-up available was taken as last control. If participant did not complete study, date of last visit available was considered. PFS was estimated using KM methodology. PD was defined as new ADPs (1.5 cm), HSM, RS, or other infiltrated organs; \>/=50% increase in size of Baseline prior ADPs or HSM in participants with PR; Lymph increase \>/=50% in peripheral blood with B Lymph \>/=5000/mm\^3; cytopenia attributable to CLL. Progression of any cytopenia (not related to autoimmune cytopenia) reported as a 2-g/dL decrease in basal Hb, Hb \<10 g/dL, \>/=50% decrease in basal Plt count, or count \<100,000/mm\^3 at \>/=3 months post-treatment was defined as PD if BM biopsy confirmed infiltration of clonal CLL cells.

Time frame: Baseline up to PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 92 months)

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamideProgression-Free Survival (PFS)6.96 Years
Secondary

Treatment-Free Survival (TFS)

TFS was defined time from start of study treatment until participant received new chemotherapy/immunotherapy because of PD and to reduce the disease with palliative or curative intent. PD was defined as new ADPs (1.5 cm), HSM, RS, or other infiltrated organs; \>/=50% increase in size of Baseline prior ADPs or HSM in participants with PR; Lymph increase \>/=50% in peripheral blood with B Lymph \>/=5000/mm\^3; cytopenia attributable to CLL. Progression of any cytopenia (not related to autoimmune cytopenia) reported as a 2-g/dL decrease in basal Hb, Hb \<10 g/dL, \>/=50% decrease in basal Plt count, or count \<100,000/mm\^3 at \>/=3 months post-treatment was defined as PD if BM biopsy confirmed infiltration of clonal CLL cells.

Time frame: Baseline up to PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 92 months)

Population: ITT Population. Only those who received new chemotherapy/immunotherapy, as per definitions for TFS, were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rituximab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamideTreatment-Free Survival (TFS)4.13 Years

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026