Skip to content

A Study of CellCept (Mycophenolate Mofetil) in Combination Therapy in Liver Transplant Patients.

A Randomized, Open Label Study Comparing the Effect of CellCept With Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Tacrolimus and a Corticosteroid-sparing Regimen Versus Fixed Dose CellCept, Tacrolimus and Corticosteroids Maintained up to 6 Months, on Acute Rejection and Safety in Liver Transplant Patients.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00545402
Enrollment
180
Registered
2007-10-17
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2011-07-31
Last updated
2014-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Transplantation

Brief summary

This 2 arm study will compare the efficacy and safety of two CellCept-containing treatment regimens in de novo liver transplant patients. Patients will be randomized into one of two groups, to receive either CellCept (at a starting dose of 3g/day po, adjusted according to exposure) standard dose tacrolimus and corticosteroids (10-15 mg/kg i.v. on day 0), or fixed dose CellCept 2g/day po, standard dose tacrolimus and corticosteroids (10-15mg/kg i.v. on day 0, then reducing from 20mg to 5mg over 6 months, and discontinuing after 6 months). The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Interventions

DRUGMycophenolate mofetil, adjusted dose

3 g/d PO BID during meals from Day 0 to Day 4, followed by dose adjustment based on AUC using the Bayesian method with limited sampling strategy on Days 5 and 14, Months 1, 13, 6, 9, and 12.

DRUGTacrolimus

Target trough level of 8-2 ng/mL from Day 0 to Month 1, adjusted to a target trough level of 3-8 ng/mL from the end of Month 1 through Month 12

DRUGCorticosteroids, IV

10-15 mg/kg IV pre-operation on Day 0

DRUGMycophenolate mofetil, Standard dose

2 g/d PO BID during meals from Day 0 to Month 12

DRUGCorticosteroids, PO

20 mg/d QDS from Day 0 through Month 1; 15 mg/day, TID from the end of Month 1 through Month 2; 10 mg/d BID from the end of Month 2 through Month 3; and 5 mg/d once per day from the end of Month 3 through Month 6.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients, \>=18 years of age; * recipient of a first orthotopic liver transplant.

Exclusion criteria

* history of organ transplants; * patient receiving a multi-organ transplant; * calculated creatinine clearance \<=30mL/min before transplant; * leukocyte count \< 2000/mm3 at randomization; * history of cancer within past 5 years, except for successfully treated basal cell or squamous cell cancer, or in situ cervical cancer; * pregnant or breast-feeding females, or females of childbearing age not using effective contraception.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) According to Banff Criteria up to 12 Months Post-TransplantDays 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12, 28 days after Month 12 or last dose of study treatment, and 6 and 12 months after the last dose of study treatmentBanff criteria required at least 2 of the 3 following features for a histopathological diagnosis of acute rejection: portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation, and venous endothelial inflammation. Each item was graded from 0 to 3 where 0 equals (=) mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. The sum of the 3 individual scores, from 0 to 9, corresponded to the Rejection Activity Index (RAI). If RAI = 0, 1, or 2, there was no evidence of rejection. If RAI = 3, there was borderline acute rejection. If RAI = 4 or 5, there was mild acute rejection. If RAI = 6 or 7, there was moderate acute rejection. If RAI = 8 or 9, there was severe acute rejection.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Graft LossDays 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12, 28 days after Month 12 or last dose of study treatment, and 6 and 12 months after the last dose of study treatment.Graft survival was defined as the time between the randomization date and the graft loss date. Participants were censored at the date of last follow up, the date of last contact or premature withdrawal, and date of death.
Graft SurvivalDays 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12, 28 days after Month 12 or last dose of study treatment, and 6 and 12 months after the last dose of study treatment.The median time, in months, between randomization and graft loss event. Participants were censored at the date of last follow up, the date of last contact or premature withdrawal, and date of death.
Overall Survival (OS) at Month 12 - Percentage of Participants With an EventDays 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12OS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and death up to Month 12. Participants were censored at the date of last follow up and the date of last contact or premature withdrawal.
Overall Survival at Month 12Days 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12The median time, in months, between randomization and OS event. Participants were censored at the date of last follow up and the date of last contact or premature withdrawal.
Percentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewDays 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12The percentage of participants with biopsies of grafts evaluated by central review and scored according to Banff criteria at Month 12 post-transplant.

Countries

France

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CS
Participants received MMF tablets or capsules, 3 g/d, PO, BID with meals from Day 0 to Day 4; thereafter the dose was adjusted based on total exposure (AUC) using the Bayesian method with limited sampling strategy on Days 5 and 14 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Participants also received tacrolimus capsules, adjusted to a target trough level of 8-12 ng/mL from Day 0 through Month 1; the dose was adjusted to reach a target trough level of 3-8 ng/mL from the end of Month 1 through Month 12. Participants also received an IV bolus of methylprednisolone 10-15 mg/kg pre-operative on Day 0 per standard practice of the center.
90
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CS
Participants received MMF capsules or tablets, 2 g/d, PO, BID with meals from Day 0 to Month 12; tacrolimus capsules, adjusted to a target trough level of 8-12 ng/mL from Day 0 to Month 1; the dose was reduced to reach a target trough level of 3-8 ng/mL from the end of Month 1 through Month 12; and IV bolus of prednisone, 10-15 mg/kg, pre-operative on Day 0 followed by prednisone tablets, 20 mg/d, PO, from Day 0 through Month 1; 15 mg/d, PO, from the end of Month 1 through Month 2; 10 mg/d, PO, from the end of Month 2 through Month 3; and 5 mg/d from the end of Month 3 through Month 6. Prednisone was discontinued from Month 7 through end of treatment.
90
Total180

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath57
Overall StudyDiscontinuation of treatment179
Overall StudyGraft loss24
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyReason not specified11
Overall StudyUse of unauthorized immunosuppressant87
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAdjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CSFixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CSTotal
Age, Continuous53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
55.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
54.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants19 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
74 Participants71 Participants145 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
91 / 9191 / 92
serious
Total, serious adverse events
70 / 9169 / 92

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) According to Banff Criteria up to 12 Months Post-Transplant

Banff criteria required at least 2 of the 3 following features for a histopathological diagnosis of acute rejection: portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation, and venous endothelial inflammation. Each item was graded from 0 to 3 where 0 equals (=) mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. The sum of the 3 individual scores, from 0 to 9, corresponded to the Rejection Activity Index (RAI). If RAI = 0, 1, or 2, there was no evidence of rejection. If RAI = 3, there was borderline acute rejection. If RAI = 4 or 5, there was mild acute rejection. If RAI = 6 or 7, there was moderate acute rejection. If RAI = 8 or 9, there was severe acute rejection.

Time frame: Days 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12, 28 days after Month 12 or last dose of study treatment, and 6 and 12 months after the last dose of study treatment

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) According to Banff Criteria up to 12 Months Post-Transplant8.0 percentage of participants
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) According to Banff Criteria up to 12 Months Post-Transplant8.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Graft Survival

The median time, in months, between randomization and graft loss event. Participants were censored at the date of last follow up, the date of last contact or premature withdrawal, and date of death.

Time frame: Days 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12, 28 days after Month 12 or last dose of study treatment, and 6 and 12 months after the last dose of study treatment.

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CSGraft Survival12.9 months
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CSGraft Survival12.9 months
Secondary

Overall Survival at Month 12

The median time, in months, between randomization and OS event. Participants were censored at the date of last follow up and the date of last contact or premature withdrawal.

Time frame: Days 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CSOverall Survival at Month 1212.9 months
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CSOverall Survival at Month 1212.9 months
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) at Month 12 - Percentage of Participants With an Event

OS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and death up to Month 12. Participants were censored at the date of last follow up and the date of last contact or premature withdrawal.

Time frame: Days 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CSOverall Survival (OS) at Month 12 - Percentage of Participants With an Event8.9 percentage of participants
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CSOverall Survival (OS) at Month 12 - Percentage of Participants With an Event11.1 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.7091Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central Review

The percentage of participants with biopsies of grafts evaluated by central review and scored according to Banff criteria at Month 12 post-transplant.

Time frame: Days 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12

Population: ITT population; only participants with evaluable biopsies were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewNormal liver4.8 percentage of participants
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewChronic hepatitis26.2 percentage of participants
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewMinor lesions4.8 percentage of participants
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewAcute rejection0.0 percentage of participants
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewChronic rejection7.1 percentage of participants
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewVascular lesions35.7 percentage of participants
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewPathology of biliary obstruction4.8 percentage of participants
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewLobular hepatitis4.8 percentage of participants
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewRecurrence of initial autoimmune disease0.0 percentage of participants
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewOther35.7 percentage of participants
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewLobular hepatitis2.9 percentage of participants
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewVascular lesions11.4 percentage of participants
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewNormal liver11.4 percentage of participants
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewOther45.7 percentage of participants
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewMinor lesions17.1 percentage of participants
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewPathology of biliary obstruction5.7 percentage of participants
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewAcute rejection0.0 percentage of participants
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewRecurrence of initial autoimmune disease0.0 percentage of participants
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewChronic rejection2.9 percentage of participants
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central ReviewChronic hepatitis22.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss

Graft survival was defined as the time between the randomization date and the graft loss date. Participants were censored at the date of last follow up, the date of last contact or premature withdrawal, and date of death.

Time frame: Days 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12, 28 days after Month 12 or last dose of study treatment, and 6 and 12 months after the last dose of study treatment.

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants With Graft Loss2.2 percentage of participants
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CSPercentage of Participants With Graft Loss5.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.2611Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026