Skip to content

Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a New Artificial Tear for Use After LASIK Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00544713
Enrollment
228
Registered
2007-10-16
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2008-06-30
Last updated
2011-12-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndrome

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new artificial tear for the treatment of dry eye that may occur after LASIK surgery

Interventions

As directed by Investigator at the end of each study visit: 1 to 2 drops in each eye, 1 to 2 times a day up to every hour while awake

As directed by Investigator at the end of each study visit: 1 to 2 drops in each eye, 1 to 2 times a day up to every hour while awake

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Candidate for bilateral LASIK surgery for myopia correction in the range of -1.00 to -8.00 diopters

Exclusion criteria

* Dry eye signs and symptoms * Preoperative soft or rigid contact lens wear within last 7 or 30 days, respectively * Pregnancy or planning pregnancy * Uncontrolled systemic disease * Use of systemic medications affecting dry eye

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post LASIK Dry Eye Symptoms as Measured by Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI©) Score at Day 90Day 90Measured on 12 domains (categories); a 5-point scale for each domain (0 = best, no dry eye symptoms, 4 = worst, constant dry eye symptoms). Sum of the domain scores is normalized (standardized) to a severity scale of 0-100 (0 = no symptoms (best score), 100 = maximum severity (worst score)).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90Day 90A questionnaire was administered to all patients to evaluate the acceptability of the Artificial Tears (referred to as AT). Percentage of patients responding either Agree or Strongly Agree at day 90 was tabulated. The potential response categories included Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree and Strongly Disagree.
Patient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90Day 90A patient acceptability - sensory questionnaire was administered to all patients to evaluate the acceptability of the Artificial Tears (AT). Percentage of patients responding either Agree or Strongly Agree at day 90 was tabulated. The potential response categories included Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree and Strongly Disagree.
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Status at Day 90Day 90BCVA status at Day 90 reported as the number of patients whose scores were either Better, No Change, or Worse than their scores at baseline. The status was tabulated as number of lines read correctly at Day 90 minus the number of lines read correctly at baseline. Better equals increase of 2 lines or more; No Change equals change between -2 to +2 lines; Worse equals decrease of 2 lines or more. BCVA is measured using a special eye chart a nd is reported as the number of lines (5 letters per line) read correctly.
Change From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Topography as Measured by Pentacam at Day 90Baseline, Day 90Change from Baseline in corneal topography of the worse eye as measured using a Pentacam system which calculates a number. Corneal topography is a non-invasive medical imaging technique for mapping the surface of the eye. The Pentacam system measures the pupil and anterior segment (the front part of the eye) which provides a range from 10 (best) to 60 (worst). A negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Topography Measured by Humphrey Atlas at Day 90Baseline, Day 90Change from Baseline in corneal topography of the worse eye as measured by a Humphrey Atlas system which calculates a number. Corneal topography is anon-invasive medical imaging technique for mapping the surface curvature of the cornea (the outer structure of the eye). The higher the number the more irregular the cornea. A Humphrey Atlas system detects irregular conditions in the cornea with a range from 0 = best to 2.5 = worst. A negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Schirmer's Test at Day 90Baseline, Day 90Change from baseline in Schirmer's Test results at Day 90 in the worse eye. The Schirmer's Test measures the rate of the secretion of tears produced by the eye over 5 minutes. The results indicate the presence of dry eye (Normal = greater than or equal to 15 millimeters (mm) of tears, Dry Eye = less than 15 mm of tears). The smaller the number, the more severe the dry eye.
Change From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Staining With Fluorescein at Day 90Baseline, Day 90Change from Baseline in corneal staining of the worse eye at Day 90. Sum of corneal staining over 5 zones; each zone was measured on a modified Oxford Scheme (0 = no staining and 5 = severe staining), for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 25. The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye condition. A negative change from baseline represents a decrease in corneal staining (improvement).
Change From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Conjunctival Staining With Lissamine Green at Day 90Baseline, Day 90Change from Baseline in conjunctival staining of the worse eye using Lissamine Green staining procedure. Sum of conjunctival staining over 6 zones; each zone was measured on a modified Oxford Scheme (0 = no staining and 5 = severe staining), with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 30. The higher the grade score, the worse dry eye condition. A negative number change from baseline represents a decrease in corneal staining (improvement).
Change From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) at Day 90Baseline, Day 90Change from Baseline in TBUT of the worse eye at Day 90. TBUT is the time required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. A short TBUT is a sign of poor tear film. A positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in TBUT (improvement).
Change From Baseline in Study Product Usage at Day 90Baseline, Day 90Change from baseline in the study product usage (average number of uses per day) at Day 90. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in eye drop usage (improvement).
Change From Baseline of Total Higher Order Aberration (HOA) of the Worse Eye at Day 90Baseline, Day 90Change from Baseline in total HOA of the worse eye. The total HOA number is measured using a machine that calculates and detects changes in the cornea which could occur post Lasik surgery. A negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60Day 14, Day 60Number of patients prescribed to each dosing regimen at Day 14 and Day 60. At each visit from Day 14 (the first post-operative visit) to Day 60, patients were prescribed to 1 to 4 dosing regimens based on the investigator's clinical evaluation. Dosing schedule options were: At least every 2 hours while awake, 6 to 8 times per day, 3 to 5 times per day, at 1 to 2 times per day.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial Tear
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin based artificial tear
114
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial Tear
Carboxymethylcellulose based artificial tear
114
Total228

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCarboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearCarboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearTotal
Age, Customized
<40 Years
88 participants92 participants180 participants
Age, Customized
>= 40 Years
26 participants22 participants48 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
62 Participants51 Participants113 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
52 Participants63 Participants115 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
88 / 11482 / 114
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1140 / 114

Outcome results

Primary

Post LASIK Dry Eye Symptoms as Measured by Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI©) Score at Day 90

Measured on 12 domains (categories); a 5-point scale for each domain (0 = best, no dry eye symptoms, 4 = worst, constant dry eye symptoms). Sum of the domain scores is normalized (standardized) to a severity scale of 0-100 (0 = no symptoms (best score), 100 = maximum severity (worst score)).

Time frame: Day 90

Population: Intent to Treat population defined as all patients who started the study and were randomized

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPost LASIK Dry Eye Symptoms as Measured by Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI©) Score at Day 908.32 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.125
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPost LASIK Dry Eye Symptoms as Measured by Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI©) Score at Day 906.43 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.036
Secondary

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Status at Day 90

BCVA status at Day 90 reported as the number of patients whose scores were either Better, No Change, or Worse than their scores at baseline. The status was tabulated as number of lines read correctly at Day 90 minus the number of lines read correctly at baseline. Better equals increase of 2 lines or more; No Change equals change between -2 to +2 lines; Worse equals decrease of 2 lines or more. BCVA is measured using a special eye chart a nd is reported as the number of lines (5 letters per line) read correctly.

Time frame: Day 90

Population: Intent to Treat includes all patients who started the study and were randomized. One patient's status in the first arm was not available at Day 90 and was not evaluated for this outcome measure therefore only 113 patients were analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Status at Day 90Better8 Number of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Status at Day 90No Change104 Number of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Status at Day 90Worse1 Number of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Status at Day 90Better7 Number of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Status at Day 90No Change107 Number of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Status at Day 90Worse0 Number of Patients
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Study Product Usage at Day 90

Change from baseline in the study product usage (average number of uses per day) at Day 90. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in eye drop usage (improvement).

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Population: Intent-to-Treat includes all patients that started the study and were randomized. Only those patients who reported actual eye drop use at Baseline and on Day 90 were analyzed. This is indicated in parenthesis as (number of patients in arm 1 who reported eye drop use/number of patients in arm 2 who reported eye drop use).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline in Study Product Usage at Day 90Baseline (108/108)7.9 Number of study product uses per dayStandard Deviation 3.16
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline in Study Product Usage at Day 90Change from Baseline at Day 90 (108/105)-4.9 Number of study product uses per dayStandard Deviation 3.38
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline in Study Product Usage at Day 90Baseline (108/108)7.9 Number of study product uses per dayStandard Deviation 4.89
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline in Study Product Usage at Day 90Change from Baseline at Day 90 (108/105)-4.5 Number of study product uses per dayStandard Deviation 5.97
Secondary

Change From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Conjunctival Staining With Lissamine Green at Day 90

Change from Baseline in conjunctival staining of the worse eye using Lissamine Green staining procedure. Sum of conjunctival staining over 6 zones; each zone was measured on a modified Oxford Scheme (0 = no staining and 5 = severe staining), with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 30. The higher the grade score, the worse dry eye condition. A negative number change from baseline represents a decrease in corneal staining (improvement).

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Population: Intent-to-Treat population defined as all patients who started the study and were randomized

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Conjunctival Staining With Lissamine Green at Day 90Baseline1.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.98
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Conjunctival Staining With Lissamine Green at Day 90Change from Baseline at Day 900.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.65
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Conjunctival Staining With Lissamine Green at Day 90Baseline0.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.32
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Conjunctival Staining With Lissamine Green at Day 90Change from Baseline at Day 90-0.3 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.24
Secondary

Change From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Staining With Fluorescein at Day 90

Change from Baseline in corneal staining of the worse eye at Day 90. Sum of corneal staining over 5 zones; each zone was measured on a modified Oxford Scheme (0 = no staining and 5 = severe staining), for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 25. The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye condition. A negative change from baseline represents a decrease in corneal staining (improvement).

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Population: Intent to Treat population defined as all patients who started the study and were randomized

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Staining With Fluorescein at Day 90Baseline0.5 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Staining With Fluorescein at Day 90Change from Baseline at Day 900.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.12
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Staining With Fluorescein at Day 90Baseline0.5 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.12
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Staining With Fluorescein at Day 90Change from Baseline at Day 900.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.47
Secondary

Change From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Topography as Measured by Pentacam at Day 90

Change from Baseline in corneal topography of the worse eye as measured using a Pentacam system which calculates a number. Corneal topography is a non-invasive medical imaging technique for mapping the surface of the eye. The Pentacam system measures the pupil and anterior segment (the front part of the eye) which provides a range from 10 (best) to 60 (worst). A negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Population: Intent-to-Treat population defined as all patients who started the study and were randomized

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Topography as Measured by Pentacam at Day 90Baseline31.95 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.941
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Topography as Measured by Pentacam at Day 90Change from Baseline at Day 90-2.12 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.321
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Topography as Measured by Pentacam at Day 90Baseline32.32 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.347
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Topography as Measured by Pentacam at Day 90Change from Baseline at Day 90-2.24 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.267
Secondary

Change From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Topography Measured by Humphrey Atlas at Day 90

Change from Baseline in corneal topography of the worse eye as measured by a Humphrey Atlas system which calculates a number. Corneal topography is anon-invasive medical imaging technique for mapping the surface curvature of the cornea (the outer structure of the eye). The higher the number the more irregular the cornea. A Humphrey Atlas system detects irregular conditions in the cornea with a range from 0 = best to 2.5 = worst. A negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Population: Intent-to-Treat population defined as all patients who started the study and were randomized

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Topography Measured by Humphrey Atlas at Day 90Baseline1.32 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.855
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Topography Measured by Humphrey Atlas at Day 90Change from Baseline at Day 90-0.49 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.899
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Topography Measured by Humphrey Atlas at Day 90Baseline1.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.456
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Corneal Topography Measured by Humphrey Atlas at Day 90Change from Baseline at Day 90-0.26 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.396
Secondary

Change From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Schirmer's Test at Day 90

Change from baseline in Schirmer's Test results at Day 90 in the worse eye. The Schirmer's Test measures the rate of the secretion of tears produced by the eye over 5 minutes. The results indicate the presence of dry eye (Normal = greater than or equal to 15 millimeters (mm) of tears, Dry Eye = less than 15 mm of tears). The smaller the number, the more severe the dry eye.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Population: Intent-to-Treat population defined as all patients who started the study and were randomized

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Schirmer's Test at Day 90Baseline16.3 Millimeters of TearsStandard Deviation 8.4
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Schirmer's Test at Day 90Change from Baseline at Day 90-0.3 Millimeters of TearsStandard Deviation 8.75
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Schirmer's Test at Day 90Baseline13.5 Millimeters of TearsStandard Deviation 6.3
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Schirmer's Test at Day 90Change from Baseline at Day 901.7 Millimeters of TearsStandard Deviation 9.59
Secondary

Change From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) at Day 90

Change from Baseline in TBUT of the worse eye at Day 90. TBUT is the time required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. A short TBUT is a sign of poor tear film. A positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in TBUT (improvement).

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Population: Intent-to-Treat population defined as all patients who started the study and were randomized

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) at Day 90Baseline13.66 Number of secondsStandard Deviation 6.133
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) at Day 90Change from Baseline at Day 90-0.92 Number of secondsStandard Deviation 6.013
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) at Day 90Baseline13.25 Number of secondsStandard Deviation 5.25
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of the Worse Eye in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) at Day 90Change from Baseline at Day 90-0.87 Number of secondsStandard Deviation 12.924
Secondary

Change From Baseline of Total Higher Order Aberration (HOA) of the Worse Eye at Day 90

Change from Baseline in total HOA of the worse eye. The total HOA number is measured using a machine that calculates and detects changes in the cornea which could occur post Lasik surgery. A negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Population: Intent-to-Treat population defined as all patients who started the study and were randomized

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of Total Higher Order Aberration (HOA) of the Worse Eye at Day 90Baseline0.521 MicronsStandard Deviation 0.1842
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of Total Higher Order Aberration (HOA) of the Worse Eye at Day 90Change from Baseline at Day 90-0.058 MicronsStandard Deviation 0.1509
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of Total Higher Order Aberration (HOA) of the Worse Eye at Day 90Baseline0.520 MicronsStandard Deviation 0.1845
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearChange From Baseline of Total Higher Order Aberration (HOA) of the Worse Eye at Day 90Change from Baseline at Day 90-0.047 MicronsStandard Deviation 0.1452
Secondary

Patient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90

A questionnaire was administered to all patients to evaluate the acceptability of the Artificial Tears (referred to as AT). Percentage of patients responding either Agree or Strongly Agree at day 90 was tabulated. The potential response categories included Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree and Strongly Disagree.

Time frame: Day 90

Population: Intent to Treat includes all patients who started the study are were randomized. Only those patients who answered the particular question on Day 90 were analyzed. This is indicated in parenthesis as (number of patients in the first arm who answered that specific question/Number of patients in the second arm who answered that specific question).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90Liked using these AT (112/110)88.4 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT helped eyes feel comfortable (112/110)94.6 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT were soothing to eyes (111/110)95.5 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT protected eyes from dryness (112/109)88.4 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT protected eyes from low humidity (112/110)78.6 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90Vision was normal few min.after AT use(112/110)93.8 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90Few min. after use, AT gave clear vision(111/110)94.6 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT helped eyes heal from surgery (112/110)83.9 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT helped eyes feel same as pre-LASIK (111/110)85.6 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90It's good to use AT after surgery(111/109)97.3 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT helped eyes heal from surgery (112/110)86.4 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90Liked using these AT (112/110)93.6 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90Vision was normal few min.after AT use(112/110)92.7 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT helped eyes feel comfortable (112/110)94.5 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90It's good to use AT after surgery(111/109)96.3 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT were soothing to eyes (111/110)95.4 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90Few min. after use, AT gave clear vision(111/110)94.5 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT protected eyes from dryness (112/109)89.9 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT helped eyes feel same as pre-LASIK (111/110)89.1 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability- Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT protected eyes from low humidity (112/110)82.7 Percentage of Patients
Secondary

Patient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90

A patient acceptability - sensory questionnaire was administered to all patients to evaluate the acceptability of the Artificial Tears (AT). Percentage of patients responding either Agree or Strongly Agree at day 90 was tabulated. The potential response categories included Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree and Strongly Disagree.

Time frame: Day 90

Population: Intent to Treat includes all patients who started the study and were randomized. Only those patients who answered the particular question on Day 90 were analyzed. This is indicated in parenthesis as (number of patients in the first arm who answered that specific question/Number of patients in the second arm who answered that specific question).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT were convenient to use (112/109)96.4 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90I no longer feel I need to use AT (111/108)43.2 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT were helpful to achieve comfort (112/109)92.0 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90Thickness of AT is just right (112/109)79.5 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT were important to a good outcome (111/109)82.0 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT did not interfere with vision (112/108)64.3 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT were helpful to achieve good vision (112/109)71.4 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT did not cause my eyes to get crusty (112/108)66.1 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT were easy to use (112/109)99.1 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT did not cause my eyes to get crusty (112/108)80.6 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT were easy to use (112/109)99.1 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT were convenient to use (112/109)91.7 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT were important to a good outcome (111/109)80.7 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT were helpful to achieve comfort (112/109)93.6 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT were helpful to achieve good vision (112/109)76.1 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90I no longer feel I need to use AT (111/108)38.0 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90Thickness of AT is just right (112/109)87.2 Percentage of Patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearPatient Acceptability (Sensory) - Percentage of Patients Who Rated Artificial Tears (AT) as Acceptable at Day 90AT did not interfere with vision (112/108)82.4 Percentage of Patients
Other Pre-specified

Number of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60

Number of patients prescribed to each dosing regimen at Day 14 and Day 60. At each visit from Day 14 (the first post-operative visit) to Day 60, patients were prescribed to 1 to 4 dosing regimens based on the investigator's clinical evaluation. Dosing schedule options were: At least every 2 hours while awake, 6 to 8 times per day, 3 to 5 times per day, at 1 to 2 times per day.

Time frame: Day 14, Day 60

Population: Intent to Treat includes all patients that started the study and were randomized. Only those patients who were prescribed a dosing regimen at Day 14 to Day 60 visits were analyzed. The is indicated in parenthesis as (number of patients in arm 1 who were prescribed/number of patients in arm 2 who were prescribed).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearNumber of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60Day 14: at least every 2 hrs (113/110)20 Number of patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearNumber of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60Day 60: at least every 2 hrs (109/107)4 Number of patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearNumber of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60Day 14: 3-5 times a day (113/110)58 Number of patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearNumber of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60Day 60: 6-8 times a day (109/107)12 Number of patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearNumber of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60Day 14: 6-8 times a day (113/110)30 Number of patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearNumber of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60Day 60: 3-5 times a day (109/107)62 Number of patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearNumber of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60Day 14: 1-2 times a day (113/110)5 Number of patients
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin Based Artificial TearNumber of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60Day 60: 1-2 times a day (109/107)31 Number of patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearNumber of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60Day 14: 1-2 times a day (113/110)4 Number of patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearNumber of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60Day 14: at least every 2 hrs (113/110)22 Number of patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearNumber of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60Day 14: 6-8 times a day (113/110)30 Number of patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearNumber of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60Day 14: 3-5 times a day (113/110)54 Number of patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearNumber of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60Day 60: 1-2 times a day (109/107)30 Number of patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearNumber of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60Day 60: at least every 2 hrs (109/107)3 Number of patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearNumber of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60Day 60: 6-8 times a day (109/107)14 Number of patients
Carboxymethylcellulose Based Artificial TearNumber of Patients Prescribed to Each Dosing Regimen at Day 14 and Day 60Day 60: 3-5 times a day (109/107)60 Number of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026