Ankylosing Spondylitis
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aims to provide a holistic assessment of patients receiving etanercept in a real-world setting.
Detailed description
Non-interventional study: subjects to be selected according to the usual clinical practice of their physician
Interventions
The patients will be treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of etanercept in Germany. The dosage and duration of therapy is to be determined by the physician to meet the patients' individual needs for treatment.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS)
Exclusion criteria
* Hypersensitivity to etanercept * Active infection including chronic or localised infection * Sepsis or risk of sepsis
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 26 | Week 26 | Percentage of participants achieving partial remission was determined by assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) criteria. Partial remission was defined as a score of less than 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) in each of the 4 assessment in ASAS domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 52 | Week 52 | Percentage of participants achieving partial remission was determined by ASAS criteria. Partial remission defined as a score of less than 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) in each of the 4 assessment in ASAS domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | BASDAI is a validated self-assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participant with AS. Utilizing a 11-point Likert-scale (0= none and 10=very severe) participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The index was computed by adding questions 1 to 4 plus the mean of questions 5 and 6. The resulting 0 to 50 score was divided by 5 to give a final 0-10 BASDAI score (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem). |
| Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | BASFI is a validated self assessment tool that determines the degree of functional limitation in AS. Participants answered 10 questions, consisting of 8 specific questions regarding function in AS and 2 questions reflecting the participant's ability to cope with everyday life. Each question was answered on a 0-10 scale (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem), the sum of which (divided by 10) resulted in the BASFI score (0-10). |
| Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | Occiput-to-wall distance is the distance between the occiput (posterior or back portion of the head) and the wall when the participant stood with heels and shoulder against the wall and the back straight. |
| Change From Baseline in Lateral Lumbar Flexion at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | Lateral lumbar flexion was determined by the difference of the finger-floor-distance in normal position and in lateral bending position. |
| Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Pain at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | Participants were asked to assess their global pain intensity within the past 7 days. Pain was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst). |
| Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | Participants were asked to assess their disease activity within the past 7 days. Disease activity was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst). |
| Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | Physicians were asked to assess the disease activity of participants within the past 7 days. Disease activity was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst). |
| Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | Duration of morning stiffness is defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes. |
| Percentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning Stiffness | Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52 | Duration of morning stiffness is defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes. A significant reduction of duration of morning stiffness is defined as a reduction of the duration in minutes by at least 20 percent or reduction to 'no morning stiffness' (absence of morning stiffness). |
| Percentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral Arthritis | Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52 | Peripheral arthritis is the inflammation of joints that involved asymmetrically. It involved the hips, shoulder girdle (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular joints), joints of the chest wall (costovertebral joints, costosternal junctions) and symphysis pubis. |
| Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Joints by Peripheral Arthritis at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | Peripheral arthritis is the inflammation of joints that involved asymmetrically. It involved the hips, shoulder girdle (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular joints), joints of the chest wall (costovertebral joints, costosternal junctions) and symphysis pubis. In case of no presence of peripheral arthritis the number of affected joints was set to 0. |
| Percentage of Participants With Presence of Enthesitis | Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52 | Enthesitis is the inflammation of the enthesis, where the joint capsules, ligaments or tendons attach to the bone. This inflammation can lead to severe pain and discomfort. |
| Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs) | Baseline up to Week 52 | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life- threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability or incapacity; congenital anomaly. Percentage of participants with AEs included participants affected with both SAEs and non--SAEs. |
| Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 millimeter/hour (mm/hr). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation. |
| Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS-20) Response | Week 12, 26, 38, 52 | ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in AS participants. ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 20= at least \>= 20 percent improvement from baseline and an absolute change \>=1 unit on a 0-10 numeric scale (0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity) in at least 3 of the domains (on a 0-10 numerical scale): Global assessment of disease activity by participant, participant's global pain intensity, function measured by BASFI and inflammation measured by the average of the last two Likert-scales in BASDAI concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration and no worsening in the remaining domain. |
| Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 40 (ASAS-40) Response | Week 12, 26, 38, 52 | ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants. ASAS =4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 40= at least (\>=) 40 percent improvement from baseline and an absolute change \>=2 unit on a 0-10 numeric scale (0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity) in at least 3 of the domains (on a 0-10 numerical scale): Global assessment of disease activity by participant, participant's global pain intensity, function measured by BASFI and inflammation measured by the average of the last two Likert-scales in BASDAI concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration and no worsening in the remaining domain. |
| Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Time Trade Off (TTO) | Baseline, Week 26, 52 | EQ 5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (extreme problems). Score of each domain is transformed into a single TTO value using formula developed by Greiner et al and results in a total score range -0.205 to 0.999, higher score indicates a better health state. |
| Euro Quality of Life (EQ--5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Baseline, Week 26, 52 | EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health. State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicate worst health state. Score of each domain is transformed into a single VAS score using formula developed by Greiner et al and results in a total score range of 0 to 100, where higher score indicates a better health state. |
| Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP) | Baseline, Week 26, 52 | WPAI:SHP is 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the amount of absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss and daily activity impairment attributable to rheumatoid arthritis for a period of 7 days prior to each visit. It yields 4 sub-scores: work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism or reduced on-the-job effectiveness), overall work impairment (work productivity loss or absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment (daily activity impairment). These sub-scores are transformed to impairment percentages (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. |
| Healthcare Resource Utilization | Baseline, Week 26, 52 | Participants utilization of healthcare resources was evaluated as number of events for healthcare resources utilization including: number of visits to general practitioners, visits to rheumatologist, visits to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations. At baseline, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented. After enrollment, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation. |
| Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Baseline, Week 26, 52 | Participants duration of healthcare resources utilization was evaluated as number of days for healthcare resources utilization including: duration of visits to general practitioners, to rheumatologist, to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations. At baseline, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilizations during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented. After enrollment, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation. |
| Percentage of Participants With Prior or Concomitant Medication Use for Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis | Baseline up to Week 52 | Participants taking any non-study medications which were administered either prior to or during the study treatment for AS were reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Discontinuation of Treatment Due to Adverse Events | Baseline up to Week 52 | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. |
| Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Body Parts by Enthesitis at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | Enthesitis is the inflammation of the enthesis, where the joint capsules, ligaments or tendons attach to the bone. This inflammation can lead to severe pain and discomfort. In case of no presence of enthesitis the number of affected body parts was set to 0. |
| Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs) by Co-morbidity | Baseline up to Week 52 | — |
Countries
Germany
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
A total of 1715 participants were enrolled for documentation. Of these 1715 participants enrolled, only 1685 participants were included in analysis.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Etanercept Participants who had confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and commenced treatment with etanercept (Enbrel) for the first time as per Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) were observed prospectively for 52 weeks. According to SmPC, recommended dose included etanercept 25 milligram (mg) twice weekly or 50 mg once weekly. | 1,685 |
| Total | 1,685 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 140 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 196 |
| Overall Study | Other | 98 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Etanercept |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 43.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Female | 615 participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Male | 1067 participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Missing | 3 participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 588 / 1,685 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 128 / 1,685 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 26
Percentage of participants achieving partial remission was determined by assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) criteria. Partial remission was defined as a score of less than 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) in each of the 4 assessment in ASAS domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation.
Time frame: Week 26
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants greater than or equal to (\>=) 18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, who received etanercept therapy for the first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 26 | 19.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving partial remission was determined by ASAS criteria. Partial remission defined as a score of less than 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) in each of the 4 assessment in ASAS domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation.
Time frame: Week 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, who received etanercept therapy for the first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 52 | 23.0 percentage of participants |
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 52
BASDAI is a validated self-assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participant with AS. Utilizing a 11-point Likert-scale (0= none and 10=very severe) participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The index was computed by adding questions 1 to 4 plus the mean of questions 5 and 6. The resulting 0 to 50 score was divided by 5 to give a final 0-10 BASDAI score (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 52 | Baseline (n=1635) | 5.327 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.029 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=1128) | -2.199 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.163 |
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 52
BASFI is a validated self assessment tool that determines the degree of functional limitation in AS. Participants answered 10 questions, consisting of 8 specific questions regarding function in AS and 2 questions reflecting the participant's ability to cope with everyday life. Each question was answered on a 0-10 scale (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem), the sum of which (divided by 10) resulted in the BASFI score (0-10).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 52 | Baseline (n=1626) | 4.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=1129) | -1.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 52
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 52 | Baseline (n=1497) | 2.6 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) | Standard Deviation 4.7 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=873) | -1.6 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 52
Duration of morning stiffness is defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 52 | Baseline (n=1641) | 58.6 minutes | Standard Deviation 59.2 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=1165) | -37.0 minutes | Standard Deviation 54 |
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 52
ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 millimeter/hour (mm/hr). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 52 | Baseline (n=1422) | 26.9 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 21.7 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=812) | -14.2 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 21.1 |
Change From Baseline in Lateral Lumbar Flexion at Week 52
Lateral lumbar flexion was determined by the difference of the finger-floor-distance in normal position and in lateral bending position.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Lateral Lumbar Flexion at Week 52 | Baseline (n=1123) | 11.8 cm | Standard Deviation 11.8 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Lateral Lumbar Flexion at Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=656) | 1.0 cm | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Body Parts by Enthesitis at Week 52
Enthesitis is the inflammation of the enthesis, where the joint capsules, ligaments or tendons attach to the bone. This inflammation can lead to severe pain and discomfort. In case of no presence of enthesitis the number of affected body parts was set to 0.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Body Parts by Enthesitis at Week 52 | Baseline (n=1658) | 0.6 body parts | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Body Parts by Enthesitis at Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=1174) | -0.4 body parts | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Joints by Peripheral Arthritis at Week 52
Peripheral arthritis is the inflammation of joints that involved asymmetrically. It involved the hips, shoulder girdle (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular joints), joints of the chest wall (costovertebral joints, costosternal junctions) and symphysis pubis. In case of no presence of peripheral arthritis the number of affected joints was set to 0.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'N' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Joints by Peripheral Arthritis at Week 52 | Baseline (n=1652) | 2.2 joints | Standard Deviation 5.5 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Joints by Peripheral Arthritis at Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=1174) | -1.3 joints | Standard Deviation 5.2 |
Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Week 52
Occiput-to-wall distance is the distance between the occiput (posterior or back portion of the head) and the wall when the participant stood with heels and shoulder against the wall and the back straight.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Week 52 | Baseline (n=1347) | 6.7 centimeter (cm) | Standard Deviation 7.8 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=788) | -0.7 centimeter (cm) | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52
Participants were asked to assess their disease activity within the past 7 days. Disease activity was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52 | Baseline (n=1602) | 6.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=1094) | -3.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Pain at Week 52
Participants were asked to assess their global pain intensity within the past 7 days. Pain was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Pain at Week 52 | Baseline (n=1630) | 6.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Pain at Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=1117) | -3.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52
Physicians were asked to assess the disease activity of participants within the past 7 days. Disease activity was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52 | Baseline (n=1655) | 6.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=1171) | -4.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization
Participants duration of healthcare resources utilization was evaluated as number of days for healthcare resources utilization including: duration of visits to general practitioners, to rheumatologist, to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations. At baseline, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilizations during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented. After enrollment, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Baseline: General Practitioner Visit (n=986) | 3.7 days | Standard Deviation 10.5 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 26: Ergotherapy (n = 1393) | 0.0 days | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Baseline: Rheumatologist Visit (n=928) | 3.1 days | Standard Deviation 5.7 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Baseline: Ergotherapy (n = 1663) | 0.0 days | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Baseline: Other Specialist Visit (n=1242) | 0.9 days | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Baseline: In-patient Hospitalization (n = 1633) | 2.0 days | Standard Deviation 5.7 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Baseline: In-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1648) | 1.5 days | Standard Deviation 6 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Baseline: Follow-up Treatment (n = 1661) | 0.1 days | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Baseline: Out-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1654) | 0.2 days | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Baseline: Physiotherapy (n = 1551) | 6.2 days | Standard Deviation 20.2 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Baseline: Out-patient Hospitalization (n = 1661) | 0.0 days | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Baseline: Other Health Care Resources (n = 1641) | 0.4 days | Standard Deviation 6 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Baseline: Sum Over All Care Resources (n = 1663) | 14.5 days | Standard Deviation 28 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 26: General Practitioner Visit (n = 917) | 1.2 days | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 26: Rheumatologist Visit (n = 834) | 2.2 days | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 26: Other Specialist Visit (n = 1190) | 0.4 days | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 26: In-patient Hospitalization (n = 1390) | 0.3 days | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 26: In-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1391) | 1.0 days | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 26: Follow-up Treatment (n = 1395) | 0.0 days | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 26: Out-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1394) | 0.1 days | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 26: Physiotherapy (n = 1350) | 3.0 days | Standard Deviation 9.9 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 26: Out-patient Hospitalization (n = 1395) | 0.0 days | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 26: Other Health Care Resources (n = 1376) | 0.3 days | Standard Deviation 4 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 26: Sum Over All Care Resources (n = 1395) | 7.0 days | Standard Deviation 14.5 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 52: General Practitioner Visit (n = 762) | 1.0 days | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 52: Rheumatologist Visit (n = 716) | 1.5 days | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 52: Other Specialist Visit (n = 1009) | 0.3 days | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 52: In-patient Hospitalization (n = 1177) | 0.3 days | Standard Deviation 2 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 52: In-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1185) | 0.4 days | Standard Deviation 3 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 52: Follow-up Treatment (n = 1186) | 0.0 days | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 52: Out-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1186) | 0.2 days | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 52: Physiotherapy (n = 1151) | 2.6 days | Standard Deviation 9.6 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 52: Out-patient Hospitalization (n = 1186) | 0.0 days | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 52: Ergotherapy (n = 1186) | 0.0 days | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 52: Other Health Care Resources (n = 1162) | 0.2 days | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Etanercept | Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization | Week 52: Sum Over All Care Resources (n = 1186) | 5.4 days | Standard Deviation 13.9 |
Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Time Trade Off (TTO)
EQ 5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (extreme problems). Score of each domain is transformed into a single TTO value using formula developed by Greiner et al and results in a total score range -0.205 to 0.999, higher score indicates a better health state.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Time Trade Off (TTO) | Baseline (n=1623) | 0.58 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Etanercept | Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Time Trade Off (TTO) | Week 52 (n=1143) | 0.82 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Etanercept | Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Time Trade Off (TTO) | Week 26 (n=1343) | 0.80 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
Euro Quality of Life (EQ--5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health. State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicate worst health state. Score of each domain is transformed into a single VAS score using formula developed by Greiner et al and results in a total score range of 0 to 100, where higher score indicates a better health state.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Euro Quality of Life (EQ--5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Baseline (n=1623) | 54.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.7 |
| Etanercept | Euro Quality of Life (EQ--5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Week 26 (n=1343) | 71.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.2 |
| Etanercept | Euro Quality of Life (EQ--5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Week 52 (n=1143) | 74.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.9 |
Healthcare Resource Utilization
Participants utilization of healthcare resources was evaluated as number of events for healthcare resources utilization including: number of visits to general practitioners, visits to rheumatologist, visits to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations. At baseline, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented. After enrollment, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'N' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Baseline: In-patient Hospitalization (n = 1658) | 0.3 events | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Baseline: Follow-up Treatment (n = 1662) | 0.0 events | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 26: Other Specialist Visit (n = 1393) | 0.6 events | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 26: Ergotherapy (n = 1395) | 0.0 events | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 52: In-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1186) | 0.1 events | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 26: Other Health Care Resources (n = 1390) | 0.5 events | Standard Deviation 4.5 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 26: Sum Over All Care Resources (n = 1395) | 11.5 events | Standard Deviation 16.9 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 52: In-patient Hospitalization (n = 1186) | 0.0 events | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 52: Out-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1186) | 0.0 events | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 52: Physiotherapy (n = 1186) | 4.3 events | Standard Deviation 13.3 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 52: Out-patient Hospitalization (n = 1186) | 0.0 events | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Baseline: General Practitioner Visit (n=1654) | 4.7 events | Standard Deviation 8.3 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Baseline: Rheumatologist Visit (n=1657) | 3.7 events | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Baseline: Other Specialist Visit (n=1659) | 1.6 events | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Baseline: In-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1657) | 0.2 events | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Baseline: Out-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1661) | 0.0 events | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Baseline: Physiotherapy (n = 1659) | 9.1 events | Standard Deviation 25 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Baseline: Out-patient Hospitalization (n = 1663) | 0.0 events | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Baseline: Ergotherapy (n = 1663) | 0.0 events | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Baseline: Other Health Care Resources (n = 1662) | 0.7 events | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Baseline: Sum Over All Care Resources (n = 1663) | 20.3 events | Standard Deviation 29.7 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 26: General Practitioner Visit (n = 1389) | 2.2 events | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 26: Rheumatologist Visit (n = 1392) | 3.0 events | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 26: In-patient Hospitalization (n = 1395) | 0.1 events | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 26: In-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1392) | 0.2 events | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 26: Follow-up Treatment (n = 1395) | 0.0 events | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 26: Out-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1395) | 0.0 events | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 26: Physiotherapy (n = 1395) | 5.0 events | Standard Deviation 14.1 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 26: Out-patient Hospitalization (n = 1394) | 0.0 events | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 52: General Practitioner Visit (n = 1184) | 1.8 events | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 52: Rheumatologist Visit (n = 1184) | 2.0 events | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 52: Other Specialist Visit (n = 1183) | 0.6 events | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 52: Follow-up Treatment (n = 1186) | 0.0 events | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 52: Ergotherapy (n = 1186) | 0.0 events | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 52: Other Health Care Resources (n = 1185) | 0.7 events | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
| Etanercept | Healthcare Resource Utilization | Week 52: Sum Over All Care Resources (n = 1186) | 9.6 events | Standard Deviation 15.8 |
Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS-20) Response
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in AS participants. ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 20= at least \>= 20 percent improvement from baseline and an absolute change \>=1 unit on a 0-10 numeric scale (0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity) in at least 3 of the domains (on a 0-10 numerical scale): Global assessment of disease activity by participant, participant's global pain intensity, function measured by BASFI and inflammation measured by the average of the last two Likert-scales in BASDAI concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration and no worsening in the remaining domain.
Time frame: Week 12, 26, 38, 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS-20) Response | Week 38 (n=1235) | 63.1 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS-20) Response | Week 12 (n=1480) | 60.6 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS-20) Response | Week 26 (n=1395) | 61.6 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS-20) Response | Week 52 (n=1186) | 63.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 40 (ASAS-40) Response
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants. ASAS =4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 40= at least (\>=) 40 percent improvement from baseline and an absolute change \>=2 unit on a 0-10 numeric scale (0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity) in at least 3 of the domains (on a 0-10 numerical scale): Global assessment of disease activity by participant, participant's global pain intensity, function measured by BASFI and inflammation measured by the average of the last two Likert-scales in BASDAI concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration and no worsening in the remaining domain.
Time frame: Week 12, 26, 38, 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 40 (ASAS-40) Response | Week 12 (n=1480) | 44.1 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 40 (ASAS-40) Response | Week 26 (n=1395) | 46.7 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 40 (ASAS-40) Response | Week 38 (n=1235) | 48.6 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 40 (ASAS-40) Response | Week 52 (n=1186) | 51.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Discontinuation of Treatment Due to Adverse Events
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52
Population: Safety population included all treated participants with available post--baseline safety data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuation of Treatment Due to Adverse Events | 11.8 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Presence of Enthesitis
Enthesitis is the inflammation of the enthesis, where the joint capsules, ligaments or tendons attach to the bone. This inflammation can lead to severe pain and discomfort.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'N' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Presence of Enthesitis | Baseline (n=1663) | 20.6 percentage of participants | 59.2 |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Presence of Enthesitis | Week 2 (n=1405) | 14.7 percentage of participants | 31.4 |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Presence of Enthesitis | Week 6 (n=1452) | 11.5 percentage of participants | — |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Presence of Enthesitis | Week 12 (n=1480) | 9.5 percentage of participants | — |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Presence of Enthesitis | Week 26 (n=1395) | 8.5 percentage of participants | — |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Presence of Enthesitis | Week 38 (n=1235) | 7.4 percentage of participants | — |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Presence of Enthesitis | Week 52 (n=1186) | 7.9 percentage of participants | — |
Percentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral Arthritis
Peripheral arthritis is the inflammation of joints that involved asymmetrically. It involved the hips, shoulder girdle (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular joints), joints of the chest wall (costovertebral joints, costosternal junctions) and symphysis pubis.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'N' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral Arthritis | Week 2 (n=1405) | 26.0 percentage of participants | 31.4 |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral Arthritis | Week 6 (n=1452) | 22.0 percentage of participants | — |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral Arthritis | Week 12 (n=1480) | 18.2 percentage of participants | — |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral Arthritis | Baseline (n=1663) | 36.8 percentage of participants | 59.2 |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral Arthritis | Week 26 (n=1395) | 16.7 percentage of participants | — |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral Arthritis | Week 38 (n=1235) | 14.6 percentage of participants | — |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral Arthritis | Week 52 (n=1186) | 15.5 percentage of participants | — |
Percentage of Participants With Prior or Concomitant Medication Use for Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis
Participants taking any non-study medications which were administered either prior to or during the study treatment for AS were reported.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52
Population: Safety population included all treated participants with available post-baseline safety data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Prior or Concomitant Medication Use for Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis | Concomitant Medication | 38.4 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Prior or Concomitant Medication Use for Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis | Prior Therapy | 98.6 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life- threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability or incapacity; congenital anomaly. Percentage of participants with AEs included participants affected with both SAEs and non--SAEs.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52
Population: Safety population included all treated participants with available post-baseline safety data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs) | SAEs | 7.6 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs) | AEs | 38.2 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs) by Co-morbidity
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52
Population: Safety population included all treated participants with available post--baseline safety data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs) by Co-morbidity | SAEs | NA percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs) by Co-morbidity | AEs | NA percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning Stiffness
Duration of morning stiffness is defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes. A significant reduction of duration of morning stiffness is defined as a reduction of the duration in minutes by at least 20 percent or reduction to 'no morning stiffness' (absence of morning stiffness).
Time frame: Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'N' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning Stiffness | Week 2 (n=1405) | 51.6 percentage of participants | 59.2 |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning Stiffness | Week 6 (n=1452) | 62.1 percentage of participants | 31.4 |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning Stiffness | Week 12 (n=1480) | 67.2 percentage of participants | — |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning Stiffness | Week 26 (n=1395) | 68.0 percentage of participants | — |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning Stiffness | Week 38 (n=1235) | 69.8 percentage of participants | — |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning Stiffness | Week 52 (n=1186) | 70.6 percentage of participants | — |
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)
WPAI:SHP is 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the amount of absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss and daily activity impairment attributable to rheumatoid arthritis for a period of 7 days prior to each visit. It yields 4 sub-scores: work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism or reduced on-the-job effectiveness), overall work impairment (work productivity loss or absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment (daily activity impairment). These sub-scores are transformed to impairment percentages (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, 52
Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP) | Baseline: Impairment While Working (n=890) | 48.3 percentage of impairment | Standard Deviation 26.9 |
| Etanercept | Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP) | Week 52: Overall work impairment (n = 578) | 26.3 percentage of impairment | Standard Deviation 24.2 |
| Etanercept | Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP) | Week 52: Activity impairment (n = 1137) | 32.3 percentage of impairment | Standard Deviation 24.9 |
| Etanercept | Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP) | Baseline: Work Time Missed (n=776) | 21.9 percentage of impairment | Standard Deviation 36.3 |
| Etanercept | Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP) | Baseline: Overall work impairment (n=716) | 52.9 percentage of impairment | Standard Deviation 29.8 |
| Etanercept | Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP) | Baseline: Activity impairment (n = 1624) | 58.1 percentage of impairment | Standard Deviation 24.6 |
| Etanercept | Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP) | Week 26: Work Time Missed (n = 666) | 6.6 percentage of impairment | Standard Deviation 20.6 |
| Etanercept | Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP) | Week 26: Impairment While Working (n = 799) | 27.3 percentage of impairment | Standard Deviation 23.1 |
| Etanercept | Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP) | Week 26: Overall work impairment (n = 657) | 29.8 percentage of impairment | Standard Deviation 25.9 |
| Etanercept | Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP) | Week 26: Activity impairment (n = 1331) | 34.6 percentage of impairment | Standard Deviation 24.6 |
| Etanercept | Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP) | Week 52: Work Time Missed (n = 588) | 6.3 percentage of impairment | Standard Deviation 19.2 |
| Etanercept | Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP) | Week 52: Impairment While Working (n = 706) | 24.6 percentage of impairment | Standard Deviation 21.9 |