Skip to content

Study Evaluating The Use Of Etanercept In Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis

Observational Study Of The Use Of Enbrel (Registered) (Etanercept) In Routine Clinical Practice To Treat Ankylosing Spondylitis (as) Patients: An Effectiveness, Safety, And Health Economic Evaluation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00544557
Enrollment
1715
Registered
2007-10-16
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2015-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankylosing Spondylitis

Brief summary

This study aims to provide a holistic assessment of patients receiving etanercept in a real-world setting.

Detailed description

Non-interventional study: subjects to be selected according to the usual clinical practice of their physician

Interventions

DRUGEtanercept

The patients will be treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of etanercept in Germany. The dosage and duration of therapy is to be determined by the physician to meet the patients' individual needs for treatment.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS)

Exclusion criteria

* Hypersensitivity to etanercept * Active infection including chronic or localised infection * Sepsis or risk of sepsis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 26Week 26Percentage of participants achieving partial remission was determined by assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) criteria. Partial remission was defined as a score of less than 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) in each of the 4 assessment in ASAS domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 52Week 52Percentage of participants achieving partial remission was determined by ASAS criteria. Partial remission defined as a score of less than 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) in each of the 4 assessment in ASAS domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52BASDAI is a validated self-assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participant with AS. Utilizing a 11-point Likert-scale (0= none and 10=very severe) participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The index was computed by adding questions 1 to 4 plus the mean of questions 5 and 6. The resulting 0 to 50 score was divided by 5 to give a final 0-10 BASDAI score (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem).
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52BASFI is a validated self assessment tool that determines the degree of functional limitation in AS. Participants answered 10 questions, consisting of 8 specific questions regarding function in AS and 2 questions reflecting the participant's ability to cope with everyday life. Each question was answered on a 0-10 scale (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem), the sum of which (divided by 10) resulted in the BASFI score (0-10).
Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Week 52Baseline, Week 52Occiput-to-wall distance is the distance between the occiput (posterior or back portion of the head) and the wall when the participant stood with heels and shoulder against the wall and the back straight.
Change From Baseline in Lateral Lumbar Flexion at Week 52Baseline, Week 52Lateral lumbar flexion was determined by the difference of the finger-floor-distance in normal position and in lateral bending position.
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Pain at Week 52Baseline, Week 52Participants were asked to assess their global pain intensity within the past 7 days. Pain was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52Baseline, Week 52Participants were asked to assess their disease activity within the past 7 days. Disease activity was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52Baseline, Week 52Physicians were asked to assess the disease activity of participants within the past 7 days. Disease activity was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 52Baseline, Week 52Duration of morning stiffness is defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes.
Percentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning StiffnessWeek 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52Duration of morning stiffness is defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes. A significant reduction of duration of morning stiffness is defined as a reduction of the duration in minutes by at least 20 percent or reduction to 'no morning stiffness' (absence of morning stiffness).
Percentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral ArthritisBaseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52Peripheral arthritis is the inflammation of joints that involved asymmetrically. It involved the hips, shoulder girdle (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular joints), joints of the chest wall (costovertebral joints, costosternal junctions) and symphysis pubis.
Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Joints by Peripheral Arthritis at Week 52Baseline, Week 52Peripheral arthritis is the inflammation of joints that involved asymmetrically. It involved the hips, shoulder girdle (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular joints), joints of the chest wall (costovertebral joints, costosternal junctions) and symphysis pubis. In case of no presence of peripheral arthritis the number of affected joints was set to 0.
Percentage of Participants With Presence of EnthesitisBaseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52Enthesitis is the inflammation of the enthesis, where the joint capsules, ligaments or tendons attach to the bone. This inflammation can lead to severe pain and discomfort.
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs)Baseline up to Week 52An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life- threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability or incapacity; congenital anomaly. Percentage of participants with AEs included participants affected with both SAEs and non--SAEs.
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 millimeter/hour (mm/hr). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.
Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS-20) ResponseWeek 12, 26, 38, 52ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in AS participants. ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 20= at least \>= 20 percent improvement from baseline and an absolute change \>=1 unit on a 0-10 numeric scale (0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity) in at least 3 of the domains (on a 0-10 numerical scale): Global assessment of disease activity by participant, participant's global pain intensity, function measured by BASFI and inflammation measured by the average of the last two Likert-scales in BASDAI concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration and no worsening in the remaining domain.
Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 40 (ASAS-40) ResponseWeek 12, 26, 38, 52ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants. ASAS =4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 40= at least (\>=) 40 percent improvement from baseline and an absolute change \>=2 unit on a 0-10 numeric scale (0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity) in at least 3 of the domains (on a 0-10 numerical scale): Global assessment of disease activity by participant, participant's global pain intensity, function measured by BASFI and inflammation measured by the average of the last two Likert-scales in BASDAI concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration and no worsening in the remaining domain.
Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Time Trade Off (TTO)Baseline, Week 26, 52EQ 5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (extreme problems). Score of each domain is transformed into a single TTO value using formula developed by Greiner et al and results in a total score range -0.205 to 0.999, higher score indicates a better health state.
Euro Quality of Life (EQ--5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline, Week 26, 52EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health. State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicate worst health state. Score of each domain is transformed into a single VAS score using formula developed by Greiner et al and results in a total score range of 0 to 100, where higher score indicates a better health state.
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)Baseline, Week 26, 52WPAI:SHP is 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the amount of absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss and daily activity impairment attributable to rheumatoid arthritis for a period of 7 days prior to each visit. It yields 4 sub-scores: work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism or reduced on-the-job effectiveness), overall work impairment (work productivity loss or absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment (daily activity impairment). These sub-scores are transformed to impairment percentages (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Healthcare Resource UtilizationBaseline, Week 26, 52Participants utilization of healthcare resources was evaluated as number of events for healthcare resources utilization including: number of visits to general practitioners, visits to rheumatologist, visits to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations. At baseline, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented. After enrollment, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.
Duration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationBaseline, Week 26, 52Participants duration of healthcare resources utilization was evaluated as number of days for healthcare resources utilization including: duration of visits to general practitioners, to rheumatologist, to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations. At baseline, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilizations during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented. After enrollment, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.
Percentage of Participants With Prior or Concomitant Medication Use for Treatment of Ankylosing SpondylitisBaseline up to Week 52Participants taking any non-study medications which were administered either prior to or during the study treatment for AS were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Discontinuation of Treatment Due to Adverse EventsBaseline up to Week 52An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Body Parts by Enthesitis at Week 52Baseline, Week 52Enthesitis is the inflammation of the enthesis, where the joint capsules, ligaments or tendons attach to the bone. This inflammation can lead to severe pain and discomfort. In case of no presence of enthesitis the number of affected body parts was set to 0.
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs) by Co-morbidityBaseline up to Week 52

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 1715 participants were enrolled for documentation. Of these 1715 participants enrolled, only 1685 participants were included in analysis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Etanercept
Participants who had confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and commenced treatment with etanercept (Enbrel) for the first time as per Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) were observed prospectively for 52 weeks. According to SmPC, recommended dose included etanercept 25 milligram (mg) twice weekly or 50 mg once weekly.
1,685
Total1,685

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event140
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy196
Overall StudyOther98

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEtanercept
Age, Continuous43.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
615 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
1067 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Missing
3 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
588 / 1,685
serious
Total, serious adverse events
128 / 1,685

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 26

Percentage of participants achieving partial remission was determined by assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) criteria. Partial remission was defined as a score of less than 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) in each of the 4 assessment in ASAS domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation.

Time frame: Week 26

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants greater than or equal to (\>=) 18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, who received etanercept therapy for the first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 2619.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 52

Percentage of participants achieving partial remission was determined by ASAS criteria. Partial remission defined as a score of less than 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) in each of the 4 assessment in ASAS domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, who received etanercept therapy for the first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 5223.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 52

BASDAI is a validated self-assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participant with AS. Utilizing a 11-point Likert-scale (0= none and 10=very severe) participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The index was computed by adding questions 1 to 4 plus the mean of questions 5 and 6. The resulting 0 to 50 score was divided by 5 to give a final 0-10 BASDAI score (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 52Baseline (n=1635)5.327 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.029
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=1128)-2.199 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.163
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 52

BASFI is a validated self assessment tool that determines the degree of functional limitation in AS. Participants answered 10 questions, consisting of 8 specific questions regarding function in AS and 2 questions reflecting the participant's ability to cope with everyday life. Each question was answered on a 0-10 scale (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem), the sum of which (divided by 10) resulted in the BASFI score (0-10).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 52Baseline (n=1626)4.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=1129)-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 52

The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 52Baseline (n=1497)2.6 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 4.7
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=873)-1.6 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 4.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 52

Duration of morning stiffness is defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 52Baseline (n=1641)58.6 minutesStandard Deviation 59.2
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=1165)-37.0 minutesStandard Deviation 54
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 52

ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 millimeter/hour (mm/hr). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 52Baseline (n=1422)26.9 mm/hrStandard Deviation 21.7
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=812)-14.2 mm/hrStandard Deviation 21.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Lateral Lumbar Flexion at Week 52

Lateral lumbar flexion was determined by the difference of the finger-floor-distance in normal position and in lateral bending position.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Lateral Lumbar Flexion at Week 52Baseline (n=1123)11.8 cmStandard Deviation 11.8
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Lateral Lumbar Flexion at Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=656)1.0 cmStandard Deviation 8.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Body Parts by Enthesitis at Week 52

Enthesitis is the inflammation of the enthesis, where the joint capsules, ligaments or tendons attach to the bone. This inflammation can lead to severe pain and discomfort. In case of no presence of enthesitis the number of affected body parts was set to 0.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Number of Affected Body Parts by Enthesitis at Week 52Baseline (n=1658)0.6 body partsStandard Deviation 1.6
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Number of Affected Body Parts by Enthesitis at Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=1174)-0.4 body partsStandard Deviation 1.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Joints by Peripheral Arthritis at Week 52

Peripheral arthritis is the inflammation of joints that involved asymmetrically. It involved the hips, shoulder girdle (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular joints), joints of the chest wall (costovertebral joints, costosternal junctions) and symphysis pubis. In case of no presence of peripheral arthritis the number of affected joints was set to 0.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'N' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Number of Affected Joints by Peripheral Arthritis at Week 52Baseline (n=1652)2.2 jointsStandard Deviation 5.5
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Number of Affected Joints by Peripheral Arthritis at Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=1174)-1.3 jointsStandard Deviation 5.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Week 52

Occiput-to-wall distance is the distance between the occiput (posterior or back portion of the head) and the wall when the participant stood with heels and shoulder against the wall and the back straight.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Week 52Baseline (n=1347)6.7 centimeter (cm)Standard Deviation 7.8
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=788)-0.7 centimeter (cm)Standard Deviation 4.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52

Participants were asked to assess their disease activity within the past 7 days. Disease activity was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52Baseline (n=1602)6.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=1094)-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Pain at Week 52

Participants were asked to assess their global pain intensity within the past 7 days. Pain was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Pain at Week 52Baseline (n=1630)6.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Pain at Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=1117)-3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52

Physicians were asked to assess the disease activity of participants within the past 7 days. Disease activity was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52Baseline (n=1655)6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=1171)-4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization

Participants duration of healthcare resources utilization was evaluated as number of days for healthcare resources utilization including: duration of visits to general practitioners, to rheumatologist, to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations. At baseline, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilizations during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented. After enrollment, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationBaseline: General Practitioner Visit (n=986)3.7 daysStandard Deviation 10.5
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 26: Ergotherapy (n = 1393)0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0.4
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationBaseline: Rheumatologist Visit (n=928)3.1 daysStandard Deviation 5.7
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationBaseline: Ergotherapy (n = 1663)0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0.1
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationBaseline: Other Specialist Visit (n=1242)0.9 daysStandard Deviation 2.5
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationBaseline: In-patient Hospitalization (n = 1633)2.0 daysStandard Deviation 5.7
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationBaseline: In-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1648)1.5 daysStandard Deviation 6
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationBaseline: Follow-up Treatment (n = 1661)0.1 daysStandard Deviation 1.8
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationBaseline: Out-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1654)0.2 daysStandard Deviation 3.6
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationBaseline: Physiotherapy (n = 1551)6.2 daysStandard Deviation 20.2
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationBaseline: Out-patient Hospitalization (n = 1661)0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationBaseline: Other Health Care Resources (n = 1641)0.4 daysStandard Deviation 6
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationBaseline: Sum Over All Care Resources (n = 1663)14.5 daysStandard Deviation 28
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 26: General Practitioner Visit (n = 917)1.2 daysStandard Deviation 2.1
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 26: Rheumatologist Visit (n = 834)2.2 daysStandard Deviation 2.7
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 26: Other Specialist Visit (n = 1190)0.4 daysStandard Deviation 1.9
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 26: In-patient Hospitalization (n = 1390)0.3 daysStandard Deviation 1.9
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 26: In-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1391)1.0 daysStandard Deviation 5.1
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 26: Follow-up Treatment (n = 1395)0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0.6
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 26: Out-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1394)0.1 daysStandard Deviation 1.2
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 26: Physiotherapy (n = 1350)3.0 daysStandard Deviation 9.9
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 26: Out-patient Hospitalization (n = 1395)0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 26: Other Health Care Resources (n = 1376)0.3 daysStandard Deviation 4
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 26: Sum Over All Care Resources (n = 1395)7.0 daysStandard Deviation 14.5
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 52: General Practitioner Visit (n = 762)1.0 daysStandard Deviation 1.7
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 52: Rheumatologist Visit (n = 716)1.5 daysStandard Deviation 2.1
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 52: Other Specialist Visit (n = 1009)0.3 daysStandard Deviation 2.3
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 52: In-patient Hospitalization (n = 1177)0.3 daysStandard Deviation 2
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 52: In-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1185)0.4 daysStandard Deviation 3
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 52: Follow-up Treatment (n = 1186)0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 52: Out-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1186)0.2 daysStandard Deviation 3.7
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 52: Physiotherapy (n = 1151)2.6 daysStandard Deviation 9.6
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 52: Out-patient Hospitalization (n = 1186)0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 52: Ergotherapy (n = 1186)0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0.9
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 52: Other Health Care Resources (n = 1162)0.2 daysStandard Deviation 2.5
EtanerceptDuration of Healthcare Resources UtilizationWeek 52: Sum Over All Care Resources (n = 1186)5.4 daysStandard Deviation 13.9
Secondary

Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Time Trade Off (TTO)

EQ 5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (extreme problems). Score of each domain is transformed into a single TTO value using formula developed by Greiner et al and results in a total score range -0.205 to 0.999, higher score indicates a better health state.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptEuro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Time Trade Off (TTO)Baseline (n=1623)0.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
EtanerceptEuro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Time Trade Off (TTO)Week 52 (n=1143)0.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
EtanerceptEuro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Time Trade Off (TTO)Week 26 (n=1343)0.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
Secondary

Euro Quality of Life (EQ--5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health. State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicate worst health state. Score of each domain is transformed into a single VAS score using formula developed by Greiner et al and results in a total score range of 0 to 100, where higher score indicates a better health state.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptEuro Quality of Life (EQ--5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline (n=1623)54.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.7
EtanerceptEuro Quality of Life (EQ--5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 26 (n=1343)71.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.2
EtanerceptEuro Quality of Life (EQ--5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 52 (n=1143)74.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.9
Secondary

Healthcare Resource Utilization

Participants utilization of healthcare resources was evaluated as number of events for healthcare resources utilization including: number of visits to general practitioners, visits to rheumatologist, visits to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations. At baseline, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented. After enrollment, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'N' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationBaseline: In-patient Hospitalization (n = 1658)0.3 eventsStandard Deviation 0.9
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationBaseline: Follow-up Treatment (n = 1662)0.0 eventsStandard Deviation 0.1
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 26: Other Specialist Visit (n = 1393)0.6 eventsStandard Deviation 1.5
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 26: Ergotherapy (n = 1395)0.0 eventsStandard Deviation 0.5
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 52: In-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1186)0.1 eventsStandard Deviation 0.9
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 26: Other Health Care Resources (n = 1390)0.5 eventsStandard Deviation 4.5
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 26: Sum Over All Care Resources (n = 1395)11.5 eventsStandard Deviation 16.9
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 52: In-patient Hospitalization (n = 1186)0.0 eventsStandard Deviation 0.2
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 52: Out-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1186)0.0 eventsStandard Deviation 0.7
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 52: Physiotherapy (n = 1186)4.3 eventsStandard Deviation 13.3
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 52: Out-patient Hospitalization (n = 1186)0.0 eventsStandard Deviation 0
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationBaseline: General Practitioner Visit (n=1654)4.7 eventsStandard Deviation 8.3
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationBaseline: Rheumatologist Visit (n=1657)3.7 eventsStandard Deviation 3.3
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationBaseline: Other Specialist Visit (n=1659)1.6 eventsStandard Deviation 3.1
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationBaseline: In-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1657)0.2 eventsStandard Deviation 1.6
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationBaseline: Out-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1661)0.0 eventsStandard Deviation 0.8
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationBaseline: Physiotherapy (n = 1659)9.1 eventsStandard Deviation 25
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationBaseline: Out-patient Hospitalization (n = 1663)0.0 eventsStandard Deviation 0.1
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationBaseline: Ergotherapy (n = 1663)0.0 eventsStandard Deviation 0.1
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationBaseline: Other Health Care Resources (n = 1662)0.7 eventsStandard Deviation 7.4
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationBaseline: Sum Over All Care Resources (n = 1663)20.3 eventsStandard Deviation 29.7
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 26: General Practitioner Visit (n = 1389)2.2 eventsStandard Deviation 3.1
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 26: Rheumatologist Visit (n = 1392)3.0 eventsStandard Deviation 2.6
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 26: In-patient Hospitalization (n = 1395)0.1 eventsStandard Deviation 0.6
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 26: In-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1392)0.2 eventsStandard Deviation 1.9
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 26: Follow-up Treatment (n = 1395)0.0 eventsStandard Deviation 0.2
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 26: Out-patient Rehabilitation (n = 1395)0.0 eventsStandard Deviation 0.8
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 26: Physiotherapy (n = 1395)5.0 eventsStandard Deviation 14.1
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 26: Out-patient Hospitalization (n = 1394)0.0 eventsStandard Deviation 0
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 52: General Practitioner Visit (n = 1184)1.8 eventsStandard Deviation 3.8
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 52: Rheumatologist Visit (n = 1184)2.0 eventsStandard Deviation 1.9
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 52: Other Specialist Visit (n = 1183)0.6 eventsStandard Deviation 2.6
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 52: Follow-up Treatment (n = 1186)0.0 eventsStandard Deviation 0
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 52: Ergotherapy (n = 1186)0.0 eventsStandard Deviation 0.9
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 52: Other Health Care Resources (n = 1185)0.7 eventsStandard Deviation 5.1
EtanerceptHealthcare Resource UtilizationWeek 52: Sum Over All Care Resources (n = 1186)9.6 eventsStandard Deviation 15.8
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS-20) Response

ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in AS participants. ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 20= at least \>= 20 percent improvement from baseline and an absolute change \>=1 unit on a 0-10 numeric scale (0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity) in at least 3 of the domains (on a 0-10 numerical scale): Global assessment of disease activity by participant, participant's global pain intensity, function measured by BASFI and inflammation measured by the average of the last two Likert-scales in BASDAI concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration and no worsening in the remaining domain.

Time frame: Week 12, 26, 38, 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS-20) ResponseWeek 38 (n=1235)63.1 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS-20) ResponseWeek 12 (n=1480)60.6 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS-20) ResponseWeek 26 (n=1395)61.6 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS-20) ResponseWeek 52 (n=1186)63.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 40 (ASAS-40) Response

ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants. ASAS =4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 40= at least (\>=) 40 percent improvement from baseline and an absolute change \>=2 unit on a 0-10 numeric scale (0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity) in at least 3 of the domains (on a 0-10 numerical scale): Global assessment of disease activity by participant, participant's global pain intensity, function measured by BASFI and inflammation measured by the average of the last two Likert-scales in BASDAI concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration and no worsening in the remaining domain.

Time frame: Week 12, 26, 38, 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 40 (ASAS-40) ResponseWeek 12 (n=1480)44.1 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 40 (ASAS-40) ResponseWeek 26 (n=1395)46.7 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 40 (ASAS-40) ResponseWeek 38 (n=1235)48.6 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 40 (ASAS-40) ResponseWeek 52 (n=1186)51.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Discontinuation of Treatment Due to Adverse Events

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52

Population: Safety population included all treated participants with available post--baseline safety data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Discontinuation of Treatment Due to Adverse Events11.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Presence of Enthesitis

Enthesitis is the inflammation of the enthesis, where the joint capsules, ligaments or tendons attach to the bone. This inflammation can lead to severe pain and discomfort.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'N' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Presence of EnthesitisBaseline (n=1663)20.6 percentage of participants 59.2
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Presence of EnthesitisWeek 2 (n=1405)14.7 percentage of participants 31.4
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Presence of EnthesitisWeek 6 (n=1452)11.5 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Presence of EnthesitisWeek 12 (n=1480)9.5 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Presence of EnthesitisWeek 26 (n=1395)8.5 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Presence of EnthesitisWeek 38 (n=1235)7.4 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Presence of EnthesitisWeek 52 (n=1186)7.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral Arthritis

Peripheral arthritis is the inflammation of joints that involved asymmetrically. It involved the hips, shoulder girdle (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular joints), joints of the chest wall (costovertebral joints, costosternal junctions) and symphysis pubis.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'N' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral ArthritisWeek 2 (n=1405)26.0 percentage of participants 31.4
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral ArthritisWeek 6 (n=1452)22.0 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral ArthritisWeek 12 (n=1480)18.2 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral ArthritisBaseline (n=1663)36.8 percentage of participants 59.2
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral ArthritisWeek 26 (n=1395)16.7 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral ArthritisWeek 38 (n=1235)14.6 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral ArthritisWeek 52 (n=1186)15.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Prior or Concomitant Medication Use for Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis

Participants taking any non-study medications which were administered either prior to or during the study treatment for AS were reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52

Population: Safety population included all treated participants with available post-baseline safety data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Prior or Concomitant Medication Use for Treatment of Ankylosing SpondylitisConcomitant Medication38.4 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Prior or Concomitant Medication Use for Treatment of Ankylosing SpondylitisPrior Therapy98.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life- threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability or incapacity; congenital anomaly. Percentage of participants with AEs included participants affected with both SAEs and non--SAEs.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52

Population: Safety population included all treated participants with available post-baseline safety data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs)SAEs7.6 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs)AEs38.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs) by Co-morbidity

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52

Population: Safety population included all treated participants with available post--baseline safety data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs) by Co-morbiditySAEsNA percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs) by Co-morbidityAEsNA percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning Stiffness

Duration of morning stiffness is defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes. A significant reduction of duration of morning stiffness is defined as a reduction of the duration in minutes by at least 20 percent or reduction to 'no morning stiffness' (absence of morning stiffness).

Time frame: Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'N' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning StiffnessWeek 2 (n=1405)51.6 percentage of participants 59.2
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning StiffnessWeek 6 (n=1452)62.1 percentage of participants 31.4
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning StiffnessWeek 12 (n=1480)67.2 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning StiffnessWeek 26 (n=1395)68.0 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning StiffnessWeek 38 (n=1235)69.8 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning StiffnessWeek 52 (n=1186)70.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)

WPAI:SHP is 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the amount of absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss and daily activity impairment attributable to rheumatoid arthritis for a period of 7 days prior to each visit. It yields 4 sub-scores: work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism or reduced on-the-job effectiveness), overall work impairment (work productivity loss or absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment (daily activity impairment). These sub-scores are transformed to impairment percentages (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, 52

Population: Effectiveness population: all treated participants \>=18 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, received etanercept therapy for first time and had post-baseline documentation. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptWork Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)Baseline: Impairment While Working (n=890)48.3 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 26.9
EtanerceptWork Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)Week 52: Overall work impairment (n = 578)26.3 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 24.2
EtanerceptWork Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)Week 52: Activity impairment (n = 1137)32.3 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 24.9
EtanerceptWork Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)Baseline: Work Time Missed (n=776)21.9 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 36.3
EtanerceptWork Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)Baseline: Overall work impairment (n=716)52.9 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 29.8
EtanerceptWork Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)Baseline: Activity impairment (n = 1624)58.1 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 24.6
EtanerceptWork Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)Week 26: Work Time Missed (n = 666)6.6 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 20.6
EtanerceptWork Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)Week 26: Impairment While Working (n = 799)27.3 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 23.1
EtanerceptWork Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)Week 26: Overall work impairment (n = 657)29.8 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 25.9
EtanerceptWork Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)Week 26: Activity impairment (n = 1331)34.6 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 24.6
EtanerceptWork Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)Week 52: Work Time Missed (n = 588)6.3 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 19.2
EtanerceptWork Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)Week 52: Impairment While Working (n = 706)24.6 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 21.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026