Skip to content

Phase 2 Dose-finding Study to Evaluate the Effects of BA058 in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

A Randomized, Parallel-Group, Phase 2 Dose-finding Study to Evaluate the Effects of BA058 in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00542425
Enrollment
222
Registered
2007-10-11
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2017-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporosis

Keywords

osteoporosis, postmenopausal, bone loss

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether BA058 is effective in building bone in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Detailed description

This is a randomized, parallel-group, multi-center, dose-finding study to evaluate the effects of BA058 in the treatment of otherwise healthy postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Interventions

DRUGteriparatide

teriparatide 20 µg subcutaneous daily

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo subcutaneous daily

DRUGBA058 20 µg

BA058 20 µg subcutaneous daily

DRUGBA058 40 µg

BA058 40 µg subcutaneous daily

DRUGBA058 80 µg

BA058 80 µg subcutaneous daily

Sponsors

Radius Health, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
55 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Primary Inclusion Criteria: * The patient has a bone mineral density T-score ≤ 2.5 at the lumbar spine or hip (femoral neck) by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Women with a bone mineral density T-score of 2.0 or lower and a prior low-trauma forearm, humerus, vertebral, sacral, pelvic, hip, femoral, or tibial fracture within the past 5 years, or who have an additional risk factor such as age 65 or greater or a strong maternal history of osteoporosis defined as a fracture related to osteoporosis or osteoporosis itself as determined by BMD criteria, are also study candidates. * The patient is in good general health as determined by medical history and physical examination and is without evidence of clinically significant abnormality in the opinion of the Investigator. Primary

Exclusion criteria

* History of bone disorders (e.g., Paget's disease) other than postmenopausal osteoporosis. * Prior treatment with approved or as yet unapproved bone-acting investigational agents. * History of carcinoma, nephrolithiasis or urolithiasis within the past five years or osteosarcoma at any time. * History of radiotherapy (radiation therapy).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Marker of Bone Metabolism, PINP6 monthsPINP, N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen, is a marker of anabolic bone growth.
Change in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.6 monthsTotal analyzable spine bone mineral density (BMD) was analyzed by DXA at Week 24.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Bone Mineral Density, Femoral Neck.6 monthsFemoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) was analyzed by DXA at Week 24.
Change in Bone Mineral Density, Total Hip.6 monthsTotal analyzable hip bone mineral density (BMD) was analyzed by DXA at Week 24.
Change in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.12 monthsTotal analyzable spine bone mineral density (BMD) was analyzed by DXA at Week 48.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment for the study started in the US, in January 2007. For the initial 24-week treatment period, patients were randomized to study treatment at 30 study centers in the US, Argentina, India and the UK . Eleven of the 30 study centers treated patients in the 24-week treatment extension period in the US, Argentina, and India.

Pre-assignment details

After eligibility was established, patients entered a 4-week Pretreatment Period during which they received daily Calcium and Vitamin D supplements, were trained in self-injection with the pen devices, and were assessed for additional evaluations at the end of the Pretreatment Period. Patients who remained eligible were randomized on Day 1.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo46
BA058 20 µg43
BA058 40 µg43
BA058 80 µg45
Teriparatide45
Total222

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Extended 24 Weeks of TreatmentAdverse Event00110
Extended 24 Weeks of TreatmentOther11001
Extended 24 Weeks of TreatmentProtocol Violation00100
Extended 24 Weeks of TreatmentRefusal of treatment01000
Initial 24 WeeksAdministrative reasons00110
Initial 24 WeeksAdverse Event01132
Initial 24 WeeksInability to complete procedures03212
Initial 24 WeeksLost to Follow-up22100
Initial 24 WeeksNon-compliance00011
Initial 24 WeeksOther02100
Initial 24 WeeksProtocol Violation00010
Initial 24 WeeksRefusal of treatment22141

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboBA058 20 µgBA058 40 µgBA058 80 µgTeriparatideTotal
Age, Continuous65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.11
66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.96
64.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.35
64.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.21
64.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.48
65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.19
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants43 Participants43 Participants45 Participants45 Participants222 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
30 / 4531 / 4332 / 4333 / 4535 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 452 / 430 / 432 / 450 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.

Total analyzable spine bone mineral density (BMD) was analyzed by DXA at Week 24.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included any patient who received at least one dose of study medication; N=221. 187 of the 221 ITT patients had data available for analysis at Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.1.22 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 3.211
BA058 20 µgChange in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.3.30 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 2.068
BA058 40 µgChange in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.5.21 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 4.427
BA058 80 µgChange in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.6.11 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 3.744
TeriparatideChange in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.5.47 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 4.218
Comparison: For the BMD endpoint, the planned study size has 80 percent power with alpha=0.02 to detect a difference in mean change from baseline of 3.0 (percent) in BMD for the BA058 group and the BA058 Placebo group using an assumed SD of 3.5-4.0. The estimates for SD are based upon results of lumbar spine BMD presented by Body 2002.p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Comparison: For the BMD endpoint, the planned study size has 80 percent power with alpha=0.02 to detect a difference in mean change from baseline of 3.0 (percent) in BMD for the BA058 group and the BA058 Placebo group using an assumed SD of 3.5-4.0. The estimates for SD are based upon results of lumbar spine BMD presented by Body 2002.p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Primary

Change in Marker of Bone Metabolism, PINP

PINP, N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen, is a marker of anabolic bone growth.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included any patient who received at least one dose of study medication; N=221. 193 of the 221 ITT patients had data available for analysis at Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Marker of Bone Metabolism, PINP-13.1 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 26.47
BA058 20 µgChange in Marker of Bone Metabolism, PINP20.0 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 61.05
BA058 40 µgChange in Marker of Bone Metabolism, PINP90.8 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 116.92
BA058 80 µgChange in Marker of Bone Metabolism, PINP97.2 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 123.88
TeriparatideChange in Marker of Bone Metabolism, PINP154.3 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 213.07
Comparison: Study size provided 95 percent power to detect a difference in means of 114 (ng/mL) for PINP endpoint between BA058 (SD=147.5) and placebo (SD=34.5). Study size was based on Bauer 2006 data and utilized a 2-tailed 2-sample t-test with a significance level of alpha=0.01 with a Bonferonni adjustment for multiple testing. It included a 10 percent adjustment for within study dropouts over 6 months and a 15 percent adjustment to maintain adequate power for a per protocol analysis of key endpoints.p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Comparison: Study size provided 95 percent power to detect a difference in means of 114 (ng/mL) for PINP endpoint between BA058 (SD=147.5) and placebo (SD=34.5). Study size was based on Bauer 2006 data and utilized a 2-tailed 2-sample t-test with a significance level of alpha=0.01 with a Bonferonni adjustment for multiple testing. It included a 10 percent adjustment for within study dropouts over 6 months and a 15 percent adjustment to maintain adequate power for a per protocol analysis of key endpoints.p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Secondary

Change in Bone Mineral Density, Femoral Neck.

Femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) was analyzed by DXA at Week 24.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included any patient who received at least one dose of study medication; N=221. 182 of the 221 ITT patients had data available for analysis at Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Bone Mineral Density, Femoral Neck.0.79 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 4.797
BA058 20 µgChange in Bone Mineral Density, Femoral Neck.2.69 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 4.022
BA058 40 µgChange in Bone Mineral Density, Femoral Neck.2.20 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 4.406
BA058 80 µgChange in Bone Mineral Density, Femoral Neck.3.07 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 4.175
TeriparatideChange in Bone Mineral Density, Femoral Neck.1.07 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 4.564
Secondary

Change in Bone Mineral Density, Total Hip.

Total analyzable hip bone mineral density (BMD) was analyzed by DXA at Week 24.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included any patient who received at least one dose of study medication; N=221. 182 of the 221 ITT patients had data available for analysis at Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Bone Mineral Density, Total Hip.0.39 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 3.053
BA058 20 µgChange in Bone Mineral Density, Total Hip.1.43 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 2.639
BA058 40 µgChange in Bone Mineral Density, Total Hip.1.97 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 3.699
BA058 80 µgChange in Bone Mineral Density, Total Hip.2.60 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 3.488
TeriparatideChange in Bone Mineral Density, Total Hip.0.45 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 3.925
Secondary

Change in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.

Total analyzable spine bone mineral density (BMD) was analyzed by DXA at Week 48.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: The extension population included any patient who continued in the extended 24 weeks of treatment; N=55. 49 of the 55 extension patients had data available for analysis at Week 48.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.0.74 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 3.541
BA058 20 µgChange in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.5.14 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 3.164
BA058 40 µgChange in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.9.84 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 5.313
BA058 80 µgChange in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.12.94 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 3.251
TeriparatideChange in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.8.63 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 6.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026