Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of NT 201 in the Treatment of Lateral Periorbital Wrinkles

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of NT 201 in Comparison to Placebo and to Compare Two Different Application Schemes of NT 201 in the Treatment of Lateral Periorbital Wrinkles

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00541723
Enrollment
111
Registered
2007-10-10
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2008-05-31
Last updated
2012-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lateral Periorbital Wrinkles

Brief summary

To investigate the efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) in comparison to placebo in the treatment of moderate to severe lateral periorbital wrinkles at maximum smile and to compare two different application schemes of Xeomin. Each subject will be treated on the right and left eye area, using the same dose but different application schemes (i.e. 3 or 4 injection sites).

Detailed description

Conducted in Europe

Interventions

Intramuscular injection at day 0, at 3 and 4 injection sites per eye (4 x 3 or 3 x 4 units = 12 units per eye)

DRUGPlacebo

Intramuscular injection at day 0, at 3 and 4 injection sites per eye.

Sponsors

Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Main Inclusion Criteria: \- Moderate (grade 2) to severe (grade 3) symmetrical lateral periorbital wrinkles assessed by the investigator according to the 4-point scale at maximum smile Main

Exclusion criteria

\- Significant facial asymmetry

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response assessed by an independent rater at maximum smile at week 4 for either eye area compared to baseline.Week 4Responder: subjects with improvement of at least 1 point on a 4 point scale for lateral periorbital wrinkles.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response assessed by the investigator at maximum smile for either eye area compared to baseline.Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 20Responder: subjects with improvement of at least 1 point on a 4 point scale for lateral periorbital wrinkles.
Response assessed by the subject's global assessment at maximum smile for either eye area compared to baseline.Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 20Responder: subjects with at least a moderate improvement, i.e. a score of at least +2 on a 9 point Likert scale.

Countries

France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026