Skip to content

Phase II Study of Revlimid®, Oral Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Phase II Study of Revlimid®, Oral Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone (RCP) for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00540644
Enrollment
70
Registered
2007-10-08
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2016-06-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

Multiple Myeloma, Revlimid

Brief summary

The purpose of this study to explore the combination of Revlimid®, oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone (RCP) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Detailed description

This is a phase II single institution trial in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Revlimid® 25 mg p.o. daily on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. Cyclophosphamide 50 mg p.o. BID daily on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. Prednisone 50 mg p.o. Q.O.D..

Interventions

25 mg p.o. daily on days 1-21 of each 28 day cycle

DRUGCyclophosphamide

50 mg p.o. BID daily on days 1-21 of each 28 day cycle

DRUGPrednisone

50 mg p.o. Q.O.D.

Sponsors

Celgene
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Attaya Suvannasankha
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients with newly diagnosed, symptomatic multiple myeloma based on the following criteria: * Presence of an M-component in serum and/or urine plus clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow and/or a documented clonal plasmacytoma PLUS one or more of the following: * Calcium elevation (11.5 mg/dl) \[42.65 mmol/l\] * Renal insufficiency (1.5 x the ULN of serum creatinine) * Anemia (hemoglobin \<=10 g/dl or 2 g/dl \<= normal) * Bone disease (lytic lesions or osteopenia) Measurable disease is defined at least one of the following three measurements: * Serum M-protein \>=1 g/dl ( or 10 g/l) * Urine M-protein \>=200 mg/24 h * Serum FLC assay: Involved FLC level \>=10 mg/dl (\>=100 mg/l) provided serum FLC ratio is abnormal * Measurable plasmacytoma * NOTE: If a patient meets the criteria for symptomatic multiple myeloma but does not meet serum M-protein, urine M-protein or serum FLC levels stated above, percent plasma cells in bone marrow will be used to follow response. Laboratory test results within these ranges: * Absolute neutrophil count \>= 1.0 x 109/L * Platelet count \>= 50 x 10(9)/L * Hemoglobin \>= 9 gm/dl * Serum creatinine \<= 2.5mg/dL. * Total bilirubin \<=1.5 x upper limit of normal * AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) \<= 3 x ULN

Exclusion criteria

* Known hypersensitivity to thalidomide * The development of erythema nodosum if characterized by a desquamating rash while taking thalidomide or similar drugs. * Patients with a solitary plasmacytoma * Patients with uncontrolled diabetes * Patients with ≥ Grade 3 sensory neuropathy * History of cardiac disease, with NYHA Class II or greater

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response Rate (RR) After 6 Cycles of Therapy Using the Proposed International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response CriteriaAfter 6 cyclesEvaluate the response rate of patients receiving therapy. Patients are considered as having a response if their overall response is Partial Response or better using the proposed International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria. The percentage of patients achieving this and the exact 95% confidence interval will be calculated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment Related Adverse Events Grade 3 or HigherBeginning of treatment up to 5 yearsNumber of unique patients who had treatment related (possible, probable or definite) adverse events that were graded 3 or greater.
Quality of Life Using the FACT-G Databaseline and after last cycle (up to 6 cycles)Change from baseline FACT-G scores. The quality of life questionnaire (FACT-G) was given at various timepoints during the study. The values for change from baseline to endpoint are provided. Physical Well-Being (PWB; sum of 7 items, point range 0-28); Social/Family Well-Being (SWB, sum of 7-items, point range 0-28); Emotional Well-Being (EWB; sum of 6-items, point range 0-24); Functional Well-Being (FWB; sum of 7-items, point range 0-28) ; Fact-G score=sum of PWB, SWB, EWB, FWB, point range 0-108. Note: The higher the score, the better the outcome

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Original Study - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone
Original portion of the study where patients received Revlimid® 25 mg p.o. daily on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. Cyclophosphamide 50 mg p.o. BID daily on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. Prednisone 50 mg p.o. Q.O.D.
48
Extension - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone
Extension portion of the study where patients received Revlimid® 25 mg p.o. daily on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. Cyclophosphamide 50 mg p.o. BID daily on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. Prednisone 50 mg p.o. Q.O.D.
22
Total70

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event31
Overall StudyDisease Progression31
Overall StudyNoncomplilance10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision05
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOriginal Study - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, PrednisoneExtension - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, PrednisoneTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
22 Participants5 Participants27 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
26 Participants17 Participants43 Participants
Age, Continuous61.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
59.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
61.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
48 Participants22 Participants70 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
43 Participants21 Participants64 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants8 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants14 Participants44 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
48 / 4822 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 485 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Response Rate (RR) After 6 Cycles of Therapy Using the Proposed International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria

Evaluate the response rate of patients receiving therapy. Patients are considered as having a response if their overall response is Partial Response or better using the proposed International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria. The percentage of patients achieving this and the exact 95% confidence interval will be calculated.

Time frame: After 6 cycles

Population: All patients receiving at least one dose of study drug and having at least one post-baseline visit

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Original Study - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, PrednisoneResponse Rate (RR) After 6 Cycles of Therapy Using the Proposed International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria86.7 percentage of participants
Extension - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, PrednisoneResponse Rate (RR) After 6 Cycles of Therapy Using the Proposed International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria71.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Quality of Life Using the FACT-G Data

Change from baseline FACT-G scores. The quality of life questionnaire (FACT-G) was given at various timepoints during the study. The values for change from baseline to endpoint are provided. Physical Well-Being (PWB; sum of 7 items, point range 0-28); Social/Family Well-Being (SWB, sum of 7-items, point range 0-28); Emotional Well-Being (EWB; sum of 6-items, point range 0-24); Functional Well-Being (FWB; sum of 7-items, point range 0-28) ; Fact-G score=sum of PWB, SWB, EWB, FWB, point range 0-108. Note: The higher the score, the better the outcome

Time frame: baseline and after last cycle (up to 6 cycles)

Population: All patients enrolled and received treatment with a baseline and post-baseline measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Original Study - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, PrednisoneQuality of Life Using the FACT-G DataSocial/Family Well-Being Change from Baseline-0.03 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.08
Original Study - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, PrednisoneQuality of Life Using the FACT-G DataFunctional Well-Being Change from Baseline3.38 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.33
Original Study - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, PrednisoneQuality of Life Using the FACT-G DataEmotional Well-Beling Change from Baseline2.52 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.95
Original Study - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, PrednisoneQuality of Life Using the FACT-G DataFACT-G Change from Baseline7.44 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.07
Original Study - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, PrednisoneQuality of Life Using the FACT-G DataPhysical Well-Being Change from Baseline1.57 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Extension - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, PrednisoneQuality of Life Using the FACT-G DataFACT-G Change from Baseline-3.61 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.92
Extension - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, PrednisoneQuality of Life Using the FACT-G DataPhysical Well-Being Change from Baseline-2.81 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.14
Extension - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, PrednisoneQuality of Life Using the FACT-G DataSocial/Family Well-Being Change from Baseline-0.23 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.53
Extension - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, PrednisoneQuality of Life Using the FACT-G DataEmotional Well-Beling Change from Baseline0.60 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.22
Extension - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, PrednisoneQuality of Life Using the FACT-G DataFunctional Well-Being Change from Baseline-1.17 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.97
Secondary

Treatment Related Adverse Events Grade 3 or Higher

Number of unique patients who had treatment related (possible, probable or definite) adverse events that were graded 3 or greater.

Time frame: Beginning of treatment up to 5 years

Population: All patients enrolled and received treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Original Study - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, PrednisoneTreatment Related Adverse Events Grade 3 or Higher21 participants
Extension - Revlimid, Cyclophosphamide, PrednisoneTreatment Related Adverse Events Grade 3 or Higher11 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026