Skip to content

Multicenter Trial of Immunotherapy With House Dust Mite Allergoid

A Multicentre Randomized Placebo-controlled Double-blind Clinical Trial for Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of a Specific Immunotherapy With an Aluminium Hydroxide-adsorbed Allergoid Preparation of House Dust Mite (Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus) in Patients With Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis and/or Allergic Asthma Bronchiale

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00540631
Acronym
ACRI
Enrollment
108
Registered
2007-10-08
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2013-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rhinoconjunctivitis

Keywords

House Dust Mite Allergen, Aluminium hydroxide-adsorbed

Brief summary

Multicenter Immunotherapy House Dust Mite Allergoid

Detailed description

A multicentre randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial for evaluation of safety and efficacy of a specific immunotherapy with an aluminium hydroxide-adsorbed allergoid preparation of house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) in patients with rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis and/or allergic asthma bronchiale

Interventions

BIOLOGICALspecific immunotherapy with Acaroid, subcutaneously, Up-titration till strength B 0.6 mL (6000 TU)

Injection Number Date Proposed Dose Individual Dose Strength A=1000 TU/ml B=10000TU/ml ml Dose per Injection 1. to be det. A 0.1 100 TU 2. 7 (+7) days later A 0.2 200 TU 3. 7 (+7) days later A 0.4 400 TU 4. 7 (+7) days later A 0.6 600 TU 5. 7 (+7) days later B 0.1 1000 TU 6. 7 (+7) days later B 0.2 2000 TU 7. 7 (+7) days later B 0.4 4000 TU 8. 7 (+7) days later B 0.6 6000 TU Maintenance (Init 2,4) 4-6 weekly B 0.6 6000 TU To be continued Injection Number Date Proposed Dose Individual Dose Strength A=1000 TU/ml B=10000TU/ml ml Dose per Injection 1. to be det. A 0.1 100 TU 2. 7 (+7) days later A 0.2 200 TU 3. 7 (+7) days later A 0.4 400 TU 4. 7 (+7) days later A 0.6 600 TU 5. 7 (+7) days later B 0.1 1000 TU 6. 7 (+7) days later B 0.2 2000 TU 7. 7 (+7) days later B 0.4 4000 TU 8. 7 (+7) days later B 0.6 6000 TU Maintenance (Init 2,4) 4-6 weekly B 0.6 6000 TU To be continued

Sponsors

Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Positive SPT * Positive EAST * Positive specific provocation test

Exclusion criteria

* Serious chronic diseases * other perennial allergies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint is the change of the area under the curve (AUC)of the Symptom-Medication-Score (SMS)after 2 years of double-blind treatment to baselineNovember 2007 - February 2010

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Tolerability and safety of treatments during the entire study period4 years
Change of the AUC of the SMS after one year to baseline.1 year
Change of Nasal Eosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP) after 2 years to baseline2 years
Immunologic changes IgE, IgG1 and IgG42 years

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026