Skip to content

Albumin-bound Paclitaxel (ABI-007) for Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Randomized, Phase III Trial of ABI-007 and Carboplatin Compared With Taxol and Carboplatin as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00540514
Enrollment
1052
Registered
2007-10-08
Start date
2007-11-01
Completion date
2013-02-01
Last updated
2019-10-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Keywords

Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare disease response of Albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABI-007) plus Carboplatin versus Taxol and Carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Interventions

DRUGAlbumin-bound paclitaxel

Administered by intravenous infusion.

DRUGPaclitaxel

Administered by intravenous infusion.

DRUGCarboplatin

Administered by intravenous infusion. Dosing was based on the Calvert formula: carboplatin dose (mg) = (Target AUC) x (glomerular filtration rate \[GFR\] + 25). For the purposes of this protocol, the GFR is considered to be equivalent to creatinine clearance (calculated by the method of Cockcroft and Gault, 1976).

Sponsors

Celgene
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) * Male or non-pregnant and non-lactating female, and equal or greater than age 18 * If a female patient is of child-bearing potential, as evidence by regular menstrual periods, she must have a negative serum pregnancy test (beta human chorionic gonadotropin \[βhCG\]) documented within 72 hours of the first administration of study drug * If sexually active, the patient must agree to utilize contraception considered adequate and appropriate by the investigator * No other current active malignancy * Radiographically-documented measurable disease (defined by the presence of at least 1 radiographically documented measurable lesion) * Patients must have received no prior chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy permitted providing cytotoxic chemotherapy was completed 12 months prior to starting the study * Patient has the following blood counts at baseline: * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1.5x10\^9/L * Platelets greater than or equal to 100x10\^9/L * Hemoglobin (Hgb) greater than or equal to 9 g/dL * Patient has the following blood chemistry levels at baseline: * Aspartate aminotransferase (SGOT), alanine aminotransferase (SGPT) less than or equal to 2.5 x upper limit of normal range (ULN) or less than or equal to 5.0 x ULN if liver metastases; * Total bilirubin less than or equal to ULN * Creatinine less than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL * Expected survival of greater than 12 weeks * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1 * Patient or his/her legally authorized representative or guardian has been informed about the nature of the study, and has agreed to participate in the study, and signed the Informed Consent form prior to participation in any study-related activities

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of active brain metastases, including leptomeningeal involvement. Prior evidence of brain metastasis permitted only if treated and stable and off therapy for greater than or equal to 1 month * The only evidence of disease is non-measurable * Patient has pre-existing peripheral neuropathy of Grade 2, 3, or 4 (per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events \[CTCAE\] Version 3). * Patient received radiotherapy in the last 4 weeks, except if to a non-target lesion only. Prior radiation to a target lesion is permitted only if there has been clear progression of the lesion since radiation was completed * Patient has a clinically significant concurrent illness * Patient has received treatment with any investigational drug within the previous 4 weeks * Patient has a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs * Patient has serious medical risk factors involving any of the major organ systems such that the investigator considers it unsafe for the patient to receive an experimental research drug * Patient is enrolled in any other clinical protocol or investigational trial that involves administration of experimental therapy and/or therapeutic devices.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology AssessmentObjective response was evaluated every 6 weeks until progression or new anti-cancer therapy initiation, up to 22 months.Antitumor response was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an objective response (Confirmed Response \[CR\] or Partial Response \[PR\]), confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Response was based on the blinded radiological review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response guidelines, Version 1.0. A complete response was defined as a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Partial response was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD, and the persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for CR or Progressive Disease (the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesion(s) or appearance of one or more new lesions).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Participant SurvivalUp to 38 monthsOverall survival was defined as the time from the day of randomization to participant death (due to any cause), as assessed by post study follow-up performed monthly for 6 months and every 3 months thereafter for 12 months. All participants who were lost to the follow-up prior to the end of the trial or who completed the 18 month follow up phase were censored at last known time the participant was alive.
Percentage of Participants With Controlled DiseaseAssessed every 6 weeks, up to 22 monthsControlled disease was defined as the percentage of participants with stable disease for ≥ 16 weeks or confirmed complete or partial overall response, based on blinded radiological assessment. Stable disease was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage of target lesions to qualify for Partial Response, nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progressive Disease, or the persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for Complete Response or Progressive Disease.
Duration of Response in Responding PatientsAssessed every 6 weeks, up to 38 monthsDuration of response was assessed by progression free survival for participants who achieved a confirmed complete response or partial response based on blinded radiological assessment.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Up to 38 monthsA Treatment-emergent AE was any AE that began or worsened in grade after the start of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or end of study whichever is later. Treatment related toxicity was one considered by the investigator to be possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug. AEs were graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 on the following scale: Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening, Grade 5 = death. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: is fatal or life-threatening; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; requires or prolongs in-patient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a patient; and conditions not included in the above that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) ParametersBlood samples for PK analyses were taken during Cycle 1 at 0.25, 3.5 and 24 hours post-infusion.
SPARC Status and Correlation With Overall SurvivalArchival tissue samples were used for SPARC analysis. Survival was assessed for up to 38 months.The expression and cellular distribution of Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in cysteine (SPARC) in biopsies of lung tumor was examined by immunohistochemistry using a 2 antibody system by an approved central laboratory and analyzed by 2 pathologists. The following tissue components were scored: tumor cells, fibroblasts, inflammatory cells, acellular stroma/matrix, and blood vessels. To classify participants into high-SPARC and low-SPARC groups, an average z-score was calculated across variables and classified high-SPARC (average z-scores ≥0) and low-SPARC (average z-scores \<0) groups. SPARC status was then correlated with overall survival (the time from the day of randomization to participant death due to any cause).
Progression-free Survival by Blinded Radiology AssessmentAssessed every 6 weeks until progression or death, up to 38 monthsProgression free survival time was defined as the time from the day of randomization to the start of disease progression or death (any cause), whichever occurred first, based on the blinded radiological review response assessment. Progressive disease was defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the SLD of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started, or the presence of one or more new lesions, or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesion(s) or appearance of one or more new lesion(s). Participants who did not have disease progression or had not died were censored at the last visit they were documented as progression free. If palliative radiotherapy or surgery at lesion sites occurred, the participant was censored at the last date without documented progression prior to radiotherapy or surgery. In follow-up, participants who began new therapy prior to progression were censored at the last documented date as progression-free.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximal Degree of Neutropenia Based on Clinical Laboratory Values of Absolute Neutrophil Count38 monthsThe maximal degree of neutropenia (and myelosuppression) was assessed by the overall nadir of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) based on clinical laboratory measurements graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0.
Maximal Degree of Thrombocytopenia Based on Clinical Laboratory Values of Platelet Count38 monthsThe maximal degree of thrombocytopenia (and myelosuppression) was assessed by the overall nadir of platelet count based on clinical laboratory measurements graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0.
Time to Improvement of ≥ Grade 3 Treatment Related Peripheral Neuropathy38 monthsPeripheral neuropathy was graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 on the following scale: Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening, Grade 5 = death. Improvement in peripheral neuropathy was evaluated as: * Time to improvement of grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy by at least one grade; * Time to improvement of grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy to grade 1. Time to improvement was defined as the time from the first occurrence of grade 3 or higher treatment related neuropathy to improvement, as defined. Participants not experiencing improvement were censored at the last time the participant was evaluated for adverse events.
Maximal Degree of Anemia Based on Clinical Laboratory Values for Hemoglobin38 monthsThe maximal degree of anemia (and myelosuppression) was assessed by the overall nadir of hemoglobin levels based on clinical laboratory measurements graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment, by HistologyObjective response was evaluated every 6 weeks until progression or new anti-cancer therapy initiation, up to 22 months.Antitumor response was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an objective response (Confirmed Response \[CR\] or Partial Response \[PR\]), confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Response was based on the blinded radiological review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response guidelines, Version 1.0. A complete response was defined as a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Partial response was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD, and the persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for CR or Progressive Disease (the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesion(s) or appearance of one or more new lesions). Histology was determined at the time of primary diagnosis.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Eligible patients were randomized on Day 1 in a 1:1 ratio into 1 of 2 treatment arms and were required to start treatment within 7 days of randomization. The data below represent a cut-off of 31 January 2011. One patient was randomized twice and not included in the Intent-to-treat population.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + Carboplatin
Participants received albumin-bound paclitaxel 100 mg/m\^2 administered as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin was given at an Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 6 mg\*min/mL on Day 1 only of each 21-day cycle, beginning immediately after the completion of albumin-bound paclitaxel administration. Participants could continue treatment at the investigator's discretion until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.
521
Paclitaxel + Carboplatin
Participants received 200 mg/m\^2 paclitaxel administered by intravenous infusion followed by carboplatin at AUC = 6 mg\*min/mL on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Participants could continue treatment at the investigator's discretion until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.
531
Total1,052

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event2024
Overall StudyExcluded prior to treatment77
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyPaclitaxel not available02
Overall StudyPhysician Decision8699
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation34
Overall StudyStill on treatment30
Overall StudyUnacceptable Toxicity6162
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject6567

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPaclitaxel + CarboplatinAlbumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinTotal
Age, Continuous59.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.53
59.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.14
59.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.33
Anatomic Site of Primary Diagnosis
Lung
499 participants480 participants979 participants
Anatomic Site of Primary Diagnosis
Other
32 participants41 participants73 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
0 (Fully active)
113 participants133 participants246 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
1 (Restrictive but ambulatory)
416 participants385 participants801 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
2 (Ambulatory but unable to work)
2 participants3 participants5 participants
Histology of Primary Diagnosis
Carcinoma/ Adenocarcinoma
264 participants254 participants518 participants
Histology of Primary Diagnosis
Large Cell Carcinoma
13 participants9 participants22 participants
Histology of Primary Diagnosis
Other
33 participants29 participants62 participants
Histology of Primary Diagnosis
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
221 participants229 participants450 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
80 participants79 participants159 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black, of African Heritage
8 participants12 participants20 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
North American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
5 participants2 participants7 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White, Hispanic or Latino
5 participants11 participants16 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White, Non Hispanic and Non Latino
433 participants416 participants849 participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
9 participants5 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
23 participants21 participants44 participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
75 participants74 participants149 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russian Federation
231 participants238 participants469 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
135 participants120 participants255 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
58 participants63 participants121 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
134 Participants129 Participants263 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
397 Participants392 Participants789 Participants
Smoking status
Missing
5 participants2 participants7 participants
Smoking status
Never smoked
144 participants137 participants281 participants
Smoking status
Smoked and currently smokes
234 participants214 participants448 participants
Smoking status
Smoked and quit smoking
148 participants168 participants316 participants
Stage at Primary Diagnosis
I
20 participants16 participants36 participants
Stage at Primary Diagnosis
II
24 participants18 participants42 participants
Stage at Primary Diagnosis
IIIa
24 participants22 participants46 participants
Stage at Primary Diagnosis
IIIb
116 participants135 participants251 participants
Stage at Primary Diagnosis
IV
344 participants325 participants669 participants
Stage at Primary Diagnosis
Unknown
3 participants5 participants8 participants
Stage at Randomization
IIIb
110 participants108 participants218 participants
Stage at Randomization
IV
421 participants413 participants834 participants
Time from 1st Documented Metastasis/Relapse to Study Entry0.8 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.25
0.9 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.11
0.9 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.73
Time from Primary Diagnosis to Study Entry4.3 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.09
4.3 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.12
4.3 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.6

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
483 / 514499 / 524
serious
Total, serious adverse events
93 / 51480 / 524

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment

Antitumor response was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an objective response (Confirmed Response \[CR\] or Partial Response \[PR\]), confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Response was based on the blinded radiological review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response guidelines, Version 1.0. A complete response was defined as a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Partial response was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD, and the persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for CR or Progressive Disease (the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesion(s) or appearance of one or more new lesions).

Time frame: Objective response was evaluated every 6 weeks until progression or new anti-cancer therapy initiation, up to 22 months.

Population: The intent-to-treat population which includes all randomized patients regardless of whether the patient received any study drug or had any efficacy assessments collected.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment33 percentage of participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment25 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the albumin-bound paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen response rate (PA) is equal to that of the paclitaxel (Taxol)/carboplatin regimen (PT). Superiority of albumin-bound paclitaxel/carboplatin to paclitaxel/carboplatin will be established if the lower bound of the 95.1% CI of the response rate ratio is \> 1.0.p-value: 0.00595.1% CI: [1.082, 1.593]Chi-squared
Secondary

Duration of Response in Responding Patients

Duration of response was assessed by progression free survival for participants who achieved a confirmed complete response or partial response based on blinded radiological assessment.

Time frame: Assessed every 6 weeks, up to 38 months

Population: Intent-to-treat patients with an objective response.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinDuration of Response in Responding Patients9.6 months
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinDuration of Response in Responding Patients9.5 months
p-value: 0.55195% CI: [0.652, 1.244]Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

A Treatment-emergent AE was any AE that began or worsened in grade after the start of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or end of study whichever is later. Treatment related toxicity was one considered by the investigator to be possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug. AEs were graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 on the following scale: Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening, Grade 5 = death. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: is fatal or life-threatening; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; requires or prolongs in-patient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a patient; and conditions not included in the above that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.

Time frame: Up to 38 months

Population: Treated population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 AE483 participants
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 grade 3 or higher AE360 participants
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 treatment-related AE469 participants
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 treatment-related grade 3 or higher AE321 participants
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 serious AE93 participants
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 treatment-related serious AE37 participants
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 AE with taxane permanently discontinued80 participants
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 AE with action of taxane dosage reduced237 participants
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 AE with action of taxane interrupted0 participants
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 AE with action of taxane delayed365 participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 AE with action of taxane dosage reduced120 participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 AE504 participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 treatment-related serious AE30 participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 grade 3 or higher AE355 participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 AE with action of taxane delayed214 participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 treatment-related AE481 participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 AE with taxane permanently discontinued84 participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 treatment-related grade 3 or higher AE315 participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 AE with action of taxane interrupted5 participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)At least 1 serious AE80 participants
Secondary

Overall Participant Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time from the day of randomization to participant death (due to any cause), as assessed by post study follow-up performed monthly for 6 months and every 3 months thereafter for 12 months. All participants who were lost to the follow-up prior to the end of the trial or who completed the 18 month follow up phase were censored at last known time the participant was alive.

Time frame: Up to 38 months

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinOverall Participant Survival12.1 months
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinOverall Participant Survival11.2 months
p-value: 0.27195.1% CI: [0.797, 1.066]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Controlled Disease

Controlled disease was defined as the percentage of participants with stable disease for ≥ 16 weeks or confirmed complete or partial overall response, based on blinded radiological assessment. Stable disease was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage of target lesions to qualify for Partial Response, nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progressive Disease, or the persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for Complete Response or Progressive Disease.

Time frame: Assessed every 6 weeks, up to 22 months

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants With Controlled Disease53 percentage of participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants With Controlled Disease49 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.23995% CI: [0.953, 1.21]Chi-squared
Secondary

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters

Time frame: Blood samples for PK analyses were taken during Cycle 1 at 0.25, 3.5 and 24 hours post-infusion.

Population: Patients randomized to receive albumin-bound paclitaxel/carboplatin treatment in Canada, Russia, Ukraine and United States had the option to participate in sparse PK sampling in this study. Only 15 participants consented to participate, an insufficient number to support the planned population PK analysis hence these analyses were not performed.

Secondary

Progression-free Survival by Blinded Radiology Assessment

Progression free survival time was defined as the time from the day of randomization to the start of disease progression or death (any cause), whichever occurred first, based on the blinded radiological review response assessment. Progressive disease was defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the SLD of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started, or the presence of one or more new lesions, or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesion(s) or appearance of one or more new lesion(s). Participants who did not have disease progression or had not died were censored at the last visit they were documented as progression free. If palliative radiotherapy or surgery at lesion sites occurred, the participant was censored at the last date without documented progression prior to radiotherapy or surgery. In follow-up, participants who began new therapy prior to progression were censored at the last documented date as progression-free.

Time frame: Assessed every 6 weeks until progression or death, up to 38 months

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinProgression-free Survival by Blinded Radiology Assessment6.3 months
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinProgression-free Survival by Blinded Radiology Assessment5.8 months
p-value: 0.21495.1% CI: [0.767, 1.06]Log Rank
Secondary

SPARC Status and Correlation With Overall Survival

The expression and cellular distribution of Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in cysteine (SPARC) in biopsies of lung tumor was examined by immunohistochemistry using a 2 antibody system by an approved central laboratory and analyzed by 2 pathologists. The following tissue components were scored: tumor cells, fibroblasts, inflammatory cells, acellular stroma/matrix, and blood vessels. To classify participants into high-SPARC and low-SPARC groups, an average z-score was calculated across variables and classified high-SPARC (average z-scores ≥0) and low-SPARC (average z-scores \<0) groups. SPARC status was then correlated with overall survival (the time from the day of randomization to participant death due to any cause).

Time frame: Archival tissue samples were used for SPARC analysis. Survival was assessed for up to 38 months.

Population: SPARC biomarker Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinSPARC Status and Correlation With Overall SurvivalHigh-SPARC17 participants
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinSPARC Status and Correlation With Overall SurvivalLow-SPARC18 participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinSPARC Status and Correlation With Overall SurvivalHigh-SPARC22 participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinSPARC Status and Correlation With Overall SurvivalLow-SPARC14 participants
Comparison: SPARC correlation with overall survival for the overall SPARC population.p-value: 0.302Univariate Cox regression
Other Pre-specified

Maximal Degree of Anemia Based on Clinical Laboratory Values for Hemoglobin

The maximal degree of anemia (and myelosuppression) was assessed by the overall nadir of hemoglobin levels based on clinical laboratory measurements graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0.

Time frame: 38 months

Population: Treated population where laboratory data were available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinMaximal Degree of Anemia Based on Clinical Laboratory Values for Hemoglobin90.0 g/LStandard Deviation 17.19
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinMaximal Degree of Anemia Based on Clinical Laboratory Values for Hemoglobin103.9 g/LStandard Deviation 16.9
Other Pre-specified

Maximal Degree of Neutropenia Based on Clinical Laboratory Values of Absolute Neutrophil Count

The maximal degree of neutropenia (and myelosuppression) was assessed by the overall nadir of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) based on clinical laboratory measurements graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0.

Time frame: 38 months

Population: Treated population where laboratory data were available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinMaximal Degree of Neutropenia Based on Clinical Laboratory Values of Absolute Neutrophil Count1.39 × 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.721
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinMaximal Degree of Neutropenia Based on Clinical Laboratory Values of Absolute Neutrophil Count1.26 × 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.366
Other Pre-specified

Maximal Degree of Thrombocytopenia Based on Clinical Laboratory Values of Platelet Count

The maximal degree of thrombocytopenia (and myelosuppression) was assessed by the overall nadir of platelet count based on clinical laboratory measurements graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0.

Time frame: 38 months

Population: Treated population where laboratory data were available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinMaximal Degree of Thrombocytopenia Based on Clinical Laboratory Values of Platelet Count114.9 × 10^9/LStandard Deviation 82.13
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinMaximal Degree of Thrombocytopenia Based on Clinical Laboratory Values of Platelet Count136.6 × 10^9/LStandard Deviation 81.91
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment, by Histology

Antitumor response was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an objective response (Confirmed Response \[CR\] or Partial Response \[PR\]), confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Response was based on the blinded radiological review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response guidelines, Version 1.0. A complete response was defined as a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Partial response was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD, and the persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for CR or Progressive Disease (the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesion(s) or appearance of one or more new lesions). Histology was determined at the time of primary diagnosis.

Time frame: Objective response was evaluated every 6 weeks until progression or new anti-cancer therapy initiation, up to 22 months.

Population: The intent-to-treat population. N indicates the number of participants in each histology category for each treatment arm respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment, by HistologyCarcinoma/Adenocarcinoma [254, 264]26 percentage of participants
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment, by HistologySquamous Cell Carcinoma [229, 221]41 percentage of participants
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment, by HistologyLarge Cell Carcinoma [N=9, 13]33 percentage of participants
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment, by HistologyOther [N=29, 33]24 percentage of participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment, by HistologyOther [N=29, 33]15 percentage of participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment, by HistologyCarcinoma/Adenocarcinoma [254, 264]27 percentage of participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment, by HistologyLarge Cell Carcinoma [N=9, 13]15 percentage of participants
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment, by HistologySquamous Cell Carcinoma [229, 221]24 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.036Regression, Logistic
Other Pre-specified

Time to Improvement of ≥ Grade 3 Treatment Related Peripheral Neuropathy

Peripheral neuropathy was graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 on the following scale: Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening, Grade 5 = death. Improvement in peripheral neuropathy was evaluated as: * Time to improvement of grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy by at least one grade; * Time to improvement of grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy to grade 1. Time to improvement was defined as the time from the first occurrence of grade 3 or higher treatment related neuropathy to improvement, as defined. Participants not experiencing improvement were censored at the last time the participant was evaluated for adverse events.

Time frame: 38 months

Population: Treated population with ≥ grade 3 treatment-related peripheral neuropathy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinTime to Improvement of ≥ Grade 3 Treatment Related Peripheral NeuropathyImprovement by ≥1 grade24.0 days
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel + CarboplatinTime to Improvement of ≥ Grade 3 Treatment Related Peripheral NeuropathyImprovement to grade 138.0 days
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinTime to Improvement of ≥ Grade 3 Treatment Related Peripheral NeuropathyImprovement by ≥1 grade26.0 days
Paclitaxel + CarboplatinTime to Improvement of ≥ Grade 3 Treatment Related Peripheral NeuropathyImprovement to grade 1104.0 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026