Skip to content

Evaluating the Use of a Silastic Spring-Loaded Silo for Infants With Gastroschisis

A Multi-Centre, Prospective Randomized Trial to Evaluate Routine Use of a Silastic Spring-Loaded Silo for Infants With Gastroschisis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00539292
Enrollment
88
Registered
2007-10-04
Start date
2001-06-30
Completion date
2006-12-31
Last updated
2024-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroschisis

Keywords

pediatrics, gastroschisis, silastic spring-loaded silo

Brief summary

This study seeks to evaluate whether the routine, primary use of the spring-loaded silo (SLS) to treat infants with gastroschisis will result in improved outcomes, faster recovery times and fewer post-surgical complications than the standard selective use of the silo.

Detailed description

Standard treatment of the infant with gastroschisis consists of , the bowel being reduced into the abdomen, when possible,and the abdominal wall defect being closed in the operating room. When complete reduction of the eviscerated contents is not possible, a silastic silo is sewn on the abdominal wall and its contents are gradually reduced into the abdomen over several days. Once reduction is obtained, the silo is removed and the abdominal defect is closed. Current methods of treatment are associated with significant morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and high costs. Gastroschisis closure continues to be accompanied by a number of complications ranging from ileus, sepsis, TPN-related liver damage, necrotizing enterocolitis, respiratory insufficiency, and death. The optimal timing and method of closure, including primary versus secondary closure, continues to be debated. No prospective randomized studies to date have examined the routine use of the spring-loaded silo.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPrimary placement of a spring-loaded silo

primary closure of abdomen

Sponsors

The Hospital for Sick Children
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to 30 Days
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Gastroschisis * Birth Weight ≥ 1500 grams * Gestational Age ≥ 34 weeks

Exclusion criteria

* Birth Weight \< 1500 grams * Gestational Age \< 34 weeks * Presence of Bowel Ischemia or Necrosis * Abdominal wall defect too small * Major associated anomalies or medical condition * Presence of Intracranial Hemorrhage (grade IV) * Parent Refusal for Randomization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ventilation StatusData collected daily during the first 14 days after the abdominal wall closure (measured in days)length of time on the ventilator

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
TPNData collected daily during the first 14 days after the abdominal wall closure, then monthly for 3 months until discharge (measured in days)use of total parenteral nutrition (TPN)
Length of Hospital StayData collected daily during the first 14 days after the abdominal wall closure (measured in days), then monthly for 3 months until discharge.days in hospital
Complications During Hospitalization (e.g., Sepsis)post-surgery to hospital discharge; Data collected daily during the first 14 days after the abdominal wall closure (measured in days), then monthly for 3 months until discharge.Clinical sepsis confirmed with a positive blood culture
Intraabdominal Pressure (IAP) as Reflected by Intragastric Pressureintraabdominal pressure at the time of definitive closure

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 195 infants with gastroschisis were admitted to the participating centers between June 2001 and December 2006. After screening for eligibility and obtaining consent for enrollment, 55 patients were randomized. A randomization plan was generated by the lead center through an electronic Web-based randomization program.

Pre-assignment details

55 patients were randomized, 28 infants in the spring-loaded silo group and 27 infants in the primary closure group. One patient in the spring-loaded silo group was excluded from the study because of repeated dislodg-ement of the silo, requiring use of a sewn prosthetic device and inability to perform secondary closure.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Silastic Spring-Loaded Silo Group
Silastic Spring-Loaded Silo Group Primary placement of a spring-loaded silo Silastic Spring-Loaded Silo Group - Primary placement of a spring-loaded silo: routine bedside placement of a preformed Silastic spring-loaded silo, with gradual reduction and elective abdominal wall closure. Patients were assigned to 1 of the 2 groups using the sealed-envelope method. 28 Infants had a spring-loaded silo placed in the delivery room or the neonatal intensive care unit. Reduction of the eviscerated bowel was accomplished by the daily application of gentle pressure, followed by the placement of a clip or umbilical tape across the silo to maintain the reduction. When the bowel was completely reduced, a clinical decision was made by the responsible surgeon for either silo removal and abdominal wall closure in the operating room under general anesthesia or abdominal wall closure at the bedside using the umbilical flap technique.
27
Primary Closure of Abdomen Group
Primary Closure of Abdomen Group Primary Closure: primary closure of abdomen Primary Closure of Abdomen Group - Primary Closure: primary closure of abdomen: immediate attempt at primary closure, with placement of a silo only if primary closure was unsuccessful. Patients were assigned to 1 of the 2 groups using the sealed-envelope method. 27 Infants underwent an attempt at primary closure. These infants underwent complete bowel reduction and abdominal wall closure, either in the operating room under general anesthesia or at the bedside. If the operating surgeon believed that primary closure would result in excessive lAP, a clinical decision was made to delay abdominal wall closure, and a spring-loaded silo was applied for gradual reduction and subsequent closure.
27
Total54

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSilastic Spring-Loaded Silo GroupPrimary Closure of Abdomen GroupTotal
Age, Continuous36.4 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
36.7 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
36.5 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
Birth weight (g)2446 grams
STANDARD_DEVIATION 567
2382 grams
STANDARD_DEVIATION 391
2414 grams
STANDARD_DEVIATION 479
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants12 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants15 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 270 / 27
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 271 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 271 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Ventilation Status

length of time on the ventilator

Time frame: Data collected daily during the first 14 days after the abdominal wall closure (measured in days)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Silastic Spring-Loaded Silo GroupVentilation Status3.17 daysStandard Deviation 2.9
Primary Closure of Abdomen GroupVentilation Status5.29 daysStandard Deviation 5.2
Secondary

Complications During Hospitalization (e.g., Sepsis)

Clinical sepsis confirmed with a positive blood culture

Time frame: post-surgery to hospital discharge; Data collected daily during the first 14 days after the abdominal wall closure (measured in days), then monthly for 3 months until discharge.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Silastic Spring-Loaded Silo GroupComplications During Hospitalization (e.g., Sepsis)7 Participants
Primary Closure of Abdomen GroupComplications During Hospitalization (e.g., Sepsis)6 Participants
Secondary

Intraabdominal Pressure (IAP) as Reflected by Intragastric Pressure

Time frame: intraabdominal pressure at the time of definitive closure

Population: The analysis of lAP at the time of abdominal wall closure was subject to adjustment as the data measured by intragastric catheter were only available for 15 patients in the spring-loaded silo group and 19 patients in the primary closure group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Silastic Spring-Loaded Silo GroupIntraabdominal Pressure (IAP) as Reflected by Intragastric Pressure10.9 mm HgStandard Deviation 7
Primary Closure of Abdomen GroupIntraabdominal Pressure (IAP) as Reflected by Intragastric Pressure14.7 mm HgStandard Deviation 5
Secondary

Length of Hospital Stay

days in hospital

Time frame: Data collected daily during the first 14 days after the abdominal wall closure (measured in days), then monthly for 3 months until discharge.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Silastic Spring-Loaded Silo GroupLength of Hospital Stay49.1 daysStandard Deviation 34
Primary Closure of Abdomen GroupLength of Hospital Stay43.2 daysStandard Deviation 28
Secondary

TPN

use of total parenteral nutrition (TPN)

Time frame: Data collected daily during the first 14 days after the abdominal wall closure, then monthly for 3 months until discharge (measured in days)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Silastic Spring-Loaded Silo GroupTPN38.8 daysStandard Deviation 33
Primary Closure of Abdomen GroupTPN33 daysStandard Deviation 27

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026