Skip to content

Autologous Bone Marrow-derived Mononuclear Cells for Therapeutic Arteriogenesis in Patients With Limb Ischemia

Autologous Bone Marrow-derived Mononuclear Cells for Therapeutic Arteriogenesis in Patients With Limb Ischemia A Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Study in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00539266
Acronym
ABC
Enrollment
108
Registered
2007-10-04
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2011-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intermittent Claudication, Peripheral Vascular Diseases

Keywords

Claudication, Critical limb ischemia, Cell therapy, Bone marrow

Brief summary

The investigators propose confirm and extend the findings of open studies on the apparent efficacy of bone-marrow derived mononuclear cells for the induction of arteriogenesis in patients with severe claudication or critical leg ischemia and pay special attention to the influence of diabetic disease on the outcome of the study and to the possible pro-atherogenic/ pro-inflammatory effects of BM-MNC injections.

Detailed description

Although the safety and beneficial effects of intramuscular transplantation of bone marrow derived mononuclear cells procedure appear well documented, a number of critical question regarding application of BM-MNC for peripheral vascular disease remain to be answered. First, although the original study has been partially performed as semi-blinded study (patients with double sided claudication were recruited and blindly treated with BM-MNC in one leg and peripheral blood injections in the other leg), this approach does exclude a placebo effect. Second, although patients with mild diabetes were included in the protocol, the results for diabetic patients were not analyzed separately. Diabetic disease is characterized by monocyte and endothelial progenitor cell dysfunction and it is still unclear whether this approach is also effective in diabetic patients. Third, although six-month results are reported long-term efficacy has not been established yet. To address these issues, the investigators now propose confirm and extend the findings from open studies in a randomized double-blind study in patients with severe claudication or critical leg ischemia and pay special attention to the influence of diabetic disease on the outcome of the study and to the possible pro-atherogenic/ pro-inflammatory effects of BM-MNC injections.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALbone marrow derived mononuclear cells

40 IM injections (calf muscle) of 1-8 10E9 mono nuclear cells

BIOLOGICALplacebo

40 IM injections (calf muscle) of placebo suspension

Sponsors

Leiden University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* persistent (\>3 months) disabling claudication (Fontaine's stages IIb or Rutherford's categories 3, viz. pain free walking distance less than 100 meter) despite optimal therapy or critical limb ischemia (Fontaine's stages III/IV or Rutherford's categories 4-6) * ineligibility for angioplasty or bypass procedures * male of female, \>18 years old * life expectancy \> 1 year * written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* candidates for angioplasty or bypass procedures * inability to undergo bone marrow harvesting * any condition in the affected limb that is anticipated to require surgical intervention in the first weeks after BM-MNC treatment * life threatening co-morbidity * poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1C \> 10%) * active malignancy in the 5 years prior to treatment * INR \>1.5 at the time of bone-marrow harvest * bleeding diathesis * inability to undergo arterial catheterization * inability to follow the protocol and to comply with the follow up requirements * any other conditions that, in the opinion of the investigators, could interfere with the therapy or could pose a significant threat to the subject if the investigational therapy was to be initiated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Limb salvage/wound healing at t=6 months; Pain free walking distance6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
quality of life (RAND-36), pain Scores (Brief Pain Inventory), tcO2 (wrist/ankle ratio) ABI Collateral artery scores (angiogram) at t=6 months, Limb salvage/wound healing at t= 3 and 12 months, Pain free walking distance at t=3 and 12 months,3, 6 and 12 months

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactJan HN Lindeman, MD, PhD
Lindeman@lumc.nl#31 (0)71 5263968

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026