Skip to content

Precedex Versus Propofol-Awakening for Reducing Brain Injury Expansion

A Phase IV Single Center Cross Over Clinical Study Comparing Two Different Sedations Strategies for Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Neurological Critical Illness

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00538616
Acronym
PrePARE
Enrollment
8
Registered
2007-10-02
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2010-04-30
Last updated
2013-04-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Injury, Intracranial Pressure

Keywords

Brain Injury

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate brain injury when two different drugs (propofol and precedex) are used to sedate patients who need a neurologic exam.

Detailed description

The hypothesis is that a neurologic exam performed when the subject has continuous infusion of precedex will result in less brain injury (where the lactate/pyruvate ratio indicates injury) then when a neurologic exam is performed on subjects receiving propofol, because that exam requires that the propofol infusion be stopped.

Interventions

DRUGDexmedetomidine

in this crossover study, subjects will receive 6 hours of propofol and 6 hours of precedex (randomized crossover)

DRUGPropofol

in this crossover study, subjects will receive 6 hours of propofol and 6 hours of precedex (randomized crossover)

Sponsors

Hospira, now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Carmelo Graffagnino
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* primary diagnosis of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH),Intracranial Hemorrhage (ICH), stroke * Must require (be on) mechanical ventilation * must require (have in place) intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring * must require (be receiving) continuous IV sedation

Exclusion criteria

* Bleeding diathesis * Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) \< 5 with fixed pupils * Pregnant * elevated ICP that requires deep sedation * pulmonary instability * Hx of Ethanol(ETOH) abuse that requires current benzodiazepine treatment for delirium - allergy to propofol or precedex * status epilepticus * current neuromuscular blockade

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lactate/Pyruvate (L/P)Ratio1 hourL/P ratio was measured before during and after sedation assessment. The micromole value for each dialysate (lactate and pyruvate) was reported as well as the ratio (L/P). Elevated ratios (greater than 30) were attributed to metabolic distress (relative hypoxemia)during the course of the trial.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects approached if they had indwelling Licox catheters and were given sedation.

Pre-assignment details

Study started at onset of shift with 1 hour washout between crossover. One subject taken off sedation prior to enrollment because they were no longer eligible

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Precedex-Propofol
Patients received an infusion of precedex for six hours then a washout period of one hour and then a propofol infusion for six hours.
5
Propofol- Precedex
Patients received an infusion of propofol for six hours then a washout period of one hour and then a precedex infusion for six hours.
3
Total8

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPropofol- PrecedexPrecedex-PropofolTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Age Continuous55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
41.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants5 participants8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 50 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 50 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Lactate/Pyruvate (L/P)Ratio

L/P ratio was measured before during and after sedation assessment. The micromole value for each dialysate (lactate and pyruvate) was reported as well as the ratio (L/P). Elevated ratios (greater than 30) were attributed to metabolic distress (relative hypoxemia)during the course of the trial.

Time frame: 1 hour

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Precedex-PropofolLactate/Pyruvate (L/P)Ratio103.1 ratioStandard Deviation 249.5
Propofol- PrecedexLactate/Pyruvate (L/P)Ratio33.8 ratioStandard Deviation 10.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026