Skip to content

Efficacy and Tolerance of Naked DNA Vaccine in Patients With Chronic B Hepatitis

Randomised, Opened, Multicentre Phase I/II Trial in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B With HBV VL < 12 IU/ml and Under Treatment With NRTI, Which Evaluated Efficacy and Tolerance of Vaccination With Naked DNA on Viral Replication After Analogs' Treatment Interruption. ANRS HB02 VAC-ADN

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00536627
Acronym
VAC-ADN
Enrollment
70
Registered
2007-09-28
Start date
2008-01-01
Completion date
2010-11-01
Last updated
2026-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Hepatitis B

Keywords

DNA vaccine

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if DNA vaccination of chronic HBV patients under treatment with NRTI can restore T-cell responsiveness and delay virologic reactivation after treatment discontinuation.

Detailed description

Despite the availability of effective vaccines against hepatitis B, over 370 million people worldwide remain persistently infected with HBV. Persistent infection is associated with chronic liver disease that can lead to the developement of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in two-third of persons. Treatment of chronic hepatitis B relies on the use of analogs such as lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir or immunostimulators such as interferons. Although analogs are efficient, genotypic resistance occurs after one year of treatment and the rate of virologic relapse is high after treatment discontinuation. HBV is a non cytopathic virus and liver damage is caused by immune response against infected hepatocytes and to a non specific inflammatory response. Immune response contributes to the virus clearance. In acute hepatitis B infection, T cell response is polyclonal, specific and vigorous, whereas in patients with chronic infection, responses remain weak, less specific and hardly detectable in peripheral blood. T cell responses could be induced or restored by antigenic stimulation such as vaccination. In a previous phase I clinical trial, we showed that DNA vaccination with plasmid pCMVS2.S is safe and can specifically, but transiently activate T-cell responses in chronic HBV-carriers not responding to current antiviral therapies. Analogs such as lamivudine and adefovir were shown to enhance T cell responses concomitantly with viral load decrease. In this phase I/II clinical trial, we would like to determine if DNA vaccination of chronic HBV patients under treatment with NRTI can restore T-cell responsiveness and delay virologic reactivation after treatment discontinuation.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALDNA vaccine pCMVS2.S

Patients will receive injections of 1 ml of vaccine (1 mg/ml) at weeks 0, 8, 16, 40 and 44

Sponsors

French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* chronic hepatitis B with or without AgHBe * no cirrhosis and no hepatocellular carcinoma * treatment with NRTI unchanged for at least 3 months * undetectable HBV viral load for 12 months * HBV viral load \< 12 IU/ml at screening * sGPT \< 5N * tetanus immunization or booster dose for less than 8 years * accurate birth control or menopausal women or sterility * sickness insurance * signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* HLA-DR 15/16 * coinfections with HDV, HCV and/or HIV * treatment with immunomodulators * immunosuppressors * long-term corticotherapy (over 4 weeks) * active intravenous drug-users * prolonged and excessive consumption of alcohol (men \> 40g/day ; women \> 30g/day ; for more than 5 years) * medical history of autoimmune disease or presence of autoantibodies * previous immunization by HBV vaccine of less than 5 years * previous immunization by DNA vaccine against HBV * personal or family medical history of demyelinising diseases * uncontrolled hypophosphatemia * renal failure, renal transplantation, haemodialysis * pregnancy, breast-feeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary endpoint is virologic failure defined by 1) reactivation after analogs' treatment interruption, 2) virologic breakthrough during treatment with analogs, 3) the impossibility for the patients to interrupt treatment at week 48at week 72

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Delay of appearance of virologic failureat Week 72
Biological and clinical tolerance of DNA vaccineall along the trial
Immunological responsesAt weeks 18, 40, 46, 60, 72
Clinical progression of hepatitis Ball along the trial

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHélène FONTAINE, MD

Pôle d'Hépatologie, Hôpital COCHIN, PARIS, FRANCE

STUDY_CHAIRJean-Pierre ABOULKER, MD

INSERM SC-10, VILLEJUIF, FRANCE

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 3, 2026