Skip to content

Effect of MK0524A on Cholesterol Levels (0524A-048)

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Demonstrate the Lipid-Altering Efficacy and Safety and Tolerability of MK0524A in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia or Mixed Hyperlipidemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00536510
Enrollment
646
Registered
2007-09-27
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2008-03-31
Last updated
2015-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolemia, Hyperlipidemia

Keywords

High Cholesterol, Excess lipids

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study is to assess the effects of MK0524A in reducing cholesterol levels in an Asian population.

Interventions

DRUGlaropiprant/niacin (MK0524A)

Treatment Period 1: one 20mg/1g tablet laropiprant/niacin once daily for 4 weeks Treatment Period 2: two 20mg/1g tablets laropiprant/niacin once daily for 8 weeks. All patients will receive placebo for a 4 week run-in period before randomization

DRUGComparator: placebo

Treatment Period 1: one 20mg/1g tablet placebo to laropiprant/niacin once daily for 4 weeks Treatment Period 2: two 20mg/1g tablets of placebo to laropiprant/niacin once daily for 8 weeks. All patients will receive placebo for a 4 week run-in period before randomization.

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient is male or female between 18 and 70 years of age * Females of reproductive potential must agree to take acceptable contraceptive precautions for the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has a history of not being able to take niacin or niacin-containing products * Patient consumes more than 2 alcoholic beverages per day * Patient has poorly controlled Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus * Patient engages in vigorous exercise or an aggressive diet regimen

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) After 12 Weeks12 weeksLow Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) after 12 weeks is calculated as the difference between week 12 measure and baseline measure divided by baseline measure \*100

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) After 12 Weeks12 weeksPercent change from baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) after 12 weeks is calculated as the difference between week 12 measure and baseline measure divided by baseline measure \*100

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Phase III First Patient In: 10-May-2007 Last Patient Last Visit: 11-Mar-2008 42 Outpatient centers in China (21), Hong Kong (2), India (11), and Korea (8)

Pre-assignment details

Asia-regional lipid study with patients 18-70 yrs, including diabetic patients +/- statin, without ischemic vascular disease and LDL-C\<130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L), patients on a statin with ≥2 risk factors with LDL-C ≥130 and ≤160 mg/dL (3.37 and 4.14 mmol/L), and patients +/- statin with ≤1 risk factor with ≥130 and ≤190 mg/dL (3.37 and 4.92 mmol/L).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MK0524A 2 g
All patients received placebo for a 4 week run-in period before randomization. Drug: laropiprant/niacin (MK0524A) Treatment Period 1: one 20 mg /1 g tablet of laropiprant/niacin once daily for 4 weeks. Treatment Period 2: two 20 mg /1 g tablets of laropiprant/niacin once daily for 8 weeks.
322
Placebo
All patients received placebo for a 4 week run-in period before randomization. Drug: Comparator: placebo Treatment Period 1: one 20 mg /1 g tablet placebo to laropiprant/niacin once daily for 4 weeks Treatment Period 2: two 20 mg /1 g tablets of placebo to laropiprant/niacin once daily for 8 weeks.
324
Total646

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event274
Overall StudyFlushing with Product200
Overall StudyLaboratory Adverse Event21
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up118
Overall StudyPatient Discontinued for Other Reasons22
Overall StudyProtocol Violation45
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject169

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalMK0524A 2 g
Age, Customized
<65 years
279 participants555 participants276 participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
45 participants91 participants46 participants
Concomitant Statin Use
No
178 Participants350 Participants172 Participants
Concomitant Statin Use
Yes
146 Participants296 Participants150 Participants
Country
China (includes Hong Kong)
158 Participants317 Participants159 Participants
Country
India
79 Participants161 Participants82 Participants
Country
Korea
87 Participants168 Participants81 Participants
Glycemic Status
Diabetic*
164 Participants312 Participants148 Participants
Glycemic Status
Impaired Glucose*
4 Participants12 Participants8 Participants
Glycemic Status
Normal*
156 Participants322 Participants166 Participants
High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)48.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
48.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
48.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)121.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34
122.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.2
124 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
185 Participants376 Participants191 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
139 Participants270 Participants131 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
123 / 32154 / 323
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 3212 / 323

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) After 12 Weeks

Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) after 12 weeks is calculated as the difference between week 12 measure and baseline measure divided by baseline measure \*100

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set: consisted of all randomized patients who (i) took at least one dose of the treatment period study medication and (ii) had a baseline measurement and at least one measurement during Weeks 5 to 12. The last available lipid values during Weeks 5 to 12 were used for patients who had no lipid data collected at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
MK0524A 2 gPercent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) After 12 Weeks-10.3 Percent Change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) After 12 Weeks4.4 Percent Change
Comparison: The primary hypothesis of superiority of MK0524A 2 g to placebo in lowering Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) was assessed using the comparison between these 2 groups from the ANOVA model.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-18.6, -10.9]ANOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) After 12 Weeks

Percent change from baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) after 12 weeks is calculated as the difference between week 12 measure and baseline measure divided by baseline measure \*100

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set: consisted of all randomized patients who (i) took at least one dose of the treatment period study medication and (ii) had a baseline measurement and at least one measurement during Weeks 5 to 12. The last available lipid values during Weeks 5 to 12 were used for patients who had no lipid data collected at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
MK0524A 2 gPercent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) After 12 Weeks18.6 Percent Change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) After 12 Weeks2.6 Percent Change
Comparison: The secondary hypothesis of superiority of MK0524A 2 g to placebo in lowering High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) was assessed using the comparison between these 2 groups from the ANOVA model.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [12.6, 19.2]ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026