Skip to content

Efficacy & Safety of ViaDerm-hPTH(1-34) Compared to Forteo SC in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

A Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of ViaDerm-hPTH (1-34) in Comparison to Subcutaneous Injection of Forteo in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00535860
Enrollment
104
Registered
2007-09-26
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2009-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporosis

Keywords

Osteoporosis, Transdermal, hPTH(1-34)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ViaDerm-shPTH \[1-34\] transdermal delivery in comparison to subcutaneous injection of rhPTH\[1-34\] following 3-month treatment in postmenopausal women with Osteoporosis

Interventions

DRUGTeriparatide

Daily for 96 days

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
TransPharma Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
55 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Main Inclusive Criteria: * Post-menopausal women aged between 55 to 85 years (inclusive) * Posterior-Anterior lumbar vertebral and/or femoral neck BMD T-score by DXA ≤-2.5 SD. * Have normal serum PTH, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) (only for patients treated with thyroid hormone), and prolactin values. Main Exclusive Criteria: * Subjects who have a clinical significant or unstable medical or surgical condition that may preclude safe and complete study participation * Current diagnoses of disorders known to affect bone metabolism including hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, osteomalacia, or Paget's disease * Prior osteoporosis treatment with fluoride or strontium at any time; or any IV treatment with bisphosphonates in the past or oral bisphosphonate for more than 1 month in the past 24 months prior to randomization. * Any condition or disease that may interfere with the ability to have, or to evaluate a DXA scan

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline to endpoint 96 days in procollagen 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP)Baseline, 96 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
hPTH (1-34) Pharmacokinetic AUC of ViaDerm-hPTH (1-34) and teriparatide SC.Baseline, 96 days
Ratio of hPTH (1-34) AUC of transdermal treatment and subcutaneous injectionBaseline, 96 days
Ratio of hPTH (1-34) Cmax of transdermal treatment and subcutaneous injectionBaseline, 96 days
hPTH (1-34) Pharmacokinetic Cmax of ViaDerm-hPTH (1-34) and teriparatide SC.Baseline, 96 Days
Change from baseline in C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-1.)Baseline, 96 days
Percentage of patients with serum total calcium more than 1 mg/dl above the upper limit of normal rangeOver 96 days
Number of participants with hPTH (1-34) specific antibody immune responseBaseline, 96 days
Draize score for erythema and edemaOver 96 Days
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain assessmentOver 96 days
Percentage of patients with serum total calcium above the upper limit of normal rangeOver 96 days

Countries

Czechia, Hungary, Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026