Skip to content

Comparison of Two Antibiotic Regimen (Meropenem Versus Meropenem+Moxifloxacin)in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

Prospective, Randomized, Open, Multicentre Study About the Effect of an Empirical Antibiotic Monotherapy With Meropenem (Meronem®) Versus a Combination Therapy With Moxifloxacin (Avalox®) on Organ Dysfunction in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00534287
Acronym
MaxSep
Enrollment
600
Registered
2007-09-24
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2010-06-30
Last updated
2012-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Septic Shock, Severe Sepsis

Keywords

sepsis, antibiotics, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, Severe sepsis and septic shock

Brief summary

Severe sepsis and septic shock are diseases of infectious origin with a high risk of death. Antibiotic therapy is mandatory but it is unknown whether one antibiotic alone is sufficient for initial therapy. The purpose of this study is to compare a therapy with meropenem alone or the combination of meropenem plus moxifloxacin in the treatment of severe sepsis/ septic shock. Patients randomly receive one of the two treatments for at least 7 days but not longer than 14 days.

Detailed description

Early intravenous empiric broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy is an essential part of sepsis therapy. Inadequacy of empirical antibiotic therapy is associated with an increased mortality rate. Carbapenems are designed for empirical antimicrobial monotherapy. Combination therapy has been suggested but efficiency remains to be proven. In this study, antimicrobial monotherapy with meropenem is compared with a combination therapy of meropenem and moxifloxacin. It is hypothesized that the superior antibiotic therapy is associated with a lower overall organ dysfunction in sepsis. Study therapy lasts for at least 7 days unless microbiological results suggest otherwise. Study therapy may be extended to 14 days. Follow up examinations occur at 28 and 90 days. This investigator initiated study is supported by the German government (bmbf) and unrestricted industrial grants.

Interventions

DRUGmeropenem

Empirical antibiotic therapy with 3 x 1 g intravenous meropenem. Dosage is adjusted in case of renal dysfunction. Recommended duration of therapy is 7 days but can be extended up to 14 days.

DRUGmeropenem, moxifloxacin

Empirical antibiotic therapy with 3 x 1 g intravenous meropenem plus 1 x 400 mg intravenous moxifloxacin. Dosage of meropenem is adjusted in case of renal dysfunction. Recommended duration of therapy is 7 days but can be extended up to 14 days.

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bayer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Kompetenznetz Sepsis
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Severe sepsis or septic shock according to ACCP/SCCM criteria * Onset of severe sepsis or septic shock \<24 h * Informed consent * Effective contraception in fertile women

Exclusion criteria

* Age \<18 years * Pregnancy * Breast-feeding women * Pretreatment with meropenem, imipenem, or ertapenem within the last 4 weeks (\>1 daily dosage) * Pretreatment with moxifloxacin,ciprofloxacin, or levofloxacin within the last 4 weeks (\>1 daily dosage) * Pretreatment with a pseudomonas effective cephalosporin (cefepime, ceftazidim, cefpirom) or piperacillin within the last 48 hours (\>1 daily dosage). * Pretreatment with other chinolones within the last 4 weeks (\>1 daily dosage) * Presence of infection where guidelines recommend another antimicrobial therapy than the study medication (i.e. endocarditis) * Evidence or strong clinical suspicion of a microorganism where the study medication is known to be ineffective (i.e. tuberculosis, MRSA- or VRE-infection) * Known allergy against meropenem or moxifloxacin * Tendon disease or injury due to past quinolone therapy * Congenital or acquired prolongation of QT-interval * Concomitant medication which prolongs the QT-interval * Electrolyte imbalance, especially uncorrected hypokalemia * Clinically relevant bradycardia * Clinically relevant cardiac dysfunction with reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction * Symptomatic arrhythmias in the medical history * Significant hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C) or elevation of liver enzymes \>5x the upper normal range * No commitment to full patient support (i.e. DNR order) * Patient's death is considered imminent due to coexisting disease * Concomitant participation in another study or study participation with in the last 30 days. * Relationship of the patient to study team member (i.e. colleague, relative)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean total SOFA scorestudy duration but not longer than 14 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Antibiotics free days28 and 90 days
Costs of antibiotic therapyICU stay
Frequency of resistances to antibioticsICU stay
Frequency of new infections
Mortality28 and 90 days
ICU and hospital length of stay
SOFA-subscores
Clinical and microbiological cureEnd of study therapy (day 7-14) and release from ICU (max. day 21)
Frequency of adverse events (AEs, SAEs, SUSARs)
Ventilator free days28 and 90 days
Days without renal replacement therapy28 and 90 days
Vasopressor free days28 and 90 days
Response to therapyday 7 and day 10

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026