Skip to content

Rapamycin Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Kidney-Pancreas Recipients

Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil vs Tacrolimus and Sirolimus in SPK, Pancreas After Kidney or Pancreas Transplant Alone

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00533442
Enrollment
170
Registered
2007-09-21
Start date
2000-09-30
Completion date
2016-05-31
Last updated
2017-07-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 Diabetes

Keywords

Rapamycin, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF), Kidney-Pancreas Transplant

Brief summary

This study was designed to determine which maintenance immunosuppressive agent, rapamycin or mycophenalate mofetil, resulted in better outcome in patients with type 1 diabetes and renal failure, who presented for a kidney-pancreas transplant.

Detailed description

This is a randomized, prospective single center study evaluating the two maintenance drugs above.

Interventions

DRUGRapamycin

Rapamycin was initiated on day 1 postoperatively, 4mg/day;levels were maintained 5-8ng/ml. Those patients randomized to receive mycophenolate mofetil were given 1gm twice/day starting on the first post-operative day.

DRUGMycophenolate Mofetil

MMF 1 gm BID beginning 1st day postoperative day

DRUGTacrolimus

Part of standard maintenance.

DRUGSteroids

Part of standard maintenance

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma Inc
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient with Type 1 diabetes and end stage renal disease. * Women of childbearing potential must have had a negative pregnancy test (serum or urine). * Patient agrees to participate in the study and sign an informed consent. * Patient has no known contraindication to the administration of rapamycin or mycophenolate mofetil. * Patient has no history of hypersensitivity to rapamycin or mycophenolate mofetil.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has history of a malignancy within two years, with the exception of adequately treated localized squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin without evidence of recurrence. * Patient is currently abusing drugs or alcohol. * Patient is known or suspected to have an active infection or be seropositive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis C (HCV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Event-Specific Survival Comparisonsover 1-10 years post-transplantFreedom from biopsy-proven acute rejection of the kidney allograft; Freedom from biopsy-proven acute rejection of the pancreas allograft; Death-censored kidney graft survival; Death-censored pancreas graft survival; Death-uncensored graft (kidney and pancreas) survival; and Patient survival.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Kidney Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.at 1-5 years post-transplantComparisons of renal function (eGFR, measured in mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at 12, 36, and 60 months post-transplant.
Overall Pancreas Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.at 1-5 years post-transplantComparisons of pancreas function (C-peptide in ng/mL) at 12, 36, and 60 months post-transplant.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

From September 1, 2000 through December 15, 2009, 170 consecutive patients with type 1 diabetes and ESRD were randomized to receive either Rapamycin (N=84) or MMF (N=86) immediately prior to transplant. Post-transplant clinical follow-up of patients continued through January 15, 2011.

Pre-assignment details

A randomized block design was implemented for the randomization scheme using Proc Plan in SAS. Patients were randomly assigned (allocation ratio of 1:1) to the two treatment arms in blocks of 4 and 6 patients (block sizes were also chosen randomly), ensuring a balance of patients across treatment arms after each block of patients was randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tacrolimus Plus MMF Plus Steroids
This group of kidney-pancreas recipients was randomized to receive mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus after transplantation. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil: MMF 1 gm BID beginning 1st day postoperative day
86
Tacrolimus Plus Rapamycin Plus Steroids
Patients randomized to this arm received Sirolimus, after kidney-pancreas transplantation. Rapamycin: Rapamycin was initiated on day 1 postoperatively, 4mg/day;levels were maintained 5-8ng/ml. Those patients randomized to receive mycophenolate mofetil were given 1gm twice/day starting on the first post-operative day. Rapamune and Tacrolimus: Sirolimus 2 mg/day beginning 1st postoperative day (trough target levels: 10-15ng/ml) Mycophenolate Mofetil: Patients randomized to receive mycophenolate mofetil were given 1gm twice/day starting on the first post-operative day.
84
Total170

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTacrolimus Plus MMF Plus SteroidsTacrolimus Plus Rapamycin Plus SteroidsTotal
Age, Continuous43.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
41.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
42.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African-American
11 Participants6 Participants17 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
55 Participants47 Participants102 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
19 Participants31 Participants50 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants34 Participants65 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
55 Participants50 Participants105 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
16 / 8615 / 84
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 865 / 84
serious
Total, serious adverse events
40 / 8638 / 84

Outcome results

Primary

Event-Specific Survival Comparisons

Freedom from biopsy-proven acute rejection of the kidney allograft; Freedom from biopsy-proven acute rejection of the pancreas allograft; Death-censored kidney graft survival; Death-censored pancreas graft survival; Death-uncensored graft (kidney and pancreas) survival; and Patient survival.

Time frame: over 1-10 years post-transplant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tacrolimus Plus MMF Plus SteroidsEvent-Specific Survival ComparisonsBiopsy-Proven Acute Rejection of the Kidney22 Participants
Tacrolimus Plus MMF Plus SteroidsEvent-Specific Survival ComparisonsBiopsy-Proven Acute Rejection of the Pancreas9 Participants
Tacrolimus Plus MMF Plus SteroidsEvent-Specific Survival ComparisonsDeath-Censored Kidney Graft Failure18 Participants
Tacrolimus Plus MMF Plus SteroidsEvent-Specific Survival ComparisonsDeath-Censored Pancreas Graft Failure7 Participants
Tacrolimus Plus MMF Plus SteroidsEvent-Specific Survival ComparisonsDeath-Uncensored Graft (Kidney&Pancreas) Survival26 Participants
Tacrolimus Plus MMF Plus SteroidsEvent-Specific Survival ComparisonsPatient Death16 Participants
Tacrolimus Plus Rapamycin Plus SteroidsEvent-Specific Survival ComparisonsDeath-Uncensored Graft (Kidney&Pancreas) Survival25 Participants
Tacrolimus Plus Rapamycin Plus SteroidsEvent-Specific Survival ComparisonsBiopsy-Proven Acute Rejection of the Kidney8 Participants
Tacrolimus Plus Rapamycin Plus SteroidsEvent-Specific Survival ComparisonsDeath-Censored Pancreas Graft Failure2 Participants
Tacrolimus Plus Rapamycin Plus SteroidsEvent-Specific Survival ComparisonsBiopsy-Proven Acute Rejection of the Pancreas1 Participants
Tacrolimus Plus Rapamycin Plus SteroidsEvent-Specific Survival ComparisonsPatient Death15 Participants
Tacrolimus Plus Rapamycin Plus SteroidsEvent-Specific Survival ComparisonsDeath-Censored Kidney Graft Failure10 Participants
Comparison: Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection of the Kidney (logrank test).p-value: 0.01Log Rank
Comparison: Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection of the Pancreas (logrank test).p-value: 0.01Log Rank
Comparison: Death-Censored Kidney Graft Failure (logrank test).p-value: 0.16Log Rank
Comparison: Death-Censored Pancreas Graft Failure (logrank test).p-value: 0.12Log Rank
Comparison: Death-Uncensored (Kidney \& Pancreas) Graft Survival (logrank test).p-value: 0.96Log Rank
p-value: >0.99Log Rank
Secondary

Overall Kidney Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.

Comparisons of renal function (eGFR, measured in mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at 12, 36, and 60 months post-transplant.

Time frame: at 1-5 years post-transplant

Population: Number analyzed here includes all patients alive with a functioning graft that had an available measurement taken at that time

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tacrolimus Plus MMF Plus SteroidsOverall Kidney Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.Mean eGFR at 12 months71.2 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Error 2.4
Tacrolimus Plus MMF Plus SteroidsOverall Kidney Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.Mean eGFR at 36 months63.0 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Error 3.1
Tacrolimus Plus MMF Plus SteroidsOverall Kidney Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.Mean eGFR at 60 months56.5 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Error 4.1
Tacrolimus Plus Rapamycin Plus SteroidsOverall Kidney Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.Mean eGFR at 12 months67.2 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Error 2
Tacrolimus Plus Rapamycin Plus SteroidsOverall Kidney Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.Mean eGFR at 36 months61.5 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Error 2.6
Tacrolimus Plus Rapamycin Plus SteroidsOverall Kidney Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.Mean eGFR at 60 months61.9 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Error 3.8
Comparison: Comparison of Mean eGFR at 12 Months Post-Transplant (t-test).p-value: 0.21t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Comparison of Mean eGFR at 36 Months Post-Transplant (t-test).p-value: 0.71t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Comparison of Mean eGFR at 60 Months Post-Transplant (t-test).p-value: 0.33t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Overall Pancreas Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.

Comparisons of pancreas function (C-peptide in ng/mL) at 12, 36, and 60 months post-transplant.

Time frame: at 1-5 years post-transplant

Population: Number analyzed here includes all patients alive with a functioning graft that had an available measurement taken at that time

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tacrolimus Plus MMF Plus SteroidsOverall Pancreas Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.Mean Log {C-peptide at 12 months}1.15 ng/mLStandard Error 0.08
Tacrolimus Plus MMF Plus SteroidsOverall Pancreas Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.Mean Log {C-peptide at 36 months}0.990 ng/mLStandard Error 0.08
Tacrolimus Plus MMF Plus SteroidsOverall Pancreas Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.Mean Log {C-peptide at 60 months}1.17 ng/mLStandard Error 0.1
Tacrolimus Plus Rapamycin Plus SteroidsOverall Pancreas Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.Mean Log {C-peptide at 12 months}1.08 ng/mLStandard Error 0.07
Tacrolimus Plus Rapamycin Plus SteroidsOverall Pancreas Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.Mean Log {C-peptide at 36 months}0.986 ng/mLStandard Error 0.08
Tacrolimus Plus Rapamycin Plus SteroidsOverall Pancreas Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.Mean Log {C-peptide at 60 months}1.22 ng/mLStandard Error 0.1
Comparison: Comparison of Mean Log {C-Peptide Level} at 12 Months Post-Transplant (t-test).p-value: 0.47t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Comparison of Mean Log {C-Peptide Level} at 36 Months Post-Transplant (t-test).p-value: 0.97t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Comparison of Mean Log {C-Peptide Level} at 60 Months Post-Transplant (t-test).p-value: 0.75t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026