Skip to content

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of Naltrexone SR/Bupropion SR and Placebo in Overweight and Obese Subjects

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of Naltrexone Sustained Release (SR)/Bupropion Sustained Release (SR) and Placebo in Obese Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00532779
Enrollment
1742
Registered
2007-09-20
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2009-05-31
Last updated
2014-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity, Overweight

Keywords

Obesity, Antiobesity agents, Antiobesity drugs, Overweight drug therapy, Obese drug therapy, Weight loss drug effects, Bupropion administration and dosage, Naltrexone administration and dosage, Double blind method, Combination drug therapy, Delayed action preparations

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether 2 doses of the combination of naltrexone SR and bupropion SR are safe and effective in the treatment of obesity.

Detailed description

Two Phase II clinical trials demonstrated that a combination of bupropion SR and naltrexone is associated with greater weight loss than bupropion SR alone, naltrexone alone, or placebo in subjects with uncomplicated obesity. The current study investigated the safety and efficacy of 2 doses of the combination of naltrexone SR and bupropion SR compared to placebo in obese subjects with uncomplicated obesity and in those with overweight/obesity and hypertension and/or dyslipidemia.

Interventions

DRUGNaltrexone SR 16 mg/Bupropion SR 360 mg /day
DRUGNaltrexone SR 32 mg/Bupropion SR 360 mg /day
DRUGPlacebo

Ancillary therapy consisting of diet instruction, advice on behavior modification, and exercise counseling

Sponsors

Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female and male subjects, 18 to 65 years of age; * Have BMI ≥30 and ≤45kg/m² for subjects with uncomplicated obesity, and BMI of ≥27 and ≤45kg/m² for subjects with obesity and controlled hypertension and/or dyslipidemia; * Normotensive (systolic ≤140 mm Hg; diastolic ≤90 mm Hg). Anti-hypertensive medications are allowed with the exception of alpha-adrenergic blockers and clonidine; medical regimen must be stable for at least 6 weeks prior to randomization; * Medications for treatment of dyslipidemia are allowed as long as medical regimen has been stable for at least 6 weeks prior to randomization; * Free of opioid medication for 7 days prior to randomization; * No clinically significant abnormality of serum albumin, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, bilirubin, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium or phosphorus; * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) within 2.5 x upper limit of normal range (ULN); * No clinically significant abnormality of hematocrit, white blood cell (WBC) count, white cell differential, or platelets; * Fasting glucose \< 126 mg/dL on no hypoglycemic agents, fasting triglycerides \<400 mg/dL; * No clinically significant abnormality on urinalysis; * TSH within normal limits or normal T3, if TSH is below normal limits; * Negative serum pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential; * Negative urine drug screen; * IDS-SR scores \< 2 on items 5 (sadness), 6 (irritability), 7 (anxiety/tension) and 18 (suicidality), and IDS-SR total score \< 30; * Women of child bearing potential had to be non-lactating and agree to use effective contraception throughout the study period and 30 days after discontinuation of study drug; * Able to comply with all required study procedures and schedule; * Able to speak and read English; * Willing and able to give written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Obesity of known endocrine origin (e.g., untreated hypothyroidism, Cushing's syndrome, established Polycystic Ovary Syndrome); * Serious medical conditions (including but not limited to ongoing renal or hepatic insufficiency, Class III or IV congestive heart failure; myocardial infarction, history of angina pectoris, claudication, or acute limb ischemia within the previous 6 months; lifetime history of stroke); * History of malignancy within the previous 5 years with exception of non-melanoma skin cancer or surgically cured cervical cancer; * A lifetime history of serious psychiatric illness, including lifetime history of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or other psychosis, bulimia, or anorexia nervosa; * Current serious psychiatric illness including severe personality disorder, (e.g. borderline or antisocial), current severe major depressive disorder, recent (previous 6 months) suicide attempt, current active suicidal ideation, or recent hospitalization due to psychiatric illness; * A response to bipolar disorder questions indicating the presence of bipolar disorder; * In need of medications for the treatment of a psychiatric disorder (with the exception of short-term insomnia) within the previous 6 months prior to randomization; * History of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence (with the exception of nicotine dependence) within 1 year prior to study initiation; * Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus; * Screening ECG with a corrected QT interval by the method of Bazett (QTcB) \>450 msec (men) and \> 470 millisecond (msec) (women) or the presence of any clinically significant cardiac abnormalities, including but not limited to patterns consistent with myocardial ischemia, electrolyte abnormalities, or atrial or ventricular dysrhythmia or significant conduction abnormalities; * Excluded concomitant medications: any psychotropic agents (including antipsychotic, antidepressant, anxiolytic, mood stabilizer, anticonvulsant agents or agents for the treatment of Attention Deficit Disorder) with the exception of low dose benzodiazepine or hypnotic agents for the treatment of insomnia (up to 2 mg lorazepam/day or equivalent dose of a benzodiazepine or hypnotic agent); any anorectic or weight loss agents; any over-the-counter dietary supplements or herbs with psychoactive, appetite or weight effects; alpha-adrenergic blockers; dopamine agonists; clonidine; coumadin; theophylline; cimetidine; oral corticosteroids; cholestyramine, cholestypol, Depo Provera®; smoking cessation agents; use of opioid or opioid-like medications, including analgesics and antitussives; * History of surgical or device (e.g., gastric banding) intervention for obesity; * History of seizures of any etiology, or of predisposition to seizures (e.g., history of cerebrovascular accident, head trauma with ≥5 minutes loss of consciousness, concussion symptoms lasting ≥15 minutes, brain surgery, skull fracture, subdural hematoma, or febrile seizures); * History of treatment with bupropion or naltrexone within the preceding 12 months; * History of hypersensitivity or intolerance to bupropion or naltrexone; * Initiation or discontinuation of tobacco products including inhaled tobacco (such as cigarettes, cigars, pipes, etc), chewing tobacco or snuff in the 3 months prior to randomization or planned during study participation. Use of nicotine replacement products (nicotine gum, patch) during study participation was not allowed; * Use of drugs, herbs, or dietary supplements believed to significantly affect body weight or participation in a weight loss management program within one month prior to randomization; * Loss or gain of more than 4.0 kilograms within 3 months prior to randomization; * Pregnant or breast-feeding women or planning to become pregnant during the study period or within 30 days of discontinuing study drug; * Planned surgical procedure that can impact the conduct of the study; * Use of investigational drug, device or procedure within the previous 30 days; * Participation in any previous clinical trial sponsored by Orexigen Therapeutics; * Any condition which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study; * Investigators, study personnel, sponsor representatives and their immediate families.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Co-primary: Body Weight- Mean Percent ChangeBaseline, 56 weeks
Co-primary: Body Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥5% DecreaseBaseline, 56 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Waist CircumferenceBaseline, 56 weeks
Change in Fasting HDL Cholesterol LevelsBaseline, 56 weeks
Change in IWQOL-Lite Total ScoresBaseline, 56 weeksIWQOL-Lite= Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite Questionnaire Total score is based on a scale from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the poorest and 100 the best quality of life and where a score of 71-79 indicates moderate impairment
Change in High-sensitivity C Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Levels, Using Log-transformed DataBaseline, 56 weeks
Change in Fasting Insulin Levels, Using Log-transformed DataBaseline, 56 weeks
Change in Fasting Blood Glucose LevelsBaseline, 56 weeks
Change in HOMA-IR Levels, Using Log-transformed DataBaseline, 56 weeksHOMA-IR= Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance
Change in Fasting Triglycerides Levels, Using Log-transformed DataBaseline, 56 weeks
Change in Fasting LDL Cholesterol LevelsBaseline, 56 weeks
Change in Systolic Blood PressureBaseline, 56 weeks
Change in Diastolic Blood PressureBaseline, 56 weeks
Change in IDS-SR Total ScoresBaseline, 56 weeksIDS-SR= Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Subject Rated IDS-SR total score is based on 30 items. The total score can range from 0-84, with 0 being no depressive symptoms and 84 being very severe depressive symptoms. A total score ≤ 13 indicates no depression.
Change in Food Craving Inventory Sweets Subscale ScoreBaseline, 56 weeksThe Food Craving Inventory is a 33-item self-report measure designed to assess specific food cravings and is organized into 4 subscales (high fats, sweets, carbohydrates/starches, and fast-food fats). A craving was defined as an intense desire to consume a particular food (or food type) that was difficult to resist over the past month. Subjects rated their frequency of cravings for each of the 33 items using a 5-point scale, where 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, and 5=always. The sweets subscale consisted of 8 items and the score ranges from 8 (better outcome) to 40 (worse outcome).
Change in Food Craving Inventory Carbohydrates Subscale ScoreBaseline, 56 weeksThe Food Craving Inventory is a 33-item self-report measure designed to assess specific food cravings and is organized into 4 subscales (high fats, sweets, carbohydrates/starches, and fast-food fats). A craving was defined as an intense desire to consume a particular food (or food type) that was difficult to resist over the past month. Subjects rated their frequency of cravings for each of the 33 items using a 5-point scale, where 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, and 5=always. The carbohydrates subscale consisted of 8 items and the score ranges from 8 (better outcome) to 40 (worse outcome).
Change in Question 19 From 21-Item COE (Control of Eating) QuestionnaireBaseline, 56 weeksQuestion 19: Generally, how difficult has it been to control your eating? Scoring: 0=not at all difficult; 100=extremely difficult
Body Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥10% DecreaseBaseline, 56 weeks

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
NB16
Naltrexone SR 16 mg/Bupropion SR 360 mg /day
578
NB32
Naltrexone SR 32 mg/Bupropion SR 360 mg /day
583
Placebo
Placebo
581
Total1,742

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event12211256
Overall StudyDeath010
Overall StudyDrug noncompliance, moved, other142329
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy121240
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up766566
Overall StudyPregnancy253
Overall StudyProtocol Violation597
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject636090

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNB16TotalPlaceboNB32
Age, Continuous44.35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.25
44.14 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.17
43.66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.14
44.41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.14
BMI36.22 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.28
36.17 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.21
36.18 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
36.10 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.35
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
13 participants48 participants17 participants18 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
4 participants14 participants4 participants6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
122 participants338 participants110 participants106 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
6 participants15 participants4 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
6 participants20 participants6 participants8 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
427 participants1307 participants440 participants440 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
490 Participants1482 Participants496 Participants496 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
88 Participants260 Participants85 Participants87 Participants
Weight99.49 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.76
99.55 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.99
99.45 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.31
99.70 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.88

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
345 / 569365 / 573230 / 569
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 5699 / 5738 / 569

Outcome results

Primary

Co-primary: Body Weight- Mean Percent Change

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT (Full Analysis Set): Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB16Co-primary: Body Weight- Mean Percent Change-5.00 percentage of body weightStandard Error 0.31
NB32Co-primary: Body Weight- Mean Percent Change-6.14 percentage of body weightStandard Error 0.31
PlaceboCo-primary: Body Weight- Mean Percent Change-1.33 percentage of body weightStandard Error 0.3
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-4.5, -2.85]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-5.63, -3.99]ANCOVA
Primary

Co-primary: Body Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥5% Decrease

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NB16Co-primary: Body Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥5% Decrease39.49 percentage of participants
NB32Co-primary: Body Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥5% Decrease47.98 percentage of participants
PlaceboCo-primary: Body Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥5% Decrease16.44 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.52, 4.63]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.6, 6.57]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Body Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥10% Decrease

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NB16Body Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥10% Decrease20.17 Percentage of participants
NB32Body Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥10% Decrease24.63 Percentage of participants
PlaceboBody Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥10% Decrease7.44 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.14, 4.81]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.82, 6.23]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB16Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure0.09 mm HgStandard Error 0.29
NB32Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure0.04 mm HgStandard Error 0.29
PlaceboChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure-0.86 mm HgStandard Error 0.28
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [0.19, 1.73]
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [0.13, 1.67]
Secondary

Change in Fasting Blood Glucose Levels

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB16Change in Fasting Blood Glucose Levels-2.39 mg/dLStandard Error 0.57
NB32Change in Fasting Blood Glucose Levels-3.24 mg/dLStandard Error 0.55
PlaceboChange in Fasting Blood Glucose Levels-1.30 mg/dLStandard Error 0.56
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [-2.6, 0.42]
p-value: =0.0195% CI: [-3.42, -0.46]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Fasting HDL Cholesterol Levels

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB16Change in Fasting HDL Cholesterol Levels3.36 mg/dLStandard Error 0.47
NB32Change in Fasting HDL Cholesterol Levels3.42 mg/dLStandard Error 0.45
PlaceboChange in Fasting HDL Cholesterol Levels-0.06 mg/dLStandard Error 0.47
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.17, 4.66]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.26, 4.7]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Fasting Insulin Levels, Using Log-transformed Data

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
NB16Change in Fasting Insulin Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-11.84 percent change
NB32Change in Fasting Insulin Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-17.14 percent change
PlaceboChange in Fasting Insulin Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-4.57 percent change
p-value: =0.063ANCOVA
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Fasting LDL Cholesterol Levels

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB16Change in Fasting LDL Cholesterol Levels-3.67 mg/dLStandard Error 1.21
NB32Change in Fasting LDL Cholesterol Levels-4.41 mg/dLStandard Error 1.17
PlaceboChange in Fasting LDL Cholesterol Levels-3.28 mg/dLStandard Error 1.2
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [-3.62, 2.84]
p-value: 0.48495% CI: [-4.29, 2.04]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Fasting Triglycerides Levels, Using Log-transformed Data

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
NB16Change in Fasting Triglycerides Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-7.96 percent change
NB32Change in Fasting Triglycerides Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-12.69 percent change
PlaceboChange in Fasting Triglycerides Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-3.08 percent change
p-value: =0.046ANCOVA
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Food Craving Inventory Carbohydrates Subscale Score

The Food Craving Inventory is a 33-item self-report measure designed to assess specific food cravings and is organized into 4 subscales (high fats, sweets, carbohydrates/starches, and fast-food fats). A craving was defined as an intense desire to consume a particular food (or food type) that was difficult to resist over the past month. Subjects rated their frequency of cravings for each of the 33 items using a 5-point scale, where 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, and 5=always. The carbohydrates subscale consisted of 8 items and the score ranges from 8 (better outcome) to 40 (worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB16Change in Food Craving Inventory Carbohydrates Subscale Score-1.85 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
NB32Change in Food Craving Inventory Carbohydrates Subscale Score-2.11 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange in Food Craving Inventory Carbohydrates Subscale Score-1.84 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [-0.53, 0.53]
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [-0.8, 0.27]
Secondary

Change in Food Craving Inventory Sweets Subscale Score

The Food Craving Inventory is a 33-item self-report measure designed to assess specific food cravings and is organized into 4 subscales (high fats, sweets, carbohydrates/starches, and fast-food fats). A craving was defined as an intense desire to consume a particular food (or food type) that was difficult to resist over the past month. Subjects rated their frequency of cravings for each of the 33 items using a 5-point scale, where 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, and 5=always. The sweets subscale consisted of 8 items and the score ranges from 8 (better outcome) to 40 (worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB16Change in Food Craving Inventory Sweets Subscale Score-2.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
NB32Change in Food Craving Inventory Sweets Subscale Score-2.62 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
PlaceboChange in Food Craving Inventory Sweets Subscale Score-2.77 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [0.14, 1.23]
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [-0.4, 0.69]
Secondary

Change in High-sensitivity C Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Levels, Using Log-transformed Data

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
NB16Change in High-sensitivity C Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-28.02 percent change
NB32Change in High-sensitivity C Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-28.98 percent change
PlaceboChange in High-sensitivity C Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-16.66 percent change
p-value: =0.016ANCOVA
p-value: =0.008ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in HOMA-IR Levels, Using Log-transformed Data

HOMA-IR= Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
NB16Change in HOMA-IR Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-14.33 percent change
NB32Change in HOMA-IR Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-20.19 percent change
PlaceboChange in HOMA-IR Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-5.90 percent change
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in IDS-SR Total Scores

IDS-SR= Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Subject Rated IDS-SR total score is based on 30 items. The total score can range from 0-84, with 0 being no depressive symptoms and 84 being very severe depressive symptoms. A total score ≤ 13 indicates no depression.

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB16Change in IDS-SR Total Scores0.02 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
NB32Change in IDS-SR Total Scores-0.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
PlaceboChange in IDS-SR Total Scores-0.72 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [0.19, 1.28]
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [-0.09, 1]
Secondary

Change in IWQOL-Lite Total Scores

IWQOL-Lite= Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite Questionnaire Total score is based on a scale from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the poorest and 100 the best quality of life and where a score of 71-79 indicates moderate impairment

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB16Change in IWQOL-Lite Total Scores11.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.54
NB32Change in IWQOL-Lite Total Scores12.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.54
PlaceboChange in IWQOL-Lite Total Scores8.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.51
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.72, 4.54]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.73, 5.56]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Question 19 From 21-Item COE (Control of Eating) Questionnaire

Question 19: Generally, how difficult has it been to control your eating? Scoring: 0=not at all difficult; 100=extremely difficult

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB16Change in Question 19 From 21-Item COE (Control of Eating) Questionnaire-12.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
NB32Change in Question 19 From 21-Item COE (Control of Eating) Questionnaire-14.52 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.09
PlaceboChange in Question 19 From 21-Item COE (Control of Eating) Questionnaire-8.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.04
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [-6.68, -0.94]
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-8.71, -2.98]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB16Change in Systolic Blood Pressure0.29 mm HgStandard Error 0.4
NB32Change in Systolic Blood Pressure-0.11 mm HgStandard Error 0.41
PlaceboChange in Systolic Blood Pressure-1.94 mm HgStandard Error 0.39
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [1.16, 3.3]
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [0.76, 2.9]
Secondary

Change in Waist Circumference

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB16Change in Waist Circumference-5.04 cmStandard Error 0.43
NB32Change in Waist Circumference-6.24 cmStandard Error 0.42
PlaceboChange in Waist Circumference-2.46 cmStandard Error 0.43
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.74, -1.43]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-4.93, -2.64]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026