Skip to content

A Study of MabThera (Rituximab) Plus Chlorambucil in Participants With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

An Open-Label Study to Characterize the Safety and Response Rate of MabThera (Rituximab) Plus Chlorambucil in Previously Untreated Patients With CD20-Positive B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00532129
Enrollment
100
Registered
2007-09-19
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2012-04-30
Last updated
2016-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic

Brief summary

This single arm study will assess the safety and effect on response rate of a combination of rituximab and chlorambucil in previously untreated participants with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Participants will receive 6 monthly cycles of combination treatment, followed by up to 6 cycles of chlorambucil alone. Rituximab will be administered on Day 1 of each cycle, at a dose of 375 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) intravenously (IV) in Cycle 1, and 500 mg/m\^2 in subsequent cycles, and chlorambucil will be administered on Days 1-7 of each cycle at a dose of 10 mg/m\^2/day per oral (PO).

Interventions

DRUGRituximab

375mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of Cycle 1; 500mg/m\^2 on Day 1 of Cycles 2-6.

DRUGChlorambucil

10 mg/m\^2/day PO on Days 1 to 7 of each cycle for a maximum of 12 cycles.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* previously untreated participants with cluster of differentiation 20 (CD20) positive B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia; * participants with progressive Binet stage B, or C requiring therapy according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) criteria; * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status \<=2.

Exclusion criteria

* previous treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL); * known concomitant hematological malignancy; * transformation to aggressive B-cell malignancy; * history of severe cardiac disease; * known hypersensitivity or anaphylactic reactions to murine antibodies.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)First administration of study treatment up to 56 days after the beginning of the last treatment cycle (up to 365 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious AE (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 56 days from the beginning of the last treatment cycle that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAEs as well as non-serious AEs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With BOR of Partial Response (PR)Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)PR was achieved if all of the following criteria were met: a)≥50% decrease in Lym count from the baseline value, b)≥50% reduction in LD by CT scan, c)≥50% reduction in size of liver/spleen by PE/CT scan and at least 1 of the following for a minimum of 8 weeks: i. Leuk ≥1.5×10\^9/L or 50% improvement over baseline, ii. Plat \>100×10\^9/L or 50% improvement over baseline and iii. Hb \>11.0 g/dL or 50% improvement over baseline without transfusion. Participants who fulfilled criteria for CR with persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia were considered in PRs. CR was achieved if all of the criteria were fulfilled for ≥8 weeks: a)Absence of LD by PE and CT scan, b)No HM/SM by PE/CT, c)Absence of B symptoms, d)Normal CBC, and e)BM biopsy: normocellular for age, \<30% of the cells being Lym and LN absent.
Percentage of Participants With BOR of Nodular Partial Response (nPR)Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)CR was achieved if all of the following criteria were met for ≥8 weeks: a)Absence of LD by PE and CT scan, b)No HM/SM by PE/CT scan, c)Absence of B symptoms, d)Normal CBC, and e)BM biopsy: normocellular for age, \<30% of the cells being Lym and LN absent. Participants with nPR were those who satisfied all of the CR criteria except for the BM, where LN could be identified histologically.
Percentage of Participants With BOR of Progressive Disease (PD)Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)PD is considered if 1 of the following criteria is met: a)≥50% increase in sum of the products of ≥2 lymph nodes compared to their smallest size (at least one ≥2 cm in diameter) or appearance of new lymph nodes/extranodal lesions, b)≥50% increase in the size of hepatosplenomegaly (HSM) as determined by PE/CT scan; appearance of palpable HM/SM that was not previously present, c)≥50% increase in the absolute number of circulating Lym to ≥5×10\^9/L, d)Transformation to a more aggressive histology. Symptomatic deterioration (evident in clinical symptoms but not supported by tumor assessments), in such cases, the determination of clinical progression was based on symptomatic deterioration.
Percentage of Participants Who DiedBaseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)
Percentage of Participants With BOR of Stable Disease (SD)Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)Participants without CR/PR or PD were considered having a tumor response of SD. CR: a) Absence of LD by PE and CT, b) No HM/SM by PE/CT, c) Absence of B symptoms, d) Normal CBC, and e) BM biopsy: normocellular for age, \<30% of the cells being Lym and LN absent. PR: a) ≥50% decrease in Lym count from baseline, b) ≥50% reduction in LD, c) ≥50% reduction in size of liver/spleen by PE/CT and ≥1 of the following for at least 8 weeks: i. Leuk ≥1.5×10\^9/L or 50% improvement over baseline, ii. Plat \>100×10\^9/L or 50% improvement over baseline and iii. Hb \>11.0 g/dL or 50% improvement over baseline without transfusion. PD: a) ≥50% increase in sum of the products of ≥2 lymph nodes compared to their smallest size or appearance of new lymph nodes/extranodal lesions, or b) ≥50% increase in the size of HSM; new appearance of palpable HM/SM, or c) ≥50% increase in the absolute number of circulating Lym to ≥5×10\^9/L, or d) Transformation to a more aggressive histology.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (CR or PR)Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)Objective response was defined as a tumor response of CR or PR. CR was achieved if all of the criteria were met for ≥8 weeks: a)Absence of LD by PE and CT scan, b)No HM/SM by PE/CT scan, c)Absence of B symptoms, d)Normal CBC, and e)BM biopsy: normocellular for age, \<30% of the cells being Lym and LN absent. PR was achieved if all of the criteria were met: a)≥50% decrease in Lymp count from the baseline value, b)≥50% reduction in LD by CT scan, c)≥50% reduction in size of liver/spleen by PE/CT scan and at least 1 of the following for a minimum of 8 weeks: i. Leuk ≥1.5×10\^9/L or 50% improvement over baseline, ii. Plat \>100×10\^9/L or 50% improvement over baseline and iii. Hb \>11.0 g/dL or 50% improvement over baseline without transfusion. Participants who fulfilled criteria for CR with persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia were considered PRs.
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) of Clinical CR or Confirmed CRBaseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)Clinical CR was achieved if all of the following criteria were met: a)Absence of lymphadenopathy (LD) by physical examination (PE) and Computed Tomography (CT) scan (all lymph nodes less than \[\<\] 1.5 centimeters \[cm\] in diameter), b)No hepatomegaly (HM)/splenomegaly (SM) by PE/CT scan, c)Absence of B symptoms (unexplained fever greater than \[\>\] 38 degrees \[°\] Centigrade \[C\], drenching night sweats/\>10 percent \[%\] body weight loss in the last 6 months), d)Normal Complete Blood Count (CBC) (i. Leukocytes (Leuk) greater than or equal to \[≥\] 1.5×10\^9 per liter (/L), ii. Platelets (Plat) \>100×10\^9/L, and iii. Haemoglobin (Hb) \>11.0 grams per deciliter \[g/dL\]) and e)Once clinical, radiological and laboratory evaluations demonstrated CR, bone marrow (BM) biopsy and aspirate were performed 8 weeks later for confirmation; BM sample: normocellular for age, \<30% of the cells being lymphocytes (Lym) and lymphoid nodules (LN) absent was considered as a confirmed CR.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) TimeBaseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)PFS was defined as the interval (in days) from trial treatment start date to earlier of the date of first tumor response assessment of PD or date of death by any cause. Participants who experienced none of these events or who were lost to follow-up at the time of analysis were censored on last date when they were assessed for tumor response. PD is considered if 1 of the following criteria is met: a)≥50% increase in sum of products of ≥2 lymph nodes compared to their smallest size (at least one ≥2 cm in diameter) or appearance of new lymph nodes/extranodal lesions, b)≥50% increase in the size of HSM as determined by PE/CT; appearance of palpable HM/SM that was not previously present, c)≥50% increase in the number of circulating Lym to ≥5×10\^9/L, d)Transformation to a more aggressive histology. Symptomatic deterioration (evident in clinical symptoms but not supported by tumor assessments), in such cases, the determination of clinical progression was based on symptomatic deterioration.
Disease Free Survival (DFS) TimeBaseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)DFS time was defined as interval (in days) from first tumor response of CR to date of first tumor response of PD, or date of death by any cause. Participants who experienced none of these events or who were lost to follow-up at the time of analysis were censored on last date when they were assessed for tumor response. CR: a) Absence of LD by PE and CT, b) No HM/SM by PE/CT, c) Absence of B symptoms, d) Normal CBC, and e) BM biopsy: normocellular for age, \<30% of the cells being Lym and LN absent. PD: a) ≥50% increase in sum of the products of ≥2 lymph nodes compared to their smallest size or appearance of new lymph nodes/extranodal lesions, or b) ≥50% increase in the size of HSM; new appearance of palpable HM/SM, or c) ≥50% increase in the absolute number of circulating Lym to ≥5×10\^9/L, or d) Transformation to a more aggressive histology.
Overall Survival (OS) TimeBaseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)This was defined as the interval (number of days) from the trial treatment start date to the date of death by any cause. Participants who were alive at the time of the analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up assessment.
Duration of Response (DoR)Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)DoR: defined as interval (in days) from first tumor response (of CR/PR/nPR) to earlier of date of PD/death. Participants without PD/death or who were lost to follow-up were censored. CR: a)Absence of LD by PE and CT, b)No HM/SM by PE/CT, c)Absence of B symptoms, d)Normal CBC, and e)BM biopsy: normocellular for age, \<30% of the cells being Lym and LN absent. PR: a)≥50% decrease in Lym count from baseline value, b)≥50% reduction in LD, c)≥50% reduction in size of liver/spleen by PE/CT scan and d)Leuk, Plat and Hb ≥1.5×10\^9/L, \>100×10\^9/L and \>11.0 g/dL, respectively or 50% improvement (of all the 3) over baseline value. nPR: participants who satisfied all of CR criteria except for BM, where LN could be identified. PD: a)≥50% increase in sum of the products of ≥2 lymph nodes or appearance of new lymph nodes/extranodal lesions, or b)≥50% increase in size of HSM; new appearance of palpable HM/SM, or c)≥50% increase in number of Lym, or d)Transformation to a more aggressive histology.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) NegativityBaseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)MRD negativity was defined by the absence of tumor cells in bone marrow, using 4-color flow cytometry. MRD was assessed in participants with a confirmed CR. CR was achieved if all of the following criteria were met for ≥8 weeks: a)Absence of LD by PE and CT scan, b)No HM/SM by PE/CT scan, c)Absence of B symptoms, d)Normal CBC, and e)BM biopsy: normocellular for age, \<30% of the cells being Lym and LN absent.
Mean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresBaseline, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and 11, end of follow-up (FU) (24 month [m] FU visit, up to approximately 3 years)EORTC QLQ-C30: included global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QOL), functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used a 4- point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; a higher score for Global Qol/functional scales=better level of QoL/functioning, or a higher score for symptom scale=greater degree of symptoms.
Percentage of Participant With Disease Progression or DeathBaseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)PD is considered if 1 of the following criteria is met: a)≥50% increase in sum of the products of ≥2 lymph nodes compared to their smallest size (at least one ≥2 cm in diameter) or appearance of new lymph nodes/extranodal lesions, b)≥50% increase in the size of HSM as determined by PE/CT scan; appearance of palpable HM/SM that was not previously present, c)≥50% increase in the absolute number of circulating Lym to ≥5×10\^9/L, d)Transformation to a more aggressive histology. Symptomatic deterioration (evident in clinical symptoms but not supported by tumor assessments), in such cases, the determination of clinical progression was based on symptomatic deterioration.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rituximab + Chlorambucil
Participants received combination therapy of rituximab plus chlorambucil for first 6 cycles. Participants who did not achieve CR after Cycle 6 then received chlorambucil alone from Cycle 7 onwards until either they achieved a CR or for a maximum of 6 additional cycles. Rituximab: 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1; 500 mg/m\^2 on Day 1 of Cycles 2-6. Chlorambucil: 10 mg/m\^2/day PO on Days 1 to 7 of Cycles 1-6; 10 mg/m\^2/day PO on Days 1 to 7 of Cycles 7-12, if applicable.
100
Total100

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Follow-up PeriodAdverse event/Serious adverse event1
Follow-up PeriodDisease progression57
Follow-up PeriodLost to Follow-up1
Follow-up PeriodOther6
Treatment PeriodAdverse event/Serious adverse event25
Treatment PeriodDisease progression3
Treatment PeriodOther5
Treatment PeriodPhysician Decision15
Treatment PeriodProtocol Violation1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRituximab + Chlorambucil
Age, Continuous69.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
66 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
97 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
39 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious AE (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 56 days from the beginning of the last treatment cycle that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAEs as well as non-serious AEs.

Time frame: First administration of study treatment up to 56 days after the beginning of the last treatment cycle (up to 365 days)

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + ChlorambucilPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)99 percentage of participants
Secondary

Disease Free Survival (DFS) Time

DFS time was defined as interval (in days) from first tumor response of CR to date of first tumor response of PD, or date of death by any cause. Participants who experienced none of these events or who were lost to follow-up at the time of analysis were censored on last date when they were assessed for tumor response. CR: a) Absence of LD by PE and CT, b) No HM/SM by PE/CT, c) Absence of B symptoms, d) Normal CBC, and e) BM biopsy: normocellular for age, \<30% of the cells being Lym and LN absent. PD: a) ≥50% increase in sum of the products of ≥2 lymph nodes compared to their smallest size or appearance of new lymph nodes/extranodal lesions, or b) ≥50% increase in the size of HSM; new appearance of palpable HM/SM, or c) ≥50% increase in the absolute number of circulating Lym to ≥5×10\^9/L, or d) Transformation to a more aggressive histology.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)

Population: FAS population participants who achieved confirmed CR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rituximab + ChlorambucilDisease Free Survival (DFS) Time855.0 days
Secondary

Duration of Response (DoR)

DoR: defined as interval (in days) from first tumor response (of CR/PR/nPR) to earlier of date of PD/death. Participants without PD/death or who were lost to follow-up were censored. CR: a)Absence of LD by PE and CT, b)No HM/SM by PE/CT, c)Absence of B symptoms, d)Normal CBC, and e)BM biopsy: normocellular for age, \<30% of the cells being Lym and LN absent. PR: a)≥50% decrease in Lym count from baseline value, b)≥50% reduction in LD, c)≥50% reduction in size of liver/spleen by PE/CT scan and d)Leuk, Plat and Hb ≥1.5×10\^9/L, \>100×10\^9/L and \>11.0 g/dL, respectively or 50% improvement (of all the 3) over baseline value. nPR: participants who satisfied all of CR criteria except for BM, where LN could be identified. PD: a)≥50% increase in sum of the products of ≥2 lymph nodes or appearance of new lymph nodes/extranodal lesions, or b)≥50% increase in size of HSM; new appearance of palpable HM/SM, or c)≥50% increase in number of Lym, or d)Transformation to a more aggressive histology.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)

Population: FAS population participants who achieved confirmed CR, PR or nPR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rituximab + ChlorambucilDuration of Response (DoR)645.0 days
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores

EORTC QLQ-C30: included global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QOL), functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used a 4- point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; a higher score for Global Qol/functional scales=better level of QoL/functioning, or a higher score for symptom scale=greater degree of symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and 11, end of follow-up (FU) (24 month [m] FU visit, up to approximately 3 years)

Population: FAS. Number of participants analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome and n=number of participants evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGHS/QoL score-baseline (n=91)65.7 units on scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in GHS/QoL Score-Cycle 5 (n=59)6.4 units on scaleStandard Deviation 21.7
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in GHS/QoL Score-24m FU (n=17)2.0 units on scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresEmotional functioning score-baseline (n=91)82.5 units on scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in emotional functioning score-Cycle 5 (n=59)1.0 units on scaleStandard Deviation 16.5
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in emotional functioning score-24m FU (n=17)0.5 units on scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in cognitive functioning-24m FU (n=17)5.2 units on scaleStandard Deviation 18
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresSocial functioning score-baseline (n=91)82.2 units on scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in social functioning score-Cycle 11 (n=40)0.0 units on scaleStandard Deviation 27.9
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in GHS/QoL Score-Cycle 11 (n=40)6.2 units on scaleStandard Deviation 16.9
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical functioning score-baseline (n=91)77.0 units on scaleStandard Deviation 22.3
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in physical functioning score-Cycle 5 (n=59)1.0 units on scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in physical functioning score-Cycle 11 (n=40)3.4 units on scaleStandard Deviation 22
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in physical functioning score-24m FU (n=17)-2.0 units on scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresRole functioning score-baseline (n=91)73.4 units on scaleStandard Deviation 31.6
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in role functioning score-Cycle 5 (n=59)0.0 units on scaleStandard Deviation 28.9
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in role functioning score-Cycle 11 (n=40)3.8 units on scaleStandard Deviation 32.1
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in role functioning score-24m FU (n=17)3.9 units on scaleStandard Deviation 20
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in emotional functioning score-Cycle 11 (n=40)-0.1 units on scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive functioning score-baseline (n=91)84.1 units on scaleStandard Deviation 19.1
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in cognitive functioning score-Cycle 5 (n=59)-1.9 units on scaleStandard Deviation 15.4
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in cognitive functioning-Cycle 11 (n=40)-0.4 units on scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in social functioning score-Cycle 5 (n=59)2.5 units on scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in social functioning score-at 24m FU (n=17)5.2 units on scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue score-baseline (n=91)33.4 units on scaleStandard Deviation 25.7
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in fatigue score-Cycle 5 (n=59)-1.4 units on scaleStandard Deviation 24.9
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in fatigue score-Cycle 11 (n=40)-6.1 units on scaleStandard Deviation 27.7
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in fatigue score-24m FU (n=17)-5.6 units on scaleStandard Deviation 22.2
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresNausea/vomiting score-baseline (n=91)6.2 units on scaleStandard Deviation 16.2
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in nausea/vomiting score-Cycle 5 (n=59)1.7 units on scaleStandard Deviation 20.9
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in nausea/vomiting score-Cycle 11 (n=40)0.4 units on scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in nausea/vomiting score-24m FU (n=17)-2.9 units on scaleStandard Deviation 8.8
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPain score-baseline (n=91)17.8 units on scaleStandard Deviation 27
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in pain score-Cycle 5 (n=59)-3.4 units on scaleStandard Deviation 28.8
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in pain score-Cycle 11 (n=40)-1.3 units on scaleStandard Deviation 33.2
Rituximab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline (CFB) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCFB in pain score-24m FU (n=17)0.0 units on scaleStandard Deviation 31.2
Comparison: CFB in GHS/QoL statistical analysis at Cycle 5.p-value: =0.029t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in GHS/QoL statistical analysis at Cycle 11.p-value: =0.027t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in GHS/QoL statistical analysis at end of FU.p-value: =0.602t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in physical functioning statistical analysis at Cycle 5.p-value: =0.631t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in physical functioning statistical analysis at Cycle 11.p-value: =0.339t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in physical functioning statistical analysis at end of FU.p-value: =0.44t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in role functioning statistical analysis at Cycle 5.p-value: =1t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in role functioning statistical analysis at Cycle 11.p-value: =0.465t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in role functioning statistical analysis at end of FU.p-value: =0.431t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in emotional functioning statistical analysis at Cycle 5.p-value: =0.65t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in emotional functioning statistical analysis at Cycle 11.p-value: =0.98t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in emotional functioning statistical analysis at end of FU.p-value: =0.906t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in cognitive functioning statistical analysis at Cycle 5.p-value: =0.381t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in cognitive functioning statistical analysis at Cycle 11.p-value: =0.886t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in cognitive functioning statistical analysis at end of FU.p-value: =0.264t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in social functioning statistical analysis at Cycle 5.p-value: =0.424t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in social functioning statistical analysis at Cycle 11.p-value: =1t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in social functioning statistical analysis at end of FU.p-value: =0.312t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in fatigue statistical analysis at Cycle 5.p-value: =0.664t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in fatigue functioning statistical analysis at Cycle 11.p-value: =0.17t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in fatigue statistical analysis at end of FU.p-value: =0.318t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in Nausea/vomiting statistical analysis at Cycle 5.p-value: =0.536t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in nausea/vomiting statistical analysis at Cycle 11.p-value: =0.9t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in nausea/vomiting statistical analysis at end of FU.p-value: =0.188t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in pain statistical analysis at Cycle 5.p-value: =0.37t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in pain statistical analysis at Cycle 11.p-value: =0.813t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: CFB in pain statistical analysis at end of FU.p-value: =1t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) Time

This was defined as the interval (number of days) from the trial treatment start date to the date of death by any cause. Participants who were alive at the time of the analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up assessment.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rituximab + ChlorambucilOverall Survival (OS) TimeNA percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity

MRD negativity was defined by the absence of tumor cells in bone marrow, using 4-color flow cytometry. MRD was assessed in participants with a confirmed CR. CR was achieved if all of the following criteria were met for ≥8 weeks: a)Absence of LD by PE and CT scan, b)No HM/SM by PE/CT scan, c)Absence of B symptoms, d)Normal CBC, and e)BM biopsy: normocellular for age, \<30% of the cells being Lym and LN absent.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)

Population: FAS population participants who achieved confirmed CR.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + ChlorambucilPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Died

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + ChlorambucilPercentage of Participants Who Died15.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) of Clinical CR or Confirmed CR

Clinical CR was achieved if all of the following criteria were met: a)Absence of lymphadenopathy (LD) by physical examination (PE) and Computed Tomography (CT) scan (all lymph nodes less than \[\<\] 1.5 centimeters \[cm\] in diameter), b)No hepatomegaly (HM)/splenomegaly (SM) by PE/CT scan, c)Absence of B symptoms (unexplained fever greater than \[\>\] 38 degrees \[°\] Centigrade \[C\], drenching night sweats/\>10 percent \[%\] body weight loss in the last 6 months), d)Normal Complete Blood Count (CBC) (i. Leukocytes (Leuk) greater than or equal to \[≥\] 1.5×10\^9 per liter (/L), ii. Platelets (Plat) \>100×10\^9/L, and iii. Haemoglobin (Hb) \>11.0 grams per deciliter \[g/dL\]) and e)Once clinical, radiological and laboratory evaluations demonstrated CR, bone marrow (BM) biopsy and aspirate were performed 8 weeks later for confirmation; BM sample: normocellular for age, \<30% of the cells being lymphocytes (Lym) and lymphoid nodules (LN) absent was considered as a confirmed CR.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + ChlorambucilPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) of Clinical CR or Confirmed CRClinical CR37.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab + ChlorambucilPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) of Clinical CR or Confirmed CRConfirmed CR10.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab + ChlorambucilPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) of Clinical CR or Confirmed CRClinical CR or Confirmed CR47.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BOR of Nodular Partial Response (nPR)

CR was achieved if all of the following criteria were met for ≥8 weeks: a)Absence of LD by PE and CT scan, b)No HM/SM by PE/CT scan, c)Absence of B symptoms, d)Normal CBC, and e)BM biopsy: normocellular for age, \<30% of the cells being Lym and LN absent. Participants with nPR were those who satisfied all of the CR criteria except for the BM, where LN could be identified histologically.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + ChlorambucilPercentage of Participants With BOR of Nodular Partial Response (nPR)6.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BOR of Partial Response (PR)

PR was achieved if all of the following criteria were met: a)≥50% decrease in Lym count from the baseline value, b)≥50% reduction in LD by CT scan, c)≥50% reduction in size of liver/spleen by PE/CT scan and at least 1 of the following for a minimum of 8 weeks: i. Leuk ≥1.5×10\^9/L or 50% improvement over baseline, ii. Plat \>100×10\^9/L or 50% improvement over baseline and iii. Hb \>11.0 g/dL or 50% improvement over baseline without transfusion. Participants who fulfilled criteria for CR with persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia were considered in PRs. CR was achieved if all of the criteria were fulfilled for ≥8 weeks: a)Absence of LD by PE and CT scan, b)No HM/SM by PE/CT, c)Absence of B symptoms, d)Normal CBC, and e)BM biopsy: normocellular for age, \<30% of the cells being Lym and LN absent.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + ChlorambucilPercentage of Participants With BOR of Partial Response (PR)68.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BOR of Progressive Disease (PD)

PD is considered if 1 of the following criteria is met: a)≥50% increase in sum of the products of ≥2 lymph nodes compared to their smallest size (at least one ≥2 cm in diameter) or appearance of new lymph nodes/extranodal lesions, b)≥50% increase in the size of hepatosplenomegaly (HSM) as determined by PE/CT scan; appearance of palpable HM/SM that was not previously present, c)≥50% increase in the absolute number of circulating Lym to ≥5×10\^9/L, d)Transformation to a more aggressive histology. Symptomatic deterioration (evident in clinical symptoms but not supported by tumor assessments), in such cases, the determination of clinical progression was based on symptomatic deterioration.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + ChlorambucilPercentage of Participants With BOR of Progressive Disease (PD)4.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BOR of Stable Disease (SD)

Participants without CR/PR or PD were considered having a tumor response of SD. CR: a) Absence of LD by PE and CT, b) No HM/SM by PE/CT, c) Absence of B symptoms, d) Normal CBC, and e) BM biopsy: normocellular for age, \<30% of the cells being Lym and LN absent. PR: a) ≥50% decrease in Lym count from baseline, b) ≥50% reduction in LD, c) ≥50% reduction in size of liver/spleen by PE/CT and ≥1 of the following for at least 8 weeks: i. Leuk ≥1.5×10\^9/L or 50% improvement over baseline, ii. Plat \>100×10\^9/L or 50% improvement over baseline and iii. Hb \>11.0 g/dL or 50% improvement over baseline without transfusion. PD: a) ≥50% increase in sum of the products of ≥2 lymph nodes compared to their smallest size or appearance of new lymph nodes/extranodal lesions, or b) ≥50% increase in the size of HSM; new appearance of palpable HM/SM, or c) ≥50% increase in the absolute number of circulating Lym to ≥5×10\^9/L, or d) Transformation to a more aggressive histology.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + ChlorambucilPercentage of Participants With BOR of Stable Disease (SD)11.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (CR or PR)

Objective response was defined as a tumor response of CR or PR. CR was achieved if all of the criteria were met for ≥8 weeks: a)Absence of LD by PE and CT scan, b)No HM/SM by PE/CT scan, c)Absence of B symptoms, d)Normal CBC, and e)BM biopsy: normocellular for age, \<30% of the cells being Lym and LN absent. PR was achieved if all of the criteria were met: a)≥50% decrease in Lymp count from the baseline value, b)≥50% reduction in LD by CT scan, c)≥50% reduction in size of liver/spleen by PE/CT scan and at least 1 of the following for a minimum of 8 weeks: i. Leuk ≥1.5×10\^9/L or 50% improvement over baseline, ii. Plat \>100×10\^9/L or 50% improvement over baseline and iii. Hb \>11.0 g/dL or 50% improvement over baseline without transfusion. Participants who fulfilled criteria for CR with persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia were considered PRs.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + ChlorambucilPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (CR or PR)84.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participant With Disease Progression or Death

PD is considered if 1 of the following criteria is met: a)≥50% increase in sum of the products of ≥2 lymph nodes compared to their smallest size (at least one ≥2 cm in diameter) or appearance of new lymph nodes/extranodal lesions, b)≥50% increase in the size of HSM as determined by PE/CT scan; appearance of palpable HM/SM that was not previously present, c)≥50% increase in the absolute number of circulating Lym to ≥5×10\^9/L, d)Transformation to a more aggressive histology. Symptomatic deterioration (evident in clinical symptoms but not supported by tumor assessments), in such cases, the determination of clinical progression was based on symptomatic deterioration.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab + ChlorambucilPercentage of Participant With Disease Progression or Death68.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Time

PFS was defined as the interval (in days) from trial treatment start date to earlier of the date of first tumor response assessment of PD or date of death by any cause. Participants who experienced none of these events or who were lost to follow-up at the time of analysis were censored on last date when they were assessed for tumor response. PD is considered if 1 of the following criteria is met: a)≥50% increase in sum of products of ≥2 lymph nodes compared to their smallest size (at least one ≥2 cm in diameter) or appearance of new lymph nodes/extranodal lesions, b)≥50% increase in the size of HSM as determined by PE/CT; appearance of palpable HM/SM that was not previously present, c)≥50% increase in the number of circulating Lym to ≥5×10\^9/L, d)Transformation to a more aggressive histology. Symptomatic deterioration (evident in clinical symptoms but not supported by tumor assessments), in such cases, the determination of clinical progression was based on symptomatic deterioration.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death up to approximately 2.5 years (assessed at Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, Day 1 of Cycles 7-12, and thereafter every 3 months up to approximately 2.5 years; cycle length = 28 days)

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rituximab + ChlorambucilProgression Free Survival (PFS) Time716.5 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026