Skip to content

A Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) in Combination With Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

A Randomized, Open-label Study Comparing the Anti-tumor Effect of Treatment With Tarceva Plus Avastin Versus Chemotherapy Plus Avastin in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00531960
Enrollment
124
Registered
2007-09-19
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2010-01-31
Last updated
2014-11-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Brief summary

This 2 arm study will compare the efficacy and safety of Tarceva plus Avastin, and chemotherapy plus Avastin, in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Patients will be randomized to receive either Tarceva 150mg p.o. daily plus Avastin 15mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks, or standard platinum-based chemotherapy (4-6 cycles) plus Avastin. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Interventions

DRUGBevacizumab

15 mg/kg, IV, Day 1 of Cycles 1 through 7

DRUGStandard platinum-based chemotherapy

At the discretion of the investigator

DRUGErlotinib

150 mg, PO, daily

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients, \>=18 years of age; * advanced (stage IIIb and IV) non-small cell lung cancer; * measurable disease; * ECOG PS 0-1.

Exclusion criteria

* prior chemotherapy or treatment with another systemic anti-cancer agent; * radiotherapy within 4 weeks prior to first dose of study treatment; * CNS metastases; * other malignancies in past 5 years, except for adequately treated cancer in situ of the cervix, basal or squamous cell skin cancer.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or DeathScreening, end of every 2nd cycle through Cycle 8 (21-day cycles), and every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of study and final analysis up to a maximum of 42 months.Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or death, from any cause. Progressive disease (PD) was defined according to Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (V) 1.0. For target lesions (TLs), progressive disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the start of treatment. For non-target lesions (NTLs), PD was defined as unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants were censored at the date of last post-baseline (BL) tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. If no post-BL tumor assessment was available, the participant was censored at date of randomization.
PFSScreening, end of every 2nd cycle through Cycle 8 (21-day cycles), and every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of study and final analysis up to a maximum of 42 months.The median time, in weeks, from randomization to PFS event. Participants were censored at the date of last post-BL tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. If no post-BL tumor assessment was available, the participant was censored at date of randomization. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who DiedScreening, Days 1, 8, and 21 of Cycles 1-8 (21-day cycles), and every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of study and final analysis up to a maximum of 42 months.Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death, due to any cause. Participants were censored at final analysis at the date the participant was last known to be alive.
OSScreening, Days 1, 8, and 21 of Cycles 1-8 (21-day cycles), and every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of study and final analysis up to a maximum of 42 months.The median time, in months, from randomization to OS event. Participants were censored at final analysis at the date the participant was last known to be alive.
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST V 1.0Screening, end of every 2nd cycle through Cycle 8 (21-day cycles), and every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of study and final analysis up to a maximum of 42 months.BOR was defined as the best response recorded from randomization until disease progression/recurrence or death, taking as reference for PD the smallest measurement (nadir) recorded since treatment started. Assignment of PR of CR required confirmation of tumor measurement changes by repeat assessments performed no less than 4 weeks after criteria for response was first met. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs; and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking BL SLD as reference. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. The 95% CI for one sample binomial was calculated using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST V 1.0Screening, end of every 2nd cycle through Cycle 8 (21-day cycles), and every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of study and final analysis, 12 months after the last participant's 1st visitDisease control was defined as a BOR of CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST V 1.0 for at least 4 weeks at any time during randomized treatment or disease stabilization, after study entry. Participants without a post-BL assessment of response were considered as having no disease control. The 95% CI for the one sample binomial was calculated using the Pearson-Clopper method.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, France, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
Participants received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg, IV, on Day 1 of Cycles 1 through 7 (21 day cycles) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal. Participants also received a maximum of up to 6 cycles (12-18 weeks) with EITHER a gemicitabine/cisplatin regimen (gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2, IV, on Days 1 and 8 of up to 6 cycles of 21 days, and cisplatin 80 mg/m\^2, IV, on Day 1 of up to 6 cycles of 21 days); OR a carboplatin/paclitaxel regimen (paclitaxel 200 mg/m\^2, IV, followed by carboplatin 6 mg/mL\*min on Day 1 of up to 6 cycles of 21 days). The chemotherapy regimen and number of cycles was up to the discretion of the investigator.
61
Bevacizumab + Erlotinib
Participants received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg, IV, on Day 1 of Cycles 1 through 7 (21 day cycles) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal. Participants also received erlotinib 150 mg tablets, PO, daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal.
63
Total124

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event54
Overall StudyDeath32
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy4241
Overall StudyOther410
Overall StudyRefused Treatment56
Overall StudyViolation of Selection Criteria20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBevacizumab + ChemotherapyBevacizumab + ErlotinibTotal
Age, Continuous58.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.55
61.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.94
59.53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.34
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants26 Participants51 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants37 Participants73 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
58 / 6060 / 63
serious
Total, serious adverse events
22 / 6017 / 63

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or death, from any cause. Progressive disease (PD) was defined according to Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (V) 1.0. For target lesions (TLs), progressive disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the start of treatment. For non-target lesions (NTLs), PD was defined as unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants were censored at the date of last post-baseline (BL) tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. If no post-BL tumor assessment was available, the participant was censored at date of randomization.

Time frame: Screening, end of every 2nd cycle through Cycle 8 (21-day cycles), and every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of study and final analysis up to a maximum of 42 months.

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bevacizumab + ChemotherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death72.1 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + ErlotinibPercentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death76.2 percentage of participants
Primary

PFS

The median time, in weeks, from randomization to PFS event. Participants were censored at the date of last post-BL tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. If no post-BL tumor assessment was available, the participant was censored at date of randomization. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Time frame: Screening, end of every 2nd cycle through Cycle 8 (21-day cycles), and every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of study and final analysis up to a maximum of 42 months.

Population: FAS; only participants with an event (disease progression or death) were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bevacizumab + ChemotherapyPFS34.6 weeks
Bevacizumab + ErlotinibPFS23.4 weeks
p-value: 0.80695% CI: [0.7, 1.59]Log Rank
Secondary

OS

The median time, in months, from randomization to OS event. Participants were censored at final analysis at the date the participant was last known to be alive.

Time frame: Screening, Days 1, 8, and 21 of Cycles 1-8 (21-day cycles), and every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of study and final analysis up to a maximum of 42 months.

Population: FAS; only participants who died were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bevacizumab + ChemotherapyOSNA months
Bevacizumab + ErlotinibOS16.4 months
p-value: 0.406395% CI: [0.75, 2.05]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Died

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death, due to any cause. Participants were censored at final analysis at the date the participant was last known to be alive.

Time frame: Screening, Days 1, 8, and 21 of Cycles 1-8 (21-day cycles), and every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of study and final analysis up to a maximum of 42 months.

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bevacizumab + ChemotherapyPercentage of Participants Who Died45.9 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + ErlotinibPercentage of Participants Who Died52.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST V 1.0

BOR was defined as the best response recorded from randomization until disease progression/recurrence or death, taking as reference for PD the smallest measurement (nadir) recorded since treatment started. Assignment of PR of CR required confirmation of tumor measurement changes by repeat assessments performed no less than 4 weeks after criteria for response was first met. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs; and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking BL SLD as reference. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. The 95% CI for one sample binomial was calculated using the Pearson-Clopper method.

Time frame: Screening, end of every 2nd cycle through Cycle 8 (21-day cycles), and every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of study and final analysis up to a maximum of 42 months.

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bevacizumab + ChemotherapyPercentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST V 1.044.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + ErlotinibPercentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST V 1.027.0 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.044495% CI: [-34.8, 0.3]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST V 1.0

Disease control was defined as a BOR of CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST V 1.0 for at least 4 weeks at any time during randomized treatment or disease stabilization, after study entry. Participants without a post-BL assessment of response were considered as having no disease control. The 95% CI for the one sample binomial was calculated using the Pearson-Clopper method.

Time frame: Screening, end of every 2nd cycle through Cycle 8 (21-day cycles), and every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of study and final analysis, 12 months after the last participant's 1st visit

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bevacizumab + ChemotherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST V 1.085.2 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + ErlotinibPercentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST V 1.073.0 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.094495% CI: [-27.3, 2.8]Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026