Skip to content

Adding Adefovir Dipivoxil Versus Switching to Entecavir in Patients With Lamivudine-resistant Chronic Hepatitis B

Prospective Randomized Study for the Comparison of Adding Adefovir Dipivoxil and Switching to Entecavir in Patients With Lamivudine-resistant Chronic Hepatitis B

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00531167
Enrollment
219
Registered
2007-09-18
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2012-10-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Hepatitis B

Keywords

lamivudine resistant mutations, rescue therapy

Brief summary

Antiviral resistance mutations limit the efficacy of therapy for chronic hepatitis B. At year 2, resistance to adefovir may occur as high as 25% in patients with history of lamivudine resistance. Resistance to entecavir is reported to be 10% in lamivudine refractory patients during the same period. However, combination of lamivudine and adefovir decreased the adefovir resistance rate as low as 0% in the recent studies. By overcoming the antiviral resistance, the efficacy of therapy will be maximized. This study is intended to compare the efficacy of two strategies, combination of lamivudine and adefovir vs. entecavir monotherapy in patients with lamivudine resistance.

Detailed description

Recently, published data showed combination of lamivudine and adefovir lead to PCR negativity (\<1000 copies/mL) up to 80% in the treatment of lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B at year 2 \[Rapti et al. Hepatology 2007 Feb;45(2):307-13.\]. Other studies also showed 76% and 69% PCR negativity in mostly HBeAg negative subjects \[Lampertico et al. Hepatology 2006 Oct;44(4) Suppl 1:556A-557A, Lampertico et al. Hepatology 2006 Oct;44(4) Suppl 1:693A-694A\]. In the study for the treatment of lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients which included HBeAg positive subjects more predominantly, entecavir monotherapy showed 34% of PCR negativity (\<300 copies/mL) at year 2 \[Tenney DJ, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Mar;51(3):902-11\]. Although it is assumed that combination of lamivudine and adefovir would be more effective than entecavir monotherapy for lamivudine resistant patients, we cannot verify the assumption, because there is no data directly comparing these two strategies until now. The aim of this study is to determine the most effective therapy for the patients with lamivudine resistant chronic hepatitis B. We will compare the PCR negativity (\<60 IU/ml) of HBV DNA at year 2 in patients receiving 'the combination of lamivudine and adefovir' and 'entecavir monotherapy'. Since we are planning to include lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients regardless of HBeAg status, we assumed the PCR negativity (\<300 copies/mL or \<60 IU/mL) in adefovir-lamivudine combination and entecavir monotherapy group as 55% and 34%, respectively, considering HBeAg status and lower detection limit of PCR. The result of this study will be able to clearly demonstrate the superiority of combination therapy with lamivudine and adefovir to entecavir monotherapy, which provide us the guide to rescue therapy for patients with lamivudine resistant HBV.

Interventions

DRUGcombination of lamivudine+adefovir vs entecavir

Lamivudine 100 mg/day, Adefovir 10 mg/day, Entecavir 0.5 mg/day

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Korea University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Chronic hepatitis B patients (positive HBsAg \> 6 months) 2. Age \> 16 year old 3. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>1.5 x ULN 4. History of treatment with lamivudine more than 6 months 5. Proven lamivudine resistant mutation 6. HBV DNA level\> 20000 IU/mL 7. Compensated liver disease (Child-Pugh-Turcotte score over 7; prothrombin time prolonged more than 3 sec above ULN or INR over 1.5; serum albumin \>3 g/dL; total bilirubin \<2.5 mg/dL; No history of variceal bleeding, ascites, or hepatic encephalopathy) 8. Patients willing to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Out of inclusion criteria 2. Any one of following * Serum phosphorus level under 2.4 mg/dL * Serum creatinine level over 1.5 mg/dL or creatinine clearance \<50 mL/min * Absolute neutrophil count lower than 1000 cell/mL * Hb level under 10 g/dL (male), under 9 g/dL (female) * Serum AFP \>100 ng/mL 3. History of treatment with interferon-a, thymosin-alfa 1, or nucleos(t)ide analogue other than lamivudine in 6 months of screening 4. Recipient of organ transplantation 5. Positive antibody test to HIV, HCV or HDV 6. Pregnant or breast feeding women 7. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or uncontrolled malignant disease 8. Habitual alcohol drinker (\>140 g/week for men, \>70 g/week for women)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
PCR negativity (<60 IU/ml) of HBV DNAAt the end of year 2 (since starting rescue therapy for lamivudine resistance)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. PCR negativity (<60 IU/ml) of HBV DNA at year 1 (interim analysis) 2. Degrees of HBV DNA reduction 3. ALT normalization 4. HBeAg seroconversion 5. Development of resistant mutation 6. Virologic breakthrough 7. Biochemical breakthroughAt the end of year 2 except interim analysis

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026