Skip to content

THE PARTNER TRIAL: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve Trial

THE PARTNER TRIAL: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve Trial Edwards SAPIEN Transcatheter Heart Valve

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00530894
Acronym
PARTNER
Enrollment
1057
Registered
2007-09-18
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2017-07-31
Last updated
2017-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Aortic Stenosis

Keywords

Valvular Heart Disease, Critical/Severe Aortic Stenosis, High risk symptomatic patients

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of the device and delivery systems (transfemoral and transapical) in high risk, symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Detailed description

Subjects will undergo a physical exam and screening tests will be performed to determine if they are either A) a patient with a high surgical risk or B) not a candidate for surgery. They will then be randomized (like the flip of a coin) to have the investigational device implanted or to receive the current surgical or medical management available.

Interventions

OTHERmedical management and/or balloon aortic valvuloplasty

Sponsors

Edwards Lifesciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Cohort A 1. Patients must have co-morbidities such that the surgeon and cardiologist Co-PIs concur that the predicted risk of operative mortality is ≥15% and/or a minimum STS score of 10 2. Patient has senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis with echocardiographically derived criteria: mean gradient \>40 mmHg or jet velocity greater than 4.0 m/s or an initial aortic valve area of \< 0.8 cm2 3. Patient is symptomatic from his/her aortic valve stenosis, as demonstrated by NYHA Functional Class II or greater 4. The subject or the subject's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the IRB of the respective clinical site 5. The subject and the treating physician agree that the subject will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits Cohort B All candidates for Cohort B of this study must meet #2, 3, 4, 5 of the above criteria and 6. The subject, after formal consults by a cardiologist and two cardiovascular surgeons agree that medical factors preclude operation, based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious, irreversible morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement. Specifically, the probability of death or serious, irreversible morbidity should exceed 50%.

Exclusion criteria

1. Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1month before the intended treatment. 2. Aortic valve is a congenital unicuspid or bicuspid valve; or is non-calcified 3. Mixed aortic valve disease (aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation with predominant aortic regurgitation \>3+). 4. Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure performed within 30 days of the index procedure, (or 6 months if the procedure was a drug eluting coronary stent implantation). 5. Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in any position, prosthetic ring, or severe (greater than 3+) mitral insufficiency.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Death1 YearDeath from any cause.
Composite of Death and Recurrence Hospitalization.duration of studyDeath from any cause or repeat hospitalization after intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional Change of NYHABaseline to 1 yearNYHA classification change from baseline to 1 year visit. NYHA provides a way of classifying the extent of heart failure. New York Heart Association (NYHA) is a functional classification of heart failure based on how much a patient is limited during physical activity. The rating ranges from I - IV, with the lowest (I) as no limitations and the highest (IV) unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebro-vascular Events (MACCE)1 yearNumber of participants with MACCE definition includes death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and renal failure
Total Hospital Days From the Index Procedure1 yearTotal hospital days from the index procedure or randomization into control arm to one year post procedure or randomization.
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to 1 YearBaseline and 1 YearThe QOL questionnaire consisted of: Kansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ), The Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 12 (SF-12) - physical and metal states. KCCQ scores are on a range of 0-100, in which 100 reflects the best health status and 0 reflects the worst health status. SF-12 questionnaire was used in which 100 reflects the best health status and 0 reflects the worst health status.

Countries

Canada, Germany, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
High Risk: TAVR
Edwards SAPIEN Transcatheter Heart Valve
348
High Risk: SAVR
Surgical Valve Replacement
349
Inoperable TAVR
Edwards SAPIEN Transcatheter Heart Valve
179
Inoperable: Medical Therapy
Medical management and/or balloon aortic valvuloplasty
179
Total1,055

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAlive and censored prior to 1 year2000
Overall StudyDeath84895589
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1300
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12305

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHigh Risk: TAVRHigh Risk: SAVRInoperable TAVRInoperable: Medical TherapyTotal
Age, Continuous
High Risk
83.61 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.83
84.52 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.37
NA YearsNA Years84.11 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.61
Age, Continuous
Inoperable
NA YearsNA Years83.12 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
83.18 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.29
83.18 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.43
NYHA Class
High Risk Class II
20 Participants21 ParticipantsNA ParticipantsNA Participants41 Participants
NYHA Class
High Risk Class III or IV
328 Participants328 ParticipantsNA ParticipantsNA Participants656 Participants
NYHA Class
Inoperable Class III or IV
NA ParticipantsNA Participants165 Participants168 Participants333 Participants
NYHA Class
Operable Class II
NA ParticipantsNA Participants14 Participants11 Participants25 Participants
Quality of Life
High Risk KCCQ Overall
39.6 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.8
44.5 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.8
NA ScoreNA Score41.88 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.93
Quality of Life
High Risk SF-12 Mental
46.9 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
47.6 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
NA ScoreNA Score47.2 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
Quality of Life
High Risk SF-12 Physical
29.6 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
30.9 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
NA ScoreNA Score30.2 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
Quality of Life
Inoperable KCCQ Overall
NA ScoreNA Score36.19 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.52
34.44 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.14
35.35 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.32
Quality of Life
Inoperable SF-12 Mental
NA ScoreNA Score44.45 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.16
45.23 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.03
44.84 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
Quality of Life
Inoperable SF-12 Physical
NA ScoreNA Score28.23 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.73
27.70 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.89
28.0 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.23
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants5 Participants0 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American
11 Participants8 Participants4 Participants9 Participants32 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
9 Participants9 Participants5 Participants8 Participants31 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants4 Participants0 Participants0 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
324 Participants328 Participants165 Participants162 Participants979 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
147 Participants151 Participants97 Participants95 Participants490 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
201 Participants198 Participants82 Participants84 Participants565 Participants
STS Score
High Risk
11.8 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
11.7 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
NA PercentageNA Percentage11.75 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
STS Score
Inoperable
NA PercentageNA Percentage11.2 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
11.9 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
11.51 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.34

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
230 / 348217 / 351140 / 179103 / 179
serious
Total, serious adverse events
228 / 348238 / 351134 / 179151 / 179

Outcome results

Primary

Composite of Death and Recurrence Hospitalization.

Death from any cause or repeat hospitalization after intervention.

Time frame: duration of study

Population: Composite of Death and recurrence hospitalization was not a primary outcome for the High Risk groups.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
High Risk: TAVRComposite of Death and Recurrence Hospitalization.76 participants
High Risk: SAVRComposite of Death and Recurrence Hospitalization.126 participants
Primary

Death

Death from any cause.

Time frame: 1 Year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
High Risk: TAVRDeath84 participants
High Risk: SAVRDeath89 participants
Inoperable: TAVRDeath55 participants
Inoperable: Medical TherapyDeath89 participants
Secondary

Change in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to 1 Year

The QOL questionnaire consisted of: Kansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ), The Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 12 (SF-12) - physical and metal states. KCCQ scores are on a range of 0-100, in which 100 reflects the best health status and 0 reflects the worst health status. SF-12 questionnaire was used in which 100 reflects the best health status and 0 reflects the worst health status.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 Year

Population: Note that the number of participants analyzed is different from that in the participant flow as there was some missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Risk: TAVRChange in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to 1 YearSF-12 Mental52.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
High Risk: TAVRChange in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to 1 YearSF-12 Physical36.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
High Risk: TAVRChange in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to 1 YearKCCQ Overall70.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.4
High Risk: SAVRChange in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to 1 YearSF-12 Physical36.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
High Risk: SAVRChange in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to 1 YearKCCQ Overall71.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
High Risk: SAVRChange in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to 1 YearSF-12 Mental52.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
Inoperable: TAVRChange in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to 1 YearSF-12 Mental53.31 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Inoperable: TAVRChange in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to 1 YearKCCQ Overall69.41 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.37
Inoperable: TAVRChange in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to 1 YearSF-12 Physical34.85 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.13
Inoperable: Medical TherapyChange in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to 1 YearKCCQ Overall46.98 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.59
Inoperable: Medical TherapyChange in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to 1 YearSF-12 Mental46.59 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.68
Inoperable: Medical TherapyChange in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to 1 YearSF-12 Physical29.68 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.47
Secondary

Functional Change of NYHA

NYHA classification change from baseline to 1 year visit. NYHA provides a way of classifying the extent of heart failure. New York Heart Association (NYHA) is a functional classification of heart failure based on how much a patient is limited during physical activity. The rating ranges from I - IV, with the lowest (I) as no limitations and the highest (IV) unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.

Time frame: Baseline to 1 year

Population: Note that the number of participants analyzed is different from that in the participant flow as there was some missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
High Risk: TAVRFunctional Change of NYHA2.50 Units on scale
High Risk: SAVRFunctional Change of NYHA2.60 Units on scale
Inoperable: TAVRFunctional Change of NYHA2.88 Units on scale
Inoperable: Medical TherapyFunctional Change of NYHA3.92 Units on scale
Secondary

Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebro-vascular Events (MACCE)

Number of participants with MACCE definition includes death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and renal failure

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
High Risk: TAVRNumber of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebro-vascular Events (MACCE)93 participants
High Risk: SAVRNumber of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebro-vascular Events (MACCE)97 participants
Inoperable: TAVRNumber of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebro-vascular Events (MACCE)61 participants
Inoperable: Medical TherapyNumber of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebro-vascular Events (MACCE)93 participants
Secondary

Total Hospital Days From the Index Procedure

Total hospital days from the index procedure or randomization into control arm to one year post procedure or randomization.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Risk: TAVRTotal Hospital Days From the Index Procedure17.42 DaysStandard Deviation 19.05
High Risk: SAVRTotal Hospital Days From the Index Procedure20.14 DaysStandard Deviation 23.85
Inoperable: TAVRTotal Hospital Days From the Index Procedure25.24 DaysStandard Deviation 21.11
Inoperable: Medical TherapyTotal Hospital Days From the Index Procedure17.04 DaysStandard Deviation 33.46

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 30, 2026