Skip to content

A Comparison of Surgical Preparations and Wound Infection Rates for Elective Cesarean Sections

Povidone-iodine vs. Chlorhexidine Gluconate - A Comparison of Surgical Preparations and Wound Infection Rates for Elective Cesarean Sections

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00528008
Enrollment
268
Registered
2007-09-11
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2010-02-28
Last updated
2012-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wound Infection

Keywords

infection, sepsis, povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine gluconate, fever, erythema, leukocytosis, drainage, vaginal discharge, elective cesarean section

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to find out if chlorhexidine gluconate solution is better at reducing the rate of wound infection after cesarean section compared to povidone-iodine.

Detailed description

Wound infection is a universal potential morbidity to any type of surgery. Over the years many studies have been completed to evaluate ways to decrease this morbidity. Recent literature has looked at different types of surgical solutions used in pre-operative cleansing. Chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine are two standard surgical prep solutions used on a global scale. The most recent literature has shown that chlorhexidine has a decreased wound infection rate for longer surgeries. Cesarean section, as a surgical time, varies from 20 - 60 minutes. There has been no known literature regarding wound infection rates using these two solutions in elective cesarean sections. This trial will review the rates of wound infection using chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine during elective cesarean section and determine if there is any statistically significant difference between the two solutions. The results could potentially decrease wound infection rates, decrease morbidity, decrease hospital length of stay, and help to guide further surgical management.

Interventions

Abdominal surgical field cleaned with 5% povidone-iodine detergent scrub, detergent cleaned from surgical area with sterile water, and then painted with 1% povidone-iodine solution.

OTHERchlorhexidine gluconate

Abdominal surgical field painted once using 2% chlorhexidine in 70% alcohol.

Sponsors

Eastern Health
CollaboratorOTHER
Memorial University of Newfoundland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>19 years * Gestational age \> 37 weeks * Booked elective cesarean section

Exclusion criteria

* Gestational age \< 37 weeks * Premature rupture of membranes * Onset of labor prior to procedure * Evidence of maternal sepsis; maternal fever \> 38.5C * LSCS for emergency issues: non-reassuring fetal status, placental abruption, failed induction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
to determine the rate of wound infection using two standard wound preparations: povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine gluconatewithin 6 weeks following surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
readmission to hospitalwithin 6 weeks following surgery
extended length of admissionwithin 6 weeks following surgery
need for intravenous antibioticswithin 6 weeks following surgery
need for repeat procedure such as drainagewithin 6 weeks following surgery
increased outpatient surveillancewithin 6 weeks following surgery

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026