Skip to content

Effect of Passive Gait Training on the Cortical Activity in Patients With Severe Brain Injury.

Effect of Proprioceptive Stimulation With Passive Gait Training on the Cortical Activity in Patients With Impaired Consciousness Due to Severe Brain Injury.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00526500
Enrollment
60
Registered
2007-09-10
Start date
2006-08-31
Completion date
2009-05-31
Last updated
2008-11-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anoxic Brain Injury, Craniocerebral Trauma, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Anoxic Brain Injury, Passive Gait Training, Tilt Table With Integrated Stepping System, Electroencephalogram, Event Related Potentials

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to determine effect of proprioceptive stimulation with passive gait training on the cortical activity in patients with severe brain injury, demonstrated as changes in EEG (electroencephalogram)and ERP (Event Related Potentials). Hypotheses: 1) Proprioceptive stimulation increases EEG-frequency in patients with impaired consciousness due to severe brain injury. 2\) Proprioceptive stimulation increases conductivity speed of the cognitive P300-component of ERP in patients with impaired consciousness due to severe brain injury.

Detailed description

Design: Prospective controlled non-randomized study. Materials and methods: 45 patients with severe brain injury and 15 healthy volunteers will be included in this study. The study design is illustrated below: 1. Baseline measurement of electroencephalography (EEG) and event related potentials (ERP) 2. Gait training in the tilt table with integrated stepping system(20 min). 3. Control measurement of EEG and ERP Effect parameters: se outcome measures. Statistical evaluation: All collected data will be tested with reference to normal distribution. If the data is not distributed normally, then we will use either a logarithmic transformation before we use parametric statistics, or we will use non-parametric statistics for further calculations. Further analysis of the data will be done with the help of variance analysis with an inter-individually factor as a group (patients vs control persons) and intra-individually factors as: 1) experimental condition (before vs after training), 2) topographic distribution (anterior vs central vs posterior). Significance level is set to 0.05 for all effect parameters.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTilt Table With Integrated Stepping System

Passive Gait Training: one session, 20 minutes, table tilted to 70-80 degrees, speed 60 steps per minute.

Sponsors

University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Patient Goup: 1. Severe Brain Injury 2. Ongoing Impaired State of Consciousness (RLAS\<4) 3. Stable Vital Functions 4. Written Consent from Relatives/Legal Guardian Control Group: 1. No History of Neurological Diseases in the Past 2. Age over 18 years 3. Written Consent -

Exclusion criteria

Patient and Control Goup: 1. Age older than 80 years 2. Other Neurological Diseases 3. Lack of BAEP 4. Severe Co-morbidity 5. Pregnancy 6. Tilt table contraindications: orthostatic circulatory problems, unstable fractures, severe osteoporosis, sken problems, joint problems, severe asymmetry (major difference in leg length over 2 cm), co-operation problems (psychotic illnesses or neurotic disturbances), adjustment problems (i.e. integrated stepping system cannot be safely adjusted to the patient)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
EEG:frequency ratios: Alpha versus delta; alpha and beta versus delta and theta; ERP: latency of P300-component.immediately after the end og the training

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
EEG: absolute and relative power in every frequency band; median frequency;immediately after the end of the training

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactNatallia Lapitskaya, MD, PhD-stud
neunla@sc.aaa.dk004587623573
Backup ContactLena Bjorn, secretary
neuleb@sc.aaa.dk0045 8762 3562

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026