Skip to content

Dialysis Catheter Comparative Clinical Trial

A Randomized, Open-label Comparison of the Performance and Longevity of a Split-tip Versus a Symmetric Tip Hemodialysis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00526123
Enrollment
599
Registered
2007-09-06
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2011-08-31
Last updated
2013-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

End Stage Renal Disease

Keywords

Dialysis, Dialysis Catheter, Kidney Disease, Dialysis Clinic, Chronic Catheter, Catheter, Kidney

Brief summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare the longevity of two dialysis catheters.

Detailed description

This study is a multi-center, randomized, prospective, open-label, clinical study comparing a conventional split-tip catheter and a symmetric tip catheter in subjects undergoing hemodialysis.

Interventions

DEVICESymmetric Tip Catheter

Dialysis catheter

DEVICEConventional Split-tip Catheter

Dialysis Catheter

Sponsors

Tyco Healthcare Group
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject must be 18 years of age or older. * Subject must meet labeled indication for hemodialysis. * Subject must have End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). * Subject must have a patent right or left internal jugular vein. * Subject treatment plan must require chronic hemodialysis treatments 3 times per week for a minimum of 6 weeks. * Subject must give written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who are concurrently enrolled in any Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) or those that may enroll in a RCT during the course of the study, or subjects who have been previously randomized into this clinical study. * Subjects with active infection at the time of study enrollment. * Subjects with a known sensitivity to heparin, or previous incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. * Subjects with uncontrolled abnormal coagulation parameters and are at additional risk for clotting or excessive bleeding. * Subjects who are known or suspected to be pregnant at the time of study enrollment or plan to get pregnant during the study period. * Subjects for whom performing dialysis at flow rates up to 450 mL/min would be contraindicated for any reason. * Subject unable or unwilling to commit to follow-up visits and study procedures throughout the course of the study. * Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigators, are not appropriate candidates for the study based upon current or past medical history, or negative past experience with either of the study catheters.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First Catheter Induced Complication30 days% of participants that did not experience a catheter induced complication at the specified Outcome Measure Time Frame.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inadequate Flow Rates Requiring Surgical/Radiological Intervention35 weeksNumber of events per study group in which the first catheter induced complication was 'inadequate flow requiring surgical/radiological intervention'.
Average Number of Line Reversals Per Subject35 WeeksAverage number of times the dialysis lines were reversed per subject to deliver dialysis treatments
Frequency of Clinician Interventions for Catheter Malfunction and Infection35 WeeksAverage number of times clinician intervention was required for either catheter malfunction or infection
Primary Failure RateFirst dialysis session with study catheterThe percentage of catheters unable to deliver adequate blood flow of at least 300 mL/min for at least 50% of measurements during the first attempted dialysis session.
Reliability of the Catheter35 WeeksPercentage of study visits in which the median blood flow rate was greater than or equal to 300 mL/min.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients with ESRD requiring hemodialysis via a chronic hemodialysis catheter at least 3x weekly for a minimum of 6 weeks were recruited from the clinical study sites. Participating sites included hospitals and private medical clinics. Subjects were enrolled from September 2007 through January 2011

Pre-assignment details

Patients that met all of the eligibility criteria were enrolled and were randomized 1:1 to either the symmetric tip or split-tip catheter group. Enrolled subjects were further stratified via subject ID by new catheter insertion versus catheter exchange.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Symmetric Tip
symmetric tip hemodialysis catheter
303
Split-tip
split-tip hemodialysis catheter
296
Total599

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSplit-tipSymmetric TipTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
115 Participants114 Participants229 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
180 Participants189 Participants369 Participants
Age Continuous58.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.34
60.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.49
59.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.92
Region of Enrollment
United States
296 participants303 participants599 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
149 Participants160 Participants309 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
147 Participants143 Participants290 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3030 / 296
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 3034 / 296

Outcome results

Primary

First Catheter Induced Complication

% of participants that did not experience a catheter induced complication at the specified Outcome Measure Time Frame.

Time frame: 30 days

Population: Number of participants is derived from the 'per protocol' population defined as those subjects that were randomized and have at least one post baseline measurement for the primary efficacy endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Symmetric TipFirst Catheter Induced Complication78 percentage of participants
Split-tipFirst Catheter Induced Complication77 percentage of participants
Primary

First Catheter Induced Complication

% of participants that did not experience a catheter induced complication at the specified Outcome Measure Time Frame.

Time frame: 60 days

Population: Number of participants is derived from the 'per protocol' population defined as those subjects that were randomized and have at least one post baseline measurement for the primary efficacy endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Symmetric TipFirst Catheter Induced Complication66 percentage of participants
Split-tipFirst Catheter Induced Complication69 percentage of participants
Primary

First Catheter Induced Complication

% of participants that did not experience a catheter induced complication at the specified Outcome Measure Time Frame.

Time frame: 245 days

Population: Number of participants is derived from the 'per protocol' population defined as those subjects that were randomized and have at least one post baseline measurement for the primary efficacy endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Symmetric TipFirst Catheter Induced Complication40 percentage of participants
Split-tipFirst Catheter Induced Complication48 percentage of participants
Secondary

Average Number of Line Reversals Per Subject

Average number of times the dialysis lines were reversed per subject to deliver dialysis treatments

Time frame: 35 Weeks

Population: Number of participants is derived from the 'per protocol' population defined as those subjects that were randomized and have at least one post baseline measurement for the primary efficacy endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Symmetric TipAverage Number of Line Reversals Per Subject6.5 eventsStandard Deviation 18.87
Split-tipAverage Number of Line Reversals Per Subject8.0 eventsStandard Deviation 21.01
Secondary

Frequency of Clinician Interventions for Catheter Malfunction and Infection

Average number of times clinician intervention was required for either catheter malfunction or infection

Time frame: 35 Weeks

Population: Number of participants is derived from the 'per protocol' population defined as those subjects that were randomized and have at least one post baseline measurement for the primary efficacy endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Symmetric TipFrequency of Clinician Interventions for Catheter Malfunction and Infection8.2 eventsStandard Deviation 12.22
Split-tipFrequency of Clinician Interventions for Catheter Malfunction and Infection10.0 eventsStandard Deviation 15.89
Secondary

Inadequate Flow Rates Requiring Surgical/Radiological Intervention

Number of events per study group in which the first catheter induced complication was 'inadequate flow requiring surgical/radiological intervention'.

Time frame: 35 weeks

Population: Number of participants is derived from the 'intent to treat' population defined as those subjects that were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Symmetric TipInadequate Flow Rates Requiring Surgical/Radiological Intervention18 events
Split-tipInadequate Flow Rates Requiring Surgical/Radiological Intervention29 events
Secondary

Primary Failure Rate

The percentage of catheters unable to deliver adequate blood flow of at least 300 mL/min for at least 50% of measurements during the first attempted dialysis session.

Time frame: First dialysis session with study catheter

Population: Number of participants was derived from the 'per protocol' population defined as those subjects that were randomized, had a study catheter inserted, and have at least one post baseline measurement for the primary efficacy endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Symmetric TipPrimary Failure Rate3.9 percentage of catheters
Split-tipPrimary Failure Rate4.9 percentage of catheters
Secondary

Reliability of the Catheter

Percentage of study visits in which the median blood flow rate was greater than or equal to 300 mL/min.

Time frame: 35 Weeks

Population: Number of participants was derived from the 'per protocol' population defined as those subjects that were randomized, had the study catheter inserted, and have at least one post baseline measurement for the primary efficacy endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Symmetric TipReliability of the Catheter90.6 percentage of study visitsStandard Deviation 20.1
Split-tipReliability of the Catheter86.9 percentage of study visitsStandard Deviation 23.37

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026