Skip to content

Study of Suitable Schedule of Docetaxel,Anthracycline and Cyclophosphamide in Adjuvant Therapy of Beast Cancer

A Chinese Multi-Center,Randomized Study of Combination or Sequential Use of Docetaxel,Anthracycline and Cyclophosphamide in Adjuvant Therapy for Node Positive Breast Cancer

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00525642
Enrollment
603
Registered
2007-09-06
Start date
2003-06-30
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2007-09-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adjuvant, Breast Neoplasms, Chemotherapy

Keywords

Breast-adjuvant, Breast-chemotherapy, Combination chemotherapy regimens

Brief summary

Anthracycline based regimens followed by a taxane (CALGB-9344 trial and NSABP-B28) or reversed (MD Anderson Adjuvant Trial) has already accepted as adjuvant therapy for node positive breast cancer. Also in this group of patients, data from BCIRG-001 trial had shown that six cycles of adjuvant TAC (docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) is superior to standard FAC (5-FU, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide ) combination in terms of both disease free and overall survival, while associated with a higher rate of febrile neutropenia. Then question arose whether it is better to use docetaxel and anthracycline in combination or sequence.

Detailed description

In this national wide study, women with node positive operable breast cancer are eligible for inclusion.Patients were designed to randomize to six cycles of adjuvant TAC (Taxotere® 75mg/m2, doxorubicin 50mg/m2 or epirubicin 60mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500mg/m2), and four cycles of T(100mg/m2), followed by 4 cycles of AC(doxorubicin 60mg/m2 or epirubicin 75mg/m2 ,cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2). Prophylaxis with G-CSF was allowed for two arms when febrile neutropenia occurred in the first cycle of the study treatment. The second endpoint of this study is disease free survival. The primary objective is to compare the disease free survival rate and safety profiles of the above mentioned two arms.

Interventions

DRUGDocetaxel, Doxorubicin or Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide

Docetaxel 75mg/m2, doxorubicin 50mg/m2 or epirubicin 60mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500mg/m2 six cycles

Sponsors

Fudan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* pT1-3,pN1-3,M0, operable breast cancer * Karnofsky \>=80 * Pregnant test negative

Exclusion criteria

* Prior Chemotherapy with anthracyclines and / or Taxanes, except for Neoadjuvant therapy * Prior breast radiation * Bilateral breast cancer * in-operable breast cancer * Other health condition which may be contraindications for chemotherapy * contraindications for Dexamethasone

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Disease Free Survival5 years and 10 years
Grade III/IV Adverse Event,Severe Adverse Eventduring chemotherapy and 30 days after treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Overall Survival5 years and 10 years
Distant disease free Survival5 years and 10 years
Time to treatment failure5 years and 10 years

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026