Skip to content

Virus Early Transcription Factor (VETF) Multicenter Phototherapy Protocol

Continuative vs Sequential Phototherapy in Non-segmental Vitiligo Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00525395
Acronym
VETF
Enrollment
200
Registered
2007-09-05
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2011-06-30
Last updated
2010-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vitiligo

Keywords

Phototherapy, Vitiligo scoring system

Brief summary

Background Phototherapy UVB TL01 currently represents the first choice in treatment to induce the repigmentation of vitiligo spots. The problem though is that there are no systems or scales which enable an objective evaluation of the therapy, commonly known as percentage of repigmentation. Recently, a European Task Force (VETF, Vitiligo European Task Force) of experts on vitiligo, within the European Society of Pigmentation, has proposed a gravity classification on the basis of three parameters/standards - extension, progression and the level of depigmentation - and used to classify patients in ten European centres. The aim of the trial is to validate the VETF scoring system set up in relation with the therapeutic answer to the standard treatment for vitiligo and phototherapy. Leaving aside short term side effects, such as sunrush/erythema and sunburn, which are reversible and infrequent, the main problem with phototherapy is represented by the cumulative long term effects of ultraviolet rays. These can cause premature ageing of the skin (photoaging) and the appearance of skin cancer/neoplasia. Therefore the aim is to get the best results from phototherapy whilst limiting its length. Aims of the trial: 1. To validate the VETF scoring system. As phototherapy is currently the only universally accepted treatment for vitiligo, it seems logical to test the VETF scoring system first to evaluate the effectiveness of phototherapy. 2. Secondly, the target of this multicentric trial is to compare the effectiveness of two different phototherapy protocols; a first protocol foresees non-stop treatment for 6 months; a second protocol foresees periods of interruption during the treatment. This will help to verify whether interrupting a cycle of phototherapy is useful or not. This interruption might make the ultraviolet rays more effective 'stimulus on the melanocytes', and may also reduce long term damage caused by phototherapy.

Interventions

GENETICSequential phototherapy

Group A: 2 months treatment-1 month no treatment-2 months treatment-1 month no treatment

PROCEDUREContinuous phototherapy

Group B: 6 months non-stop treatment.

Sponsors

Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged between 18 and 60 years old

Exclusion criteria

* Phototype I * Previous treatment with any kind of phototherapy in the last 6 months. * Patients with counter indications for PUVA or phototherapy (history of skin cancer, pregnancy, etc.). * Acral vitiligo (only hands and feet are affected).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The percentage of repigmentation on the target lesions will be evaluated at the end of each treatment in both groups.6 months

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactMauro Picardo, MD
picardo@ifo.it

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026