Suturing vs Biological Adhesive in Simple Lacerations of Hand

Suturing Vs Adhesion for Hand Lacerations in the ER A Randomized Prospective Study

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT00524888

Acronym

sutvsglu

Enrollment

200

Registered

2007-09-05

Start date

2007-09-30

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2007-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lacerations

Keywords

Hand, Laceration, bioadhesive, ER, Hand laceration distal to the volar wrist crease

Brief summary

To assess the difference in clinical outcome between lacerations in the hand treated by sutures versus treated by tissue adhesive.

Interventions

PROCEDUREsuturing laceration

suturing simple lacerations of the hand

PROCEDUREbioadhesive

using bioadhesive on simple lacerations of the hand

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* Any age * Hand laceration distal to the volar wrist crease.

Exclusion criteria

* Fracture , tendon, artery involvement, more than 8 hours from laceration to trx, * Immunosuppression * Anticoagulation therapy * Diabetes * Unable to achieve homeostasis in more than 15 minutes * Unwilling to participate in the study * Unable to participate in the follow up or bite of any kind.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Wound appearance	3 Months

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
pain of treatment and time length of treatment	3 months

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026