Skip to content

A Study to Compare Effectiveness and Safety of Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/Rtv) 800mg/100mg Once Daily Versus DRV/Rtv 600mg/100mg Twice Daily in Early Treatment-Experienced HIV-1 Infected Patients (ODIN)

A Randomized, Open-label Trial to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of DRV/Rtv (800mg/100mg) q.d Versus DRV/Rtv (600mg/100mg) b.i.d in Early Treatment-experienced HIV-1 Infected Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00524368
Acronym
ODIN
Enrollment
590
Registered
2007-09-03
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2011-10-31
Last updated
2013-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Human Immunodeficiency Virus - Type 1

Keywords

Human immunodeficiency virus - type 1, HIV-1 Infection, TMC-114, Darunavir, Ritonavir

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test if being treated with darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/rtv) 800/100 mg daily is as effective as being treated with DRV/rtv 600/100 mg twice daily, in early antiretroviral (ARV)-experienced patients when given along with selected optimized background regimen (OBR).

Detailed description

This is a randomized (the study medication is assigned by chance), open-label (all people know the identity of the intervention) study in which 590 patients will be randomly assigned to receive either DRV/rtv 800/100 mg daily or DRV/rtv 600/100 mg twice daily along with the selected OBR. An OBR will consist of at least 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) selected by the investigator. The study will include a 4 week screening period, 48-weeks of treatment period and 4-weeks of follow-up. The study will also consists of extension phase after Week 48: in regions where DRV is not yet commercially available or reimbursed by the health care system, patients who complete the 48 weeks of treatment with DRV/rtv and who continue to benefit from this treatment, will have the opportunity to continue DRV treatment as a 600 mg twice daily dosage until DRV is reimbursed and available via the public and/or private health care system or until its development is discontinued. Safety evaluation will consists of adverse events (including specific toxicities), clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiogram, physical and skin examination.

Interventions

DRV/rtv 800/100 mg once daily group: 2 tablets of 400 mg of DRV administered orally once daily. DRV/rtv 600/100 mg twice daily group: 1 tablet of 600 mg DRV administered orally twice daily.

DRV/rtv 800/100 mg once daily group: One capsule of 100 mg of ritonavir administered orally once daily. DRV/rtv 600/100 mg twice daily group: One capsule of 100 mg of ritonavir administered orally twice daily.

Sponsors

Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with documented human immunodeficiency virus - Type 1 (HIV-1) infection * Patients with a viral load greater than 1,000 HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) copies/mL * Stable highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen for at least 12 weeks at screening * In the investigator's opinion, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are not a valid treatment option, because of the patient's antiretroviral (ARV) treatment history, ARV resistance testing, medication-taking behavior, safety and tolerability concerns, or other patient-related factors * Prescreening or/and screening plasma HIV-1 RNA greater than 1,000 copies/mL on HAART regimen at screening

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of any currently active conditions that fit the definition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Stage 4, with the following exceptions: stable cutaneous kaposi's sarcoma (ie, no internal organ involvement other than oral lesions) that is unlikely to require any form of systemic therapy during the study time period, wasting syndrome * Patients for whom an investigational ARV is part of the current regimen, with the following exceptions if applicable (depending on local regulatory approval): tenofovir, emtricitabine * Previous or current use of enfuvirtide (ENF), tipranavir and/or DRV * Life expectancy of less than 12 months * Pregnant or breast-feeding females * Any active clinically significant disease (eg, tuberculosis \[TB\], cardiac dysfunction, pancreatitis, acute viral infections) or findings during screening of medical history or physical examination that, in the investigator's opinion, would compromise the patient's safety or outcome of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Virological Response at Week 48 (Number of Participants With Plasma Viral Load Less Than 50 Copies/mL) - as Defined by the Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm48 WeeksThe TLOVR algorithm was used to derive response, ie, response and loss of response needed to be confirmed at 2 consecutive visits and participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Participants with intermittent missing viral load values were considered responders if the preceeding and succeeding visits indicated response. In all other cases, intermittent values were imputed with nonresponse. Resuppression after confirmed virologic failure was considered as failure in this algorithm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in CD4+ Cell Count From Baseline48 WeeksCD4+ cell count was calculated using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) algorithm.
Virologic Response at Week 48 (Viral Load Less Than 400 Copies/mL)48 weeksNumber of participants with confirmed plasma viral load less than 400 copies/mL at Week 48.
Change in log10 Viral Load From Baseline at Week 4848 weeks
Time to Reach First Virologic Response48 weeksTime (in weeks) to achieve viral load less than 50 copies/mL by the participants.
Time to Loss of Virologic Response48 weeksTime taken to lose the virologic response ie, plasma viral load less than 50 copies/mL by participants.
Time-averaged Difference (DAVG) of log10 Plasma Viral Load Over 48 Weeks48 weeks
Percentage of Participants Adherent/Non-adherent to ARV as Determined by Modified Medication Adherence Self Report Inventory (M-MASRI) Questionnaire at Week 4848 weeksSelf-reported adherence to the ARV medications was measured. The M-MASRI asks participants to report the number of doses taken, as well as the number of doses taken during the last 30 days prior to the study visit by means of a horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) that generates a self-rated percentage of doses of all the ARV medications taken during the past 30 days.
Area Under the Curve From the Time of Study Medication Administration Upto 24 Hour Postdose (AUC24h) of DRV and Rtv0 hour predose and 1 hour post dose measured at Weeks 4 and 24. Any time point measured at Weeks 8 and 48.Pharmacokinetic parameter AUC24h was assessed from the time of study medication administration upto 24 hour postdose. Population Pharmacokinetic Estimates of DRV and rtv were evaluated.
Predose Plasma Concentration (C0h) of DRV and Rtv.0 hour predose and 1 hour post dose measured at Weeks 4 and 24. Any time point measured at Weeks 8 and 48Pharmacokinetic parameter C0h was assessed. Population Pharmacokinetic Estimates of DRV and rtv were evaluated.
Number of Participants Developing Mutations at Endpoint48 weeksDevelopment of Mutations in Virologic Failures (Plasma Viral Load less than 50 Copies/mL) at endpoint.
Change From Baseline in Total Functional Assessment of HIV Infection (FAHI) Score48 weeksThe FAHI is a 44-item questionnaire and incorporates 5 functional scales (physical well-being, emotional well-being/living with HIV, functional and global well-being, social well-being, and cognitive functioning). Each scale included several questions (all 5 scales include total 44 questions). For each question, participants gave a score of either 0 (not at all), 1 (a little bit), 2 (somewhat), 3 (quite a bit) and 4 (very much). Total FAHI imputed score is calculated by adding scores for each question. The range of total FAHI score is 0 to 176. Higher scores indicate worsening.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brazil, Chile, France, Germany, Guatemala, Hungary, Malaysia, Panama, Puerto Rico, Romania, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

One hundred thirteen investigators in 21 countries participated in this study.

Pre-assignment details

In total 1092 participants were screened, of which 590 participants were randomly assigned and treated (294 participants were treated with DRV/rtv 800/100 mg once daily, and 296 participants with DRV/rtv 600/100 mg twice daily.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once Daily
Two 400 mg tablets of darunavir (DRV) + one 100 mg capsule of ritonavir (rtv) once daily
294
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice Daily
One 600 mg darunavir (DRV) tablet + one 100 mg capsule of ritonavir (rtv) given twice daily
296
Total590

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event1012
Overall StudyIneligible to Continue the study25
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up913
Overall StudyNon-compliant89
Overall StudyOther32
Overall StudyReached a Virologic Endpoint32
Overall StudySponsor's Decision20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject45

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyTotalDRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once Daily
Age Continuous40.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
40.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.29
40.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.09
Age (years) (categorical)
30 < Age <= 45
169 participants349 participants180 participants
Age (years) (categorical)
45 < Age <= 55
72 participants136 participants64 participants
Age (years) (categorical)
55 < Age <= 65
18 participants32 participants14 participants
Age (years) (categorical)
Age <= 30
35 participants70 participants35 participants
Age (years) (categorical)
Age > 65
2 participants3 participants1 participants
Hepatitis B or C Co-infection Status
Negative
255 participants522 participants267 participants
Hepatitis B or C Co-infection Status
Positive
37 participants62 participants25 participants
Hepatitis B or C Co-infection Status
Unknown
4 participants6 participants2 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
98 Participants213 Participants115 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
198 Participants377 Participants179 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
134 / 294147 / 296
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 29427 / 296

Outcome results

Primary

Virological Response at Week 48 (Number of Participants With Plasma Viral Load Less Than 50 Copies/mL) - as Defined by the Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm

The TLOVR algorithm was used to derive response, ie, response and loss of response needed to be confirmed at 2 consecutive visits and participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Participants with intermittent missing viral load values were considered responders if the preceeding and succeeding visits indicated response. In all other cases, intermittent values were imputed with nonresponse. Resuppression after confirmed virologic failure was considered as failure in this algorithm.

Time frame: 48 Weeks

Population: Intention To Treat (ITT) population: Participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Participants with intermittent missing viral load values were considered responders if preceeding and succeeding visits indicated response. Otherwise, intermittent values were imputed with nonresponse.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyVirological Response at Week 48 (Number of Participants With Plasma Viral Load Less Than 50 Copies/mL) - as Defined by the Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm212 Participants
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyVirological Response at Week 48 (Number of Participants With Plasma Viral Load Less Than 50 Copies/mL) - as Defined by the Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm210 Participants
Comparison: Assuming a response rate of 70% at 48 weeks for both treatment groups, 306 participants were required per treatment arm to establish noninferiority of darunavir (DRV)/ritonavir (rtv) once daily versus DRV/rtv twice daily with a maximum allowable difference of 12%, with a 1-sided significance level of 0.025 and 90% power.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.054, 0.092]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Area Under the Curve From the Time of Study Medication Administration Upto 24 Hour Postdose (AUC24h) of DRV and Rtv

Pharmacokinetic parameter AUC24h was assessed from the time of study medication administration upto 24 hour postdose. Population Pharmacokinetic Estimates of DRV and rtv were evaluated.

Time frame: 0 hour predose and 1 hour post dose measured at Weeks 4 and 24. Any time point measured at Weeks 8 and 48.

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: Participants who were randomized and who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyArea Under the Curve From the Time of Study Medication Administration Upto 24 Hour Postdose (AUC24h) of DRV and RtvPopulation Pharmacokinetic Estimates of DRV87788 ng*h/mL
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyArea Under the Curve From the Time of Study Medication Administration Upto 24 Hour Postdose (AUC24h) of DRV and RtvPopulation Pharmacokinetic Estimates of rtv5776 ng*h/mL
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyArea Under the Curve From the Time of Study Medication Administration Upto 24 Hour Postdose (AUC24h) of DRV and RtvPopulation Pharmacokinetic Estimates of DRV109401 ng*h/mL
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyArea Under the Curve From the Time of Study Medication Administration Upto 24 Hour Postdose (AUC24h) of DRV and RtvPopulation Pharmacokinetic Estimates of rtv12588 ng*h/mL
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Functional Assessment of HIV Infection (FAHI) Score

The FAHI is a 44-item questionnaire and incorporates 5 functional scales (physical well-being, emotional well-being/living with HIV, functional and global well-being, social well-being, and cognitive functioning). Each scale included several questions (all 5 scales include total 44 questions). For each question, participants gave a score of either 0 (not at all), 1 (a little bit), 2 (somewhat), 3 (quite a bit) and 4 (very much). Total FAHI imputed score is calculated by adding scores for each question. The range of total FAHI score is 0 to 176. Higher scores indicate worsening.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Intention To Treat (ITT) population - last observation carried forward (LOCF): Intermittent missing values and missing values due to premature discontinuation were imputed with the last observation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyChange From Baseline in Total Functional Assessment of HIV Infection (FAHI) ScoreFAHI score at baseline129 Scores on a scale
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyChange From Baseline in Total Functional Assessment of HIV Infection (FAHI) ScoreChange from baseline in FAHI score at Week 482.5 Scores on a scale
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyChange From Baseline in Total Functional Assessment of HIV Infection (FAHI) ScoreFAHI score at baseline123.5 Scores on a scale
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyChange From Baseline in Total Functional Assessment of HIV Infection (FAHI) ScoreChange from baseline in FAHI score at Week 480.0 Scores on a scale
p-value: 0.76195% CI: [-2.97, 4.06]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in CD4+ Cell Count From Baseline

CD4+ cell count was calculated using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) algorithm.

Time frame: 48 Weeks

Population: Intention To Treat (ITT) population - last observation carried forward (LOCF): Intermittent missing values and missing values due to premature discontinuation were imputed with the last observation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyChange in CD4+ Cell Count From BaselineValue at Baseline219 10e6/l
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyChange in CD4+ Cell Count From BaselineCD4+ cell count change from baseline at Week 48100 10e6/l
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyChange in CD4+ Cell Count From BaselineValue at Baseline236 10e6/l
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyChange in CD4+ Cell Count From BaselineCD4+ cell count change from baseline at Week 4894 10e6/l
p-value: 0.56295% CI: [-26.09, 14.2]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in log10 Viral Load From Baseline at Week 48

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Intention To Treat (ITT) population: Participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Participants with intermittent missing viral load values were considered responders if preceeding and succeeding visits indicated response. Otherwise, intermittent values were imputed with nonresponse.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyChange in log10 Viral Load From Baseline at Week 48Log10 Viral Load at baseline4.23 log10 copies/mL
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyChange in log10 Viral Load From Baseline at Week 48Log10 Viral Load change from baseline at Week 48-2.11 log10 copies/mL
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyChange in log10 Viral Load From Baseline at Week 48Log10 Viral Load at baseline4.134 log10 copies/mL
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyChange in log10 Viral Load From Baseline at Week 48Log10 Viral Load change from baseline at Week 48-2.13 log10 copies/mL
p-value: 0.97795% CI: [-0.188, 0.182]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants Developing Mutations at Endpoint

Development of Mutations in Virologic Failures (Plasma Viral Load less than 50 Copies/mL) at endpoint.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: Participants who were randomized and who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyNumber of Participants Developing Mutations at EndpointDRV resistance-associated mutation (RAM)1 Participants
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyNumber of Participants Developing Mutations at EndpointPrimary (major) protease inhibitor (PI) mutations1 Participants
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyNumber of Participants Developing Mutations at EndpointProtease inhibitor (PI) RAMs7 Participants
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyNumber of Participants Developing Mutations at EndpointNucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor RAMs4 Participants
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyNumber of Participants Developing Mutations at EndpointNucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor RAMs3 Participants
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyNumber of Participants Developing Mutations at EndpointDRV resistance-associated mutation (RAM)0 Participants
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyNumber of Participants Developing Mutations at EndpointProtease inhibitor (PI) RAMs4 Participants
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyNumber of Participants Developing Mutations at EndpointPrimary (major) protease inhibitor (PI) mutations0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Adherent/Non-adherent to ARV as Determined by Modified Medication Adherence Self Report Inventory (M-MASRI) Questionnaire at Week 48

Self-reported adherence to the ARV medications was measured. The M-MASRI asks participants to report the number of doses taken, as well as the number of doses taken during the last 30 days prior to the study visit by means of a horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) that generates a self-rated percentage of doses of all the ARV medications taken during the past 30 days.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: Participants who were randomized and who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyPercentage of Participants Adherent/Non-adherent to ARV as Determined by Modified Medication Adherence Self Report Inventory (M-MASRI) Questionnaire at Week 48Adherent67.4 Percentage of participants
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyPercentage of Participants Adherent/Non-adherent to ARV as Determined by Modified Medication Adherence Self Report Inventory (M-MASRI) Questionnaire at Week 48Non-adherent32.6 Percentage of participants
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyPercentage of Participants Adherent/Non-adherent to ARV as Determined by Modified Medication Adherence Self Report Inventory (M-MASRI) Questionnaire at Week 48Non-adherent39.7 Percentage of participants
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyPercentage of Participants Adherent/Non-adherent to ARV as Determined by Modified Medication Adherence Self Report Inventory (M-MASRI) Questionnaire at Week 48Adherent60.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Predose Plasma Concentration (C0h) of DRV and Rtv.

Pharmacokinetic parameter C0h was assessed. Population Pharmacokinetic Estimates of DRV and rtv were evaluated.

Time frame: 0 hour predose and 1 hour post dose measured at Weeks 4 and 24. Any time point measured at Weeks 8 and 48

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: Participants who were randomized and who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyPredose Plasma Concentration (C0h) of DRV and Rtv.Population Pharmacokinetic Estimates of DRV1896 ng/mL
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyPredose Plasma Concentration (C0h) of DRV and Rtv.Population Pharmacokinetic Estimates of rtv59 ng/mL
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyPredose Plasma Concentration (C0h) of DRV and Rtv.Population Pharmacokinetic Estimates of DRV3197 ng/mL
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyPredose Plasma Concentration (C0h) of DRV and Rtv.Population Pharmacokinetic Estimates of rtv307 ng/mL
Secondary

Time-averaged Difference (DAVG) of log10 Plasma Viral Load Over 48 Weeks

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Intention To Treat (ITT) population: Observed cases

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyTime-averaged Difference (DAVG) of log10 Plasma Viral Load Over 48 Weeks-1.77 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.051
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyTime-averaged Difference (DAVG) of log10 Plasma Viral Load Over 48 Weeks-1.74 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.051
p-value: 0.71195% CI: [-0.169, 0.115]ANCOVA
Secondary

Time to Loss of Virologic Response

Time taken to lose the virologic response ie, plasma viral load less than 50 copies/mL by participants.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Intention To Treat (ITT) population: Participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Participants with intermittent missing viral load values were considered responders if preceeding and succeeding visits indicated response. Otherwise, intermittent values were imputed with nonresponse.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyTime to Loss of Virologic Response250.235 DaysStandard Error 6.598
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyTime to Loss of Virologic Response281.743 DaysStandard Error 7.47
p-value: 0.71695% CI: [0.699, 1.279]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Time to Reach First Virologic Response

Time (in weeks) to achieve viral load less than 50 copies/mL by the participants.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Intention To Treat (ITT) population: Participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Participants with intermittent missing viral load values were considered responders if preceeding and succeeding visits indicated response. Otherwise, intermittent values were imputed with nonresponse.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyTime to Reach First Virologic Response85 Days
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyTime to Reach First Virologic Response85 Days
p-value: 0.91795% CI: [0.824, 1.191]Cox proportional hazards
Secondary

Virologic Response at Week 48 (Viral Load Less Than 400 Copies/mL)

Number of participants with confirmed plasma viral load less than 400 copies/mL at Week 48.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Intention To Treat (ITT) population: Participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Participants with intermittent missing viral load values were considered responders if preceeding and succeeding visits indicated response. Otherwise, intermittent values were imputed with nonresponse.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DRV/Rtv 800/100 mg Once DailyVirologic Response at Week 48 (Viral Load Less Than 400 Copies/mL)226 Participants
DRV/Rtv 600/100 mg Twice DailyVirologic Response at Week 48 (Viral Load Less Than 400 Copies/mL)227 Participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.06, 0.075]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026