Skip to content

Study of Adolescence and Depression

Brief, Primary Care Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for Unmedicated Youth

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00523081
Acronym
STAND
Enrollment
212
Registered
2007-08-30
Start date
2006-10-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2014-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

adolescent depression treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy,, collaborative care

Brief summary

STAND is a research study testing a way to help teens between 12-18 years of age who have symptoms of sadness or depression. The study hopes to learn if teens do better if they get five to nine counseling sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy coordinated with the support of their doctor. All teens who join the study will keep seeing their doctor as usual. Teens and a parent are interviewed briefly over the phone to see if they are appropriate for the study. If they qualify for the study, there is an hour-long interview with teen over the telephone and a 30 minute interview with the parent. The interview will include questions about the teen's mood, feelings, behavior, and how they get along with friends and family members. The parent is also asked about his or her own feelings and mood. If the teen and parent join the study, they will be interviewed six more times in the next two years. Half the teens in the study will also meet with a research counselor for five to nine individual, weekly sessions that last about 50 minutes each. Whether a teen attends the weekly counseling sessions is decided by chance, like flipping a coin. If teens are assigned to these sessions, they will learn ways to deal with stress and feel better. If teens take part in the counseling sessions, the study counselor will also talk to the teen's doctor from time to time to help plan for the best possible care.

Detailed description

Substantial numbers of depressed adolescents either decline antidepressant medication or quickly discontinue such medications before benefits are expected. Recent controversies regarding the safety of SSRI anti-depressants are likely to increase medication refusal. More than half of depressed adolescents identified in primary care prefer psychosocial treatments, compared to 20% who prefer medication. Among the psychotherapy alternatives to medication, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has the strongest research support. The STAND study is a two-arm, randomized, efficacy-effectiveness trial in primarily a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO), comparing a treatment as usual (TAU) control condition to TAU plus brief, individual, collaborative care CBT delivered in primary care. We will enroll 240 youth ages 12 to 18 who, during this depressive episode, have either declined anti-depressant medication or who received a single dispense of anti-depressant medication but quickly discontinued. All enrolled cases will be reassessed periodically throughout a 24-month follow-up period. The primary clinical outcome is recovery from the index episode of major depression, assessed via research diagnosis. Secondary outcomes include continuous depression symptomatology; depression response; rates of new, recurrent episodes of major depression in the follow-up period; improvements in psychosocial function; clinical improvement; reduction in depression-related dysfunction; parent/youth attitudes regarding treatment. We will also examine incremental cost-effectiveness of CBT compared to TAU from the HMO, family, and societal perspectives. We will conduct exploratory analyses of mediation and moderation of depression treatment outcomes, and employ data from the TAU control condition to estimate the usual outcomes for depressed youth who refuse/discontinue antidepressant medication. Finally, we will examine how provider, parent and youth barriers, attitudes and beliefs moderate outcomes, as well as possibly change over time as a function of participation in this program. The validation of a primary care model for brief CBT may prove to be a significant benefit to the sizeable numbers of depressed youth identified in primary care, and who elect not to try anti-depressant medication or quickly discontinue an initial trial.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

Half the teens in the study will also meet with a research counselor for five to nine individual, weekly sessions that last about 50 minutes each. Whether a teen attends the weekly counseling sessions is decided by chance, like flipping a coin. If teens are assigned to these sessions, they will learn ways to deal with stress and feel better. If teens take part in the counseling sessions, the study counselor will also talk to the teen's doctor from time to time to help plan for the best possible care.

BEHAVIORALActive control

Teens in the active control arm will keep seeing their doctor as usual. Teens and a parent are interviewed briefly over the phone to see if they are appropriate for the study. If they qualify for the study, there is an hour-long interview with teen over the telephone and a 30 minute interview with the parent. They will be interviewed six more times in the next two years.

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Kaiser Permanente
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 12-18 * Current diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder

Exclusion criteria

* Psychosis * Bipolar * Taking anti-depressant medication * Significant intellectual impairment * Recent treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The two Primary outcomes are (a) recovery of response from the index episode of major depression and (b) improvements in continuous depression symptomatology .Assessment at 1 3, 6,12, 18 and 24 months,

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes include depression response; rates of new, recurrent episodes of MDD during follow-up; improvement in psychosocial function; clinical improvements; and reduction in depression-related dysfunction.Assessment at 1 3, 6,12, 18 and 24 months,

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026