Skip to content

Comparative Results of Maxillary Deficiency Treatment by Tongue Plate and Facemask in Growing Patients

This Study is to Apply the Tongue Force to Correct the Dentofacial Deformities

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00519415
Enrollment
20
Registered
2007-08-22
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2008-11-30
Last updated
2008-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Maxillary Deficiency

Keywords

Tongue plate, Facemask, class III maxillary deficiency, orthodontic angle class three

Brief summary

A new appliance will be used to transfer the tongue force during its physiological activity to advance the nasomaxillary complex; this method will be compared with the traditional method which uses a Facemask appliance.

Detailed description

The above method will be compared with traditional one which uses the Facemask in combination with an intra-oral appliance.

Interventions

OTHERTongue plate

A functional appliance use for maxillary protraction.It has two adams clasp and two C clasp to retained the appliance and long palatal plate in the canine area which cages the tongue and transfer the force of the tongue during physiological activity to the upper arch. It has posterior bite plate and middle screw for maxillary expansion.It should be used all the time except meal time and brushing the teeth,the acrylic appliance makes specifically for the patient.

An extraoral appliance use for treatment of maxillary deficiency in growing patients.It takes anchorage from chin and forehead, it has removable intraoral appliance with hooks for elastics that exerted a force of 300 gr.It should be used 14 hours a day.

Sponsors

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Growing patients * Class III with maxillary deficiency

Exclusion criteria

* Previous orthodontic treatment * Un cooperative patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cephalometric angles and clinical featuresAt least 6 months

Countries

Iran

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026