Skip to content

Aflibercept in Combination With Docetaxel in Metastatic Androgen Independent Prostate Cancer

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Aflibercept Versus Placebo Administered Every 3 Weeks in Patients Treated With Docetaxel/ Prednisone for Metastatic Androgen-independent Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00519285
Acronym
VENICE
Enrollment
1224
Registered
2007-08-22
Start date
2007-08-31
Completion date
2012-04-30
Last updated
2016-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis

Keywords

metastatic, prostate, cancer

Brief summary

Primary objective was to demonstrate overall survival improvement with aflibercept compared to placebo in patients receiving docetaxel / prednisone for metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer (MAIPC). The secondary objectives were: * To assess the efficacy of aflibercept compared to placebo on other parameters such prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, cancer related pain, progression free survival (PFS), tumor-based and skeletal events and health-related quality of life (HRQL); * To assess the overall safety in both treatment arms; * To determine the pharmacokinetics of intravenous (IV) aflibercept in this population; * to determine immunogenicity of IV aflibercept.

Detailed description

The study consisted in 3-week treatment cycles until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or participant's refusal of further study treatment. After disease progression, participants were to be followed every 3 months until death or the study cutoff date, whichever came first. The study cut-off date was event-driven and was defined as the date when 873 deaths had occurred.

Interventions

DRUGAflibercept

25 mg/ml solution 6 mg/kg, 1-hour IV on Day 1 of each 3-Week cycle

DRUGPlacebo (for aflibercept)

Sterile aqueous buffered solution identical to aflibercept 1-hour IV on Day 1 of each 3-Week cycle

DRUGDocetaxel

Marketed formulation 75 mg/m², 1 hour IV on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle (immediately after Aflibercept or placebo)

Marketed formulation 5 mg twice daily PO from day 1 continuously

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically- or cytologically-confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma; * Metastatic disease; * Progressive disease while receiving hormonal therapy or after surgical castration; * Effective castration.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer, except estramustine and except adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatment completed \>3 years ago; * Prior treatment with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) inhibitors or VEGF receptor inhibitors; * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status \>2. The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival TimeFrom randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)Overall survival (OS) time was measured as the time from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. The median OS time and its 95.6% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of confirmation of death, the participant was censored at the last date he/she was known to be alive or the study cut-off date (when 873 deaths have occurred), whichever was earlier.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Skeletal Related EventsFrom randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)Skeletal Related Events (SRE) included pathological fractures and/or spinal cord compression, need for bone irradiation, including radioisotopes or bone surgery, change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain. Time to SRE was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of occurence of the first event defining a SRE or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median time to SRE and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of SRE, the participant was censored at the last date he/she was known to be alive or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier.
Progression Free Survival TimeFrom randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)Disease progression was defined as a composite of: Radiological tumor progression (≥20% increase in target lesions, or appearance of at least 2 new bone lesions); PSA progression (≥25% increase in PSA level confirmed 3 weeks later); Pain progression (increase in pain intensity or in analgesic consumption for cancer related pain confirmed 3 weeks later); Radiotherapy for cancer related symptoms; Occurence of Skeletal related events (SRE). Progression Free survival (PFS) time was measured as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of occurrence of the first event defining a disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median PFS time and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of disease progression, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier.
Tumor Response Rate in Participants With Measurable DiseaseBefore randomization (baseline) then every 3 months up to tumor progression (≥25% increase) or the cut-off date, whichever occurred firstTumor response was defined as either a Complete Response (disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (≥30% decrease from baseline in target lesions) as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST)version 1.0.
Prostate Specific Antigen Progression-free Survival TimeFrom randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)Prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression was defined as ≥25% increase in PSA level confirmed 3 weeks later, above the nadir in participants who had achieved a PSA response, or above the baseline in participants who hadn't achieved a PSA response. PSA progression-free survival (PFS) time was defined as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of the first documented PSA progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median PSA-PFS time and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of PSA progression or death, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier.
Prostate Specific Antigen Response RateBefore randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks up to PSA progression (≥25% increase) or the cut-off date, whichever occurred firstProstate specific antigen (PSA) response was defined as ≥50% decrease from baseline in serum PSA levels, confirmed at least 3 weeks later. Increases of any magnitude during the first 12 weeks were ignored in determining PSA response.
Pain Response RateBefore randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks up to pain progression or the cut-off date, whichever occurred firstPain response was defined as either a ≥2-point decrease from baseline in Present Pain Intensity (PPI) score without increase in Analgesics Score (AS), or a ≥50% decrease from baseline in AS without increase in the PPI score confirmed at least 3 weeks later. Increases in PPI or AS during the first 12 weeks were ignored in determining pain response.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of LifeBefore randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks until disease progression or administration of further antitumor therapy, whichever came firstFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) is a 39-item participant questionnaire that measures the concerns of patients with prostate cancer. It consists of 5 subscales assessing physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, and prostate-specific concerns. FACT-P total score is the sum of the 5 subscores. It ranges from 0 to 156 with higher score indicating better quality of life.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of SafetyFrom first dose of study treatment (aflibercept/placebo or docetaxel whichever came first) to last dose of study treatment (aflibercept/placebo or docetaxel whichever came last) + 30 daysAdverse Events (AE) are any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study. AE were collected at regular intervals throughout the study then graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE v.3.0).
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of AfliberceptPre-dose of cycle 1 (baseline), pre-dose of each every other cycle, then 30 and 90 days after the last administration of the study drugSerum for detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) was collected in patients treated in selected centers only. Samples were analyzed using a titer-based, bridging immunoassay developed and validated to detect ADAs in human serum. Samples with positive antibody levels were further analyzed using a validated, non-quantitative ligand binding assay to detect neutralizing antibodies Ab). A participant was considered to have positive antibody levels if antibodies were detected above the quantification limits.
Pain Progression-free Survival TimeFrom randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)Pain progression was defined as either ≥1-point increase in Present Pain Intensity (PPI) score or ≥25% increase in Analgesics Score (AS) confirmed at least 3 weeks later, or requirement for palliative radiotherapy. PPI scale is a self-report 0-5 scale to assess pain intensity - a score 0 reflects no pain, a score 5 reflects excruciating pain. AS is a scoring method to assess analgesics consumption. Each analgesic is scored 1 or 4 depending on the analgesic type and dose. AS is the sum of the analgesic scores. Pain progression-free survival (PFS) time was measured as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of first pain progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median pain-PFS and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of event, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of pain progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Between August 2007 and February 2010, a total of 1548 patients gave informed consent for this study.

Pre-assignment details

Amongst these patients, a total of 324 were screening failures (primarily due to non-compliance with exclusion criteria) and did not get randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo, 1 hour IV, immediately followed by docetaxel, 75 mg/m² 1 hour IV, every 3 weeks in combination with oral prednisone or prednisolone, 5 mg PO twice daily
612
Aflibercept
Aflibercept, 6 mg/kg 1 hour IV, immediately followed by docetaxel, 75 mg/m² 1 hour IV, every 3 weeks in combination with oral prednisone or prednisolone, 5 mg PO twice daily
612
Total1,224

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event127266
Overall StudyConsent withdrawn45
Overall StudyDisease progression334186
Overall StudyNot treated87
Overall StudyParticipant's request5384
Overall StudyPhysician Decision7547
Overall StudyPoor compliance to protocol57
Overall StudyReason unspecified58
Overall StudyTreatment ongoing12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalAflibercept
Age, Continuous67.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
67.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
67.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
Age, Customized
65-74 years
259 participants542 participants283 participants
Age, Customized
<65 years
225 participants420 participants195 participants
Age, Customized
≥75 years
128 participants262 participants134 participants
Body Surface Area (BSA)2.0 m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
2.0 m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
2.0 m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
Eastern Co-operative Group (ECOG) performance status
ECOG 0
285 participants568 participants283 participants
Eastern Co-operative Group (ECOG) performance status
ECOG 1
299 participants602 participants303 participants
Eastern Co-operative Group (ECOG) performance status
ECOG 2
28 participants54 participants26 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/Oriental
36 participants68 participants32 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
17 participants32 participants15 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian/White
552 participants1112 participants560 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
7 participants12 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Eastern Europe
131 Participants263 Participants132 Participants
Region of Enrollment
North America
81 Participants176 Participants95 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Other region
93 Participants180 Participants87 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South America
88 Participants159 Participants71 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Western Europe
219 Participants446 Participants227 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
612 participants1224 participants612 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
551 / 598573 / 611
serious
Total, serious adverse events
184 / 598331 / 611

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival Time

Overall survival (OS) time was measured as the time from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. The median OS time and its 95.6% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of confirmation of death, the participant was censored at the last date he/she was known to be alive or the study cut-off date (when 873 deaths have occurred), whichever was earlier.

Time frame: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)

Population: The analysis was performed on the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population (i.e all randomized participants according to the treatment assigned regardless of the drug actually received).~At the cut-off date, 873 deaths had occurred, 445 in the Placebo group and 428 in the Aflibercept group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboOverall Survival Time21.22 months
AfliberceptOverall Survival Time22.14 months
Comparison: Null hypothesis: No difference between aflibercept and placebo~The study was designed to provide 90% power to detect a 1.25-fold increase in median survival with aflibercept compared to placebo at a overall one-sided significance level of 0.025 with 873 deaths.p-value: 0.380295.6% CI: [0.822, 1.08]Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) is a 39-item participant questionnaire that measures the concerns of patients with prostate cancer. It consists of 5 subscales assessing physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, and prostate-specific concerns. FACT-P total score is the sum of the 5 subscores. It ranges from 0 to 156 with higher score indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks until disease progression or administration of further antitumor therapy, whichever came first

Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT population evaluable for Health related quality of life (i.e. with baseline and at least one post-baseline evaluable FACT-P questionnaire).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of LifeChange from baseline at cycle 1 (n =493, 461)5.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.73
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of LifeChange from baseline at cycle 2 (n =467, 437)6.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of LifeChange from baseline at cycle 6 (n =293, 224)5.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of LifeChange from baseline at cycle 10 (n =158, 117)6.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.35
AfliberceptChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of LifeChange from baseline at cycle 10 (n =158, 117)-1.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.41
AfliberceptChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of LifeChange from baseline at cycle 1 (n =493, 461)1.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.7
AfliberceptChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of LifeChange from baseline at cycle 6 (n =293, 224)-1.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.85
AfliberceptChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of LifeChange from baseline at cycle 2 (n =467, 437)-0.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.99
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety

Adverse Events (AE) are any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study. AE were collected at regular intervals throughout the study then graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE v.3.0).

Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (aflibercept/placebo or docetaxel whichever came first) to last dose of study treatment (aflibercept/placebo or docetaxel whichever came last) + 30 days

Population: The analysis was performed on the safety population (i.e. all randomized and treated participants according to the treatment actually received). Six participants in the Placebo group who received at least one dose of aflibercept in error were considered in the Aflibercept group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety- Serious AE184 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety--- Related AE leading to death8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety- Grade 3-4 AE290 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety- AE leading to permanent discontinuation125 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety- AE leading to death23 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety- AE leading to premature discontinuation73 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of SafetyAny Adverse Event585 participants
AfliberceptNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety- AE leading to premature discontinuation116 participants
AfliberceptNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of SafetyAny Adverse Event607 participants
AfliberceptNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety- Grade 3-4 AE470 participants
AfliberceptNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety- Serious AE331 participants
AfliberceptNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety- AE leading to death46 participants
AfliberceptNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety--- Related AE leading to death19 participants
AfliberceptNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety- AE leading to permanent discontinuation268 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept

Serum for detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) was collected in patients treated in selected centers only. Samples were analyzed using a titer-based, bridging immunoassay developed and validated to detect ADAs in human serum. Samples with positive antibody levels were further analyzed using a validated, non-quantitative ligand binding assay to detect neutralizing antibodies Ab). A participant was considered to have positive antibody levels if antibodies were detected above the quantification limits.

Time frame: Pre-dose of cycle 1 (baseline), pre-dose of each every other cycle, then 30 and 90 days after the last administration of the study drug

Population: The analysis was performed on the safety population evaluable for immunogenicity (i.e. exposed to aflibercept with serum samples evaluable for immunogenicity).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of AfliberceptAt any time post-baseline4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept- Not neutralizing Ab2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept- Neutralizing Ab0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept- Neutralizing potential not evaluated2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of AfliberceptAt baseline0 participants
AfliberceptNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept- Neutralizing potential not evaluated2 participants
AfliberceptNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of AfliberceptAt baseline2 participants
AfliberceptNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of AfliberceptAt any time post-baseline9 participants
AfliberceptNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept- Neutralizing Ab2 participants
AfliberceptNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept- Not neutralizing Ab5 participants
Secondary

Pain Progression-free Survival Time

Pain progression was defined as either ≥1-point increase in Present Pain Intensity (PPI) score or ≥25% increase in Analgesics Score (AS) confirmed at least 3 weeks later, or requirement for palliative radiotherapy. PPI scale is a self-report 0-5 scale to assess pain intensity - a score 0 reflects no pain, a score 5 reflects excruciating pain. AS is a scoring method to assess analgesics consumption. Each analgesic is scored 1 or 4 depending on the analgesic type and dose. AS is the sum of the analgesic scores. Pain progression-free survival (PFS) time was measured as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of first pain progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median pain-PFS and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of event, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of pain progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier.

Time frame: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)

Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT population evaluable for pain progression (i.e. with no pain or with stable pain at baseline).~At the cut-off date, pain progression or death had occurred in 507 participants, 263 in the Placebo group and 244 in the Aflibercept group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboPain Progression-free Survival Time9.72 months
AfliberceptPain Progression-free Survival Time9.20 months
Secondary

Pain Response Rate

Pain response was defined as either a ≥2-point decrease from baseline in Present Pain Intensity (PPI) score without increase in Analgesics Score (AS), or a ≥50% decrease from baseline in AS without increase in the PPI score confirmed at least 3 weeks later. Increases in PPI or AS during the first 12 weeks were ignored in determining pain response.

Time frame: Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks up to pain progression or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first

Population: The analysis was performed in the ITT population evaluable for pain response (i.e. stable analgesia at baseline and, baseline PPI ≥2 and/or baseline AS ≥10 points).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPain Response Rate46.3 percentage of participants
AfliberceptPain Response Rate35.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression Free Survival Time

Disease progression was defined as a composite of: Radiological tumor progression (≥20% increase in target lesions, or appearance of at least 2 new bone lesions); PSA progression (≥25% increase in PSA level confirmed 3 weeks later); Pain progression (increase in pain intensity or in analgesic consumption for cancer related pain confirmed 3 weeks later); Radiotherapy for cancer related symptoms; Occurence of Skeletal related events (SRE). Progression Free survival (PFS) time was measured as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of occurrence of the first event defining a disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median PFS time and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of disease progression, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier.

Time frame: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)

Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT population.~At the cut-off date, disease progression or death had occurred in 1184 participants, 592 in each treatment group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboProgression Free Survival Time6.24 months
AfliberceptProgression Free Survival Time6.90 months
Secondary

Prostate Specific Antigen Progression-free Survival Time

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression was defined as ≥25% increase in PSA level confirmed 3 weeks later, above the nadir in participants who had achieved a PSA response, or above the baseline in participants who hadn't achieved a PSA response. PSA progression-free survival (PFS) time was defined as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of the first documented PSA progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median PSA-PFS time and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of PSA progression or death, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier.

Time frame: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)

Population: The analysis was performed in the ITT population evaluable for PSA progression (i.e. with an evaluable baseline PSA).~At the cut-off date, PSA progression or death had occurred in 1138 participants, 571 in the Placebo group and 567 in the Aflibercept group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboProstate Specific Antigen Progression-free Survival Time8.11 months
AfliberceptProstate Specific Antigen Progression-free Survival Time8.25 months
Secondary

Prostate Specific Antigen Response Rate

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response was defined as ≥50% decrease from baseline in serum PSA levels, confirmed at least 3 weeks later. Increases of any magnitude during the first 12 weeks were ignored in determining PSA response.

Time frame: Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks up to PSA progression (≥25% increase) or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first

Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT population evaluable for PSA response (i.e. with a baseline PSA ≥10 ng/mL).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboProstate Specific Antigen Response Rate63.5 percentage of participants
AfliberceptProstate Specific Antigen Response Rate68.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Skeletal Related Events

Skeletal Related Events (SRE) included pathological fractures and/or spinal cord compression, need for bone irradiation, including radioisotopes or bone surgery, change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain. Time to SRE was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of occurence of the first event defining a SRE or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median time to SRE and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of SRE, the participant was censored at the last date he/she was known to be alive or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier.

Time frame: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)

Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT population.~At the cut-off date, SRE or death had occurred in 1013 participants, 516 in the Placebo group and 497 in the Aflibercept group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime to Skeletal Related Events14.98 months
AfliberceptTime to Skeletal Related Events15.31 months
Secondary

Tumor Response Rate in Participants With Measurable Disease

Tumor response was defined as either a Complete Response (disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (≥30% decrease from baseline in target lesions) as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST)version 1.0.

Time frame: Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 months up to tumor progression (≥25% increase) or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first

Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT population evaluable for tumor response (i.e. received at least one dose of study drugs (aflibercept/placebo or docetaxel), had no important deviations to protocol and was evaluable for response as per RECIST version 1.0).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboTumor Response Rate in Participants With Measurable Disease28.1 percentage of participants
AfliberceptTumor Response Rate in Participants With Measurable Disease38.7 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 23, 2026