Prostatic Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis
Conditions
Keywords
metastatic, prostate, cancer
Brief summary
Primary objective was to demonstrate overall survival improvement with aflibercept compared to placebo in patients receiving docetaxel / prednisone for metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer (MAIPC). The secondary objectives were: * To assess the efficacy of aflibercept compared to placebo on other parameters such prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, cancer related pain, progression free survival (PFS), tumor-based and skeletal events and health-related quality of life (HRQL); * To assess the overall safety in both treatment arms; * To determine the pharmacokinetics of intravenous (IV) aflibercept in this population; * to determine immunogenicity of IV aflibercept.
Detailed description
The study consisted in 3-week treatment cycles until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or participant's refusal of further study treatment. After disease progression, participants were to be followed every 3 months until death or the study cutoff date, whichever came first. The study cut-off date was event-driven and was defined as the date when 873 deaths had occurred.
Interventions
25 mg/ml solution 6 mg/kg, 1-hour IV on Day 1 of each 3-Week cycle
Sterile aqueous buffered solution identical to aflibercept 1-hour IV on Day 1 of each 3-Week cycle
Marketed formulation 75 mg/m², 1 hour IV on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle (immediately after Aflibercept or placebo)
Marketed formulation 5 mg twice daily PO from day 1 continuously
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Histologically- or cytologically-confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma; * Metastatic disease; * Progressive disease while receiving hormonal therapy or after surgical castration; * Effective castration.
Exclusion criteria
* Prior cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer, except estramustine and except adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatment completed \>3 years ago; * Prior treatment with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) inhibitors or VEGF receptor inhibitors; * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status \>2. The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival Time | From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months) | Overall survival (OS) time was measured as the time from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. The median OS time and its 95.6% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of confirmation of death, the participant was censored at the last date he/she was known to be alive or the study cut-off date (when 873 deaths have occurred), whichever was earlier. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Skeletal Related Events | From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months) | Skeletal Related Events (SRE) included pathological fractures and/or spinal cord compression, need for bone irradiation, including radioisotopes or bone surgery, change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain. Time to SRE was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of occurence of the first event defining a SRE or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median time to SRE and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of SRE, the participant was censored at the last date he/she was known to be alive or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier. |
| Progression Free Survival Time | From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months) | Disease progression was defined as a composite of: Radiological tumor progression (≥20% increase in target lesions, or appearance of at least 2 new bone lesions); PSA progression (≥25% increase in PSA level confirmed 3 weeks later); Pain progression (increase in pain intensity or in analgesic consumption for cancer related pain confirmed 3 weeks later); Radiotherapy for cancer related symptoms; Occurence of Skeletal related events (SRE). Progression Free survival (PFS) time was measured as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of occurrence of the first event defining a disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median PFS time and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of disease progression, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier. |
| Tumor Response Rate in Participants With Measurable Disease | Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 months up to tumor progression (≥25% increase) or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first | Tumor response was defined as either a Complete Response (disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (≥30% decrease from baseline in target lesions) as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST)version 1.0. |
| Prostate Specific Antigen Progression-free Survival Time | From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months) | Prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression was defined as ≥25% increase in PSA level confirmed 3 weeks later, above the nadir in participants who had achieved a PSA response, or above the baseline in participants who hadn't achieved a PSA response. PSA progression-free survival (PFS) time was defined as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of the first documented PSA progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median PSA-PFS time and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of PSA progression or death, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier. |
| Prostate Specific Antigen Response Rate | Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks up to PSA progression (≥25% increase) or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first | Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response was defined as ≥50% decrease from baseline in serum PSA levels, confirmed at least 3 weeks later. Increases of any magnitude during the first 12 weeks were ignored in determining PSA response. |
| Pain Response Rate | Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks up to pain progression or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first | Pain response was defined as either a ≥2-point decrease from baseline in Present Pain Intensity (PPI) score without increase in Analgesics Score (AS), or a ≥50% decrease from baseline in AS without increase in the PPI score confirmed at least 3 weeks later. Increases in PPI or AS during the first 12 weeks were ignored in determining pain response. |
| Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life | Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks until disease progression or administration of further antitumor therapy, whichever came first | Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) is a 39-item participant questionnaire that measures the concerns of patients with prostate cancer. It consists of 5 subscales assessing physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, and prostate-specific concerns. FACT-P total score is the sum of the 5 subscores. It ranges from 0 to 156 with higher score indicating better quality of life. |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety | From first dose of study treatment (aflibercept/placebo or docetaxel whichever came first) to last dose of study treatment (aflibercept/placebo or docetaxel whichever came last) + 30 days | Adverse Events (AE) are any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study. AE were collected at regular intervals throughout the study then graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE v.3.0). |
| Number of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept | Pre-dose of cycle 1 (baseline), pre-dose of each every other cycle, then 30 and 90 days after the last administration of the study drug | Serum for detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) was collected in patients treated in selected centers only. Samples were analyzed using a titer-based, bridging immunoassay developed and validated to detect ADAs in human serum. Samples with positive antibody levels were further analyzed using a validated, non-quantitative ligand binding assay to detect neutralizing antibodies Ab). A participant was considered to have positive antibody levels if antibodies were detected above the quantification limits. |
| Pain Progression-free Survival Time | From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months) | Pain progression was defined as either ≥1-point increase in Present Pain Intensity (PPI) score or ≥25% increase in Analgesics Score (AS) confirmed at least 3 weeks later, or requirement for palliative radiotherapy. PPI scale is a self-report 0-5 scale to assess pain intensity - a score 0 reflects no pain, a score 5 reflects excruciating pain. AS is a scoring method to assess analgesics consumption. Each analgesic is scored 1 or 4 depending on the analgesic type and dose. AS is the sum of the analgesic scores. Pain progression-free survival (PFS) time was measured as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of first pain progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median pain-PFS and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of event, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of pain progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier. |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Between August 2007 and February 2010, a total of 1548 patients gave informed consent for this study.
Pre-assignment details
Amongst these patients, a total of 324 were screening failures (primarily due to non-compliance with exclusion criteria) and did not get randomized.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Placebo, 1 hour IV, immediately followed by docetaxel, 75 mg/m² 1 hour IV, every 3 weeks in combination with oral prednisone or prednisolone, 5 mg PO twice daily | 612 |
| Aflibercept Aflibercept, 6 mg/kg 1 hour IV, immediately followed by docetaxel, 75 mg/m² 1 hour IV, every 3 weeks in combination with oral prednisone or prednisolone, 5 mg PO twice daily | 612 |
| Total | 1,224 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 127 | 266 |
| Overall Study | Consent withdrawn | 4 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Disease progression | 334 | 186 |
| Overall Study | Not treated | 8 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Participant's request | 53 | 84 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 75 | 47 |
| Overall Study | Poor compliance to protocol | 5 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Reason unspecified | 5 | 8 |
| Overall Study | Treatment ongoing | 1 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | Total | Aflibercept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 67.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 | 67.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9 | 67.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 |
| Age, Customized 65-74 years | 259 participants | 542 participants | 283 participants |
| Age, Customized <65 years | 225 participants | 420 participants | 195 participants |
| Age, Customized ≥75 years | 128 participants | 262 participants | 134 participants |
| Body Surface Area (BSA) | 2.0 m² STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2 | 2.0 m² STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2 | 2.0 m² STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2 |
| Eastern Co-operative Group (ECOG) performance status ECOG 0 | 285 participants | 568 participants | 283 participants |
| Eastern Co-operative Group (ECOG) performance status ECOG 1 | 299 participants | 602 participants | 303 participants |
| Eastern Co-operative Group (ECOG) performance status ECOG 2 | 28 participants | 54 participants | 26 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian/Oriental | 36 participants | 68 participants | 32 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black | 17 participants | 32 participants | 15 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian/White | 552 participants | 1112 participants | 560 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 7 participants | 12 participants | 5 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Eastern Europe | 131 Participants | 263 Participants | 132 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment North America | 81 Participants | 176 Participants | 95 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Other region | 93 Participants | 180 Participants | 87 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment South America | 88 Participants | 159 Participants | 71 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Western Europe | 219 Participants | 446 Participants | 227 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Male | 612 participants | 1224 participants | 612 participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 551 / 598 | 573 / 611 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 184 / 598 | 331 / 611 |
Outcome results
Overall Survival Time
Overall survival (OS) time was measured as the time from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. The median OS time and its 95.6% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of confirmation of death, the participant was censored at the last date he/she was known to be alive or the study cut-off date (when 873 deaths have occurred), whichever was earlier.
Time frame: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)
Population: The analysis was performed on the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population (i.e all randomized participants according to the treatment assigned regardless of the drug actually received).~At the cut-off date, 873 deaths had occurred, 445 in the Placebo group and 428 in the Aflibercept group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Overall Survival Time | 21.22 months |
| Aflibercept | Overall Survival Time | 22.14 months |
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) is a 39-item participant questionnaire that measures the concerns of patients with prostate cancer. It consists of 5 subscales assessing physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, and prostate-specific concerns. FACT-P total score is the sum of the 5 subscores. It ranges from 0 to 156 with higher score indicating better quality of life.
Time frame: Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks until disease progression or administration of further antitumor therapy, whichever came first
Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT population evaluable for Health related quality of life (i.e. with baseline and at least one post-baseline evaluable FACT-P questionnaire).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life | Change from baseline at cycle 1 (n =493, 461) | 5.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.73 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life | Change from baseline at cycle 2 (n =467, 437) | 6.22 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life | Change from baseline at cycle 6 (n =293, 224) | 5.50 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.38 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life | Change from baseline at cycle 10 (n =158, 117) | 6.61 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.35 |
| Aflibercept | Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life | Change from baseline at cycle 10 (n =158, 117) | -1.60 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.41 |
| Aflibercept | Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life | Change from baseline at cycle 1 (n =493, 461) | 1.30 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.7 |
| Aflibercept | Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life | Change from baseline at cycle 6 (n =293, 224) | -1.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.85 |
| Aflibercept | Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life | Change from baseline at cycle 2 (n =467, 437) | -0.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.99 |
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety
Adverse Events (AE) are any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study. AE were collected at regular intervals throughout the study then graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE v.3.0).
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (aflibercept/placebo or docetaxel whichever came first) to last dose of study treatment (aflibercept/placebo or docetaxel whichever came last) + 30 days
Population: The analysis was performed on the safety population (i.e. all randomized and treated participants according to the treatment actually received). Six participants in the Placebo group who received at least one dose of aflibercept in error were considered in the Aflibercept group.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety | - Serious AE | 184 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety | --- Related AE leading to death | 8 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety | - Grade 3-4 AE | 290 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety | - AE leading to permanent discontinuation | 125 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety | - AE leading to death | 23 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety | - AE leading to premature discontinuation | 73 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety | Any Adverse Event | 585 participants |
| Aflibercept | Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety | - AE leading to premature discontinuation | 116 participants |
| Aflibercept | Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety | Any Adverse Event | 607 participants |
| Aflibercept | Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety | - Grade 3-4 AE | 470 participants |
| Aflibercept | Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety | - Serious AE | 331 participants |
| Aflibercept | Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety | - AE leading to death | 46 participants |
| Aflibercept | Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety | --- Related AE leading to death | 19 participants |
| Aflibercept | Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety | - AE leading to permanent discontinuation | 268 participants |
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept
Serum for detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) was collected in patients treated in selected centers only. Samples were analyzed using a titer-based, bridging immunoassay developed and validated to detect ADAs in human serum. Samples with positive antibody levels were further analyzed using a validated, non-quantitative ligand binding assay to detect neutralizing antibodies Ab). A participant was considered to have positive antibody levels if antibodies were detected above the quantification limits.
Time frame: Pre-dose of cycle 1 (baseline), pre-dose of each every other cycle, then 30 and 90 days after the last administration of the study drug
Population: The analysis was performed on the safety population evaluable for immunogenicity (i.e. exposed to aflibercept with serum samples evaluable for immunogenicity).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept | At any time post-baseline | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept | - Not neutralizing Ab | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept | - Neutralizing Ab | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept | - Neutralizing potential not evaluated | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept | At baseline | 0 participants |
| Aflibercept | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept | - Neutralizing potential not evaluated | 2 participants |
| Aflibercept | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept | At baseline | 2 participants |
| Aflibercept | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept | At any time post-baseline | 9 participants |
| Aflibercept | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept | - Neutralizing Ab | 2 participants |
| Aflibercept | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept | - Not neutralizing Ab | 5 participants |
Pain Progression-free Survival Time
Pain progression was defined as either ≥1-point increase in Present Pain Intensity (PPI) score or ≥25% increase in Analgesics Score (AS) confirmed at least 3 weeks later, or requirement for palliative radiotherapy. PPI scale is a self-report 0-5 scale to assess pain intensity - a score 0 reflects no pain, a score 5 reflects excruciating pain. AS is a scoring method to assess analgesics consumption. Each analgesic is scored 1 or 4 depending on the analgesic type and dose. AS is the sum of the analgesic scores. Pain progression-free survival (PFS) time was measured as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of first pain progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median pain-PFS and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of event, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of pain progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier.
Time frame: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)
Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT population evaluable for pain progression (i.e. with no pain or with stable pain at baseline).~At the cut-off date, pain progression or death had occurred in 507 participants, 263 in the Placebo group and 244 in the Aflibercept group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Pain Progression-free Survival Time | 9.72 months |
| Aflibercept | Pain Progression-free Survival Time | 9.20 months |
Pain Response Rate
Pain response was defined as either a ≥2-point decrease from baseline in Present Pain Intensity (PPI) score without increase in Analgesics Score (AS), or a ≥50% decrease from baseline in AS without increase in the PPI score confirmed at least 3 weeks later. Increases in PPI or AS during the first 12 weeks were ignored in determining pain response.
Time frame: Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks up to pain progression or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first
Population: The analysis was performed in the ITT population evaluable for pain response (i.e. stable analgesia at baseline and, baseline PPI ≥2 and/or baseline AS ≥10 points).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Pain Response Rate | 46.3 percentage of participants |
| Aflibercept | Pain Response Rate | 35.8 percentage of participants |
Progression Free Survival Time
Disease progression was defined as a composite of: Radiological tumor progression (≥20% increase in target lesions, or appearance of at least 2 new bone lesions); PSA progression (≥25% increase in PSA level confirmed 3 weeks later); Pain progression (increase in pain intensity or in analgesic consumption for cancer related pain confirmed 3 weeks later); Radiotherapy for cancer related symptoms; Occurence of Skeletal related events (SRE). Progression Free survival (PFS) time was measured as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of occurrence of the first event defining a disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median PFS time and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of disease progression, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier.
Time frame: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)
Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT population.~At the cut-off date, disease progression or death had occurred in 1184 participants, 592 in each treatment group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Progression Free Survival Time | 6.24 months |
| Aflibercept | Progression Free Survival Time | 6.90 months |
Prostate Specific Antigen Progression-free Survival Time
Prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression was defined as ≥25% increase in PSA level confirmed 3 weeks later, above the nadir in participants who had achieved a PSA response, or above the baseline in participants who hadn't achieved a PSA response. PSA progression-free survival (PFS) time was defined as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of the first documented PSA progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median PSA-PFS time and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of PSA progression or death, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier.
Time frame: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)
Population: The analysis was performed in the ITT population evaluable for PSA progression (i.e. with an evaluable baseline PSA).~At the cut-off date, PSA progression or death had occurred in 1138 participants, 571 in the Placebo group and 567 in the Aflibercept group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Prostate Specific Antigen Progression-free Survival Time | 8.11 months |
| Aflibercept | Prostate Specific Antigen Progression-free Survival Time | 8.25 months |
Prostate Specific Antigen Response Rate
Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response was defined as ≥50% decrease from baseline in serum PSA levels, confirmed at least 3 weeks later. Increases of any magnitude during the first 12 weeks were ignored in determining PSA response.
Time frame: Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks up to PSA progression (≥25% increase) or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first
Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT population evaluable for PSA response (i.e. with a baseline PSA ≥10 ng/mL).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Prostate Specific Antigen Response Rate | 63.5 percentage of participants |
| Aflibercept | Prostate Specific Antigen Response Rate | 68.6 percentage of participants |
Time to Skeletal Related Events
Skeletal Related Events (SRE) included pathological fractures and/or spinal cord compression, need for bone irradiation, including radioisotopes or bone surgery, change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain. Time to SRE was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of occurence of the first event defining a SRE or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median time to SRE and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of SRE, the participant was censored at the last date he/she was known to be alive or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier.
Time frame: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)
Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT population.~At the cut-off date, SRE or death had occurred in 1013 participants, 516 in the Placebo group and 497 in the Aflibercept group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Time to Skeletal Related Events | 14.98 months |
| Aflibercept | Time to Skeletal Related Events | 15.31 months |
Tumor Response Rate in Participants With Measurable Disease
Tumor response was defined as either a Complete Response (disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (≥30% decrease from baseline in target lesions) as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST)version 1.0.
Time frame: Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 months up to tumor progression (≥25% increase) or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first
Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT population evaluable for tumor response (i.e. received at least one dose of study drugs (aflibercept/placebo or docetaxel), had no important deviations to protocol and was evaluable for response as per RECIST version 1.0).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Tumor Response Rate in Participants With Measurable Disease | 28.1 percentage of participants |
| Aflibercept | Tumor Response Rate in Participants With Measurable Disease | 38.7 percentage of participants |