Skip to content

Study of NY-ESO-1 ISCOMATRIX® in Patients With Measurable Stage III or IV Melanoma

A Phase II Study of the Clinical and Immunological Effects of NY-ESO-1 ISCOM® Vaccine in Patients With Measurable Stage III and IV Malignant Melanoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00518206
Enrollment
46
Registered
2007-08-20
Start date
2003-11-28
Completion date
2010-01-22
Last updated
2022-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melanoma

Keywords

Clinical Trial, Phase 2, Cancer Vaccine, NY-ESO-1 protein, human, ISCOMATRIX, immunological adjuvant, Cyclophosphamide, T-Cells, Regulatory

Brief summary

This was a Phase 2, open-label study of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOMATRIX® (ISCOM) vaccine administered as an intramuscular injection given every 4 weeks to subjects with measurable advanced malignant melanoma. Study objectives included determination of the anticancer activity, cellular and humoral immunogenicity, and safety and tolerability of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM vaccine administered alone or preceded by a single administration of low-dose cyclophosphamide.

Detailed description

In Cohort 1, 6 subjects were initially vaccinated with the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM vaccine at a dose of 100 µg of the NY-ESO-1 protein + 120 µg of the ISCOM adjuvant. These 6 subjects were monitored for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for 7 days after the first vaccination. Upon observation of tolerability (ie, \< 2/6 subjects with DLT), enrollment proceeded to a total accrual of approximately 25 subjects. Subjects received 3 vaccinations administered every 4 weeks (ie, weeks 1, 5, and 9) followed by immunological and clinical response evaluations, with clinical responses categorized according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). In the absence of disease progression, subjects may have received 3 additional vaccinations administered every 4 weeks, followed by additional vaccinations administered every 12 weeks thereafter until development of disease progression or other criteria for discontinuation. In Cohort 2, subjects received the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM vaccine on the same schedule as described for Cohort 1, but Cohort 2 subjects also received a single intravenous infusion of low-dose cyclophosphamide 1 day prior to each NY-ESO-1 ISCOM vaccination. If responses were observed in 2 of 16 subjects initially treated in Cohort 2, then 9 additional subjects were to be accrued to Cohort 2, for a total potential accrual of 25 subjects.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALNY-ESO-1 ISCOMATRIX® vaccine

NY-ESO-1 ISCOM vaccine (100 μg of the NY-ESO-1 protein formulated with 120 μg of ISCOM adjuvant) administered as an intramuscular injection every 4 weeks for 3 doses in every cycle.

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m\^2) administered as an intravenous injection 1 day prior to each vaccination with NY-ESO-1 ISCOM (100 μg of the NY-ESO-1 protein formulated with 120 μg of ISCOM adjuvant), which was administered as an intramuscular injection every 4 weeks for 3 doses in every cycle.

Sponsors

Austin Health
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Cohort 1 was enrolled first, in which subjects received the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM vaccine. Enrollment then proceeded to Cohort 2, in which subjects received the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM vaccine and low-dose cyclophosphamide.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Stage IV (metastatic) or unresectable stage III malignant melanoma. 2. Measurable disease using RECIST. 3. No other effective therapy available or appropriate. 4. Expression of NY-ESO-1 or LAGE-1 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). 5. Expected survival of at least 4 months. 6. Karnofsky performance status of ≥ 70%. 7. Within 3 weeks prior to first administration of study drug, the following laboratory parameters were required to be within the ranges specified: * Hemoglobin ≥ 100 g/L * Platelets ≥ 100 x 10\^9/L * International normalized ratio ≤ 2.0 * Creatinine ≤ 0.2 mmol/L * Bilirubin ≤ 30 mmol/L 8. Age ≥ 18 years. 9. Able and willing to give written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Other serious illnesses, eg, serious infections requiring antibiotics, bleeding disorders, or any condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would have interfered with the ability of the patient to complete all study requirements. 2. Other malignancy within last 3 years, except for treated melanoma or non-melanoma skin cancer or cervical cancer in situ. 3. Known immunodeficiency. 4. Known human immunodeficiency virus positivity. 5. Concomitant systemic treatment with corticosteroids, anti-histaminic drugs, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Specific cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, low-dose aspirin for the prevention of an acute cardiovascular event, and topical or inhaled steroids were permitted. 6. Chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy within 4 weeks prior to study week 1. 7. Other immunotherapy within 4 weeks prior to study week 1. 8. Mental impairment that may have compromised the ability to give informed consent and comply with the requirements of the study. 9. Lack of availability for immunological and clinical follow-up assessment. 10. Participation in any other clinical trial involving another investigational agent within 4 weeks prior to enrollment. 11. Pregnancy or breastfeeding. 12. Women of childbearing potential: refusal or inability to use effective means of contraception.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor ResponseUp to 22 monthsTumor responses were evaluated using computed tomography and categorized according to RECIST (version 1.0) at baseline, at week 11, between weeks 23 and 25, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Per RECIST, target lesions are categorized as follows: Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions \[no evidence of disease\]; Partial Response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD): ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cellular Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineUp to 22 monthsBlood samples were drawn to measure cellular response at pretreatment and weeks 3, 7, 11, between weeks 23 and 25, week 33, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Cellular immunity included an assay for gamma interferon-producing T cells and enumeration of NY-ESO-1b-specific T cells, detected by fluorescent labeled human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2 tetramers carrying the NY-ESO-1b peptide, expressed as percent positive staining of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Data are presented for CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses (not mutually exclusive) that were pre-existing at baseline (BL) or presented at any time post-BL.
Post-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) ReactionsUp to 22 monthsNY-ESO-1-specific DTH was measured by intradermal injection with the full-length NY-ESO-1 protein, NY-ESO-1b peptide, and NY-ESO-1 DP4 peptide at pretreatment, week 11, and between week 23 and 25. DTH reactions (eg, local skin irritation) were evaluated 2 days after DTH injections. Data presented are based on injections with the full-length peptide, as these data are considered to be representative of the comprehensive DTH results.
Humoral Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineUp to 22 monthsBlood samples were drawn to measure humoral immunologic response at pretreatment and weeks 3, 7, 11, 33, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Humoral immunity was assessed by measurement of antibodies to NY-ESO-1 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Data are presented according to baseline (BL) NY-ESO-1 antibody positivity and the time to seroconversion, if applicable.
Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsUp to 22 monthsToxicity was graded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported based on clinical laboratory tests, physical examinations, and vital signs from pre-treatment through the study period. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as any treatment-related grade 4 toxicity or any grade 3 toxicity, excluding grade 3 skin necrosis at the site of the delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction, fever, or asymptomatic hyperglycemia that improved to baseline within 3 weeks of onset.

Countries

Australia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOM
Subjects received the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM vaccine (100 μg of the NY-ESO-1 protein formulated with 120 μg of ISCOM adjuvant) administered as an intramuscular injection every 4 weeks for 3 doses in every cycle.
27
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOM
Subjects received cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m\^2) administered as an intravenous injection 1 day prior to each vaccination with NY-ESO-1 ISCOM (100 μg of the NY-ESO-1 protein formulated with 120 μg of ISCOM adjuvant), which was administered as an intramuscular injection every 4 weeks for 3 doses in every cycle.
19
Total46

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyCompletion Status Unknown10
Overall StudyDisease Progression Requiring Therapy66
Overall StudyDrug Supply Issue10
Overall StudyReason Unknown10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMTotalCohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOM
Age, Continuous61.0 years61.0 years61.0 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
19 Participants46 Participants27 Participants
Karnofsky Performance Status
100
10 Participants28 Participants18 Participants
Karnofsky Performance Status
70
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Karnofsky Performance Status
80
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Karnofsky Performance Status
90
8 Participants12 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants6 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants39 Participants26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
19 Participants46 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants20 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants26 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 270 / 19
other
Total, other adverse events
27 / 2719 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 277 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor Response

Tumor responses were evaluated using computed tomography and categorized according to RECIST (version 1.0) at baseline, at week 11, between weeks 23 and 25, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Per RECIST, target lesions are categorized as follows: Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions \[no evidence of disease\]; Partial Response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD): ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria.

Time frame: Up to 22 months

Population: Subjects with data available from at least 1 post-baseline response assessment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor ResponsePartial response1 Participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor ResponseStable disease12 Participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor ResponseProgressive disease12 Participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor ResponsePartial response1 Participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor ResponseStable disease4 Participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor ResponseProgressive disease14 Participants
Secondary

Cellular Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM Vaccine

Blood samples were drawn to measure cellular response at pretreatment and weeks 3, 7, 11, between weeks 23 and 25, week 33, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Cellular immunity included an assay for gamma interferon-producing T cells and enumeration of NY-ESO-1b-specific T cells, detected by fluorescent labeled human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2 tetramers carrying the NY-ESO-1b peptide, expressed as percent positive staining of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Data are presented for CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses (not mutually exclusive) that were pre-existing at baseline (BL) or presented at any time post-BL.

Time frame: Up to 22 months

Population: Subjects with available results from the evaluation of T-cell responses in peripheral blood.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMCellular Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineNew CD4+ T-cell Response Post-BL6 participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMCellular Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineNew CD8+ T-cell Response Post-BL5 participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMCellular Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineCD8+ T-cell Response at BL and Post-BL12 participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMCellular Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineNo CD4+ or CD8+ T-cell Response6 participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMCellular Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineCD4+ T-cell Response at BL and Post-BL4 participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMCellular Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineNo CD4+ or CD8+ T-cell Response3 participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMCellular Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineCD4+ T-cell Response at BL and Post-BL3 participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMCellular Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineNew CD4+ T-cell Response Post-BL7 participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMCellular Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineCD8+ T-cell Response at BL and Post-BL3 participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMCellular Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineNew CD8+ T-cell Response Post-BL1 participants
Secondary

Humoral Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM Vaccine

Blood samples were drawn to measure humoral immunologic response at pretreatment and weeks 3, 7, 11, 33, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Humoral immunity was assessed by measurement of antibodies to NY-ESO-1 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Data are presented according to baseline (BL) NY-ESO-1 antibody positivity and the time to seroconversion, if applicable.

Time frame: Up to 22 months

Population: Subjects with available measurement of baseline and post-baseline positivity for NY-ESO-1 antibodies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMHumoral Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineNY-ESO-1 (+) at BL and Post-BL7 Participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMHumoral Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineNY-ESO-1 (-) at BL, converted to (+) Post-BL19 Participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMHumoral Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineNY-ESO-1 (-) at BL and Post-BL1 Participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMHumoral Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineNY-ESO-1 (+) at BL and Post-BL2 Participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMHumoral Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineNY-ESO-1 (-) at BL, converted to (+) Post-BL8 Participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMHumoral Immunogenicity of the NY-ESO-1 ISCOM VaccineNY-ESO-1 (-) at BL and Post-BL5 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

Toxicity was graded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported based on clinical laboratory tests, physical examinations, and vital signs from pre-treatment through the study period. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as any treatment-related grade 4 toxicity or any grade 3 toxicity, excluding grade 3 skin necrosis at the site of the delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction, fever, or asymptomatic hyperglycemia that improved to baseline within 3 weeks of onset.

Time frame: Up to 22 months

Population: The Safety Analysis Set comprises all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsAny TEAE27 participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsSerious TEAE5 participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsMaximum Grade 4 TEAE1 participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsDeath0 participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsMaximum Grade 3 TEAE4 participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsTEAE Leading to Discontinuation2 participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsTreatment-related TEAE26 participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsDose-limiting Toxicity0 participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsTreatment-related TEAE19 participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsDose-limiting Toxicity0 participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsMaximum Grade 3 TEAE9 participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsMaximum Grade 4 TEAE1 participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsAny TEAE19 participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsSerious TEAE7 participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsDeath0 participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsTEAE Leading to Discontinuation1 participants
Secondary

Post-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) Reactions

NY-ESO-1-specific DTH was measured by intradermal injection with the full-length NY-ESO-1 protein, NY-ESO-1b peptide, and NY-ESO-1 DP4 peptide at pretreatment, week 11, and between week 23 and 25. DTH reactions (eg, local skin irritation) were evaluated 2 days after DTH injections. Data presented are based on injections with the full-length peptide, as these data are considered to be representative of the comprehensive DTH results.

Time frame: Up to 22 months

Population: Subjects who underwent DTH testing with available DTH reaction evaluation(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMPost-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) ReactionsReaction at Pretreatment and Week 112 Participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMPost-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) ReactionsReaction at Pretreatment and Week 231 Participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMPost-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) ReactionsReaction at Pretreatment, No Reaction On Study0 Participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMPost-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) ReactionsReaction at Pretreatment, No On Study DTH Results0 Participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMPost-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) ReactionsNo Reaction Pretreatment , Reaction at Week 116 Participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMPost-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) ReactionsNo Reaction Pretreatment , Reaction at Week 230 Participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMPost-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) ReactionsNo Reaction Pretreatment or on Study16 Participants
Cohort 1: NY-ESO-1 ISCOMPost-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) ReactionsNo Reaction Pretreatment, No On Study DTH Results0 Participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMPost-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) ReactionsNo Reaction Pretreatment, No On Study DTH Results3 Participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMPost-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) ReactionsReaction at Pretreatment and Week 113 Participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMPost-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) ReactionsNo Reaction Pretreatment , Reaction at Week 114 Participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMPost-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) ReactionsReaction at Pretreatment and Week 230 Participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMPost-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) ReactionsNo Reaction Pretreatment or on Study6 Participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMPost-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) ReactionsReaction at Pretreatment, No Reaction On Study1 Participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMPost-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) ReactionsNo Reaction Pretreatment , Reaction at Week 233 Participants
Cohort 2: Cyclophosphamide + NY-ESO-1 ISCOMPost-Vaccination Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH) ReactionsReaction at Pretreatment, No On Study DTH Results1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026