Skip to content

A Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) and Gemcitabine in Treatment-Naive Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

A Randomized, Open Label Study Comparing the Effect of First-line Therapy With Tarceva + Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine Monotherapy on Treatment Response in Treatment-naïve Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00518011
Enrollment
17
Registered
2007-08-17
Start date
2007-08-31
Completion date
2009-02-28
Last updated
2016-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Brief summary

This 2 arm study will assess the efficacy and safety of Tarceva plus gemcitabine, compared with gemcitabine alone, in the treatment of chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Patients will be randomized to receive either Tarceva 150mg po daily plus gemcitabine on days 1, 8, 15 and every 4 weeks subsequently, or with gemcitabine monotherapy. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Interventions

DRUGErlotinib

150 mg po daily

DRUGGemcitabine

As prescribed

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients, \>=18 years of age; * non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIb (with effusion) or stage IV with measurable disease ; * ECOG PS 2; * adequate organ function.

Exclusion criteria

* prior chemotherapy or systemic anti-tumor therapy; * hypersensitivity to erlotinib; * any condition contraindicating the use of the study medication and/or impairing the interpretation of results and/or leading to treatment-related complications.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free SurvivalUp to 2 yearsProgression free survival was defined as the interval between the day of randomization and the date of the first documentation of disease progression or date of death (from any cause), whichever occurs first.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease Control RateUp to 2 yearsDisease control rate was defined as the percentage of participants who have any evidence of confirmed objective CR or PR or Stable disease (SD) (where SD was maintained for 8 weeks), as assessed by the RECIST version 1.0 criteria. As per the RECIST Version 1.0 CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the LD. SD is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum of the LD since the treatment started. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
Duration of ResponseUp to 2 yearsDuration of response was defined as the interval between the date of CR or PR was first recorded to the date on which progressive disease was first noted or date of death.
Overall SurvivalUp to 2 yearsOverall survival was defined as the interval between the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.
Objective Response RateUp to 2 yearsObjective response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who have any evidence of confirmed objective of complete response (CR) + partial response (PR), as assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.0) criteria. As per the RECIST Version 1.0 CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions and PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the LD.
Mean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineBaseline (Day -14 to Day 0), Cycle 1 (Days 1, 8, 15 and 22), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 8, 15 and 22), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 5 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 6 (Days 1, 8, and 15)Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded as vital parameters in this study. Mean change in SBP and DBP from Baseline for each cycle calculated as Day 1 of each cycle value minus baseline value.
Mean Change in Body Temperature From BaselineBaseline (Day -14 to Day 0), Cycle 1 (Days 1, 8, 15 and 22), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 8, 15 and 22), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 5 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 6 (Days 1, 8, and 15)Mean change in body temperature from Baseline for each cycle calculated as Day 1 of each cycle value minus baseline value.
Mean Change in Pulse Rate From BaselineBaseline (Day -14 to Day 0), Cycle 1 (Days 1, 8, 15 and 22), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 8, 15 and 22), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 5 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 6 (Days 1, 8, and 15)Mean change in pulse rate from Baseline for each cycle calculated as Day 1 of each cycle value minus Baseline value

Countries

Australia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 17 chemo-naïve participants with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Stage IIIB with pleural effusion or stage IV and a Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2 (PS 2) were recruited. The study was conducted from 24 August 2007 to 14 February 2009 at 14 Centers in Australia.

Pre-assignment details

Total 17 participants were enrolled; however the data was available for 16 participants. One participant in the gemcitabine arm withdrew consent before receiving treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Gemcitabine
Participants received Gemcitabine 1000 (mg/m\^2)/day, IV on Days 1, 8, 15 and every 4 weeks for 6 cycles
9
Erlotinib + Gemcitabine
Participants received Erlotinib 150 mg/day orally as a continuous schedule with Gemcitabine 1000 (mg/m\^2)/day, IV on Days 1, 8, 15 and every 4 weeks for 6 cycles
8
Total17

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event23
Overall StudyDeath11
Overall StudyDisease Progression22
Overall StudyOther Reasons32
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGemcitabineErlotinib + GemcitabineTotal
Age, Continuous71.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.94
76.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.17
74.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.92
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 88 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 86 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Progression Free Survival

Progression free survival was defined as the interval between the day of randomization and the date of the first documentation of disease progression or date of death (from any cause), whichever occurs first.

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: Per protocol (PP) population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post baseline tumor assessment or record of death.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
GemcitabineProgression Free Survival23.3 Week
Erlotinib + GemcitabineProgression Free Survival24.4 Week
p-value: 0.364495% CI: [0.483, 7.027]Log Rank
Secondary

Disease Control Rate

Disease control rate was defined as the percentage of participants who have any evidence of confirmed objective CR or PR or Stable disease (SD) (where SD was maintained for 8 weeks), as assessed by the RECIST version 1.0 criteria. As per the RECIST Version 1.0 CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the LD. SD is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum of the LD since the treatment started. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: PP population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post baseline tumor assessment or record of death.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
GemcitabineDisease Control Rate50 Percentage of participants
Erlotinib + GemcitabineDisease Control Rate85.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Response

Duration of response was defined as the interval between the date of CR or PR was first recorded to the date on which progressive disease was first noted or date of death.

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: PP population included all randomized participants received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post baseline tumor assessment or record of death. Participants available at the time of evaluation of duration of response were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Erlotinib + GemcitabineDuration of Response16.3 Week
Secondary

Mean Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded as vital parameters in this study. Mean change in SBP and DBP from Baseline for each cycle calculated as Day 1 of each cycle value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to Day 0), Cycle 1 (Days 1, 8, 15 and 22), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 8, 15 and 22), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 5 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 6 (Days 1, 8, and 15)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose or infusion of study treatment and had a safety assessment performed at Baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineDBP at Cycle 6 (n=1, 2)5.00 mm Hg
GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineSBP at Cycle 1 (n=8, 8)3.00 mm HgStandard Deviation 6.34
GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineDBP at Cycle 1 (n=8, 8)-6.87 mm HgStandard Deviation 9.41
GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineSBP at Cycle 2 (n=7, 6)-4.85 mm HgStandard Deviation 8.33
GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineDBP at Cycle 2 (n=7, 6)-10.71 mm HgStandard Deviation 9.44
GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineSBP at Cycle 3 (n=4, 5)-9.00 mm HgStandard Deviation 8.67
GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineDBP at Cycle 3 (n=4, 5)-8.25 mm HgStandard Deviation 11.89
GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineSBP at Cycle 4 (n=1, 5)-18.00 mm Hg
GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineDBP at Cycle 4 (n=1, 5)-4.00 mm Hg
GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineSBP at Cycle 5 (n=1, 3)28.00 mm Hg
GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineDBP at Cycle 5 (n=1, 3)12.00 mm Hg
GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineSBP at Cycle 6 (n=1, 2)10.00 mm Hg
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineDBP at Cycle 5 (n=1, 3)0.66 mm HgStandard Deviation 2.51
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineDBP at Cycle 6 (n=1, 2)-0.50 mm HgStandard Deviation 2.12
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineDBP at Cycle 3 (n=4, 5)-9.20 mm HgStandard Deviation 15.64
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineSBP at Cycle 1 (n=8, 8)-0.87 mm HgStandard Deviation 9.4
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineSBP at Cycle 5 (n=1, 3)-1.66 mm HgStandard Deviation 12.34
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineDBP at Cycle 1 (n=8, 8)-5.37 mm HgStandard Deviation 12.21
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineSBP at Cycle 4 (n=1, 5)-10.20 mm HgStandard Deviation 16.52
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineSBP at Cycle 2 (n=7, 6)-17.83 mm HgStandard Deviation 9.9
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineSBP at Cycle 6 (n=1, 2)5.00 mm HgStandard Deviation 0
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineDBP at Cycle 2 (n=7, 6)-9.50 mm HgStandard Deviation 11.81
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineDBP at Cycle 4 (n=1, 5)-1.60 mm HgStandard Deviation 14.32
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Blood Pressure From BaselineSBP at Cycle 3 (n=4, 5)-17.20 mm HgStandard Deviation 19.14
Secondary

Mean Change in Body Temperature From Baseline

Mean change in body temperature from Baseline for each cycle calculated as Day 1 of each cycle value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to Day 0), Cycle 1 (Days 1, 8, 15 and 22), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 8, 15 and 22), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 5 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 6 (Days 1, 8, and 15)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose/infusion and had at least one safety assessment performed at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GemcitabineMean Change in Body Temperature From BaselineCycle 1 (n=8, 8)-0.02 FahrenheitStandard Deviation 0.73
GemcitabineMean Change in Body Temperature From BaselineCycle 5 (n=1, 3)-0.70 Fahrenheit
GemcitabineMean Change in Body Temperature From BaselineCycle 2 (n=7, 6)0.14 FahrenheitStandard Deviation 0.82
GemcitabineMean Change in Body Temperature From BaselineCycle 3 (n=4, 5)-0.07 FahrenheitStandard Deviation 0.68
GemcitabineMean Change in Body Temperature From BaselineCycle 4 (n=1, 5)-0.60 Fahrenheit
GemcitabineMean Change in Body Temperature From BaselineCycle 6 (n=1, 2)-0.20 Fahrenheit
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Body Temperature From BaselineCycle 2 (n=7, 6)-0.30 FahrenheitStandard Deviation 0.4
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Body Temperature From BaselineCycle 4 (n=1, 5)-0.24 FahrenheitStandard Deviation 0.46
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Body Temperature From BaselineCycle 5 (n=1, 3)-0.46 FahrenheitStandard Deviation 0.25
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Body Temperature From BaselineCycle 6 (n=1, 2)-0.20 FahrenheitStandard Deviation 0.98
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Body Temperature From BaselineCycle 1 (n=8, 8)-0.012 FahrenheitStandard Deviation 0.11
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Body Temperature From BaselineCycle 3 (n=4, 5)-0.32 FahrenheitStandard Deviation 0.37
Secondary

Mean Change in Pulse Rate From Baseline

Mean change in pulse rate from Baseline for each cycle calculated as Day 1 of each cycle value minus Baseline value

Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to Day 0), Cycle 1 (Days 1, 8, 15 and 22), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 8, 15 and 22), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 5 (Days 1, 8, and 15), Cycle 6 (Days 1, 8, and 15)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose or infusion of study treatment and had a safety assessment performed at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GemcitabineMean Change in Pulse Rate From BaselineCycle 4 (n=1, 5)18.00 beats per minute
GemcitabineMean Change in Pulse Rate From BaselineCycle 2 (n=7, 6)3.00 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 12.19
GemcitabineMean Change in Pulse Rate From BaselineCycle 5 (n=1, 3)-6.00 beats per minute
GemcitabineMean Change in Pulse Rate From BaselineCycle 3 (n=4, 5)2.75 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 13.14
GemcitabineMean Change in Pulse Rate From BaselineCycle 6 (n= 1, 2)4.00 beats per minute
GemcitabineMean Change in Pulse Rate From BaselineCycle 1 (n=8, 8)2.37 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 14.31
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Pulse Rate From BaselineCycle 6 (n= 1, 2)6.00 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 0
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Pulse Rate From BaselineCycle 2 (n=7, 6)-3.00 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 12.96
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Pulse Rate From BaselineCycle 3 (n=4, 5)-1.80 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 7.08
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Pulse Rate From BaselineCycle 4 (n=1, 5)1.80 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 15.33
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Pulse Rate From BaselineCycle 5 (n=1, 3)-9.00 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 18.52
Erlotinib + GemcitabineMean Change in Pulse Rate From BaselineCycle 1 (n=8, 8)3.00 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 5.58
Secondary

Objective Response Rate

Objective response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who have any evidence of confirmed objective of complete response (CR) + partial response (PR), as assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.0) criteria. As per the RECIST Version 1.0 CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions and PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the LD.

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: PP population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post baseline tumor assessment or record of death.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
GemcitabineObjective Response Rate0 Percentage of participants
Erlotinib + GemcitabineObjective Response Rate28.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the interval between the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: PP population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post baseline tumor assessment or record of death

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
GemcitabineOverall Survival21.1 Week
Erlotinib + GemcitabineOverall Survival39.0 Week
p-value: 0.716595% CI: [0.339, 4.824]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026