Malnutrition
Conditions
Keywords
Quality of life, Supplement, Care home, Elderly, Malnutrition
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the best form of dietary intervention to undernourished elderly individuals in care homes. The research aims to test the null hypothesis that there is no difference between oral nutritional supplements and dietary advice as the first line treatment for malnutrition.
Detailed description
A prospective, randomised, parallel, open-label trial, study in malnourished care home residents, without obvious dementia, to compare the effects of two common forms of nutritional support; dietary advice (DA) and oral nutritional supplements (ONS), on quality of life (QoL) and other outcomes including weight, nutritional intake and appetite. The residents were randomised to receive either DA provided by a dietitian or ONS for a period of 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was QoL and the secondary outcome measure was dietary intake.
Interventions
Dietary Advice sheet
These products are classified as non-medicinal, borderline substances, foods for special medical purposes. A range of commercially available liquid oral nutritional supplements (Fortisip) will be offered daily for a 12 week period.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male or female * Age \> 50 years * At risk of malnutrition * Competent to provide written informed consent and to answer questions * Able to eat and drink * Willingness to take part in the trial and to follow the trial protocol
Exclusion criteria
* Requirement for tube or parenteral nutrition * Galactosemia * Receiving current oral nutritional supplementation * Palliative care * Chronic renal disease requiring dialysis * Liver failure * Malignancy * Participation in other studies
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary outcome measure is Quality of Life | 6 months |
Countries
United Kingdom