Skip to content

A Study of Androgen Deprivation With Leuprolide, +/- Docetaxel for Clinically Asymptomatic Prostate Cancer Participants With a Rising Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)

A Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter, Phase III, 2-Arm Study of Androgen Deprivation With Leuprolide, +/- Docetaxel for Clinically Asymptomatic Prostate Cancer Subjects With a Rising PSA Following Definitive Local Therapy

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00514917
Acronym
Rising PSA
Enrollment
413
Registered
2007-08-10
Start date
2007-07-31
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2013-11-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Brief summary

The primary objective was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of androgen deprivation with or without docetaxel as determined by the median progression free survival (PFS) over the period of 18-month therapy and at least 18-month follow-up. The secondary objectives were: * To assess cancer specific survival; * To compare overall survival between the 2 treatment groups; * To evaluate patient-reported outcomes including quality of life, fatigue, and sexual functioning as measured by 3 different assessments.

Detailed description

The duration of the study per participant was to be at least 36 months, of which the treatment period was 18 months for all participants, followed by at least 18 months follow-up period. Participants received study treatment for up to 18 months from the time of study therapy initiation or less if one of the following occurred: disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, participant refusal or treatment delay beyond the time frame that is permitted for each treatment.

Interventions

DRUGDocetaxel

75 mg/m\^2 intravenous infusion over 1 hour every 3 weeks up to 10 cycles.

DRUGLeuprolide

22.5 mg injection subcutaneously every 12 weeks up to 18 months.

DRUGBicalutamide

50 mg tablet orally once daily for first 4 weeks of treatment.

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma pathologically confirmed * History of radical prostatectomy (pre-operative radiation therapy to the prostate or pelvis or salvage radiation after radical prostatectomy was allowed) * Demonstration of biochemical progression of disease based on prostate specific antigen (PSA) doubling time. The minimum PSA value for eligibility was greater than or equal to (\>=) 1. PSA doubling time over three values must be equal to (=) 9 months with a minimum of 3 weeks between assessments * Serum testosterone \>=100 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL) * Karnofsky performance status (KPS) \>=70 percent (%) * Adequate organ function as defined by the following laboratory criteria: * White blood cells \>=3500 per cubic millimeter (mm\^3) * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>=1500 per mm\^3 * Platelet count \>=100,000 per mm\^3 * Hemoglobin \>= 10.0 gram per deciliter (g/dL) * Total Bilirubin less than or equal to (\<=) upper limit of normal (ULN) unless due to Gilbert's disease * Creatinine l \<= 1.5 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) or creatinine clearance \>=60 cubic centimeters per minute * Aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase within pre-defined ranges * Previous hormonal therapy was allowed provided that the total duration of therapy did not exceed 6 months * Man of childbearing potential who was willing to consent to use effective contraception while on treatment and for at least 3 months thereafter * Participant who was willing and was able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plans, laboratory tests, and other study procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically significant cardiac disease (New York Heart Association Class III/IV), or severe debilitating pulmonary disease * Uncontrolled serious active infection * Anticipated duration of life \< 2 years * Less than 5-year history of successful treatment for other cancers or concurrent active nonprostate cancer other than nonmelanoma dermatologic tumor * Peripheral neuropathy \>=Grade 2 * History of hypersensitivity reaction to Docetaxel or other drugs formulated with polysorbate 80, leuprolide, or bicalutamide * Prior chemotherapy within the past 10 years (except non-taxane based chemotherapy for treatment of other cancers); concurrent treatment on another clinical trial or with any other cancer therapy including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy (except salvage radiation therapy), chemoembolization therapy, cryotherapy * Other severe acute or chronic medical conditions including psychiatric disease, or significant laboratory abnormality requiring further investigation that may cause undue risk for the participant's safety, delay or prohibit protocol participation, or interfere with the interpretation of study results, and in the judgment of the investigator would make the participant inappropriate for entry into this study * Radiographic findings suspicious for metastatic disease in the treating physician's clinical judgment. Participant who had radiographically suspicious pelvic lymph nodes prior to radial prostatectomy, but who, at the time of enrollment did not have suspicious adenopathy was eligible. Participant was eligible even if he/she had tumor-containing pelvic adenopathy at the time of surgery as long as at the time of enrollment there was no radiographically evident nodal disease in the clinician's opinion * Participant was the investigator or any sub-investigator, research assistant, pharmacist, study coordinator, other staff or relative thereof directly involved in the conduct of the protocol * Participant unlikely to comply with protocol or research tests, for example, uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits, and unlikelihood of completing the study * Participant who participated in another clinical study/received investigational product within 30 days of screening The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 36 in Testosterone Specific Evaluable PopulationMonth 36PFS rate at Month 36 was defined as probability of being progression-free at Month 36. PFS rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Intent-to-treat (ITT) PopulationRandomization until PSA progression or radiographic progression or death due to prostate cancer, assessed up to Month 60PFS was the time from randomization to the date of first documented prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression, or radiographic progression, or death due to prostate cancer in the absence of previous documentation of disease progression, whichever occurred first. PSA progression was determined as: a) During treatment period: a 50 percent (%) increase from baseline, which was confirmed by a second value; b) During follow-up: detectable PSA (defined as PSA greater than or equal to 0.05 nanogram per millimeter \[ng/mL\]), which was confirmed by consecutive observation (not less than 2 weeks apart). Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 36 in ITT PopulationMonth 36PFS rate at Month 36 was defined as probability of being progression-free at Month 36. PFS rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Testosterone Specific Evaluable PopulationRandomization until PSA progression or radiographic progression or death due to prostate cancer, assessed up to Month 60PFS was the time from randomization to the date of first documented PSA progression, or radiographic progression, or death due to prostate cancer in the absence of previous documentation of disease progression, whichever occurred first. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Score at EOTBaseline, EOT (up to Month 18)Physical well-being, functional well-being, and prostate cancer concerns sub-scales of the FACT-P questionnaire were combined to calculate TOI. Total TOI score ranges from 0 to 104, with higher scores representing a better quality of life with fewer symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Erectile Function Domain of International Index of Erectile Function (EF-IIEF) Total Score at EOTBaseline, EOT (up to Month 18)EF-IIEF is a 6-item erectile function domain of IIEF. It consists of Question 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 15 of IIEF questionnaire. 5 questions are scored from 0 (no activity) to 5 (very high activity) and 1 question is scored from 1 (very low activity) to 5 (very high activity). Total EF-IIEF score ranges from 1 to 30, where higher score indicates high activity.
Change From Baseline in Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Index Score at EOTBaseline, EOT (up to Month 18)MAF scale consists of 16-items to measure 4 dimensions of fatigue during past week: severity (Item 1-2), distress (Item 3), degree of interference in activities of daily living (Item 4-14), and timing (Item 15-16). Item 1-14 are scored on a numeric rating scale from 1 to 10, where higher score indicate more severity/distress/interference. Item 15-16 had multiple choice responses (4 responses each). Scale Index was calculated using Item 1-15, in following steps: 1) Item 15 score converted to 1-10 scale by multiplying the score with 2.5; 2) Average score was calculated from Item 4-14; 3) Finally scale index was calculated by adding Items 1, 2, 3 scores with average score from step 2 and converted score of Item 15 from step 1. Total MAF scale index score ranges 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (severe fatigue).
Overall Survival (OS): Number of Participants Who Died (All Cause)Randomization until death due to any cause, assessed up to Month 60The OS was the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. OS was to be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. However, the analysis was not performed due to insufficient number of events. Reported is the number of participants who died from any cause.
Cancer-Specific Survival: Number of Participants Who Died (Cancer-Specific)Randomization until death due to prostate cancer, assessed up to Month 60The cancer-specific survival was the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to prostate cancer. Cancer-specific survival was to be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. However, the analysis was not performed due to insufficient number of events. Reported is the number of participants who died from prostate cancer.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Total Score at End of Treatment (EOT)Baseline, EOT (up to Month 18)FACT-P is a 39-item participant questionnaire which assesses physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and additional prostate cancer specific concerns (12 items). All items are scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The total FACT-P score ranges from 0-156, with higher scores representing a better quality of life with fewer symptoms. A score of 156 represents the best outcome.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From first administration of study treatment until 30 days after the last administration of study treatmentTEAE: any adverse event (AE) that occurred or worsened during the on-treatment period, which was the period from first administration of study treatment until 30 days after last administration of study treatment. AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious AE: an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly, or medically important. Drug-related AEs were any untoward medical occurrences attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 3.0 Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (life threatening/disabling) TEAEs were also reported.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Germany, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled from 53 sites in North America (the United States of America and Canada) and Europe. Study was terminated after all participants had completed treatment with docetaxel, but before all participants had completed 18 months follow-up. The termination was not due to any safety or efficacy concerns.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide
Participants received docetaxel 75 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) intravenous infusion over 1 hour every 3 weeks up to 10 cycles (3 week cycle) along with leuprolide 22.5 mg injection subcutaneously every 12 weeks up to 18 months and bicalutamide 50 mg tablet orally once daily for first 4 weeks of treatment.
196
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide
Participants received leuprolide 22.5 mg injection subcutaneously every 12 weeks up to 18 months and bicalutamide 50 mg tablet orally once daily for first 4 weeks of treatment.
204
Total400

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath410
Overall StudyDiscontinued due to study closure8881
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up43
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyUndefined115
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1816

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDocetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideLeuprolide+BicalutamideTotal
Age Continuous65.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.97
64.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.97
64.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.99
Age, Customized
>= 75 Years
15 participants
7.7
11 participants
5.4
26 participants
Age, Customized
Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 65 to < 75 Years
95 participants
48.5
89 participants
43.6
184 participants
Age, Customized
Less Than (<) 65 Years
86 participants
43.9
104 participants
51
190 participants
Body Surface Area (BSA)2.05 square meter (m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.176
2.08 square meter (m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.194
2.06 square meter (m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.186
Prior Radiation Therapy63 participants75 participants138 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/Oriental
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
16 participants13 participants29 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian/White
175 participants184 participants359 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Others
4 participants7 participants11 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
196 Participants204 Participants400 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
185 / 196139 / 204
serious
Total, serious adverse events
49 / 19620 / 204

Outcome results

Primary

Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population

PFS was the time from randomization to the date of first documented prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression, or radiographic progression, or death due to prostate cancer in the absence of previous documentation of disease progression, whichever occurred first. PSA progression was determined as: a) During treatment period: a 50 percent (%) increase from baseline, which was confirmed by a second value; b) During follow-up: detectable PSA (defined as PSA greater than or equal to 0.05 nanogram per millimeter \[ng/mL\]), which was confirmed by consecutive observation (not less than 2 weeks apart). Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Randomization until PSA progression or radiographic progression or death due to prostate cancer, assessed up to Month 60

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized, with study drug assignment designated according to randomization, regardless of whether participants received any study drug or a different drug from that to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideMedian Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population25.4 months
Leuprolide+BicalutamideMedian Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population23.3 months
Comparison: Null hypothesis: No difference between new treatment combination (Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide) and conventional treatment (Leuprolide+Bicalutamide).~The study was sized to have 90% power to detect a difference between treatment arms at a 2-sided 0.05 significance level with 186 events and anticipating 10% non-evaluable participants.p-value: 0.050195% CI: [1, 1.65]Log Rank
Primary

Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Testosterone Specific Evaluable Population

PFS was the time from randomization to the date of first documented PSA progression, or radiographic progression, or death due to prostate cancer in the absence of previous documentation of disease progression, whichever occurred first. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Randomization until PSA progression or radiographic progression or death due to prostate cancer, assessed up to Month 60

Population: Testosterone-specific evaluable population included all participants who recovered testosterone to non-castrate levels (50 ng/mL) following the completion of treatment of leuprolide with at least 1 follow-up PSA assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideMedian Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Testosterone Specific Evaluable Population25.7 months
Leuprolide+BicalutamideMedian Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Testosterone Specific Evaluable Population24.7 months
Primary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 36 in ITT Population

PFS rate at Month 36 was defined as probability of being progression-free at Month 36. PFS rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Month 36

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 36 in ITT Population15.5 percent chance of being progression-free
Leuprolide+BicalutamideProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 36 in ITT Population8.6 percent chance of being progression-free
Primary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 36 in Testosterone Specific Evaluable Population

PFS rate at Month 36 was defined as probability of being progression-free at Month 36. PFS rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Month 36

Population: Testosterone-specific evaluable population included all participants who recovered testosterone to non-castrate levels (50 ng/mL) following completion of treatment of leuprolide with at least 1 follow-up PSA assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 36 in Testosterone Specific Evaluable Population15.8 percent chance of being progression-free
Leuprolide+BicalutamideProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 36 in Testosterone Specific Evaluable Population9.1 percent chance of being progression-free
Secondary

Cancer-Specific Survival: Number of Participants Who Died (Cancer-Specific)

The cancer-specific survival was the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to prostate cancer. Cancer-specific survival was to be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. However, the analysis was not performed due to insufficient number of events. Reported is the number of participants who died from prostate cancer.

Time frame: Randomization until death due to prostate cancer, assessed up to Month 60

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideCancer-Specific Survival: Number of Participants Who Died (Cancer-Specific)2 participants
Leuprolide+BicalutamideCancer-Specific Survival: Number of Participants Who Died (Cancer-Specific)3 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Erectile Function Domain of International Index of Erectile Function (EF-IIEF) Total Score at EOT

EF-IIEF is a 6-item erectile function domain of IIEF. It consists of Question 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 15 of IIEF questionnaire. 5 questions are scored from 0 (no activity) to 5 (very high activity) and 1 question is scored from 1 (very low activity) to 5 (very high activity). Total EF-IIEF score ranges from 1 to 30, where higher score indicates high activity.

Time frame: Baseline, EOT (up to Month 18)

Population: ITT population. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and n signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideChange From Baseline in Erectile Function Domain of International Index of Erectile Function (EF-IIEF) Total Score at EOTBaseline (n=201, 205)6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideChange From Baseline in Erectile Function Domain of International Index of Erectile Function (EF-IIEF) Total Score at EOTChange at EOT (n=180, 186)-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.15
Leuprolide+BicalutamideChange From Baseline in Erectile Function Domain of International Index of Erectile Function (EF-IIEF) Total Score at EOTBaseline (n=201, 205)6.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.25
Leuprolide+BicalutamideChange From Baseline in Erectile Function Domain of International Index of Erectile Function (EF-IIEF) Total Score at EOTChange at EOT (n=180, 186)-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.11
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Total Score at End of Treatment (EOT)

FACT-P is a 39-item participant questionnaire which assesses physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and additional prostate cancer specific concerns (12 items). All items are scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The total FACT-P score ranges from 0-156, with higher scores representing a better quality of life with fewer symptoms. A score of 156 represents the best outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, EOT (up to Month 18)

Population: ITT population. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and n signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Total Score at End of Treatment (EOT)Baseline (n=206, 205)121.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.32
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Total Score at End of Treatment (EOT)Change at EOT (n=186, 184)-4.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.55
Leuprolide+BicalutamideChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Total Score at End of Treatment (EOT)Baseline (n=206, 205)119.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.95
Leuprolide+BicalutamideChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Total Score at End of Treatment (EOT)Change at EOT (n=186, 184)-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.78
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Score at EOT

Physical well-being, functional well-being, and prostate cancer concerns sub-scales of the FACT-P questionnaire were combined to calculate TOI. Total TOI score ranges from 0 to 104, with higher scores representing a better quality of life with fewer symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, EOT (up to Month 18)

Population: ITT population. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and n signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Score at EOTBaseline (n=206, 206)82.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.58
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Score at EOTChange at EOT (n=187, 187)-5.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.19
Leuprolide+BicalutamideChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Score at EOTBaseline (n=206, 206)80.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.52
Leuprolide+BicalutamideChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Score at EOTChange at EOT (n=187, 187)-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.83
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Index Score at EOT

MAF scale consists of 16-items to measure 4 dimensions of fatigue during past week: severity (Item 1-2), distress (Item 3), degree of interference in activities of daily living (Item 4-14), and timing (Item 15-16). Item 1-14 are scored on a numeric rating scale from 1 to 10, where higher score indicate more severity/distress/interference. Item 15-16 had multiple choice responses (4 responses each). Scale Index was calculated using Item 1-15, in following steps: 1) Item 15 score converted to 1-10 scale by multiplying the score with 2.5; 2) Average score was calculated from Item 4-14; 3) Finally scale index was calculated by adding Items 1, 2, 3 scores with average score from step 2 and converted score of Item 15 from step 1. Total MAF scale index score ranges 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (severe fatigue).

Time frame: Baseline, EOT (up to Month 18)

Population: ITT population. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and n signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideChange From Baseline in Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Index Score at EOTBaseline (n=168, 171)16.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.33
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideChange From Baseline in Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Index Score at EOTChange at EOT (n=127, 144)4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.93
Leuprolide+BicalutamideChange From Baseline in Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Index Score at EOTBaseline (n=168, 171)16.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.93
Leuprolide+BicalutamideChange From Baseline in Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Index Score at EOTChange at EOT (n=127, 144)2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS): Number of Participants Who Died (All Cause)

The OS was the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. OS was to be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. However, the analysis was not performed due to insufficient number of events. Reported is the number of participants who died from any cause.

Time frame: Randomization until death due to any cause, assessed up to Month 60

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideOverall Survival (OS): Number of Participants Who Died (All Cause)4 participants
Leuprolide+BicalutamideOverall Survival (OS): Number of Participants Who Died (All Cause)11 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

TEAE: any adverse event (AE) that occurred or worsened during the on-treatment period, which was the period from first administration of study treatment until 30 days after last administration of study treatment. AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious AE: an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly, or medically important. Drug-related AEs were any untoward medical occurrences attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 3.0 Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (life threatening/disabling) TEAEs were also reported.

Time frame: From first administration of study treatment until 30 days after the last administration of study treatment

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least part of one dose of any of the study drugs.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Leading to any Treatment Discontinuation35 participants
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Leuprolide Related TEAE109 participants
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Resulting in Death0 participants
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Bicalutamide Related TEAE52 participants
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Grade 3-4 TEAE94 participants
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Treatment Related TEAE184 participants
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Serious AE49 participants
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Grade 3-4 Serious TEAE43 participants
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Docetaxel Related TEAE183 participants
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Leading to Interruption of any Treatment77 participants
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE188 participants
Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Leading to Interruption of any Treatment1 participants
Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE163 participants
Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Serious AE20 participants
Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Resulting in Death1 participants
Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Leading to any Treatment Discontinuation1 participants
Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Grade 3-4 TEAE22 participants
Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Docetaxel Related TEAENA participants
Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Leuprolide Related TEAE136 participants
Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Bicalutamide Related TEAE74 participants
Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Treatment Related TEAE136 participants
Leuprolide+BicalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Grade 3-4 Serious TEAE14 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026