Skip to content

Evaluate Use of Gravitational Platelet Separation System on Leg Wound Healing in Coronary Bypass Surgery

A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Use of Gravitational Platelet Separation System on Leg Wound Healing in Coronary Bypass Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00514241
Enrollment
140
Registered
2007-08-09
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2008-08-31
Last updated
2017-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Heart Failure

Brief summary

The aim of platelet rich plasma (PRP) application is to accelerate the healing cascade via application of elevated cytokine concentrations released during platelet degranulation. This is a prospective randomized study of the effect of autologous platelet concentrate application during surgical closure following a vein harvest during coronary bypass surgery. This prophylactic measure will be compared to standard surgical closure techniques with the primary outcome being the incidence of leg wound infection.

Detailed description

Postoperative wound disturbances, particularly surgical site infection of the chest and leg incision site following cardiac surgery are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and costs. A recent dissertation from the National hospital in Norway showed a 20% infection rate in wounds after bypass surgery, this is probably representable nation wide. Prophylactic interventions that reduce postoperative wound disturbances and infection would have inherent value in cardiothoracic surgery. Ideally, a specific intervention would demonstrate improved patient outcomes while reducing the output of hospital resources. The aim of platelet rich plasma (PRP) application is to accelerate the healing cascade via application of elevated cytokine concentrations released during platelet degranulation. It is hypothesized that the elevated cytokine levels will elucidate an accelerated healing response of the affected tissue. PPP application has also been advocated as a tissue sealant for topical hemostasis. This is a prospective randomized study of the effect of autologous platelet concentrate application during surgical closure following a vein harvest during coronary bypass surgery. This prophylactic measure will be compared to standard surgical closure techniques with the primary outcome being the incidence of leg wound infection.

Interventions

DEVICEThe GPS™ II Platelet Concentrate Separation Kit

The GPS™ II Platelet Concentrate Separation Kit system is designed to be used for the safe and rapid preparation of autologous platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) from a small sample of blood at the patient's point of care. The PRP can be mixed with autograft and allograft bone prior to application to an orthopedic surgical site as deemed necessary by the clinical use requirements.

Sponsors

Zimmer Biomet
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient undergoing a cardiothoracic procedure requiring a leg vein harvest * Patient signature of informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * \< 18 years of age * History of amenia (hemoglobin \< 11.0) * History of bleeding disorder * Un-cooperative patient or patient with neurological disorders who are incapable of following directions or who are predictably unwilling to return for follow-up examinations * Hypothyroidism * History of any blood disorder * Patient with an active infection * Patients taking Cox II inhibitors. * Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Presence/absence of leg wound infection, General wound healing - picture evaluation6 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
ASEPSIS Score, Length of hospital stay, Reoperation rate for bleeding and infection control6 weeks

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026