Skip to content

Effects of Fetal Movement Counting in Third Trimester of Pregnancy

Effects of Fetal Movement Counting - a Randomized Controlled Trial of an Unselected Population

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00513942
Enrollment
1200
Registered
2007-08-09
Start date
2007-08-31
Completion date
2010-09-30
Last updated
2014-10-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Decreased Fetal Movements, Unspecified Trimester, Other Fetus, Pregnancy, Worries

Keywords

Fetal Movement, Maternal-Fetal-Attachment, Fetus

Brief summary

The aim is to test effects of using formal kick counting chart in the third trimester of pregnancy in an unselected population. The research questions are: Does Fetal Movement Counting (FMC): 1. Improve the identification of risk pregnancies/pathology? 2. Affect the women's well-being? 3. Stimulate maternal-fetal attachment antepartum?

Detailed description

Fetal activity serves as an indirect measure of central nervous system integrity and function, and regular FM can be regarded as an expression of fetal well-being.A hypoxic fetus responds automatically by redistributing blood away from the non-essential organs which lead to a reduction of non-vital activities; movements. Conversely, pregnancies in which the mother report decreased fetal movements (DFM) is associated with adverse outcomes and may indicate danger for the fetus. In cases were DFM are associated with complications of pregnancy, maternal lack of sensitivity and awareness to fetal movements may be a risk factor for her pregnancy. The most important current identifier of DFM is the women's perception of what is a decrease of FM. Fetal movement counting may be a tool for the mothers that might increase identification of risk pregnancies. The outcome measures are (referring to the research questions above): 1. Identification of risk pregnancies/pathology? 1. Primary outcome measures: Numbers of identified pathological conditions in pregnancies (fetal growth restriction (FGR), acute caesarean section on fetal indication/non-reactive non-stress test (NST), oligohydramnios, pathologic blood flow in arteria umbilicalis, maternal perception of absent fetal movements for more than 24 hours before admission to hospital, or perinatal death). 2. Secondary outcome measures: Frequency of consultations because of maternal concern, use of resources in evaluation of these pregnancies (NST, ultrasound, Doppler, recurrent consultations), induced or spontaneous start of delivery, mode of birth. 2. Affect the women's well-being? 1. Primary outcome measure: Maternal concern. 2. Secondary outcome measure: Maternal satisfaction with use of FMC and sense of control in interpretation of signals from own body and child. 3. Stimulate maternal-fetal attachment antepartum? 1. Primary outcome measure: Maternal-fetal attachment. 2. Secondary outcome measure: Health promoting behavior in pregnancy (smoking habits, use of alcohol, attending standard program for antenatal care).

Interventions

Women in the intervention group will receive an information pamphlet. The main items will be basic information and interpretation of fetal activity and instructions when to contact health professionals if experiencing DFM.

Sponsors

Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* women booking at screening ultrasound in pregnancy week 17-20 * native speaking women * singleton pregnancies

Exclusion criteria

* women with pregnancies with severe anomalies or other cause to consider termination

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Identification of pathological conditions in pregnancies and birth, maternal concern (Cambridge Worry Scale), maternal-fetal attachment (Prenatal Attachment Inventory)One and a half year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Frequency of consultations, use of resources and mode of birth, maternal satisfaction and sense of control in interpretation of signals from own body and child, health promoting behaviorOne and a half year

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 27, 2026