Skip to content

Biliary Stenting With or Without Photodynamic Therapy in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma or Other Biliary Tract Tumors That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery

Porfimer Sodium Photodynamic Therapy Plus Stenting Versus Stenting Alone in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinomas and Other Biliary Tract Tumours: a Multicentre, Randomised, Phase Lll Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00513539
Acronym
Photostent-02
Enrollment
92
Registered
2007-08-08
Start date
2007-07-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2013-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer, Gallbladder Cancer

Keywords

unresectable gallbladder cancer, recurrent gallbladder cancer, metastatic gallbladder cancer, cholangiocarcinoma of the gallbladder, unresectable extrahepatic bile duct cancer, recurrent extrahepatic bile duct cancer, metastatic extrahepatic bile duct cancer, cholangiocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile duct

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Biliary stenting is the placement of a tube in the bile ducts to keep a blocked area open. Photodynamic therapy uses a drug, such as porfimer sodium, that is absorbed by tumor cells. The drug becomes active when it is exposed to light. When the drug is active, tumor cells are killed. It is not yet known whether biliary stenting is more effective with or without photodynamic therapy in treating patients with biliary tract tumors. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying biliary stenting to see how well it works compared with biliary stenting and photodynamic therapy using porfimer sodium in treating patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma or other biliary tract tumors that cannot be removed by surgery.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * To assess the efficacy, in terms of overall survival, of biliary stenting with vs without photodynamic therapy using porfimer sodium in advanced, recurrent, or metastatic biliary tract carcinoma. Secondary * To evaluate the two treatments arms with respect to progression-free survival, toxicity using NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (version 3.0), and quality of life. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified by participating center, primary site (gallbladder vs bile duct), disease stage (locally advanced vs metastatic), prior therapy (i.e., surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy) (yes vs no), performance score (0 vs 1 vs 2 vs 3), and prior treatment arm on UK chemotherapy trial ABC-02 (gemcitabine hydrochloride alone vs gemcitabine hydrochloride and cisplatin). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. * Arm I: Patients undergo either endoscopic or percutaneous drainage and insertion of unilateral or bilateral plastic endoprostheses above the main strictures of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. * Arm II: Patients undergo treatment as in arm I. Patients also receive porfimer sodium IV and then undergo laser activation 48 hours later. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for at least 3 years. Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK.

Interventions

DRUGporfimer sodium

Sponsors

University College, London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Inclusion criteria: * Histopathological/cytological diagnosis of nonresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic biliary tract carcinoma (intra- or extra-hepatic), or gallbladder carcinoma * Adequate biliary drainage, with no evidence of active uncontrolled infection (patients on antibiotics are eligible)

Exclusion criteria

* Porphyria * No brain metastases PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Inclusion criteria: * ECOG performance status 0, 1, 2, or 3 * Estimated life expectancy \> 3 months * Women of child-bearing potential should have a negative pregnancy test prior to study entry AND be using an adequate contraception method, which must be continued for 1 month after completion of treatment * Not pregnant or nursing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Overall survivalminimum follow up 3 years or until death

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Progression-free survival every 3 monthsminimum follow up 3 years or until death
Toxicity as assessed by NCI CTC v. 3.0patients followed up for minimum of 3 years
Quality of life as assessed by EORTC QLQ 30 and PAN 26 at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after completion of study treatmentpatients followed up for a minimum of 3 years

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026